In post 199, pisskop wrote:
Random is scummy because he forgets basic things and is putting on a show.
How is that scummy? I do that all the time.
It's not alignment indicative.
In post 199, pisskop wrote:
Random is scummy because he forgets basic things and is putting on a show.
In post 200, House wrote:In post 199, pisskop wrote:
Random is scummy because he forgets basic things and is putting on a show.
How is that scummy? I do that all the time.
It's not alignment indicative.
In post 202, pisskop wrote:In post 200, House wrote:In post 199, pisskop wrote:
Random is scummy because he forgets basic things and is putting on a show.
How is that scummy? I do that all the time.
It's not alignment indicative.
But you are House :b
. Random is being a filthy lurker, and in the absence of better votes I'm sticking here.
In post 204, pisskop wrote:
. I'm wary of voting either so early when there's been so muchterriblearound them.
In post 197, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:106 - Ploben, this is weak as fuck. Which is interesting for reasons explained later.
People's experience has no effect on a claim. Where have you plucked that from?
In post 197, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:112 - MY early L-1? I think you mean YOUR early L-1. You're using someone else's reasoning now for what I might have been doing? I think you're scum.
In post 207, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:163 - There is always a threat. If someone stated intent to hammer, Zeb would have had no choice to claim. Simple as that.
In post 194, ploben wrote:I think we're on the same page but why not share your information and help us solve this?
In post 210, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
194 - Ploben, why are you speaking to Slandaar as if he is town?
In post 214, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You think scum is on the same page as you?
You also want scum to help you solve the game?
Nah, you're talking to him as if he is town.
In post 210, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:177 - Why the unvote?
182 - Better to get an early claim than a late one. That should be obvious.
186 - PR fishing is definitely bad for town.
188 - What question?
189 - Well you're wrong on at least one of them.
194 - Ploben, why are you speaking to Slandaar as if he is town?In post 194, ploben wrote:I think we're on the same page but why not share your information and help us solve this?
199 - Sure, if it was another naked vote with no explanation.
PEdit - Haha, Kaboose. Great pen from Lovren
In post 131, Ponystar17 wrote:Maybe you guys are right about BBT - I've never played in a game with him before, or really had time to look at his meta. But I've looked back over the thread, and I'm having trouble finding a pro-town reason for his choice to justify his wagon rather than keep the wagon going to L-1 in order to succeed at his alleged goal. And while I acknowledge that it could be a reaction test, I a problem with that, too. Unless I'm misinterpreting a post, he never outright admits to reaction-testing, and he's had plenty of time to observe reactions since the post. It's not that I can't see this as a reaction test, I just don't find it any easier than seeing it as scum play. Maybe it is too obvious for an experienced scum player, I just can't bring myself to stop suspecting him entirely.
Also, hello, House! Don't expect me to go easy on you just because you scumclaimed in that last game.
In post 201, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:131 - This post feels town. I like it.
In post 182, Ponystar17 wrote:Can someone who disagrees with the BBT wagon please explain why anything anyone has done so far is more suspicious than bad logic and blatant PR-hunting? I don't think meta is an acceptable excuse for behaviour which actively attempts to decrease town's chances of winning.
What I mean by bad logic: acting like it doesn't matter whether PRs are outed now or many days later, acting like wanting PRs outed at all isn't pro-scum.