In post 474, Save The Dragons wrote:and his insistence that he shouldn't be town read at this point actually makes me think he's town more.
I'd probably be doing it as scum too
Alright, back to lurking.
In post 474, Save The Dragons wrote:and his insistence that he shouldn't be town read at this point actually makes me think he's town more.
In post 472, Save The Dragons wrote:Lying about tokens would require the entire team to either lie or keep their mouth shut. Before I even knew alignment I didn't want to say anything about our tokens.
I kind of hate this argument.
Especially since
Someone on the team has a higher chance of using scum tokens (which, may I remind you, doesn't guarantee scum)
In post 409, Thor665 wrote:Refusing to discuss it tends to strongly suggest that at least one of you went scum though.
became:
In post 381, Thor665 wrote:paired with the token thing.
part of the reason Jason is scum
The odds that Jason's team is not talking about token use because Jason used tokens to get scum and because of it Jason actually rolled scum...actually not that high.
sthar8: I'm not trying to be critical but is there something else to your pie read than her attacks on you?
Deltawave: At some point I thought at least one of {Deltawave, Thor} was scum which was perhaps somewhat biased. I'm not sure where I currently stand on DeltaWave. All the stuff about me is useless to me so I would love to hear more about things like:
In post 268, DeltaWave wrote:Scumpool - Boon, STD, Pie
Why pie and is this still true
Who else do you think is scum
What your opinion on Jason is since you seem to have none
Boonskiies: his entire line of questioning for 407 411 413 and 414 kind of looks like scum trying to push the lynch on me further with a crap argument especially considering it came after he was reminded of my list
Spoiler: Ninja Mafia
jason: I seem to recall saying I would try to justify my town read
49: The questions he ask seem legit
60: His response to thor's attack seems genuine like "okay w/e dude." I think it would be difficult as scum to justify a case on SK ignoring the thing he's currently being pushed for by someone I think that's more of a town mindset. I agreed with his point on Micc.
161: I don't remember if I mentioned this or not It's interesting to note that SK deserves a vote while Delta a prodding though I think he called SK out a little more.
173: I suppose this is null, this is probably how a scum should treat an early wagon against them to appear town and make it less legit but it could be town actually not bothered by the wagon against them
178: While I'm not sure I would follow onto his initial push onto boon, dismissing the case as 'creative fluff' is odd. The response seems genuine.
I guess there's a lot of gut
I also disagree with pretty much every point of the case against jason I've seen brought up. I don't think RVS was telling, I don't think his attack on Boonskiies looks like trying to hose a village idiot, I don't think the tokens mean anything they're really distracting and easy to attack.
Trojan Horse:
Every post just seems to bother me :/
Thor:
In post 380, Save The Dragons wrote:Ceph would like to know if ffery is reading this game.
In post 229, Egg wrote:Boon, Cheet says you self meta'd quite a bit in your scum game with him. The Burning?
In post 452, Thor665 wrote:But I'm sure that quote from you was *not* based on calling him scummy for playstyle.
In post 231, jasonT1981 wrote:In post 226, Boonskiies wrote:Also they say they think I'm playing towards my scum metayet are bringing up me using self meta, which is a very town meta thing I do. My team doesn't agree with me voting Jason. I like causing commotion for the sake of reactions. I believe that should be obvious at this point.
Unvote
BINGO DING DING DING WE HAVE A SCUMMER
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go
Lots of self meta here, from scum Boon.
And lots of the 'this is what I do as town not scum'
And lookie here from that game
In post 1369, Boonskiies wrote:It's self meta. Like how I say that I hammer people at L-1 on Day 1 without much resent when I'm town
And look at this.. exactly the same
In post 181, Boonskiies wrote:Again, hi. Jason...My name is Boonskiies. I'm known to hammer my biggest town read on occasion without letting them claim in a moment's notice. Mainly when I'm town! Me OMGUS'ing is nothing.
Same exact argument used as scum
Eat the fucking noose ASAP. This guy is scum. 100%
In post 231, jasonT1981 wrote:In post 226, Boonskiies wrote:Also they say they think I'm playing towards my scum metayet are bringing up me using self meta, which is a very town meta thing I do. My team doesn't agree with me voting Jason. I like causing commotion for the sake of reactions. I believe that should be obvious at this point.
Unvote
BINGO DING DING DING WE HAVE A SCUMMER
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go
Lots of self meta here, from scum Boon.
And lots of the 'this is what I do as town not scum'
And lookie here from that game
In post 1369, Boonskiies wrote:It's self meta. Like how I say that I hammer people at L-1 on Day 1 without much resent when I'm town
And look at this.. exactly the same
In post 181, Boonskiies wrote:Again, hi. Jason...My name is Boonskiies. I'm known to hammer my biggest town read on occasion without letting them claim in a moment's notice. Mainly when I'm town! Me OMGUS'ing is nothing.
