Newbie 1826 Basketball Game Over
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
On page 19 and thoughts are as follows:
FFS Assemble. I'm seriously thinking about avoiding games with him in future if this is how he's going to play every time.
Surprised Cheeky ends up getting lynched from this position; interested to see what happens there.
Terrible hammer from Voyager, one of the worst I've seen. He was very new at the time though and his explanation seems kind of genuine so not entirely scumreading him for it, however.
Glad the Peaches slot was killed as that was one that looked dodgy at this point.
I'm suspicious of the Plot slot - if only because they still happen to be alive.
The Clemency slot is a bit vague. Not sure what to think there,
The Xnad slot has done nothing of note so far.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Page 23:
My Town feeling for UVC is growing - pretty much entirely on gut, but I just don't see his reaction to his wagon and subsequent pushing of Cheeky coming from scum.
I agree with my predecessor's points against Clemency in 523.
I don't particularly like Thor's entrance.
Toto, who did you replace? I don't see you on the list.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Sounds interesting. What page might I find that?In post 1042, Toto wrote:Dude, just read BlackVoid replace out, there is now way I'm getting lynched this game.
On page 30 now.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Not really liking how NSG posts this and leaves without interacting with anyone.
What are you thinking, NSG?-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
@Toto- I think he would have been a lot more hesitant to hammer Assemble if he was scum - especially newbscum in probably his first scum game. His explanation also seemed quite genuine to me.
There's been a lot of little things I've read that have made me gut read him as Town. I might go through it more thoroughly once I've fully caught up.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
At page 36 - just want to share an idea I had while reading this part.
BlackVoid is saying there should be a no-lynch as it's very unlikely five out of six townies will pick correctly and scum are unlikely to bus. I really disagree with no-lynching in this scenario when nothing is to be gained from the NK - what should have happened here is everyone agrees beforehand to allow the conftown to pick someone to lynch, and once he has made his decision no-one is to have any objections - this way scum could not have influenced the lynch at all, and if they tried then they would have risked being outed.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
This is terrible - a no-lynch is acceptable is this situation, but to want it done immediately without using any of the day to find scum/produce more content seems something scum would wish for.
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Whereas this looks a bit LAMIST.In post 966, northsidegal wrote:not okay with even the chance of the day ending yet.
Why even vote 'no-lynch' in the first place if you don't want to risk the possibility of the day ending at this point?-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Not really sure what your point is there, NSG. Are you saying why would anyone vote someone if at that point they are not ready for the day to end?
Well, it's a bit different to putting 'no-lynch' to L-2 when pretty much everyone in the game had expressed interest in no-lynching at that point. It feels like you voted just so you could unvote and look Town.
Just caught up to the BlackVoid replace-out...what an anti-climax.
NSG - I want you to answer if you believe BlackVoid's replace-out makes Toto Town? Not sure why you answered my post above yet avoided this question.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Huh? Then why did you not mention your disapproval at the time?In post 1085, northsidegal wrote:also, now that the nightkill is already happened i should talk a bit more about yesterday -initially i thought the exact same thing as you in 1082, but on hearing the argument it made sense to me to avoid talking. the no lynch was for town information purposes and seeing how scum made their kill only based off of the day two information would be more revealing, i thought.
The fact you also voted NL immediately after Thor implied you agreed with his stance.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
I understand why you eventually agreed with it, but in 1085 you said you initially thought the exact same thing as me about Thor's post (that it was bad) so I'm asking you why you didn't mention your initial disapproval in the thread?In post 1090, northsidegal wrote:
like i said, i didn't get that it was referring to the idea of having no discussion that day and just voting no lynch until lucca both pointed it out and explained why it made sense. when he did that, i both understood the original post and agreed with it.In post 1089, Luca Blight wrote:But why didn't you mention your disapproval of Thor's post at the time?
Who do you think is scum?
