Mini 1763 - Game OV
-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
hey rc wanna be pretend masons.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 15, Performer wrote:Hell yeah, I'm town again.
VOTE: Katsuki
because I initially joined due to him and a few others I recognized on the player list
his award isn't as frightening as I thought, based on his activity level and another detail from his profile, which you can find here:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/memberlist.p ... le&u=13446
would this be related his play in d1 from the game you replaced out of?
you know, the game that MarioManiac hosted
anything to do with what I think it has to do with?
In post 8, RadiantCowbells wrote:that would involve getting me night killed so no.
damn, I wanted to pretend to be Mason too
I've never been a Mason off or onsite
what's up , Mario!!!! why did you feed your cat the muffin I brought over as a gift
muffins are for humans
-----
Spoiler: initiating playstyle imitations
Nah I voted lapsa because it was a familiar name-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 45, KainTepes wrote:Then I don't understand this website,
in TOS if there are 3 votes, all others will jump and inevitably lynch the victim, and people who jump on it tend to be evil roles or jesters!!
which means that if you have 3 votes you are dead pretty much unless during the defense most people vote you INNOCENT
The town to scum ratio is different on mafia scum and we have a different time limit to work with also less power roles and the only third party faction in normals is SK and they aren't guaranteed. This will effect voting.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 50, KainTepes wrote:No you will need 7 votes too in TOS except that once 2 or more peopel vote for the same person other people just follow suit and the person will be lynched... it is really annoying because sometimes people vote for no reason, but at least in DEFENSE you can tell everyone your role and results and town will vote INNOCENT...!!
Since this game does not have DEFENSE, when should I reveal my role??
At l1 one vote before lynch anyone that hammers before a claim gets flack-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 56, Soapbar wrote:
garmr tried to hammer lapsa but can't count
page 3 confirmed scum b o i s
@Kain, may want to read up on the wiki a bit, there should be an article somewhere about common abbreviations somewhere. There's also a lot of articles on terminology, so if you see any terms you don't recognize, might be wise to look up on the wiki as well.
Oh no you caught me (sarcasm)-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 90, FA_Q2 wrote:You know, I have seen that exact avatar used on another account Tepes. I just cannot place it...
Lord laharl as a prinny looks cooler dude.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 113, KainTepes wrote:But I am good at it, I won 700+ games and only lost less than 300
A vast majority of the players don't think things through while here every action gets criticized. People think things out here. Set up spec is unknown so fake claims become viable here and scum can always claim vanilla town and no one will question it because it's a legit possibility that all that are left is vanilla. In town of salem you can just all claim roles day 1 and lynch the people that conflict have conflicting roles you can break it in 100s of way as town. Tbh the reason town doesn't win so much is the amount of stupidity on there.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 169, Boonskiies wrote:I transitioned. I always inherently find you scum and vote you early. I don't like Irao's vibe. The posts seem like a 'trying to post-trying not to take a side' kind of deal, which is enforced by him voting Mario who is like the easiest person to vote for no reason on this entire site.
Oh that's interesting that you find me scummy. Can you elaborate on some points about me I love when people talk about me.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 171, Boonskiies wrote:I said inherently. Like...throughout my games with you. Really...? You never notice I usually vote you then change my mind later? I don't actually find you scummy this game. That was just my first post this game, haha.
Nope never noticed but keeping note on that and you.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 212, Lapsa wrote:In post 201, Performer wrote:I guess we'll just agree to disagree as clearly you believe fake claims are an oh-so-fabulous strategy for us to win against scum.
i don't believe that. town fake claims are dangerous. it didn't work out well
but i disagree that it was a total failure and that it was all my fault
Depends on the claim tbh I can see a bullet proof claim as not that bad if they are widely town read/confirmed town if they are vanilla.
Honestly don't have much on a scum read but I have a strong feeling kain is town. His acting how you would in a tos game in a tos game claiming allows you to win faster since there is no vanilla town. Everything he says comes along as honest and not understanding. The fact he is eager to claim now probably indicates he is town and scum I think he would be very hesitant to do so according to tos meta.
I think boon is acting weird his says he finds me inherently scummy yet he votes me and says he doesn't find me scummy after a couple of post when I pretty much did jack shit between that transition. It's not really scummy just weird.
