Open 645: C9++ - Game Over

Zachstralkita · Post Post #16 (isolation #0) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:28 am

HEY HEY HEY WHAT'S GOIN ON HERE FRIENDS WE HAVE TO CATCH US SOME ROOTIN TOOTIN MAFIA SCUM NO QUICKHAMMERS ALLOWED SO I SUGGEST YOU......STOP THAT

Zachstralkita · Post Post #18 (isolation #1) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:29 am

VOTE: Riddleton

Zachstralkita · Post Post #21 (isolation #2) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:39 am

Riddleton didn't even give a RANDOM REASON so it makes me think he's the one we should be RANDOM KILLING

Zachstralkita · Post Post #24 (isolation #3) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:43 am

In post 23, Kappy wrote:Scum, please vote Zach so we know who you are.

SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH U CANT TELL THEM NOW THEY KNOW

also that was the worst post ever but its not because you were joking

)))) right friend

):00))

Zachstralkita · Post Post #25 (isolation #4) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:44 am

Ümläüt LIVES. WE MUST PROTECT THE DOTS ABOVE HIS NAME. ANYONE WHO VIOLATES THIS RULE IS SUBJECT TO BEFALLING THE ENTIRE TOWN WITH DEATH.

AND YOURSELF

Zachstralkita · Post Post #28 (isolation #5) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:49 am

In post 27, Bins wrote:zach pls take a moment and stop channeling yourself

sorry i woke up about 40 minutes ago and need to utilize my daily happiness before my mind realizes who i actually am

Zachstralkita · Post Post #30 (isolation #6) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:08 am

@mod, my riddleton vote doesn't show up on vc?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #32 (isolation #7) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:11 am

it's there now but before it w-

no nothing unusual no conspiracy is involved

Zachstralkita · Post Post #34 (isolation #8) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:50 am

Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita

Haha that's cute but what's going to be noted by me is that you're reverse psychologing it with your vote on me and could be actual scum

Also I would like to request protection from any mystical forces that will aid this town at night

Thank you

Zachstralkita · Post Post #46 (isolation #9) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:34 am

Dunn lay off the ket I'm innocent child

a plain farmer wrote:In my last 3 games, my first vote hit scum. Depending on your position on the Gambler's Fallacy, you may wish to vote Riddleton.

I think Riddler's a good lynch anyway.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #47 (isolation #10) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:34 am

whyd i call him riddler LMFAOOOOO

Zachstralkita · Post Post #51 (isolation #11) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:51 am

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 25, Zachstralkita wrote:Ümläüt LIVES. WE MUST PROTECT THE DOTS ABOVE HIS NAME. ANYONE WHO VIOLATES THIS RULE IS SUBJECT TO BEFALLING THE ENTIRE TOWN WITH DEATH.

AND YOURSELF
don't be useless this game, thanks.

I'm being plenty useful, fuck off kindly.

Dunnstral wrote:Zach, you follow my vote too, I need you and Bins to follow my vote when I switch off of you. Deal?

no

who are you voting for...............................

Zachstralkita · Post Post #53 (isolation #12) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:52 am

In post 52, Dunnstral wrote:I'm not saying who I'm voting for until you and bins agree to follow.

then u can obviously see why that's ridiculous

Zachstralkita · Post Post #56 (isolation #13) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:57 am

In post 52, Dunnstral wrote:I'm not saying who I'm voting for until you and bins agree to follow.

this has to be the worst line ever

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 51, Zachstralkita wrote:
LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 25, Zachstralkita wrote:Ümläüt LIVES. WE MUST PROTECT THE DOTS ABOVE HIS NAME. ANYONE WHO VIOLATES THIS RULE IS SUBJECT TO BEFALLING THE ENTIRE TOWN WITH DEATH.

AND YOURSELF
don't be useless this game, thanks.
I'm being plenty useful, fuck off kindly.
Yeah, so far so good. I did like to see you vote my way.

ya ok

Zachstralkita · Post Post #59 (isolation #14) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 12:03 pm

In post 57, Dunnstral wrote:So I can take it you won't be following my vote...?

Then I'm not gonna make one

Okay, you're stealing my style because I'm supposed to be the unhelpful one.

But whatever.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #61 (isolation #15) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 12:06 pm

In post 60, Dunnstral wrote:Oops my bad

VOTE: LicketyQuickety

@zach look I made a vote, now follow?