Can you back this up with some reasoning?In post 1090, northsidegal wrote: if i had to pick, right now? probably you and thor.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
The point wasn't whether you agreed with the no-lynch; the point was you disagreed with Thor's approach of ending the day immediately without discussion, yet in 952 (the very following post) not only do you not mention your disapproval of Thor's approach, you make it look as though you're going along with it by also voting No-Lynch and putting it to L-2 so early in the day.In post 1092, northsidegal wrote:
if you're talking about from the start of this day, it didn't really seem relevant to sayIn post 1091, Luca Blight wrote:
I understand why you eventually agreed with it, but in 1085 you said you initially thought the exact same thing as me about Thor's post (that it was bad) so I'm asking you why you didn't mention your initial disapproval in the thread?In post 1090, northsidegal wrote:
like i said, i didn't get that it was referring to the idea of having no discussion that day and just voting no lynch until lucca both pointed it out and explained why it made sense. when he did that, i both understood the original post and agreed with it.In post 1089, Luca Blight wrote:But why didn't you mention your disapproval of Thor's post at the time?
Who do you think is scum?"oh hey guys initially i didn't agree with no lynching but then i agreed with it". it was really just an internal thought process that i brought up because it seemed lke you had the same thought that i did. i still get the feeling that i'm not answering your question, though.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
That doesn't match up to this:
But clearly this is going nowhere.In post 1085, northsidegal wrote:also, now that the nightkill is already happened i should talk a bit more about yesterday -initially i thought the exact same thing as you in 1082, but on hearing the argument it made sense to me to avoid talking. the no lynch was for town information purposes and seeing how scum made their kill only based off of the day two information would be more revealing, i thought.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Whatever you thought Thor's intentions were, you disapproved yet made no comment towards it, instead actually going along with what he wanted.In post 1095, northsidegal wrote:is that satisfactory? at the time i made 952 i hadn't picked up that thor wanted the day over with no discussion - i thought that he was referring to how people should sheep him in more of a general game sense (ie sheep him on his scumreads).-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Yes, partly, but perhaps I'm not making the other part of my point clear:In post 1098, Toto wrote:Nsg I think what lucca is saying is that you voted no lynch before anyone explained why it was good
In 1085 she said she initially thought the exact same thing as me about Thor's post (that it was bad, anti-town etc).
She made no comment about Thor's post despite her's being the one immediately after it. Not only that, but she also immediately voted no-lynch, which is in-keeping with want Thor wanted, despite the fact she disagreed with him.
Like, if she thought the same as me about Thor's post (that it was bad, anti-town etc) why not at least mention it in her following post? Why just go along with it if she sincerely disagrees?-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Not quite - you said you 'initially thought the same' as me - meaning as soon as you saw Thor's post (whatever you thought his intentions may be) you already disapproved of it.In post 1099, northsidegal wrote:oh, i get what you're asking now. you're asking why, when i realized the original intent (ie when i realized that thor was suggesting to end the day with no discussion), i didn't say something to the effect of my disagreement, correct?
Am I wrong in interpreting this?-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
This bit jumps out at me with regards to the Lucca kill - NSG obviously saw something with Lucca that others missed.In post 1057, northsidegal wrote:
preliminary thoughts: i will probably be treating ucv as town for today when choosing a lynch. i think it's unfortunate that lucca was the nightkill, from what i know about his playstyle and from what he said it seemed like he had a lot prepared to say today.In post 1054, Luca Blight wrote:Not really liking how NSG posts this and leaves without interacting with anyone.
What are you thinking, NSG?
Also, why is she treating UVC as Town today? I skimmed through her previous posts and can't see her mention UVC much, Is she just parroting what I've been saying?-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
This post feels really weird to me.In post 949, northsidegal wrote:i feel like i have actively ruined this game. i came in, got someone a lot of people townread lynched and will now probably get my own slot lynched. town probably would have had a better chance if i just let myself die. this isn't even to comment how on poorly i read cheeky.
anyways, here we are with our conftown dead and the promised two weeks to sort things out. hopefully we can still make something out of this. if town can win anyways i might be able to make up for it all.
Would NSG be saying this if she was Town and genuinely believed her in her case on Cheeky? I mean, everyone's different, but never have I had such self-conscious feelings as Town following a mislynch - if I genuinely believe in my case on someone and they flip town, I tend to be more annoyed at the other person for not conveying their towniness better rather than beating myself up so pathetically in the thread.