Performer comes off as incredibly scummy. What I noticed is his habit to push his own version into things. Like my original vote on lapsa he was saying was that because of last game. Then 146 was him trying to put anyone on the same wagon after him in a bad light even through it was rvs. I think his going for low hanging fruit with his vote on kain and boon.
VOTE: Performer-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 227, Lapsa wrote:@garm
depends on lot of things. even in circus game that move had a chance to end up being brilliant
speaking of kain - perhaps so. although i would expect faster adaptation
about boon - that's kind a his regular play. heavy lurking and a lot of bullshit.
fun fact: Titus refused to replace in a game because it had boonskies in it. i don't blame her
fun fact #2: boonskies likes to instahammer when there's an opportunity
well - at the moment i'm not feeling scumvibes out of perf.
although your perspective seems kind a sensible and genuine - i'm gonna fence sit on perf
Depends on his mentality you can see the way he thinks he hasn't realized this is a entirely different game than town of Salemn.
I also Know about boon and played a couple of games with him. I just found him jumping back was weird.
I don't mind you fence sitting at the moment through becuase there are a few people I am fence sitting on.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 237, RadiantCowbells wrote:at first I was afraid
I WAS PETRIFIED
KEPT THINKING I COULD NEVER LIVE WITHOUT YOU BY MY SIDE
And I been spending all my nights thinking about how you did me wrong
And then I grew strong
And learned to get along-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 247, KainTepes wrote:In post 240, RadiantCowbells wrote:lapsa if you don't unvote me I will vote you and literally never unvote you for the remainder of the game until one of us dies.
this includes lylo.
What??? This is obnoxious how does this help town??? Ulness you actually THINK Lapsa is scum and you said nothing about Lapsa being scum before!!
VOTE: RadiantCowbaells
Kain can you tell me how rc is helping scum by doing what he is doing?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 251, KainTepes wrote:In [url=/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7680589#p7680589]post 248[/url], Garmr wrote:In post 247, KainTepes wrote:In post 240, RadiantCowbells wrote:lapsa if you don't unvote me I will vote you and literally never unvote you for the remainder of the game until one of us dies.
this includes lylo.
What??? This is obnoxious how does this help town??? Ulness you actually THINK Lapsa is scum and you said nothing about Lapsa being scum before!!
VOTE: RadiantCowbaells
Kain can you tell me how rc is helping scum by doing what he is doing?
Easy,, he could just pretend to be stubborn and keep his vote on Lapsa,, so if anyone ever questions him on his vote he can just say OH IM DOING THIS BECAUSE I SWORE TO VOTE FOR THE PERSON WHO VOTED ME!!!!!
That means he doesnt have to put in ANY effort into pretending to look town,, which is good for scum!!
I doubt that's what RC would do RC has been here long enough to know that shit gets him flack and besides his just as likely to fuck around as town as scum. But it seems to me rc hasn't got passed the random voting stage yet and is drawing it out.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 261, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 248, Garmr wrote:In post 247, KainTepes wrote:In post 240, RadiantCowbells wrote:lapsa if you don't unvote me I will vote you and literally never unvote you for the remainder of the game until one of us dies.
this includes lylo.
What??? This is obnoxious how does this help town??? Ulness you actually THINK Lapsa is scum and you said nothing about Lapsa being scum before!!
VOTE: RadiantCowbaells
Kain can you tell me how rc is helping scum by doing what he is doing?
Seriously?
Is it not blatantly obvious?
I expect this behavior from rc any alignment. I personally don't think it's to bad because rc gets better once the game goes on normally.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 260, iraonavp wrote:In post 226, Garmr wrote:In post 212, Lapsa wrote:In post 201, Performer wrote:I guess we'll just agree to disagree as clearly you believe fake claims are an oh-so-fabulous strategy for us to win against scum.
i don't believe that. town fake claims are dangerous. it didn't work out well
but i disagree that it was a total failure and that it was all my fault
Depends on the claim tbh I can see a bullet proof claim as not that bad if they are widely town read/confirmed town if they are vanilla.
Honestly don't have much on a scum read but I have a strong feeling kain is town. His acting how you would in a tos game in a tos game claiming allows you to win faster since there is no vanilla town. Everything he says comes along as honest and not understanding. The fact he is eager to claim now probably indicates he is town and scum I think he would be very hesitant to do so according to tos meta.
