In post 446, Davsto wrote:Prodge. I'll do some shit some time today when I have time and it's not 9AM.
Bullshit. You made half a dozen posts in other threads over the course of the next hour.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Davsto
In post 446, Davsto wrote:Prodge. I'll do some shit some time today when I have time and it's not 9AM.
In post 449, Shiro wrote:A vote is not pressure asking questions is
In post 450, Persivul wrote:In post 446, Davsto wrote:Prodge. I'll do some shit some time today when I have time and it's not 9AM.
Bullshit. You made half a dozen posts in other threads over the course of the next hour.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Davsto
In post 449, Shiro wrote:A vote is not pressure asking questions is
In post 452, Davsto wrote:In post 450, Persivul wrote:In post 446, Davsto wrote:Prodge. I'll do some shit some time today when I have time and it's not 9AM.
Bullshit. You made half a dozen posts in other threads over the course of the next hour.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Davsto
Because reading like 9 pages is really convenient and quick, amirite?
I prioritise some games over others. This is low on my list right now. Give me some goddamn space.
In post 455, Davsto wrote:When I say that I'm going to do something, I fucking do it. Leave me alone until I can do so.
This game is going to become a repeat of Prozac's BT4 at this rate and that was awful for me.
In post 455, Davsto wrote:When I say that I'm going to do something, I fucking do it. Leave me alone until I can do so.
This game is going to become a repeat of Prozac's BT4 at this rate and that was awful for me.
In post 383, Persivul wrote:In post 377, Adaptive Heap wrote:Funnily, I can sort of see where you're coming from here. In that game I actually went to the effort of skimming some of his *other* completed games and found he was generally just not a talker.
But yes he does seem a bit more interested in trite this game compared to his lurky-but-pushy self in our last game.
Why is it funny that we would both come up with similar meta reads on another player?
I'm not just being picky with that question, I have a point. I think I got an early scum rep with some people and my abrasive style keeps them from getting past that. But, if you objectively consider my entire contribution (such as the above on FAQ2) and my motivations you'll likely come to a different conclusion.
Never said I have been more productive, I simple said that vote jumping is pretty bleh way to pressure.
In post 460, Shiro wrote:@Per
Cause I was curious as to why you were switching votes
I think it is null
If you take a question about vote jumping as pressure. Uh ok I guess.
164 is more of a reason to scumread soren than a defense of Dav tbh
In post 462, Shiro wrote:As I mentioned before I am in that state were most people are different shades of null.
Which posts of Rob's are the scummiest? Which posts of Persivul's and Soren's do you like the best? What do you like/dislike about these posts? Just treat mentions of real life stuff as null. You say that you are nullreading the people that you don't mention, presumably including Heap. Do you disagree with Not maf about Heap's argument, then? What do you think about Heap's argument? Do you have a read on Heap?In post 426, KuroiXHF wrote:Rob13: I'm getting a scummy vibe off him. I'd label him slightly scum at this moment.
Persivul: I'm getting a town read off him.
Frozen Angel: I was going to say slightly scum, until she started mentioning mental illness. I hate reading things like this because when we mention medical disorders or anything like that, it detracts from the game and makes the game more personal. As I've been in games that ended it people hating others, I really hate seeing fun games getting personal. Still, in the spirit of not thinking of this game being personal, I'll put her in slightly scummy territory.
Not_Mafia: He's given me nothing to work with. Something he has done, however, was first saying that he was going to re-read the game. Then today, he calls Heap's argument stupid. I don't know (or really think) it's that alignment indicative, but it rubs me the wrong way.
Soren: Gives me a town vibe.
I didn't want to place a vote until I re-read this and seeing as I need to vote someone, I'll vote for who irks me the worst. To me, I want to vote Not_Mafia or Rob13. I'll keep a close eye to see what Not_Mafia says but for right now, I need to VOTE: Rob13
That's two paragraphs you devote to stuff that you admit that they aren't alignment indicative things. The first paragraph is okay and is the first real analysis you've done. Please cite which posts of Frozen's were goal-moving posts and which questions of Persivul's that she didn't answer.In post 433, KuroiXHF wrote:Well, the first thing that pops out at me is your dismissal and deflection off Persival's questions. You also appear defensive and emotionally involved in the game. You also did do a couple of goal-moving posts, but I don't think you understand what that means.