I'm just asking what the purpose of this post is? It feels like she has a real guilty mindset, but not in a townie way.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
And then she follows it up with more self-consciousness and excuses:
In both posts she mentions that she thinks she will be lynched next. All this explaining her mindset and worrying about being lynched makes her seem survivalistic already.In post 952, northsidegal wrote:for this game more than others, i think i've found myself thinking "i really want to believe this" a lot. as the deadline grew closer and closer and as we waited in twilight for the flip, i really wanted it to be true that cheeky was scum. if that wasn't true, then not only did it mean i got a townie lynched (and probably myself tomorrow), it also meant that my read on cheeky was totally off. after cheeky had flipped, i found myself really wanting to believe that thor was town. if that wasn't the case and thor wasn't town, it meant that i was getting manipulatedbefore i was even in the game. i don't think i'll be wanting to believe things anymore. hopefully i can approach everything from a fresh perspective and get to the core of issues.
a no lynch here is definitely the right choice. no matter who gets killed it's going to be good in terms of information. i'd like everyone to check in and get their thoughts in first before anyone ends the day, but i'm confident this is correct.
VOTE: no lynch
It just reads really fake to me.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
And yeah, that's all I have on NSG so far.
The case on her is mainly gut to be honest - her case on Cheeky was actually Ok, but it's NAI considering she thought it all up before even receiving her role pm. Her reaction to the flip reads fake to me, and I don't see a townie motive behind the posts - she seems like she's just trying to make excuses so people don't jump on her for lynching Cheeky.
I also really want her to explain why she's treating UCV as Town as I didn't see her mention him as a townread anywhere before - it feels like she saw me townreading him and decided to copy my stance.
Anyway, I'll try to get to reasons why I Townread UCV next.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
UCV
1) His hammer on Assemble, while absolutely horrid, was not something I see scum doing on D1 as I said earlier, particularly newbscum.
2) His explanation in 324 I think is an accurate portayal of what a a newbscum's mindset would be in this situation. 330 feels like genuine frustration at Assemble's lack of posting that lead to UCV's hammer.
3) 460 is another accurate break-down of the mindset I would expect from newbscum. The quick-changing opinion from AssembleTown to AssembleScum doesn't seem something that scum could pass off naturally.
4) When being attacked by Cheeky, I would expect a player like UCV as scum to become desperate and panic, yet he seems fairly composed in posts such as 492 and 560.
5) I kind of like the way he isn't too attached to his reads - a townread can become a scumread very quickly, and vice-versa (this is something that can also be a scumtell if it comes across as calculated/disingenuous, but it doesn't in this case).
So yeah. Maybe I can delve deeper if need be but I really don't see him being scum this game.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
I'm inclined to agree with Toto's claim that BlackVoid's replace-out makes him very likely Town (also BlackVoid in general looked pretty Townie, and Toto likewise).
So really from my position, if I have faith in my UCV read, it must mean NSG and Thor are thereby the scumteam.
I need to check associatives and the like just to be sure but this seems legit.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Well I can personally rule it out pretty easily just by looking at my role PM.In post 1118, Thor665 wrote:
I think Toto is town.In post 1037, Luca Blight wrote:If everyone can give their current reads/thoughts while I catch-up then that would be helpful.
I think we should lynch Voyager.
How would you rule yourself out from being a partner with Voyager?
As for everyone else, that's something they have to judge for themselves. I believe Toto is Town so it's up to him if he believes me or you.
If I was scum in that position I would be happy just ending the day right there and then and trusting my instincts based on the information already available to make the correct kill. It's just less time that scum need to pretend, and to give them a completely free pass is just bad in my opinion.In post 1118, Thor665 wrote:
I don't agree with how you think No Lynch is best played.In post 1082, Luca Blight wrote:This is terrible - a no-lynch is acceptable is this situation, but to want it done immediately without using any of the day to find scum/produce more content seems something scum would wish for.
If you're no lynching - then by definition town can't have a consensus clear townread (or else town is derp).
In that case, any conversation only helps scum figure out who most people consider town.
So why have the conversation exactly?
I don't think you're scum for holding this view as lucca thought the same and he obviously wasn't scum, but that's just my view on the matter.
Thor, you saw my case on why I believe UVC is town. Try and convince me otherwise.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
This isn't entirely true.In post 1122, Thor665 wrote:
Your case begins and ends with calling him a newbie.In post 1121, Luca Blight wrote:Thor, you saw my case on why I believe UVC is town. Try and convince me otherwise.