It's page 3 but I'm sure you have a decent form of reasoning for me to sheep you

Zachstralkita · Post Post #67 (isolation #16) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 12:15 pm

In post 62, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 11, LicketyQuickety wrote:WTF is this guy doing at L-2 already?

In post 48, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 25, Zachstralkita wrote:Ümläüt LIVES. WE MUST PROTECT THE DOTS ABOVE HIS NAME. ANYONE WHO VIOLATES THIS RULE IS SUBJECT TO BEFALLING THE ENTIRE TOWN WITH DEATH.

AND YOURSELF
don't be useless this game, thanks.

In post 55, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 51, Zachstralkita wrote:
LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 25, Zachstralkita wrote:Ümläüt LIVES. WE MUST PROTECT THE DOTS ABOVE HIS NAME. ANYONE WHO VIOLATES THIS RULE IS SUBJECT TO BEFALLING THE ENTIRE TOWN WITH DEATH.

AND YOURSELF
don't be useless this game, thanks.
I'm being plenty useful, fuck off kindly.
Yeah, so far so good. I did like to see you vote my way.

In post 58, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 57, Dunnstral wrote:So I can take it you won't be following my vote...?

Then I'm not gonna make one
Fine leave your vote on the IC. Beautiful play, bravo.

There's my reasoning

You omitted the part where he voted the guy I want to kill

LicketyQuickety wrote:Someone else get in here. I don't much like playing 3rd wheel.

P-Edit: I hope that makes sense to IC or we are in big trouble.

I guess we're fucked then.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #71 (isolation #17) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 12:27 pm

In post 70, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 67, Zachstralkita wrote:You omitted the part where he voted the guy I want to kill
???

That was like a post 5 rvs

How is his ISO conclusive to a vote? Yours might as well be a RVS.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #74 (isolation #18) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 12:48 pm

In post 73, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 71, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 70, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 67, Zachstralkita wrote:You omitted the part where he voted the guy I want to kill
???

That was like a post 5 rvs
How is his ISO conclusive to a vote? Yours might as well be a RVS.

LOOK DOJA I'LL HIT MY FOOTSOLDIERS AND PASS EM EACH A RATCHET AND THEY CLICK AND POOF... MAGIC BEFORE U EVEN GET TO SHOOT SO FUCK IF YOU KEEP A MAGGIE CAUSE WHAT'S THE USE OF HAVING HEAT TO BLAST AND YOU CAN'T REACH AND GRAB IT

Zachstralkita · Post Post #86 (isolation #19) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:12 pm

Transcend wrote:I think the strals are sock puppets and will play against their win con.

VOTE: Dunn

I haven't read this game and will when i get home.

R u dumb

Zachstralkita · Post Post #87 (isolation #20) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:13 pm

Can we... get Riddleton here guys? Get him as in.. on the noose. On his throat.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #90 (isolation #21) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:17 pm

In post 88, Dunnstral wrote:Zach stop leading mislynches and vote for transcend already

I'm not leading shit no one listens to me

Anyway Transcend's first post was hilarious and awful but you're cheating yourself if you think it's that easy for him to be scum

Zachstralkita · Post Post #91 (isolation #22) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:19 pm

Not his first post. His second post.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #93 (isolation #23) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:24 pm

You guys are finna ML Dunnstral he acts like this all the time trust me

Zachstralkita · Post Post #96 (isolation #24) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:28 pm

In post 94, Bins wrote:Just out of curiosity what does scum Dunn act like Zach

His playstyles are similar on both but on scum he doesn't do things that will obviously make people want to fucking kill him

of course i'm not a god at reading people so.....you can lynch him w/e

Smithereens wrote:are zach and Dunn a gay couple Irl?

how original

Zachstralkita · Post Post #98 (isolation #25) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:32 pm

In post 97, Smithereens wrote:no really lol I'm no homophobe :3 genuinely curious~

he's my attorney at law if you must know

Zachstralkita · Post Post #99 (isolation #26) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:32 pm

although he didnt do a good job thats why im playing this game from a norwegian prison

Zachstralkita · Post Post #128 (isolation #27) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:13 pm

I think I caught a little of that jokey jokey

In post 113, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 106, Bins wrote:
In post 96, Zachstralkita wrote:he doesn't do things that will obviously make people want to fucking kill him
does he actively try to make people want to kill him as town cause i seem to always be getting that impression lmfao
He wouldn't be able to catch me if I was mafia so you're barking up the wrong tree

Your arrogance astounds me, u dont say that on epicmafia tho LMFAOOO

Zachstralkita · Post Post #129 (isolation #28) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:13 pm

jokey joke*

Zachstralkita · Post Post #133 (isolation #29) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:24 pm

Dunnstral wrote:I mean neither does zach but we won't talk about that right now

You're getting a bit ahead of yourself

Zachstralkita · Post Post #135 (isolation #30) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:30 pm

In post 134, Dunnstral wrote:Zach you are interfering with my scumhunting.