I think boon is acting weird his says he finds me inherently scummy yet he votes me and says he doesn't find me scummy after a couple of post when I pretty much did jack shit between that transition. It's not really scummy just weird.
Performer comes off as incredibly scummy. What I noticed is his habit to push his own version into things. Like my original vote on lapsa he was saying was that because of last game. Then 146 was him trying to put anyone on the same wagon after him in a bad light even through it was rvs. I think his going for low hanging fruit with his vote on kain and boon.
VOTE: Performer
That's a silly reason to suspect Boonskiies, I think he probably read the thread between those posts, or he just changed his mind. I don't see why that's more likely to come from a scum-aligned player.
I don't get the Performer wagon in general, I think Performer is okay. But meh.
In general, this post feels forced and scummy. Most of your posts do really. I think that your strong town-aligned read on KainTepes is poorly backed up and you're just throwing town-aligned reads on town-aligned players who play strangely. I've done this before when I was scum-aligned. You can say "oh kain is town, performer is scum for pushing obvtown kain". I personally wasn't sure what alignment KainTepes is and I think most of his behavior is null. But when you flip scum-aligned, I'll be sure that KainTepes is town-aligned.
VOTE: Garmr
Was waiting for the oh look his buddying kain town. I think my town read on kain is actually pretty well backed up and just because you would do something as scum doesn't mean I would.
But look at performers reasoning and votes he votes both boon and kain lets look at the reasoning
In post 145, Performer wrote:In post 114, Garmr wrote:In post 113, KainTepes wrote:But I am good at it, I won 700+ games and only lost less than 300
A vast majority of the players don't think things through while here every action gets criticized. People think things out here. Set up spec is unknown so fake claims become viable here and scum can always claim vanilla town and no one will question it because it's a legit possibility that all that are left is vanilla. In town of salem you can just all claim roles day 1 and lynch the people that conflict have conflicting roles you can break it in 100s of way as town. Tbh the reason town doesn't win so much is the amount of stupidity on there.
Thanks for expounding on ToS - very enlightening.
VOTE: Kain
his d1 80 vote on Soap for no valid reason, was scummy
Mario's 79 analysis on him sounded reasonable
Tos logic that would be a valid vote also we are still transiting out of rvs at that time. It's just as weak reasoning to vote him in attempt to make it look like his adding new to the case and not just sheeping mario hell I would have a better read if he just admitted that he likes mario case and not try to put his own point at the end.
In post 203, Performer wrote:RC began the wagon on me, then Kat joined in on 180 because he thought my 144 & 145 were "scummy." And then Boon joins on 189 to "add pressure."
Weird? Yes, to say the least.
Scummy? Just might be, considering how RC & Boon's votes have 0 good reason.
This boonskiies still would rather go Iaor, but Performer pressure is nice.
Your vote on me is pointless. What're you trying to achieve?
VOTE: Boonskies
------
@ Kat what's "scummy" about my 144 & 145?
This is a horrible response as it comes off as omgusy and pushes the wagon of someone who can easily rack up votes despite him pushing his so called stronger scum reads more earlier. It comes off as more a tactical survival move. look through his iso the boon vote comes out of no where. If you can't see that you are blind as a fucking mole (bats at least have good site.)
One of the original reason I jumped on feels a bit redundant now I think about and the games gone on (the one where he talks about my lapsa vote) But this one doesn't
In post 146, Performer wrote:Thoughts on the people on the Lapsa wagon:
Garmr voted him for RVS, I did it to demonstrate an example to KT at the time, RC hopped on that wagon, Kat addressed me in 73 and voted Lapsa.
None had any good reason but the latter two's actions were most questionable.
this is wtf. It was still in a rvs stage people are obviously going to fuck around like that. But anyone voting after him is scummy. He is twisting the events to try and make 2 people look scummy in a scummy as fuck way.
Also me watching boon closely is justified as I found it strange yet not enough to vote him when he backed off from me pushing why he jumped in like that. The fact you are trying to give meaning to that and not let boon answer for himself makes you a fuck ton more scummy.
You are on my scum list now under performer.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 267, InsidiousLemons wrote:In post 266, Garmr wrote:I have found one thing that gives me concern from rc but I want to see how that plays out since no one really mentioned it.
If you wanted to let it play out before acting on it, why would you even bring it up?
