In post 149, PhantomCobalt wrote:Cerberus r u being srs
Absolutely. What part of my post do you think isn't serious?
In post 149, PhantomCobalt wrote:Cerberus r u being srs
I sort of understand your POV, so I am going to put you at fence-town.In post 148, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 139, Titus wrote:In post 133, Something_Smart wrote:1. Maybe you tend to read newbies more harshly (except for Dewy ).
2. You must think we're stupid, too.
3. Not to mention your case is really weak.
Give me some specific examples of SirCakez being obvious town.
1. Nope. Welcome to life outside the newbie queue. You do things that scum do, you get scumread. I am not the sole voter.
2. Absolutely not. I am reading you as desperate scum, not stupid. Why did you feel insulted? Do you feel your scumgame has been bad?
3. Why would you have 5 votes if my case was weak? It isn't. You'd be at L minus 1 but Cerb never votes so we have to wait on subs.
Town know Sir is town.
Also, I didn't explicitly say this before, or at least not in the detail I should have, but..your case is weak. Super duper weak. Not strong. "RVS push plus retraction claiming it's a joke is scum!" I mean sure, I get the logic, town wouldn't feel the need to be extra defensive there and pull super far back from an RVS vote, and would instead just shrug it off because it's fucking RVS, but why the hell can't it just be a personality quirk? SS and yourself know each other, is it really so unreasonable for him to feel the need to clarify that his suspicion on you was a joke, given that he might have enjoyed playing with you before and wanted to cooperate rather than be antagonistic from P2?
That btw, is how weak I think the RVS vote is a joke thing is, btw. I think even the chance that someone I don't even know might just have a personality that inclined them to make a joke about it outfuckingweighs that "tell".
The only reason why I might consider SS as scum is the move to vote the counterwagon to himself. That is survivalism, which might be alignment indicative, depending on how far it goes.
In post 151, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I sort of understand your POV, so I am going to put you at fence-town.In post 148, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 139, Titus wrote:In post 133, Something_Smart wrote:1. Maybe you tend to read newbies more harshly (except for Dewy ).
2. You must think we're stupid, too.
3. Not to mention your case is really weak.
Give me some specific examples of SirCakez being obvious town.
1. Nope. Welcome to life outside the newbie queue. You do things that scum do, you get scumread. I am not the sole voter.
2. Absolutely not. I am reading you as desperate scum, not stupid. Why did you feel insulted? Do you feel your scumgame has been bad?
3. Why would you have 5 votes if my case was weak? It isn't. You'd be at L minus 1 but Cerb never votes so we have to wait on subs.
Town know Sir is town.
Also, I didn't explicitly say this before, or at least not in the detail I should have, but..your case is weak. Super duper weak. Not strong. "RVS push plus retraction claiming it's a joke is scum!" I mean sure, I get the logic, town wouldn't feel the need to be extra defensive there and pull super far back from an RVS vote, and would instead just shrug it off because it's fucking RVS, but why the hell can't it just be a personality quirk? SS and yourself know each other, is it really so unreasonable for him to feel the need to clarify that his suspicion on you was a joke, given that he might have enjoyed playing with you before and wanted to cooperate rather than be antagonistic from P2?
That btw, is how weak I think the RVS vote is a joke thing is, btw. I think even the chance that someone I don't even know might just have a personality that inclined them to make a joke about it outfuckingweighs that "tell".
The only reason why I might consider SS as scum is the move to vote the counterwagon to himself. That is survivalism, which might be alignment indicative, depending on how far it goes.
Yes, you're right to be skeptical, which makes me even more confident that you are town.In post 152, Cerberus v666 wrote:Is this one of those "subtle but not really" LAMIST moves? "I see where you're coming from, so I'm thinking you might be town, because expressing a POV I can relate to means you're more likely to share my alignment...which is town, btw guys. Totally town."
I mean, I don't really see why expressing something which should be obvious to everyone should give me any town credit with anyone at all. :/
In post 155, AlwaysInnocent wrote:My RVS strategy and post-RVS strategy basically amounts to mudthrowing at as many people as I can.
In post 128, SirCakez wrote:What an interesting wagon composition.
Cerberus are you willing to place a vote yet?
In post 135, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Something_Smart is probably town.
In post 136, SirCakez wrote:Speaking of buddying look at that first sentence.
In post 19, Yonom wrote:In post 18, Titus wrote:I think you're scum with SS. Discuss.
I think you're trying too hard to jump into conclusions.
In post 23, Yonom wrote:In post 21, Something_Smart wrote:In post 18, Titus wrote:In post 17, RhazhBash wrote:Best to just play the game naturally instead of planning out our strategies D1. If I don't know what I'm doing the Mafia surely can't counter my play.
I think you're scum with SS. Discuss.
I think you're scum with Rhazh and you're distancing.
I think you're scum with SS and Rhazh and you're all distancing.
Lolz. The paranoia sure makes you look town.In post 158, Something_Smart wrote:In post 135, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Something_Smart is probably town.
In post 136, SirCakez wrote:Speaking of buddying look at that first sentence.
Actually, I get the feeling that AI is more whiteknighting me. I could definitely see a SirCakez-AI team playing both sides of the wagon and soft double bussing.
Cerb and Titus on the other hand feel town to me.
Phantom is annoying and could go either way. Rhazh as well.
Pistachi0n is ok, seems honest and genuine enough.
Yonom's done very little except jump onto L-2 with scummy reasoning. Also, interestingly, she made almost the same joke as me, and caught no flak at all for it...
In post 158, Something_Smart wrote:Yonom's done very little except jump onto L-2 with scummy reasoning.
In post 115, Yonom wrote:I kinda have to agree with SirCakez and PC here, Something_Smart seems to be jumping on conclusions too fast and too randomly.
VOTE: Something_Smart
In post 163, Something_Smart wrote:you know what
VOTE: AlwaysInnocent
This is both whiteknighting and buddying, and it's unacceptable.
Oh I'm sorry, I guess I should have checked to make sure I'd surpassed the minimum-number-of-posts-required-within-the-first-24-hours-of-the-game-before-I-can-have-an-opinion threshold before posting that!In post 144, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Lurkers commenting on the ugliness of small wagons. It only makes me more confident that at least one of you is scum.In post 141, NotAnAlt wrote:SirCakez wagon is really ugly.
Not really what I was looking for here. Were you aware of how new everyone was before Titus voted them? Did you look at the players after she voted them? What was your motivation for pointing it out or did it not mean anything?In post 142, Something_Smart wrote:1. Nothing. I just noticed it.
In post 167, Something_Smart wrote:In post 115, Yonom wrote:I kinda have to agree with SirCakez and PC here, Something_Smart seems to be jumping on conclusions too fast and too randomly.
VOTE: Something_Smart
This was your only explanation for your vote. It seems like a weak buddying attempt and a crap explanation that could easily apply to several other players (how is the flashwagon on me not jumping to conclusions?). What I did was neither too fast (barely out of RVS) nor random (I gave reasons for each vote), and that qualifies your vote as opportunism.