It also doesn't really help that I'm a grammar nazi and reading what you write is akin to claws on a chalkboard. (I don't use that to figure out if you're scummy or not, but I find it difficult to decipher what you say at times.) I understand it's not your first language and I appreciate that, but it drives me nuts.
Lastly, I can't just "forget" issues like the ones you've posted regarding real life issues and emotional/logical difficulties. This is why I find you as just leaning scum. There are many variables and there are many opportunities to learn more about you (granted I'm not lynched or killed in any way) so hopefully we'll find out a bit more.
This looks like it's saying something but really your read on her hasn't changed because you had her as lean scum and now it's still lean scum.In post 434, KuroiXHF wrote:In post 429, Persivul wrote:In post 428, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 426, KuroiXHF wrote:Frozen Angel: I was going to say slightly scum, until she started mentioning mental illness. I hate reading things like this because when we mention medical disorders or anything like that, it detracts from the game and makes the game more personal. As I've been in games that ended it people hating others, I really hate seeing fun games getting personal. Still, in the spirit of not thinking of this game being personal, I'll put her in slightly scummy territory.
forget mental thing. talk to me. why
He gave reads on you, me, Rob, NM, and Soren...and all you care about is why he finds you scummy...
Actually, this does lessen the scumminess I have on her. Mafia don't want to have attention on themselves and especially when there's no reason to try to defend themselves. It wasn't just her in that list. ...I mean, I still find her more scummy than I do find her town, so I'll still keep her on my "slightly scummy" list, but she wouldn't be the first person I'd lynch.
1. watIn post 438, KuroiXHF wrote:1. If I'm missing something, please point it to me, but I think I remember what you're referring to me but he never seemed of having circular reasoning. Perhaps it sounded circular because it made logical sense - that phrase, "It's come full circle."
2. I don't mean to come across as rude, but it might help if you stopped acting emotional in all your games. If you see yourself getting worked up, take a deep breath. Before you post, ask yourself if there's a better way to phrase it. There are more effective ways to phrase something in most cases.
3. I never said your language was alignment indicative. In fact, I said I wasn't judging your languagewasn'tbeing used to judge your scumminess. I stated that because you've gotten a lot of crap and it may be because it is often difficult to read the message you're trying to convey. (I don't want to go too far off topic, but what are your other three languages?)
4. Your mental illness isn't really indicative of scum, but it makes things a hell of a lot harder. I don't want to be a dick and vote you because of something about you personally. (#433 I've mentioned I don't want games to be personal.) I gave my view and I've done a lot reading through the game and gathering my thoughts. Right now, I have what I have. I'm sure people would have questions for me and we would discuss them. What do you know? Someone asked me.
My thoughts on Persival were mostly derived by his interactions with you, but also by the rest of the town. He seemed to be very transparent.
And no, I don't have a concrete lynch-list, but I did mention who I find more scummy than others. I wanted to, and still might vote for Not_Mafia, but I have the worst feelings about Rob13 based on his style of playing and many of his comments.
@Persival - I know, but when it comes to day one, I go with what is most likely and I'd estimate it's about a nickel or a dime on every dollar for the mafia who intentionally get themselves in hot water.
In post 418, Persivul wrote:In post 334, Rift Adrift wrote:Persivul (4): FA_Q2, Rob13, Frozen Angel, Plottin Kittehs
Not sure if this VC is still accurate, but I'd call it: scummy, not sure, not sure, emotional (Plottin didn't like that I was a dick to Frozen).
In post 465, Plottin Kittehs wrote:Prodging to say that I still like Rob better than Persivul.
In post 466, Plottin Kittehs wrote:
it's not really emotional; I think it's more likely for scum to be a dick about real life stuff than town,becausescum know that they know the person is town and they're trying to fake town paranoia and they think that if they give in and acknowledge the person is upset for real it's the same as admitting that they're town when in reality town are just as likely to use AtE as scum are and being a dick also contributes to a toxic gamestate which benefits scum more than it benefits town.
Like it's not a flat across the board all instances of being a dick = scum, that would be a dumb argument and it depends on the player themselves too. it's...being a dick in a certain way, a sort of over the topness about it that i find hard to explain but i know it when I see it,
In post 462, Shiro wrote:Yea pretty much so. I mean if your reason was bad it might have evolved into something but it didn't.