It's not much of a case, I'm surprised it sells you, it certainly doesn't sell me.
1) His hammer on assemble - I don't see scum doing this here regardless of experience. A newb in their first scumgame is even less likely however, because they will likely be extra cautious, in my opinion.
5) The way his reads change again isn't dependent on experience - it just comes across as genuine as opposed to calculated.
The other three points were made with his experience in mind, but why not? He is/was a noob, and his explanation regarding his mindset such as in 460 is pretty accurate to what I would expect from newbtown.
A lot of it is gut as I mentioned, but I don't see him being scum.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
1) From my experience, Newbs tend to hold back as scum (a bit like how Clemency has played in this game) and would be scared to pull the trigger.In post 1128, Thor665 wrote:
1. I tend to find Newbie scum to be more brazen on average, not less. Where do you draw your conclusion from? There's a reason my #1 bit of newbie scum advice is 'don't push lynches'. It's because Newbie scum always think they need to.In post 1126, Luca Blight wrote:1) His hammer on assemble - I don't see scum doing this here regardless of experience. A newb in their first scumgame is even less likely however, because they will likely be extra cautious, in my opinion.
5) The way his reads change again isn't dependent on experience - it just comes across as genuine as opposed to calculated.
The other three points were made with his experience in mind, but why not? He is/was a noob, and his explanation regarding his mindset such as in 460 is pretty accurate to what I would expect from newbtown.
A lot of it is gut as I mentioned, but I don't see him being scum.
5. I agree it's not based on experience, but I laugh at the idea it looks genuine. You're spitting on me and telling me it's raining. He changes his reads every thirty seconds on random whims - yet is always pushing a top wagon, and everyone he has leapt on has flipped town.
I agree that you successfully argued that he is a newb.
I agree that a lot of it is gut and unsupported - yet when I suggest it's unsupported your opening comment to me is "This isn't entirely true"
You know how else you can say that? "This isn't entirely false."
Which means you know I had a point in how empty your case was, but don't want to actually address the empty elephant in the room.
I have theories for why that is - but I want to lynch UCV first because I'm much more confident there.
5) Look at UVC's town meta and tell me he doesn't do the same.
I townread UVC, you want him lynched - therefore the onus is on you to convince me he is scum, not the other way around.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
I already said why - I don't see scum bussing in the situation I mentioned earlier.In post 1122, Thor665 wrote:
Okay - why do you rule out NSG and Voyager as scumbuddies?In post 1121, Luca Blight wrote:As for everyone else, that's something they have to judge for themselves. I believe Toto is Town so it's up to him if he believes me or you.
I find it fairly suspect you'll cite Voyager, then soft town read him, cite NSG but want to lynch me first, and the only apparent logic is partner pairings, but your pairings feel strategic rather than deductive.
It is deductive - if I believe my townread on UCV and Toto is town because of the BlackVoid replace out, from my position you and NSG must be scum.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
The fact Thor has come in and targeted UVC (who he probably thought would be lynchbait in LYLO) over NSG ties in well with my theory that they are indeed the scum-pairing.
Also note how NSG hasn't explained why she is treating UCV as Town today despite my asking twice. I'm pretty sure the only reason she took that position is because I had already - she hadn't mentioned a townread on UVC previously.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
As for this one, the way Deimos played shouted Town to me. When I was reading I was actually disappointed I replaced into this slot as it would have been a clear townread for me.In post 1133, Toto wrote:+ One thing you could try is try to convince others why whoever you replaced was town (same as I did).
If anyone wants to argue reasons why Deimos looked scummy then go ahead.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Possibly, but it looks very dubious when you suddenly say this:
With no reasoning behind it, nor any prior townread of that slot, just after I myself had stated my townread on UCVIn post 1057, northsidegal wrote:preliminary thoughts:i will probably be treating ucv as town for today when choosing a lynch.i think it's unfortunate that lucca was the nightkill, from what i know about his playstyle and from what he said it seemed like he had a lot prepared to say today.
As I said, it feels like you were just parroting what I said and it doesn't seem genuine.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Can you explain what you mean by this?