Same exact argument used as scum
Eat the fucking noose ASAP. This guy is scum. 100%
In post 487, jasonT1981 wrote:I referenced a meta where he boasted about doing it before, in a game he was scum, identical to how he has done it in this game.
Hold on I'll dig it up.
In post 488, SleepyKrew wrote:I've barely been reading at all, but it looks like Thor pointed out that your issue with Boon is in fact playstyle, and this has thrown you off.
In post 495, Malakittens wrote:I'm VLA for an uncertain amount of time. My cat just died in my arms so mafia posts won't be a thing. I might replace out, but I rather not if I can get my mind away from her loss after a few days
In post 455, pieguyn wrote:are you open to lynching sthar today?
In post 455, pieguyn wrote:the obvious conclusion here is that his team has a mutual agreement to not discuss how they spent their tokens in *any* of their games. jason would respect this regardless of what his alignment in *this particular* game is.
which is why I think you actually using this as a reason for thinking he's scum is a load of shit
In post 455, pieguyn wrote:it feels like you're just going through the motions with all the questions you're asking and continuing to push him as scum regardless of what he answers.
In post 455, pieguyn wrote:this is your stated reasoning for jason being scum:
It's a few little things, really, but the concise description would be; overaware RVS, paired with lack of hunting, paired with sudden push on whom I perceive as the weakest player available to push in the game, paired with no actual argument for that case beyond playstyle, paired with the token thing.
most of the questions you're asking him are in response to posts he made, but they don't have anything to do with your reasoning here for him being scum. taking the questions from your recent posts, you're asking him about whether he believes RVSassessing his RVS shenanigans - which ar a major part of my case, who he thinks the weakest player in the game isassessing his defense attack on me when I questioned him about his non-scumhunting push on Boon, pushing him for not answering how they used their tokensassessing the token based aspect of my case on him, why he thinks you should be looking at alternate options besides himthis one I agree isn't about the case - it's just making fun of his weak defense...in a *mild* way I could argue that his inability to even say 'Boon' showcases his lack of scumhunting, but I wouldn't actually wish to call that scummy and push it, really, etc. (the post I quoted was only one example of this.)
In post 455, pieguyn wrote:I don't really have a problem with this. what I have a problem with is the fact that you have not asked him anything along the lines of:
- "why is Boon doing *insert action here* scummy, as opposed to playstyle?" (re: Boon case being playstyle - what you're doing is just assuming he's scum for pushing something you think is playstyle, without making any effort to understand what his thought process behind it is)
- "who are your other scum reads besides me?" (re: you not thinking he's scum hunting)
In post 455, pieguyn wrote:the other problem I have is that, as I said before, I don't really see you taking in his answers and reevaluating. I have, to this point, seen absolutely 0 indication that you have seen anything he's said and thought he was less likely to be scum as a result of it.
In post 455, pieguyn wrote: this isn't particularly scummy,
In post 456, pieguyn wrote:In post 369, Thor665 wrote:Eh, let's see what Jason flips and then we can debate that. Nacho agrees with you though, so, meh.
I also don't buy that, if your strategy here was to sort him via pushing on him, that you'd make a post like this when you did. you pretty obviously are convinced he's scum at this point, while as I was saying in the last paragraph of the last post still haven't directly engaged him over what makes you think he's scum. this is why I don't think you're actually trying to sort him here
In post 457, pieguyn wrote:i don't know why people think jason's posts on this/the previous page come from scum
i don't know why people think Thor cherry picking 2 posts where jason calls Boon terrible, while ignoring posts like 160/162 and 222 which have nothing to do with playstyle, comes from town
In post 460, sthar8 wrote:Can you read in English? Egg never asked me for thoughts. He just announced that I was scum.In post 327, Thor665 wrote:I oppose the Egg push, the logic of 'he's avoiding scumhunting' by asking sthar8 for his thoughts is...well, that's actually the definition of scumhunting, methinks.
In post 471, Trojan Horse wrote:Let's try this:
Thor, let's say Jason got mod-confirmed as town, for some reason. Who would be your next scum candidate, and why?
In post 472, Save The Dragons wrote:
Thor:
In post 380, Save The Dragons wrote:Ceph would like to know if ffery is reading this game.
In post 485, jasonT1981 wrote:I said his mentality of hammering town reads is a liability and I stand by that.Who has motive to hammer someone coming across as town?
In post 485, jasonT1981 wrote:
It is not a play style attack, its an attack on actions I believe are scum and not of town.
If someone is willing to hammer someone coming across as town... that is scum right there.