As I mentioned beforeI am in that state were most people are different shades of null.
In post 464, Shiro wrote:Nah I stopped defending Dav. He should get his shit together.
AlsoI generally get reads by reading what is happeningunless something grabs my attention enough to pursue.
.
In post 242, Frozen Angel wrote:Ok Davasto lets try talking about the game at hand! Whats your read about Persival - Rob fight?
Convenient unvote just after Persivul unvoted Rob. I think Rob was looking for an excuse to vote Persivul but didn't want it to be seen as OMGUS.In post 170, Rob14 wrote:Just to be very clear, my flavor spoiler was meant more to educate on regenerations than to speculate. I probably did more speculation than I should have. The mod probably did randomize scum to regenerations now that I think about it. It would have been wise to do so.
Adaptive, I have to think about what you just said in terms of the timing.
I don't see much testing the waters from newb-scum. I generally see either aggressiveness or passiveness in a fairly absolute form, at least very early in the game. Testing the waters comes from newb-town unsure how to find scum more often than newb-scum trying to figure out where to push, in my experience.
Also, that Persivul transition isawful. Like, completely awful.
VOTE: Persivul
This post is a flat-out lie. Persivul was the first person to move off voting Rob. Me and Not_Mafia were both also voting Rob, and we hadn't moved our votes off Rob. There's twisting facts, but this is simply lying to make Persivul look bad.In post 174, Rob14 wrote:1) You moved onto me when I had two votes (highest at the time) with some really shitty reasoning. You argued the reasoning to the ends of the earth, using strong statements such as "reek of scum", which isn't itself scummy, but ...
2) Other people move off of me, and then suddenly you "feel better about me". You don't give any rationale for this at all. You do reference today's posting and now say you switched to me due to "scummy posting" in the first place, so I assume you haven't gone back on your reasoning from before and are just claiming I'm less scummy lately.
This does not feel like a natural transition at all. It feels like you hopped on to me when a wagon formed and hopped off when the wagon left. Your rationale for joining the wagon looks manufactured. Worse, you're saying that my posts lately which seem townish or nullish (we don't even know, because you've given none of that rationale) somehow nullify my posts earlier that "reek of scum" enough so that you want to vote Soren over me (who you've apparently seen nothing scummy enough from to bother referencing any post or play of his).
You don't need a PBPA to make a vote. You probably should give a reason if you don't want it to look contrived. I'm going to need to hear why you're no longer voting me and why you are voting Soren if I'm to remove my vote from you, because from what I can see, your move onto and off of me look awful.
Moving the goalposts. He started off saying "moved off me" and talking about votes, and then once Persivul points out he was lying about the votes, he backpedals and says "nonono I meant pressure and people off the wagon saying I'm town".In post 182, Rob14 wrote:Persivul, like 3 people said they thought I was town between your vote and unvote. The wagon was sinking fast.
Since when did you need a reason to make a joke?In post 378, Adaptive Heap wrote:I was asking why you made the comment about Not_Mafia's username in the first place.
Also please don't patronise me. I don't find it funny or clever.
-t
In post 386, Rob14 wrote:P-edit: I thought at the time that the Davsto wagon was hitting resistance because he was scum. No-one publicly said they had a town-read on Davsto iirc, so that option is highly unlikely. That wagon just kind of went caput for no reason.
Persivul's taunting of Rob and the like ("TRANSITION ALERT") reads as very town. Scum don't like to intentionally provoke other players who scumread them into scumreading them more. He's literally drawing as much attention as possible to the thing that Rob scumread him for. That doesn't seem like a thing scum would like to do.In post 437, Persivul wrote:
TRANSITION ALERT
Since I voted ari for lurking but he has now been prodded, my vote is no longer needed there and I'm moving it to:
VOTE: FA_Q2
Does this hold true with my absence now?In post 225, Adaptive Heap wrote:This is true.In post 83, Davsto wrote:Something tells me that Aristophanes is reading waayyy too much into something which we have already shown to be confusing to refer to, plus Frozen isn't native English speaker so she's obviously going to have trouble communicating.
So my townread on Frozen Angel holds. (I also have one on Aristophanes, now.)
Still doesn't lessen my scumread on you, though.