Why not it's not like i said what it is and it will put pressure on him if his scum. If his town he will just shrug it off.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Well I can argue with that all day but no fruits would come out of it.In post 269, InsidiousLemons wrote:I don't know that that's true. I think he's likely to take a look back to try and see what you were talking about, and as a result may play more carefully than he otherwise would have.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 273, iraonavp wrote:So I'm moving onto your scum list, but I should still vote Performer? Strange how I can be both scum-aligned and town-aligned at the same time.
I was giving my reasons as to why I thought preformer was scum because
1i want others to join
2you were dismissing my performer case with out addressing it fully.
You tried pushing that its just about him voting the tos boy which it wasnt just that.
Anyone who cherrypicks a small part of case like the one sentence you did should be ashamed to call themselves a mafia player and there's no town motivation to do that.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 293, Not_Mafia wrote:Naked voting? Awful
Lapsa does a lot of that-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 306, Performer wrote:@Lapsa what specifically do you find weird about Not_Mafia and my interaction?
@Insidious it was only a reaction test, like the one I used in Mario’s Circus Mafia game
-----
Garmr it sounds like you believe I voted KT because of ToS? That’s a radical assumption. I was trying to better understand KT’s play there compared to here. Unlike people who play with “vibe/feeling/gut,” I actually look at meta and other factors, and in his case he had meta on ToS instead of this site.
Kat voted me for 2 posts that he still never answered me on. Boon voted me for gut. I’m still not getting why Garmr voted me .
I want to hit a couple of people here sighs.
No it's not because of tos I scum read you it's because of his behavior is similar to town from tos I am town reading him it has nothing to do with you.
It's your post 203 where you vote since you haven't focused boon before and then you become a big wagon you push him with no reasoning other than omgus it seems like you just want to make him a counterwagon.
I don't like how you constantly portray people who are on the same wagon (but after you) as you as scummy.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 312, RadiantCowbells wrote:Still like my vote.
Ok You never really justified why lapsa was voted in the first place. In 245 only after your vote at 258 you come up with a reasoning which doesn't explain your initial vote.
Can you explain that?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
VOTE: irnavp-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 351, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 333, iraonavp wrote:In post 274, Lapsa wrote:In post 273, iraonavp wrote:So I'm moving onto your scum list, but I should still vote Performer?
Strange how I can be both scum-aligned and town-aligned at the same time.
^ i'm not seeing that
Me neither really, when I look back at it.
In post 275, MarioManiac4 wrote:honestly i cant say any wagon has much merit yet. the only reasons given for performer were by garmr and i don't think his point is any good; low-hanging fruit is a bad scumtell because nothing rules these players out from being scum and you're just saying people have to think they're town. performer covered the first point already.
id says he doesnt like earlygame inactivity which i dont really think is a tell.
ill let boon respond to #175 but i dont think its a good reason either.
performer's vote was to do with no-reason vote, again not a good reason.
basically i'm going to be That Guy who sits in the corner and criticizes wagons till either i or somebody else finds something scummy.
Doing this is anti-town, at the very least put your vote somewhere.
You can even vote me if you want. That's marginally better than not voting.
VOTE: iraonavp
I'll bite.
I don't really buy into the sentiment that you're panicking over Kain now I know that I probably will never read Kain but the "antitown" brigade is often scum-movitated. But I also do kinda like your vote on Garmr so this waffle is basically why I wasn't doing anything.
well you can go fuck yourself because his garmr vote was shit.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 419, Soapbar wrote:i did say the wagons were reachy
but now we have 2 days left.
honestly I'd rather lynch the closest thing i have to a scum read than no lynch on day fucking one.
regarding 145 and 146
you ignored everything Kain said in post 80 and after (he legitimately thought I was being serious in post 77) and in 146 it looks like your trying to throw suspicion (at least to me it looks like) onto Kat and RC when we were still in RVS at the time those 2 posted.
also
You guys are completely misrepresenting
how can I misrep
what i never represented in the first place
i only said those posts were scummy and I didn't post why since I thought it looked obvious so how did I misrepresent you.
Want to vote iron vp with me.
I seriously find it odd that when I'm pushing against performer with a solid case a lot of people were defending him and putting a scum read on me but near the end of the day those same people are jumping on him.
