Okay Spock, here's what you've been missing. If it is illogical for scum to nightkill someone they are pretending to have a scum read on, then it is also illogical for you to have a scum read on me because then that is exactly what would have just happened with Martha. The only possible plus would be if I were to do that as scum, on purpose, to try to spin WIFOM about it the next day. Which, if one were so inclined, one could say I am doing at this very moment. But if I was, then why would I point that out? Yet more WIFOM. Eat your heart out. The point is, your entire conclusion was illogical at its core.[/quote]In post 1838, RyanK wrote:It's completely illogical that scum would want to night-kill a scum read as they have a really high chance of being able to mislynch them.In post 1825, Chuck wrote:Ryan, the thing you were supposed to see that you missed was that the Martha flip makes me look bad as well. So me saying that it makes expedience look bad, is immaterial, for purposes of reading my alignment. Or as new scummer a would say, it's NAI. Martha dying made me look bad because she was the one that I suspected the most coming into today besides Expedience. And after she died all I could do was point at Expedience.
I'm sorry, I'm completely lost. You are referring to a different game? I can't possibly defend myself against something someone did in another game, so I won't even try, but I will say this: anything can be made to look almost any way, as long as someone chooses to see it that way. Rationalization is a real thing that real people do. Manipulation is also a real thing that real people do. Mafia players do it more than most.In post 1838, RyanK wrote:As I said, Vedith killed 0x40 and stated it was an attempt by Vaxkiller to silence 0x40. Vedith was scum and I think I can expect the same from this.In post 1825, Chuck wrote:It made Expedience look bad because she had expressed suspicion of have a number of times and it looked like a kill meant to silence her.
1)In post 1838, RyanK wrote:1)What were they?In post 1825, Chuck wrote:As for how Glitch flipping town makes Expedience look bad, it's because he basically single-handedly drove that wagon directly into a mislynch.
Also his argument against to me was based entirely on me being too sure that Glitch was town, when 1) Glitch had already made some very alignment indicative statements after his hammer had gone through, and 2) all I said was "if Glitch flips town", which means he was blowing it way out of proportion just to have a reason to suspect me.
2)That looks like fact.
I don't claim or soft claim or any of whatever that is for a PR. I'm literally just a VT – and even with my post saying regardless of what I am [scum, vt, pr] I would claim vt, I'll outright just say I'm not PR or scum and am just a plain little VT. xDDD
RyanK and gameplay are confusing af.
When I flip, check out Expedience and me and the association we have. I'd be shocked if he's scum.
That screams town to anyone who's not an idiot. At least, it screams town to me. And I like to think I'm not an idiot.Oh. I died. lol welp
Give me tips on how to not die next time y'all
2) I don't know how to respond to this. However, if anything, I was *more* sure that he would flip town, than I think I made it seem. He looked very, very, *very* town at the point which I made post 1364.
Hopefully everything is clear to you now.In post 1838, RyanK wrote:But factually, I really don't know what to think about this any more. UNVOTE:In post 1825, Chuck wrote:If you're actually town, no offense. If you're scum, please pick a different strategy than feigned incompetence, because it is starting to get on my nerves, and I'm a really patient person.
Now, please... Vote... Expedience.