I'm not interfering with anything I think you should say that to the 4 people voting you.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #137 (isolation #31) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:40 pm

You don't NEED anything from me actually, I just don't think Transcend's actions warrant his lynch at the moment

He's a big boy I'm sure he knows himself how he would look entering the game the way he did

Zachstralkita · Post Post #140 (isolation #32) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:45 pm

In post 139, Bins wrote: not everything has to do with you dunn

Zachstralkita · Post Post #150 (isolation #33) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:31 pm

In post 143, Bins wrote:

and basically my read on you cant be explained for *reasons not allowed by mafiascum* but i feel i've gone through this all before so i'm just going to wait a bit before i solidify anything because i'm learning you really are just like
this
(this thing that makes people scumread you) right from the get go

Nah you know what you should vote him take them RISKS

Zachstralkita · Post Post #152 (isolation #34) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:35 pm

nah i just liked to be an instigator

Zachstralkita · Post Post #153 (isolation #35) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:36 pm

I'm not a fan of the Transcend push, the Dunnstral push is KINDA better though that's not to say I scumread him

Zachstralkita · Post Post #162 (isolation #36) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:01 pm

Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Kappy

Zach come vote Kappy Riddle isn't gonna happen

LMFAO how opportunistic can u be

Zachstralkita · Post Post #230 (isolation #37) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:16 am

Transcend wrote:
In post 215, Smithereens wrote:
In post 213, Loopdan wrote:Too much RL stuff going on. I'm having a hard time keeping up with the quantity of posts and haven't really found a point of entry into this game.

Mod- please replace me out.
*Fist bumps transcend*

We totally did this.
we may have, then again, maybe not.

Smithereens Jun 16, 07:59am Jun 17, 05:05am 0 days 0 hours 22
Transcend Jun 16, 05:43pm Jun 17, 04:47am 0 days 0 hours 25

us.

Dunnstral Jun 16, 12:40pm Jun 17, 02:48am 0 days 2 hours 50
Bins Jun 16, 10:35am Jun 16, 10:07pm 0 days 6 hours 26
Zachstralkita Jun 16, 10:28am Jun 16, 10:01pm 0 days 7 hours 37

them.

Bins wrote:do you ever catch up when you just woke up and then forget everything u read

me rn

me too

Gonna ignore Smithereens being a...oops.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #233 (isolation #38) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:34 am

I can SEE the Kappy vote happening but I'm not sure I particularly like that one or the LQ vote

Zachstralkita · Post Post #236 (isolation #39) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 am

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 207, Transcend wrote:
In post 11, LicketyQuickety wrote:WTF is this guy doing at L-2 already?

oh hey this is a bad post and his lynch has momentum

VOTE: LQ
What makes it a bad post? You think getting someone at L-2 on page 1 is a good idea? Explain.

I think the meaning behind that one was your reaction was fabricated and unnecessary

Which it looked like it but I don't think it was...

Zachstralkita · Post Post #242 (isolation #40) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:42 am

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 236, Zachstralkita wrote:
LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 207, Transcend wrote:
In post 11, LicketyQuickety wrote:WTF is this guy doing at L-2 already?

oh hey this is a bad post and his lynch has momentum

VOTE: LQ
What makes it a bad post? You think getting someone at L-2 on page 1 is a good idea? Explain.
I think the meaning behind that one was your reaction was fabricated and unnecessary

Which it looked like it but I don't think it was...
Why are you answering for other people? What does that accomplish? I am trying to scum hunt and you are getting in the way of that.

You actually intended to catch scum off of a response to

that

post? It's too easy to make up a response to.

