I agree with this, I can't think of many reasons why someone would discard this.
VOTE: Katsuki
I'll probably need people to keep reminding me this is 13-p and not 9-p. Last time I played this it was 9-p and I keep thinking of this game as a 9-p.
I agree with this, I can't think of many reasons why someone would discard this.
Katsuki's a good early choice, but I'll admit it's surface-level and subject to change once we get more content.In post 25, 123456789 wrote:A
right, fine.
Who do you think most likely is scum rn (besides myself ofc) and why?
What was the card you used for your Alignment? I'm not even asking for your ability, just what card you took Alignment from.In post 48, Katsuki wrote:IC and VT are the two roles I hate most. I flaked every game I've ever played as an IC.
His early hard tunnel makes me think possible LyncherIn post 51, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Confused.In post 29, SirCakez wrote:Right now you, but not typical scum, more likely Jester or Lyncher like Alchemist suggested.
*blinks*
Why are you already thinking that he's lyncher/jester and not groupscum?
~Titus
Are you going to answer my question about your Alignment card?In post 54, Katsuki wrote:I'm still incredibly happy with an Alchemist lynch.
Yeah I don't think he's going for getting modkilled. There are quicker ways to go about that, plus as you said he could replace out instead.In post 130, Radical Rat wrote:Maybe 123 just got bad cards and wants out.
Though I don't know why he'd do this instead of just asking for replacement.
It's kinda funny I warned him about getting dayvigged as a Lyncher while he himself was a Dayvig. LolIn post 22, Alchemist21 wrote:123 if you decided to be a Lyncher just know that Dayvigs are a thing in this game. And yes they will shoot you if they don't have a better shot.
My thinking is that if all the Lovers are Town, then they are the likeliest target for scum but also the best target for protective roles. I think if scum's in the Lovers there would have been a NK unless they were Roleblocked or hit a Bulletproof.In post 393, Fate wrote:there doesn't have to be nightkilling scum tho.
Alchemist I don't know where the hell you're getting htis all lovers are town speculation, that's such a fucking stretch to go for.
Vote: Radical Rat
This is fine for today but I'd be down for triple death far from any conceivable LyLo
This is another scum point for Radical. He flips from voting Cakez to votingIn post 410, Radical Rat wrote:I agree with you there, but my problem is that this isn't what you chose to justify your vote. Your reasoning then was just that one head thought you were Town, after the other expressed suspicion.
Had you cited their inactivity instead, I wouldn't have a problem.
Yet, it seems somewhat silly to focus on you when we have a read in common, so I'll follow along if you don't mind.
VOTE: Radiant Moonlight
Well apparantly scum couldn't even do that much. LolIn post 463, House wrote:Cakez is not a person of interest. Let scum kill him
When Titus gets here I'd like her to explain why they wouldn't target them.In post 473, Radiant Moonlight wrote:I don't think they targeted the lovers at all. No solid evidence there. Just Titus theory I am running with.In post 471, House wrote:Ranger, Katsuki, and Cakez.In post 469, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Who are the lovers? You're assuming they tried to kill him.In post 467, Alchemist21 wrote:Well apparantly scum couldn't even do that much. LolIn post 463, House wrote:Cakez is not a person of interest. Let scum kill him
I think they targeted Ranger over Cakez because Ranger caught scum d1.
Titus can you answer this?In post 478, Alchemist21 wrote:When Titus gets here I'd like her to explain why they wouldn't target them.In post 473, Radiant Moonlight wrote:I don't think they targeted the lovers at all. No solid evidence there. Just Titus theory I am running with.In post 471, House wrote:Ranger, Katsuki, and Cakez.In post 469, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Who are the lovers? You're assuming they tried to kill him.In post 467, Alchemist21 wrote:Well apparantly scum couldn't even do that much. LolIn post 463, House wrote:Cakez is not a person of interest. Let scum kill him
I think they targeted Ranger over Cakez because Ranger caught scum d1.
Understandable .In post 503, Fate wrote:oh
I forgot that role existed <__<
I guess I didn't have much imagination and already had miller as one of my 3 roles /lazy
That's still basing it on their inactivity. If inactivity were a scumtell for either of them it would mean something, but it's not.In post 511, DoctorPepper wrote:VOTE: Radical Rat
For the record, I'm still suspicious of RM, but thats another day.
The case against them isn't inactivity. It's inactivity despite what these players are capable of. Especially in a hydra, where you have two people posting
Nobody will think less of you for lying as scum. The better you are at lying as scum the more impressed people will be.In post 521, Radical Rat wrote:I want my reputation to be honorable and trustworthy, even in a game filled with deception and treachery.