I feel like irons vote was the scummiest of them through and it's that slot that's made me paranoid that performer will flip town.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 446, FA_Q2 wrote:
I agree that the performer wagon is rather garbage. Bad day 1 lynch. You point out Lapsa several times but have your vote on ira. Both are better alternatives to performer but I think Lapsa is a better lynch at this point. That slot has not really contributed anything but random voting. What makes you think Ira is a better lynch?
I think iron is better-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 478, Ircher wrote:In post 460, Performer wrote:In post 450, KainTepes wrote:I FIND LAPSA more scummy, but i have not been observing IRON because he has been blending into the background??I FEEL like he is town though but will READ his posts......
I suspect MARIO a bit but IM NOT SURE anymore....!!!
KT you have got to start providing more elaboration on why you townread and scumread people. I'm not certain why you capitalized FEEL and READ in your second sentence in this post.
And when you post about things you plan to act on, it would be very helpful if you follow-up on it - by providing what you think you found or if you didn't find anything worthwhile, then let us know anyway. Because maybe you noticed something I or someone else hasn't.
I have a suspicion why you're voting Mario and I don't think it's a good enough reason to think he's scum, which I don't think he is. But I want to clarify from you - why exactly are you voting Mario anyway?
He's like RC but worse, imho.
I'm fine with {Iran, Lapsa, Katsu} lynch today.
I'd much prefer Iran he gives more info-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 553, Performer wrote:FA called Lapsa/NM/Boonskies possibly scum.
@Boon what do you find scummy about Lapsa? Serious question.
@Lapsa how about your thoughts on any other folks than droog. Reads list for instance.
I speculate that scum has strong roles, seeing as we had a Town Vig.
I thought it was a 1 shot town vig that isn't really telling on the scum roles.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 628, KainTepes wrote:i am not brain dead dont be rude, i have enough with people calling me NAMES today......
Trust me Mafia brings out the worst of us.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 676, Boonskiies wrote:I'll make one of my famous Boonskiies Color Wheel lists sometime tonight if I have the time.
Can I be rainbow-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 702, Performer wrote:Did a skim and wow - Lapsa does not look like scum.
VOTE: Katsuki
Bring him to L-1 please. He posted why he thought I'm scum, I questioned him for elaboration, he played under the radar for rest of d1, continued ignoring my question, posts a full-of-hot-air post about forgetting his case on d2.
Let me guess - he'll return later, take full advantage of this particular mod for not punctually prodding him, and he'll post some more dirt-low posts about me being scum. I don't think so, scum.
Iirc, I've noticed a pattern with Garmr:
-ira voted me>Garmr naked-voted ira
-Mario voted Lapsa>Garmr naked-voted Mario
There's something odd about that pattern.
Don't have much time tonight, planning on full catchup tomorrow.
I don't like you putting katsuki on l-1 with a potential guilty on soap.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 702, Performer wrote:
Iirc, I've noticed a pattern with Garmr:
-ira voted me>Garmr naked-voted ira
-Mario voted Lapsa>Garmr naked-voted Mario
There's something odd about that pattern.
Also this is reaching a lot and incorrect for the most part..
I was scum reading ira since post 263 and his sudden shift from me to you was what pushed his scummyness because he scum read me for pushing on you and defended you earlier.
With mario It is just gut and had nothing to do with lapsa.
So-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 708, Ircher wrote:We're pressuring Katsu, maybe even getting to claim.
I think this is a stupid idea and scum will probably jump on it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 711, KainTepes wrote:GARMR, WILL YOU LISTEN TO ME AND VOTE MARIO,,
Check the vote count I already am.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 713, Katsuki wrote:Need to catch up sometime. Responding to something I meant to get to.
Will ISO and let you know, I remember gut-reading him as town, though that was 2 weeks ago I think.
Oh so the fact that you need to iso him disprove my katsuki and boon are masons theory never mind.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 777, Ircher wrote:In post 769, Lapsa wrote:In post 758, Ircher wrote:That's a readlist which is good too imo.
irch, i'm puzzled now, maybe you could help
- kain looks more genuine as newb town
- foobar unvoted me when i was on L1
- katsu ain't ashamed of lurking and hasn't done anything explicitly scummy
assuming my theory on mario+soap team is correct, who do you think would be their scumbuddy?
Oh yeah, srry I had dinner.
Tbh, I'm a bit confused too. If you don't mind I'd like to know when exactly you made the softclaim.
As far as this goes, my guess is somewhere in{Not Mafia, Gamr, Kein??},though prob. Not Mafia imo.