Carry on, though.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #245 (isolation #41) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:48 am

In post 244, Transcend wrote:
Dunn/Zach let's get Kappy

Riddleton's going to kill us all

I will consider it.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #256 (isolation #42) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:00 am

In post 250, Smithereens wrote:
In post 224, Bins wrote:
In post 174, Smithereens wrote:
In post 139, Bins wrote:you could say "notice how bins isn't considering anyone but kappy as mafia" which would be more valid

but that's just how i play the first few pages of any game i play,
i tunnel someone because i find it gets a lot of reactions from people

not everything has to do with you dunn
I believe the bolded is post-rationalised BS. Can you substantiate the claim that you tunneled with the intention of gaining reactions from others?
In this game? I think I've made it pretty obvious I've been trying to get at least some reaction by acting weird. But Dunn was the only person to pick up on it.

In other games? No, cause I just started this new thing. It's been quite a while since I last played and I'm trying to redefine my playstyle.

"I think I've made it pretty obvious I've been trying to get at least some reaction by acting weird."
ehh... I'm not doing this for the sake of argument, but I really don't think you're telling the truth here. This is not normal behaviour and people just don't do this. When you say it after you do the behaviour, it sounds more like 'Oh shit, how do I explain that behaviour? I know, I'll make it sound deliberate and intentional.' The theory is that there are behaviours that you feel 'guilty' about and thus you're justifying them even when they don't really mean anything to anyone but yourself. Guilty conscience is generally indicative of similar mindset, so there is reason here to believe you post-rationalising your own behaviour is a scum tell.

the next freud

Zachstralkita · Post Post #264 (isolation #43) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:07 am

In post 263, Kappy wrote:Why does no one like me? I'm just a townie trying to get some love, but everyone hates me!

My vote isn't on you so I think I'm the closest thing you have pal

Zachstralkita · Post Post #289 (isolation #44) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:10 am

VOTE: Kappy

Zachstralkita · Post Post #296 (isolation #45) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:58 am

a plain farmer wrote:Zach is conftown though.

Yeah Ranger placing Dunnstrall on the same tier as me is marginally disrupting these frequencies

Zachstralkita · Post Post #298 (isolation #46) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:05 am

davesaz wrote:
In post 293, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 292, davesaz wrote:
In post 290, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 277, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why would Dunn panic so easily?
Let the record show dave never answered this.
Let the record show that I didn't notice it.
Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. Also note the "and others".
Why didn't you notice it? Sometimes who does what? "and others" I was asking you not others.
1. Because it came in while I was posting a reply to an earlier post. I hit preview to verify the tags on what I wrote but didn't notice another new post had come in. After that point it was no longer new, so when I hit the "new posts" icon for the thread it positioned at a later point. Before you get snippy about this, I never lie about RL things like the mechanics of how I read threads and post.

2. Sometimes the target panics, sometimes they don't.

3. I previously said that I want to see what the target does, and what others do. It's interesting to see who ignores it, who agrees with it, and who overreacts. (that would be you btw)

4. Why are you taking such an interest in an exchange that doesn't affect you? (I think I know the answer and I'm not scumreading you atm, but still interested in what you actually say)

Pedit @farmer: Yeah, once in a while there is an exception to the "Ranger's reads are relative" rule.

Pedit2: And slip ups like that can be a scumtell for Ranger, if indeed it is a slip. She makes a point of doing the read list thing as either alignment. Caution though, I hard scumread her for unnaturally strong town reads in a previous game and she turned up town... gonna want a reason for them being in the same tier, and a good one.

Nope Ranger just basically called Dunn 100% town.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #301 (isolation #47) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:15 am

In post 300, Dunnstral wrote:
I'm finally getting the RESPECT I DESERVE bud so why don't you back off and enjoy your vote on Kappy (who left)

LARGE CLIPS ENTER RIDES CARS FLIP, INJURE GUYS I BEAM HIS WHOLE TEAM UP STARSHIP ENTERPRISE

In post 300, Dunnstral wrote:
and enjoy your vote on Kappy (who left)

I smell blood in the water...

Wolf blood.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #365 (isolation #48) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:21 pm

nah he's trolling

anyway RIDDLE OR KAPPY best BETS

Zachstralkita · Post Post #374 (isolation #49) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:35 pm

Ranger wrote:(There's a reason 372 is a scumclaim. Free town points to the player who can figure out why!)

My mind was left utterly in shambles after reading that.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #406 (isolation #50) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 5:08 am

In post 376, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 370, Ranger wrote:{Dunnstral, Zachstral, Smithereens, Transcend}

Woah you can't put them in the same tier as Zach........

This is really all I had to say on the matter.

Also I know you guys are smart with your book learning and everything but I'm convinced this LQ push is a bad idea..

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 385, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 384, Dunnstral wrote:I couldn't care less. Bins is town and your case here is bad
OK, I'll try something different.

