In post 498, Performer wrote:his bare agreement with AI's reads
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
In post 270, pisskop wrote:AI has completely neglected to follow up here:
In post 224, AlwaysInnocent wrote:This is so not your town game.
And in general this town is bad.
In post 374, pisskop wrote:oh so were all waiting for him to act town?
AI, Droog has echoed my sentiments that you discuss my play and how you know ots town/scum. so far youve avoided answering these queries.
On that, not sure Im okay with droog voteparking, calling me null, and then defending me in aroundabout way
In post 349, droog wrote:ai i want you to answer pk here
In post 498, Performer wrote:what are you rethinking, Droog?
In post 501, pisskop wrote:AI has yet to answer this question. AI just dodged a question about his reads. How long do you dumbasses want to keep up this charade instead of pressuring him?
*shrugs*In post 501, pisskop wrote:In post 270, pisskop wrote:AI has completely neglected to follow up here:
In post 224, AlwaysInnocent wrote:This is so not your town game.
And in general this town is bad.
In post 374, pisskop wrote:oh so were all waiting for him to act town?
AI, Droog has echoed my sentiments that you discuss my play and how you know ots town/scum. so far youve avoided answering these queries.
On that, not sure Im okay with droog voteparking, calling me null, and then defending me in aroundabout way
In post 349, droog wrote:ai i want you to answer pk here
AI has yet to answer this question. AI just dodged a question about his reads. How long do you dumbasses want to keep up this charade instead of pressuring him?
In post 502, droog wrote:In post 498, Performer wrote:what are you rethinking, Droog?
my vote (clearly)
and my reads
what are you expecting
and why do you make my comment sound conniving
I hate admitting that my accusations might have been a bit premature.In post 505, pisskop wrote:Good. Ima rope ya.
In post 509, pisskop wrote:Is AI not being scummy or are you guys just ignoring it?
Simple question.
In post 513, droog wrote:come to think of it
pisskop cant just repeat his question
he has to drag my request for it in too
like he needs cover
In post 376, Performer wrote:He currently ties Ras on scummiest player currently (and yes, I do think both are scum).
@Irch you stated Rask and Droog are scummiest, there's already a wagon on Rask.Suddenly you unvote Rask and vote Droog. How is this going to help when we're already halfway through day phase 1? If this keeps up, we'll reach a no lynch.
In post 516, pisskop wrote:When somebody else raises the same question as you,it lends credibility to your question.To try to call me scummy for raising it as a valid point when the question is unanswered looks like you never cared about the question to begin with.
In post 99, pisskop wrote:This game is dumb. AI is dumb. I have never seen such an overbearing attempt to get me to ???
In post 516, pisskop wrote:Its like you looking for excuses to vote me.
In post 476, AlwaysInnocent wrote:It seems like you are just townreading people for appearance, while not really caring about the underlying reasons.In post 475, pisskop wrote:If you got that then what is your problem here? Do you feel Ive paid too much attention to others? You feel left out?