In post 1249, Kop wrote:Ranger is still leaning into my scum pile. I'd actually consider some more votes on her.
I want Anen first for sure, and since we've got some time I'd like to keep building that.
In post 1249, Kop wrote:Ranger is still leaning into my scum pile. I'd actually consider some more votes on her.
In post 1237, acryon wrote:In post 1236, KainTepes wrote:HELOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hello. Can you give me a list of each player and your read on them? And for the love of all that is good, no caps. Although I'm glad I've played with you because now I will put a no caps rule in any game I mod
This is backtracking at its finest. An FoS is, by definition, accusing a player of doing something scummy. Votes serve much the same purpose. (I realize "I voted for reactions!" is a theoretically-plausible action, but it's an awful one which virtually nobody uses for good reason.)acryon wrote:I didn't say they were scummy per se either. My intent was to get davesaz to talk, which I was successful in doing. Sometimes a FoS or vote will get that done quicker than just asking nicely.
And the scum motivation for this is...?Ranger is probably scum. Vote remains on a claimed PR, but no real attempts to do anything with that.
Oh, really? Point out where. 'Cause that post is calling you scum, and nothing other than calling you scum.He literally is waffling by his definition while defining my waffling in the same post.
This is scum, going for the easy lynch, hiding behind policy.Almost50 wrote:I think lynching KT will help clear the view much better. For one thing, he's being suspected by many (including myself) but not as many are committed to voting him, thus he remains a distraction.
Sorry to shoot you down, Kain, but, uh...I'm actually not scumreading you. You're actually a strong townread of mine.KainTepes wrote:RANGER finds me suspiciuos but he is one of the MOST TOWNIES
In post 1223, davesaz wrote:In post 1213, acryon wrote:In post 1212, davesaz wrote:If there are two scum teams I would not be at all surprised if Aneninen and BC are both scum on opposing teams.
Trying to figure out who the partners would be in that scenario.
Do you think the missing kill comment was a scumslip?
I see BC setting up a narrative of them being JK'd by a suspicious Kuroi as the explanation of a missing kill. But I question why that would be mentioned by town, since there is no evidence of a 2nd kill. Even in a MB scenario, from a town perspective all it would do is tell scum why their kill failed. On the other hand, if there are 2 scum teams it's a high probability that both teams have a RB (WW roles mimic Mafia roles in the setup and mafia get a RB in one of the weak BG setups). In that environment, the narrative makes a dandy reaction test to find the other team's RB.
Oh, Burning Crystal is probably scum anyway, but it's not for this, let me assure you. Titus is that arrogant as both town and scum, so I fully believe she thinks she was the nightkill and got JK'd.davesaz wrote:what town suggests a missing kill was because they got JK'd?
In post 1256, Ranger wrote:This is backtracking at its finest. An FoS is, by definition, accusing a player of doing something scummy. Votes serve much the same purpose. (I realize "I voted for reactions!" is a theoretically-plausible action, but it's an awful one which virtually nobody uses for good reason.)acryon wrote:I didn't say they were scummy per se either. My intent was to get davesaz to talk, which I was successful in doing. Sometimes a FoS or vote will get that done quicker than just asking nicely.
In post 1256, Ranger wrote:And the scum motivation for this is...?Ranger is probably scum. Vote remains on a claimed PR, but no real attempts to do anything with that.
In post 1256, Ranger wrote:Oh, really? Point out where. 'Cause that post is calling you scum, and nothing other than calling you scum.He literally is waffling by his definition while defining my waffling in the same post.
In post 1242, acryon wrote:If you look through my ISO, you'll see the various issues I've had with him, but mostly it comes down to him trying to make things seem scummy that just aren't, and going down roads that misdirect town from scumhunting. 1053 is a good example.
In post 1242, acryon wrote:The primary reason being the lack of defenders. Wagons on scum tend to have people defending it. As far as I remember, no one was really opposed to it until I said I was. It also doesn't help that Anen is leading that wagon and his cases are dependent on a decent helping of misrepresentation.
In post 1243, chilledtea wrote:Maybe BC's scumpartner can't find anything to defend. Maybe Ranger is the BC scumpartner.
In post 1244, acryon wrote:Yeah I suppose a second scum-team would eliminate my criticism about no real defenders. Although it still makes me nervous that Anen is leading it who may as well be confscum.
In post 1250, acryon wrote:I want Anen first for sure, and since we've got some time I'd like to keep building that.
In post 1263, Aneninen wrote:In post 1242, acryon wrote:If you look through my ISO, you'll see the various issues I've had with him, but mostly it comes down to him trying to make things seem scummy that just aren't, and going down roads that misdirect town from scumhunting. 1053 is a good example.
Isn't it strange that you're still bringing that up whereas you're BLATANTLY ignoring that others have made similar speculations. Eg. BurningCrystal's Setup post was absolutely not scummy, was it?
In post 1244, acryon wrote:Yeah I suppose a second scum-team would eliminate my criticism about no real defenders. Although it still makes me nervous that Anen is leading it who may as well be confscum.
Since when have I been "may as well confscum"? Oh, wait, because you and BurningCrystal say it so. Aaaaaaaaand I'm lurking and tunnelling. If so, what are YOU doing?
For example:
In post 1250, acryon wrote:I want Anen first for sure, and since we've got some time I'd like to keep building that.
In post 1208, chilledtea wrote:In post 1206, Burning Crystal wrote:
In post 1180, chilledtea wrote:I am sorry but I just did such a quick 180 on my reads regarding BC.
I am now so close to thinking she is scum. Like 90% sure.
Would you mind guiding me through your thought process here?
Why do you care about the setup so much? Your close mindedness regarding the setup makes me believe you have more information than me. I don't think you are vanilla town and I don't think you are town.
Such strange theories regarding Kuroi and frankly some of them just very strange. Like unless you were blocked you couldn't really have realistically known that Kuroi targeted you; but you are VT right?
And then the strange insistence that there are 2 scum teams out of which one consists of Anen and MKA. I don't even see how anyone can come to this weird conclusion and frankly I would be even more confident that you are scum if you were right in your theory.
In post 1233, Mad King Ashnard wrote:Something something lynch titus.
In post 1268, Mad King Ashnard wrote:Hey Ranger,
This has basically been the entire game.
And I'm sick of it.
~tn5421
You guys so fucking started it.
I was perfectly happy to not go near her for a while until YOU came in and voted us after Titus townread me.
Voting for pressure, as long as it's not explicitly stated to be a pressure-vote, is fine.acryon wrote:You're really saying that people don't vote for reactions for good reason?
I take full responsibility each time I'm wrong. I never expect any less.The scum motivation is to put a vote out on someone controversial so it doesn't look like you're just sitting back, but then not go anywhere with it so you have no PR blood on your hands if he were to be lynched and flip PR.
The difference is: when I was asked if I was steering away from a townread, I unambiguously and bluntly said "yes, I am, I'm scumreading acryon for these reasons".Someone asked you if you were veering away from believing me to be town and you say yes, and then damn me for potentially veering from a townread on someone else.
Unchanged except for the maybe-need for one extra person as scum. {acryon, Kop, Almost50, Burning Crystal} is where I'm looking at. So if Almost50 were removed, then I'd assume either we're in a 3-scum setup or I'm townreading one scum.Mad King Ashnard wrote:Ranger, consider Almost50 confirmed town.
What are your reads in this game?