As far as Katsu goes, he's as bad as Massive, but keep your guard up.
I think that read list is horrible because 1. I know I am town and 2. I think kein is town and not mafia is meh.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 796, Lapsa wrote:@garm what are your reads?
to be honest I am having trouble with this game but
mario rings scummy to me just from gut feel.
performer seem pretty scummy espically how performer put katsuki to l-1 then posted some bullshit about me naked voting ira when I had shown I had a scum read on ira and I was the biggest factor to a ira lynch i will admit.
Ircher seems like a town but I pretty much disagree with everything he has being saying today. It's all extremely sloppy.
I thought kat and boon were masons but now they probably aren't I still don't think they are scummy through after reading.
I got a few null because I can't work some slots
but this
In post 791, MarioManiac4 wrote:MarioManiac4- Confirmed town, by way of Role PM.
Performer- Mainly POE. There are too many people that are null-scum for me to consider this slot. And he tends to be more friendly as scum from my experience with being scum+town with him.
Ircher- After replacing in for RC (who I won't pretend to be able to read) he comes in with a decent catchup. His fustration at his reads being ignored is town; instead of just being like "Oh my reads are being ignored what a shame this means i'll be able to hide behind them lololol" he's like "OH, HOW ABOUT YOU READ MY POSTS BECAUSE I WANT SCUM TO GET LYNCHED." And unlike scum, he doesn't let it go.
KainTepes- i think I buy his playstyle, and he seems to play like this all the time. That being said I don't really like his persistence on my mislynch wagon...
KainTepes- i think I buy his playstyle, and he seems to play like this all the time. That being said I don't really like his persistence on my mislynch wagon...
Boonskiies- I think his turn on me was too blatant to be scum, really- with one scum outed scum would be a LOT more careful than he is. Again, I want him to explain what about the Soapbar push changed his mind.
Lapsa- This is outside the scope of a normal read.If we do not lynch Soapbar today, I 100% refuse to take Lapsa as conf town.Especially if scum don't kill him (even if he claims roleblocked.) Otherwise, he's probably up with Performer and Ircher.
Not_Mafia- Null, is going to be very hard to read.
droog- I didn't have an opinion on IL and this guy comes in and just defends Lapsa. I can see this as scum especially if Lapsa is town. Right now I'd like to see if he has an opinion on current events.
Katsuki- Null, is going to be very hard to read.
Garmr- Reacts in a weird and unprovoked way when attacked- "you can go fck yourself because im town" is a bit weird for a town who knows mislynches happen and is more likely from someone who has something to hide.
Soapbar- Basically a known mafioso who we refuse to lynch. There's probably scum influence in that and I'm not going to completely rule out a Soap!town Lapsa!scum scenario in which Lapsa refuses to lynch Soap intil LYLO to get a scum win.
I doubt that mario is actually so horrible at this game to actually think performer would be town. Even if he did he wouldn't rate performer so high in his reads list and he gives a bs reasoning. Heaps of null-scum reads would generally indicate that one is scum and that the fact it's hard to lynch them would do with scum intervention.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 808, Performer wrote:For the skeptics about wagoning Soap - take a look at his ISO. The only votes he made are on 3 Townies - FA, Ira, Perf.
I find it difficult to think he's town based on his ISO.
Counting yourself as town on that list is pretty bad since that is most likely his bus vote it's like your trying to use his votes to make yourself look town instead of trying to find scum.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 820, Ircher wrote:Spoiler: Mini 1763 - D2 Garmr Iso
Hmmm.... That doesn't quite look right. I think I'd lean towards scum here.
You just listed everything as null then called me scum because of it wow that's terrible.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 822, Ircher wrote:It's about -35% confidence. That's lean toward scum. Your exaggerating/misrepping what I said
How is that exaggerating/missrepping it seriously is all null things for a scum fuck you even had me as a top town read day 1 and you say everything in my iso is null wtf.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 824, Ircher wrote:Its called reevaluating stuff. Also, end result is altered by my general vibe of the entire thing.
As far as townread D1 -- 1) I was catching up 2) It seemed reasonable compared to some things at the time 3) I wasn't looking at you in ISO.
I think your exaggerating rather than misrepping in this case though.
Probably because how I'm feeling about this i may playing it up a bit through I don't see it I'm known to take things to far so it wouldn't surprise me if I am.