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Case on Clemency
I really dislike this post - it doesn't do anything to progress the game at this point, and his point about scum being more likely to come from people who haven't been pushed makes literally no sense - why would scum be less likely to be pushed than Town?In post 77, Clemency wrote:Alright, 12 minutes to shitpost while I should be working on my English thing in class.
Honestly, I'm liking both Deimos and Cheeky so far. I feel like scum is more likely to come from the people who haven't been heavily pushed yet, I'm excited to actually try playing proactive town this game.
Plotinus has that very comfortable trustworthy town vibe, and that always puts me in a bit of paranoia.
UNVOTE:
The fact he said he excited to 'try playing proactive town' pings me as well; why mention 'town' here? Why not just say 'play proactively?' It reads fake to me.
He makes the point against Assemble that he's playing defensively and not trying to catch scum, but isn't this a natural thing to do when you are being heavily suspected yourself? And it's not as if Clemency is doing a whole lot to find scum himself at this point - he's not voting anyone, and hasn't applied any sort of pressure on anyone up until this post, which itself is a complete overreaction to the 'tone' of Assemble's post, in my opinion.In post 119, Clemency wrote:
I don't like this tone. Don't like it, don't like it, not one bit.In post 114, Assemblerotws wrote:Rolling my eyes right now.
Perhaps a bit hypocritical coming from me, but this makes me feel like you're playing the game as someone trying to defend themselves entirely rather than somebody who wants to catch the scum and win the game. Sure, there can be town motivation in clearing your own slot as town, to help with the process of elimination, but being that condescending clears that thought from my mind. Give us your reads, if you have any.
He makes so many vague posts like this. He says he's keeping his focus on the Zemaj slot, but how exactly is he doing so? He's not doing anything to pressure said slot.In post 121, Clemency wrote:Also, I'll be keeping my focus on Zemaj's slot, something seemed off about it to me, but I can't fully place my finger on it yet.
Yes, he is sitting on the sidelines - again, he's not putting any pressure on Assemble or following up on his suspicion, nor is he doing so on the slot he was supposed to be focusing on (Zemaj). He is literally doing nothing but sitting back and watching Town bury itself.In post 266, Clemency wrote:I'm not sitting on the sidelines, the wagon I want to be on is L-1.
Into D2, and once again he goes for the easy wagon while sheeping the reasons of others. Again, he is doing nothing to show any sort of town motivation at this point.In post 349, Clemency wrote:Well, here I was trying to build up the energy to post, and you two covered all my bases for me.
VOTE: Voyager
Given Clemency is still voting UCV here, what is the purpose of this post? Obviously not to act as a defence. It's like a disclaimer for after UCV flips so he can say 'well I did consider he might be town'.In post 403, Clemency wrote:While I don't know if I like the idea of Voyager in LyLo(no offense), I feel like I should play a bit of devil's advocate here, so scum doesn't get another free mislynch.
While it may seem scummy, the defense that he simply didn't know he had to claim can't be discredited. Considering how new his account is, I'd assume it's his first game here.
We all had our eyes on Assemble(Well, most of us) and I was about ready to claim intent myself.
I wouldn't blame anyone for hammering Assemble, due to how he was playing so apathetically, like he was just bored scum that got caught early. The 'online but not posting' thing especially got to me.
Perhaps this was due to a lack of motivation, or other matters, but he was the best option at a time.
I don't necessarily think Voyager is innocent, but I want to create a counter-argument so if he's scum, he's taken down by facts rather than gut.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Another horrible post. Clemency says he wants to make sure UCV has an argument to defend himself, but if Clemency can't defend him well enough he'll vote him? Wtf is this mindset?In post 407, Clemency wrote:I think they're reasonable considering my silence the past few days.
I never said you didn't use facts. I just want to make sure that he gets an argument to defend himself, and if I can't defend him well enough to compete, I'll vote on him.
I'm convinced there was scum in the Assemble wagon.
And he's convinced there's scum on the Assemble wagon? That's convenient given Clemency wasn't there (eve though he said he wanted to be). He thought Assemble was scum, so why wouldn't it be reasonable for other townies not to think so also?
