"The Ground quakes with the anger of the people. Their cries echo in the heavens. Now is the time for this to end."
-Warren,Suikoden I
Deadline
"The Ground quakes with the anger of the people. Their cries echo in the heavens. Now is the time for this to end."
-Warren,Suikoden I
In post 1146, Klingoncelt wrote:
If there are 2 people in the hood. The bigger the hood, the more likely that there's at least 1 Scum in it. A hood with 4 players in it most likely has at least 1 Scum.
In post 1149, Klingoncelt wrote:
It's Day 1. I'm trying to sort things out. This game is like falling down a rabbit hole, it's so nuts. As soon as I think I've got someone sorted, somebody else comes in and changes everything.
For now, I'm trying to figure out who's Scum between Wgeurts and Ranger, and between Jeanne and LQ. Also I keep forgetting that Brantz and Pistachion are in the game until I see their names in my notes.
I still think the threadlock vote thing was scummy.
That's pretty much all I have right now.
Deal.
One thing - I want everyone's reads on Brantz and Pistachion.
For obvious reasons, nobody should respond to this until a massclaim.wgeurts wrote:LQ, everyone is a PR this game.
In post 1151, Titus wrote:In post 1146, Klingoncelt wrote:
If there are 2 people in the hood. The bigger the hood, the more likely that there's at least 1 Scum in it. A hood with 4 players in it most likely has at least 1 Scum.
That's only true of mod designed hoods. Jeanne picked me. We added Elbrin and Suzune.
In post 1144, pistachi0n wrote:In post 967, FireKari wrote:In post 960, pistachi0n wrote:VOTE: FireKari
I didn't like her earlier, I especially don't like her convenient LQ vote.
Which vote did you not like and why?
The vote on LQ in 938. Why is LQ going to give you the most information out of all your scumreads? I didn't like it because you were jumping as the wagon got larger.
In post 1146, Klingoncelt wrote:
If there are 2 people in the hood. The bigger the hood, the more likely that there's at least 1 Scum in it. A hood with 4 players in it most likely has at least 1 Scum.
In post 1152, Titus wrote:
Why are you pushing dichotomies?
If you thought the threadlock thing was scummy, where is the anger? You are fully capable of being pissed with me, ranting at me. You have a certain amount of fire. Where is it?
Why do you feel the way you do?
Why aren't you asking questions that could highlight alignment?
All true.wgeurts wrote:You do realise LQ could be town?
That so could I?
That you 4 aren't conf-town?
For the record: Titus's brilliant usage of both neighborhood and messenger role with a coded message attached to it isBlackest Magic wrote:Titus - Don't like the gambit, just looks like an attempt to earn some townreads.
Explicitly-OMGUS reads.Titus - Early on, didn't like her accusing LQ of rolefishing, or saying that my RVS was the worst she's ever seen.
Ranger - Really didn't like his post saying i'm confirmed scum. Especially on D1. People who do that to me are usually scum. Would love to wagon this.
This isBrantz - He will remain in my lynch pool unless he does something townie.
In post 1153, Ranger wrote:For obvious reasons, nobody should respond to this until a massclaim.wgeurts wrote:LQ, everyone is a PR this game.
But if massclaim comes to pass and this is shown to be accurate...what does that tell you about LQ?
...Exactly. Scum who doesn't know everyone has a role.
I must also note I absolutelyhatethe tag-team wgeurts has with LQ against Jeanne. It pressured Jeanne into revealing info she really didn't need to reveal.
In post 1157, Ranger wrote:All true.wgeurts wrote:You do realise LQ could be town?
That so could I?
That you 4 aren't conf-town?
At least two of the three are incredibly likely to be true, though. I seriously like a {Titus, Jeanne, Elbirn, Suzune} townbloc. I personally added in FireKari because I hold ahardtownread on them. I hate the attempts to break the townbloc up, and I think they are driven by scum's fear that they can't break it.
I'm convinced LQ is scum. I do owe explanation for this, but none of his posting is good. He lacks actual scumhunting; he's just throwing random accusations out there that he doesn't even believe in.
The only one I really see any reason to doubt is my read on you. You could just be bad town not realizing how horrendously wrong you are, I will admit that, but you're not off my radar.
Would you be willing to vote LicketyQuickety again?VOTE: LQ
We think LQ is likely scum, but also think LQ is the best lynch target even if he were to flip town. LQ flip will help us read others, more than any other flip.
In post 1151, Titus wrote:In post 1146, Klingoncelt wrote:
If there are 2 people in the hood. The bigger the hood, the more likely that there's at least 1 Scum in it. A hood with 4 players in it most likely has at least 1 Scum.
That's only true of mod designed hoods. Jeanne picked me. We added Elbrin and Suzune.
In post 1161, Ranger wrote:FireKari:Whatever happened to this?Would you be willing to vote LicketyQuickety again?VOTE: LQ
We think LQ is likely scum, but also think LQ is the best lynch target even if he were to flip town. LQ flip will help us read others, more than any other flip.
It shows that Klingon is probably town, though.Titus wrote:@RR, Quoting Klingon's ISO and saying it's meaningful doesn't explain anything.
So please vote them?FireKari wrote:Still think Lickety is the lynch for the day.
I canNOT believe that a town player would ask this question.Reasonably Rational wrote:Firekari: Under what circumstances would you be unable to conftown D2?
I never said it was bad. I said my suspicion was weak. But given the way my mark works, there was absolutely nothing bad about marking a weak scumread.Marking someone after two posts, with something she admits is at best bad, isn't pro-town play.
And I don't believe you hold such a backwards view of the game. There are ten town in a game and only three mafia. If you're throwing dirt at everyone and townreading almost nobody, you are quite literally entirely backwards of what youI actually don't believe there's a single person so far today who has given me cause to think they're town.
I didn't like his RVS posting.Blackest Magic wrote:What made you think wguerts was scum that early in the game?
Because I was using my mark as a second vote. The act of marking wgeurts served as a statement of suspicion. So does a vote. Marking wgeurts while also voting him would have been a waste of resources.Why didn't you vote them for that?
Hated that post. I saw no original content in it, simply restating and rehashing questions people had already gone over.Yukari wrote:Like this post.
And I refuse to believe you hold this opinion when I've made it clear that where I come from, RVS content is important.Reasonably Rational wrote:Ranger, for developing a scum read strong enough to mark a player after two meaningless posts were made by that player.
Sort-of? The later into the day I use the mark, the less utility there is behind me having marked a player.pistachi0n wrote:Ranger, is your marking only useful at the beginning of the day?
And most of the members of the townbloc do townread each other. Titus and Jeanne had a spat where they didn't, but (1) it seems to have reversed and (2) I've been trying to strengthen their townreads on one another anyway.wgeurts wrote:Lol it's not a town bloc, a town bloc for one is widely town read and don't scum read each other.
Helpful hint for gambits: don't pull it on someone who knows how day roles work. Thanks to my own role, I know you're bluffing.You know what fuck it.
Kill: ranger
In post 828, Jeanne11 wrote:It may be awful, but I will not be tricked again, get it?
Also, the proof I am town is that I wouldn't be voting LQ if I am scum.
In post 1170, Ranger wrote:And I refuse to believe you hold this opinion when I've made it clear that where I come from, RVS content is important.Reasonably Rational wrote:Ranger, for developing a scum read strong enough to mark a player after two meaningless posts were made by that player.
Sort-of? The later into the day I use the mark, the less utility there is behind me having marked a player.pistachi0n wrote:Ranger, is your marking only useful at the beginning of the day?