Spec chat I'm assuming is short for "spectator chat" - people who are watching and commenting on a game but not playingIn post 12, redMeow wrote:What's a spec chat?
VOTE: FormerFish
Spec chat I'm assuming is short for "spectator chat" - people who are watching and commenting on a game but not playingIn post 12, redMeow wrote:What's a spec chat?
surely you can ask better questions than this?In post 26, Formerfish wrote:You were only town when you were drunk? Now as a sober player you are scum?
MKM - what kind of information/answer were you looking to get out of redMeow here? what doIn post 28, Miss Kobayashi Maru wrote:@redMeow, what do you make of Cowbells' vote on you?
I can't remember the last time I've seen town refer to themselves or anything they've posted as scummy. Why do you think your post was scummy?In post 70, Miss Kobayashi Maru wrote:Definitely should've read the rules more carefully and known the vote didn't count in the first place, but I'm weirded out that you called out this in particular. The rest of my post was waaay scummier
he's trying a little too hard in a way that I can imagine being fakeIn post 92, Miss Kobayashi Maru wrote:anybody want to explain why they're voting for this guy?
if you have your FoS on Demi, why do you also want explanations from three people voting him? I would assume that we are likely town seeing the same things you're seeing. If you'reIn post 141, ClearlyClarity wrote:With Demi at L-1 right now, I still haven't heard substantiated explanations from three of the four (Kobayashi, GuiltyLion, Cowbells) about why they're voting for him. Formerfish's analysis vibes with me pretty well, but not enough to fully convince me. I'm sus of the way Demi tunnels on Kobayashi instead of trying to defend himself, but then again I've been guilty of doing the same. Hoping my posts will remedy that.
I'll think on it but I have my FoS on Demi.
I don't think "pushing for info" is always town behavior. I do think it's a useful thing to do if you are town.In post 163, Demigodrick wrote:Care to explain why you tell newbies to push for info, then call me pushing for info fake and scummy?
for example, this pings me as unnatural and forced phrasing, and not how town would reason or speak about people's alignments.In post 166, Demigodrick wrote:I would find it easy to change my read on you with more posts like this.
Scum are going to try to fake driving/pushing/pressuring. You realize this, yes? Just asking questions or pressuring is not enough to make someone town. There has to be a level of substance and genuine (and uninformed) intention behind that content that signifies town.In post 176, Demigodrick wrote:Apologies if i didnt get the phrasing right, however to me it means the same thing. Driving/pushing/pressuring. Its all for the same goal. You encourage newbies to do it, then turned around and voted me (after a frankly poor fence sitting post from MKM)
I'll probably put more effort into pushing a case on you later if my reads get stronger, but I've played some 50+ mafia games and over time you just get a roughly calibrated sense of who is posting genuinely vs who is faking it. There's a vibe to all of your posts, questions, comments that fits a pattern of what tryhard newbie scum looks like. I can keep picking out numerous examples, another one being the way you try to turn this around on me at the end here. Your goal seems to be to argue with me and try to make me defensive than to understand me. I've also asked questions of MKM and Clarity that were intended to give me some insight into their thought process and their alignment, and if you were town and paying attention you might put some weight to that.In post 176, Demigodrick wrote:Ok then, add something to that. Why does it feel fake that I am actually trying to scum hunt? Is it literally because I am try harding? Because I am trying to generate conversation? It seems odd to me that you'd actually pull someone up on this and call it scummy. What have you contributed so far except jumping on the wagon of me so early in D1? That's mighty dodgy play in my book.
unless you are scumreading them and want to give me reasons why you think they are scum, I don't really feel like it's important or even pro-town for me to answer this question right now.In post 176, Demigodrick wrote:On what basis?
nvm I changed my mind, redMeow has decent odds of scumIn post 236, redMeow wrote:And this is what we have now. You're asking everyone, which is a clever move either way:
You want to see what others think about me and godrick, so in case one of us hangs, you will be able to judge other people and probably are able to build traps, no matter if he and I flip town and/or scum.
I can see though how it is a good idea to involve everyone with their reads regarding people and generally I like the idea.
What I conclude: you have lots and lots of gut feelings, mixed ones too, but never care to elaborate.
You're not being consequent with your thoughts or at least you're taking any of us with you on your journey, which is why I will
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
In post 291, RadiantCowbells wrote:i mean
we know if redmeow/mjl are scum they're probably scum together
we can fairly safely hit someone else and not really risk equity against that scumteam
In post 297, ThatOneMedic wrote:I can see the possible Clearly-godrick team now, but I don't think it's the most likely scenario right now.
The biggest problem for me right now is that I feel like godrick is the individually-scummiest player on this list right now, but given that my first- and second- most likely scumpairings are Red-Godrick and Red-MJL, it's making me wonder whether going for Red is just overall a safer option.
What makes you think Red + godrick doesn't work?
p-edit: oh I guess you think it does
When you said you weren't happy with the associatives, did you mean you had a problem with the associatives themselves this early on or that you thought the associatives made them look suspicious?
It was a little ambiguous, thought it was the former at first
thanks guys for doing all the legwork this game so I don't have toIn post 298, RadiantCowbells wrote:nah
i'm not happy with them as in they could be scum.
i'm also not happy with cc/godrick but cc has a few towny posts.
1. trying to parse the newbie slots, they tend to be easier to read and SEs will show their alignment more from their votes than their postsIn post 363, ThatOneMedic wrote:1. What have you been paying the most attention to this game?
2. Why should I believe that you're town?
3. What's the scummiest thing that your top townread has done?
4. What's the towniest thing that your top scumread has done?
5. What have you noticed so far this game that nobody else has mentioned?
6. How do you feel about your play overall this game?
he's trying to take points off his TOM townread because he doesn't like his read on me but he's doing it in a really forced way where he still townreads him. It's either an attempt to continue to make me look bad or an excuse to ignore the (good!) points and reads that TOM is making.In post 345, Demigodrick wrote:Town or scum motivated? Town, but I do feel uneasy about you. For example, GL has made 9 posts, and you have him as "ultra-town". Is that really enough content to be making that sort of declaration? I have my own reads towards GL, as I've detailed, yet you have my two scummiest reads (FF, GL) as your towniest reads.
and what's with the scare quotes hereIn post 345, Demigodrick wrote:You vote me after a "re-read". Scum interaction with GL maybe?
also this is phrased badly because I'm tired and I used what little brainpower I had left catching up on posts in this gameIn post 383, GuiltyLion wrote:RC I can see the waffle on redMeow but I wouldn't let yourself get too paranoid on DGR
you weren't bad for your first game here! I think it takes a few games of experience as both alignments to get a roughly developed sense of what town looks like and how to emulate a town thought process.In post 642, Demigodrick wrote:Am I that scummy?