This came just after the fake hammer on UCV - as my predecessor pointed out, how did he know it was a bad decision? Especially as Clemency was not only scunmreading UCV but also voting him himself.In post 415, Clemency wrote:-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
In post 1144, northsidegal wrote:
i have my own reasons and i didn't really feel the need to give a long explanation, especially given that i was just giving preliminary thoughts. unless you're suggesting that i'm partners with ucv,In post 1142, Luca Blight wrote:Possibly, but it looks very dubious when you suddenly say this:
With no reasoning behind it, nor any prior townread of that slot, just after I myself had stated my townread on UCVIn post 1057, northsidegal wrote:preliminary thoughts:i will probably be treating ucv as town for today when choosing a lynch.i think it's unfortunate that lucca was the nightkill, from what i know about his playstyle and from what he said it seemed like he had a lot prepared to say today.
As I said, it feels like you were just parroting what I said and it doesn't seem genuine.what exactly do i gain as scum by sheeping someone else's conftown read?like, if you're not going somewhere with this point then is there a reason you keep bringing it up, besides perhaps to subtly cast my slot in an untrustworthy light?
back to working on my case, then.Bolded- UCV would no longer be considered an easy lynch target by yourself, and by treating him as town you could gain his trust.
And you don't feel the need to explain why you're treating someone as Town in LYLO? Seriously?
The reason I keep bringing it up is because it seems like a fabrication; not genuine. I believe you copied my stance on UVC in an attempt to curry favour with him.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
I wasn't talking about you - I was asking how her view on UCV comes from someone who is paranoid and lacks assurance? She is willing to treat him as town for no apparent reason.In post 1156, Thor665 wrote:
Her position on me without locking is pseudo partners does.In post 1153, Luca Blight wrote:How does NSG's position on UCV indicate 'lack of assurance' and 'paranoia'?
Because the only way I'm scum is if you or UCV (who you claim she both town reads) are my partners.
She doesn't have a pretty little bow case though, does she?
Hence - paranoia. She's attacking me because she's spooked.
You're the one putting words in my mouth - I didn't say you 'cleared' her, I was stating the fact you sucmread me for 'bold-claims' but lean more town on NSG despite making the same bold claims.In post 1156, Thor665 wrote:
As long as we ignore that random clear becoming a scum team, and that she hasn't doubled down on it or dodged my question about the logic being used to clear people - yeah, what you and she did is identical.In post 1154, Luca Blight wrote:The only 'bold claim' I have made is my townread of UCV, so why is Thor ignoring that NSG has done the exact same thing (minus the reasoning?)
This also ignores that I'm still listing her as a scumspect in order to straw man the attack on me for "clearing" her.
Any other words to put in my mouth?
I also note you ducked providing the examples I asked for, or justifying why me/Clemency makes sense.
Underlined- I'm gonna copy your argument strategy and turn the question around on you. How about you show me examples of scum hammering like UCV did in this game?
You and Clemency make sense from POE as I said, but I believe there is also in-thread evidence (limited possibly due to Plot's illness) that I will get to shortly.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Err yes, she clearly is in 1141.In post 1159, Thor665 wrote:
By that logic she is claiming that you and I are scumbuddies.In post 1157, Luca Blight wrote:I wasn't talking about you - I was asking how her view on UCV comes from someone who is paranoid and lacks assurance? She is willing to treat him as town for no apparent reason.
Are you thinking she's claiming that?
Again, the onus is onIn post 1159, Thor665 wrote:
Is this an admission that you can't back up your logic?In post 1157, Luca Blight wrote:Underlined- I'm gonna copy your argument strategy and turn the question around on you. How about you show me examples of scum hammering like UCV did in this game?
Because if you say 'yes' then I'll do it.
If you say 'no' then what's the point of doing it?
I'm saying I've never barely ever seen what you're saying you've learned is the common play - so I want to know why you think something I think is illogical.youto convincemeUVC is scum - if you genuinely believe in your read and genuinely believe NSG might be his scum partner then you would do this.
Also, showing evidence of scum hammering as UVC did is a lot more clear cut than showing evidence of scum playing cautiously. I'm sure you can appreciate that?-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
So you bring up that one post Lucca made on my predecessor, but ignore the several he made openly scumreading your slot? He was less suspicious after your replace-in, but stated he still didn't like your slot.
