In post 392, Maxous wrote: In post 389, Ricastle wrote:Also, if there are actually four people in that hydra then I think the consistently horrible play coming from that slot has gone past the point where it can be overlooked.
I have to agree - 4 people and not one of them offers anything of substance regarding TSB and/or Lale
instead they coast on an increasingly town Sinsun
They go into scumbucket
Here was the initial problem with FK.
For 3-4 people in a hydra, they say relatively little and avoid giving a lot of opinions.
Their play as of post #392 was mostly cruising on Sinsun
In post 394, FireKari wrote: In post 392, Maxous wrote: In post 389, Ricastle wrote:Also, if there are actually four people in that hydra then I think the consistently horrible play coming from that slot has gone past the point where it can be overlooked.
I have to agree - 4 people and not one of them offers anything of substance regarding TSB and/or Lale
instead they coast on an increasingly town Sinsun
They go into scumbucket
We go after who we believe most likely to be scum. Sinsun is scum.
Also FOS on performer.
If you dislike our playstyle too bad. It is early D1 and we tend to hold back somewhat until later because everything we say is read by scum and town alike.
a) As I mentioned it is not a playstyle to completely ignore the two big counter-wagons and SOFTPUSH Sinsun. If they were hard-tunneling on him that might be different but they weren't.
b) In general they are defending thier play as alignment neutral instead of you know, town.
In post 401, FireKari wrote: In post 400, Maxous wrote:refusing to give a stance on the two big counterwagons of the game is not a "playstyle"
You could try asking for a stance before claiming refusal to give one.
This is a trick I used to do as scum. Chide people for not *asking* you to give opinions.
Town don't need to be asked, they just give them, PARTICULARY when they're called out on it.
The continued refusal to go "ok, here is what we think about the Lale-TSB situation" was scummy.
In post 414, FireKari wrote: In post 402, Sinsun1 wrote:I am one person and I have more content posted than the four of you combined so far.
So far your "content" consists of rambly walls of confusing twisty logic, incorrect statistics, buzzwords, insults, fluffystuffs, and not much else.
Quality over quantity any day
.
~Yukari
I don't like the bolded, it triggered a personal scumtell.
Particularly since their ISO up to this point consisted of one scum-read on Sinsun and FOS on Performer
In post 424, FireKari wrote: In post 409, FireKari wrote:
This is a lie. If it were true, you would not have asked about our age since we had already given that info.
Bump.
Liar liar sins pants on fire!
~Yukari
this is a bit disingenuous
I have read their posts, I have no idea what age they are.
It just seems like something they can use for "aha! liar! gotcha!"
-
I didn't like their self-voting bluff either.