Also note how both Thor and NSG are suspecting each other but leaning scum more on me - classic scumteam tactic of distancing while homing in on a possible compromise mislynch.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Hence the word 'compromise'.In post 1168, Thor665 wrote:
Also ignore the fact I'm blatantly not advocating your lych?In post 1164, Luca Blight wrote:Also note how both Thor and NSG are suspecting each other but leaning scum more on me - classic scumteam tactic of distancing while homing in on a possible compromise mislynch.
What the hell dude - this is utter BS as a claim.
When push comes to shove Toto is going to have to vote somebody, and between the two of you you're trying to make sure I'm ahead of your scum partner when he makes that decision.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Yep, so basically you're parroting me...In post 1165, northsidegal wrote:
there are a few reasons. one is that i think he's been being used by scum as mislynch bait, so that obviously makes me read him as town. another, and this is the main one really - i think i have a good enough idea of ucv's meta (both town and scum) to say that the typical self-conscious style he exibits as scum hasn't been present this game. you can argue about the actions of hammering the jailkeeper to be scummy as many already have, but at the end of it i think it's all best explained as being newbtown rather than scum.In post 1149, Toto wrote:
I was mostly talking about his last post, but you are right you had mostly addressed his case.In post 1146, northsidegal wrote:i did reply - 1124.
If you don't mind, please reply to why you thought we should treat UCV as town at the start of the day. You can do this after you post your case post if you want.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Why not?
As UCV isn't being lynched without you doing some work convincing, the onus most definitely is on you.In post 1166, Thor665 wrote:
The onus is on you to back up a claim you made.In post 1161, Luca Blight wrote:Again, the onus is onyouto convincemeUVC is scum - if you genuinely believe in your read and genuinely believe NSG might be his scum partner then you would do this.
I made a pretty direct and straightforward offer about providing exactly what you're asking for, all you need to do is agree or back up an argument I'm not seeing.
If UCV is about to be lynched and I don't believe he should be,thenthe onus would be on me.
No, even though it's common, if it also open to interpretation, whereas your evidence of scum hammering as UCV did in this game isn't - it would be an undisputed fact.In post 1166, Thor665 wrote:
Not if your argument is that one is super common.In post 1161, Luca Blight wrote:Also, showing evidence of scum hammering as UVC did is a lot more clear cut than showing evidence of scum playing cautiously. I'm sure you can appreciate that?
Which is what you're saying, right? I'm not misrepresenting that, am I?-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
You might not make a case on yourself, but how can you interpret the NK as incriminating me for one general comment lucca made on my slot after the intense scumreading of your slot when it was held by Clemency? You can see your point doesn't hold water.In post 1170, northsidegal wrote:
where did lucca say that he still didn't like my slot? he said that the actions of clemency were still scummy but that he liked my case, that i had excellent points and overall "a town entrance". also, i know that i'm town - obviously i'm not making a scumcase on myself.In post 1164, Luca Blight wrote:So you bring up that one post Lucca made on my predecessor, but ignore the several he made openly scumreading your slot? He was less suspicious after your replace-in, but stated he still didn't like your slot.
Also note how both Thor and NSG are suspecting each other but leaning scum more on me - classic scumteam tactic of distancing while homing in on a possible compromise mislynch.
funny you should mention that - seems to me like you and thor are doing the same thing! interesting that you bring it up, was it on your mind perhaps? also, where in my post did you get that i'm leaning scum more on you than on thor?
And you implied you're leaning scum on me more than Thor here:
In post 1163, northsidegal wrote:but given the lack of talking yesterday he never really got a chance to say anything further. Thor is trying to paint this kill as nonsensical, but I think it makes total sense from the perspective of,if not a Thor/Luca scumteam, at least Luca as scum.Lucca does a lot of gamesolving late game - him being dead is a major blow to town and a major benefit to scum.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Scumslip?In post 1200, northsidegal wrote:describe this plan to me, exactly?they each vote eachotherand the lack of a quickhammer confirms them as scum toeachother?
what do we gain out of this, exactly? and is what we gained worth risking the chance of a quickhammer? i think i would rather just vote a collectively agreed upon scumread.
NSG knows already that Thor will choose to 1v1 me instead of her as they are scum buddies.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013