Why is bins Town?
Because I said so basically

I tend to find town a lot faster than mafia, and I'm always more confident in my townreads than my scumreads

Also I don't really care about Riddle that much right now.... I think even Zach got tired of that one

how useful... and ftr NO I AM NOT TIRED OF THAT ONE I HAGVENT EVEN BEGUN TO FUCKING DROWSY

Zachstralkita · Post Post #407 (isolation #51) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 5:15 am

You guys have a lot of faith in Ranger's FBI profiling crystal 8-ball of reads........... a bit too much faith... and it's going to be your downfall

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 385, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 384, Dunnstral wrote:I couldn't care less. Bins is town and your case here is bad
OK, I'll try something different.

Why is bins Town?
Because I said so basically

treating a gut TR like it actually holds water is such a waste of your time

i mean im pretty sure bins is town too but why don't you tone it down a bit

Zachstralkita · Post Post #414 (isolation #52) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:49 am

In post 413, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 400, Bins wrote:VOTE: LQ

because if moonlogic is normal for scum LQ, all my doubt is gone

UNVOTE: LQ

ya thats what I thought now why dont you not vote town

Zachstralkita · Post Post #417 (isolation #53) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:17 am

a plain farmer wrote:
In post 372, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 367, Ranger wrote:
And if you're going to insist Lickety then I'm going to insist you give something more than 'gut feeling.'
Okay. I have an N0 guilty on LicketyQuickety. There ya go. More than gut.
OK I feel stupid for having to state this (and more stupid for you saying it), but there is no N0 in C9++. And I just can't take this seriously because most the time N0 give a VT result and Cop wouldn't out themselves Day 1 and there is not even a guaranteed Cop in the game. The only scenario I can see a reason for a cop to come out day 1 is because they were a 1-shot. But again, I have never seen a game where a 1-shot Cop gets an investigative result N0. I can honestly say this is one of the more bizarre claims I have seen (barring some of the ones I have made tho).

IF YOU ARE COP, DO NOT COUNTER CLAIM THIS!!!
Lickety, man, I was townreading you . Why, if you're town, did the most obvious rebuttal not involve anything to the effect of "How could she get a guilty on me when I'm town?" I'm trying my best to treat this with a grain of salt, but as far as scumslips go, this is quite a biggie.

I wouldn't consider it a scumslip

Zachstralkita · Post Post #420 (isolation #54) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:21 am

In post 419, a plain farmer wrote:If Lickety had just stopped after his first sentence, I wouldn't either. But then he goes on to wonder if 1-shot cops get N0s or just full cops, and says "I can honestly say this is one of the more bizarre claims I have seen" which seems to indicate he at least gave some bit of credibility to the notion that Ranger was making an actual claim.

yea thats actually a pretty bad fucking post im not even gonna try to save him from that one

Zachstralkita · Post Post #421 (isolation #55) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:23 am

So if it's " quite a biggie " as far as scumslips go, why are you blowing air on the topic but not casting a vote on him?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #424 (isolation #56) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:29 am

In post 422, a plain farmer wrote:Because it's still just a scumslip.

A scumslip usually denotes scum.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #425 (isolation #57) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:32 am

VOTE: a plain farmer

It makes me giddy how involved you've managed to be in the game without actually being involved.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #428 (isolation #58) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:43 am

I've found scum so if everyone can just shift their votes over to a plain farmer, that'd be nice.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #431 (isolation #59) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 10:51 am

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 428, Zachstralkita wrote:I've found scum so if everyone can just shift their votes over to a plain farmer, that'd be nice.
VOTE: Kappy

that's nice and all but i found a scum actually playing their slot

Zachstralkita · Post Post #435 (isolation #60) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:07 pm

Smithereens wrote:
In post 428, Zachstralkita wrote:I've found scum so if everyone can just shift their votes over to a plain farmer, that'd be nice.
What's so scum about that? Believing that scum slips can be done by townies is actually a valid hypothesis.

That's not why he's scum.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #437 (isolation #61) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:17 pm

In post 436, Smithereens wrote:
In post 435, Zachstralkita wrote: That's not why he's scum.
alright, so what did you see as scummy?

His posts are very POSTY, but they're not filled with content. At all.

It's a lot of noise. and that's MY JOB

trust me on this one.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #459 (isolation #62) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 1:03 pm

In post 458, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuick

Zachstralkita · Post Post #464 (isolation #63) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 1:35 pm

hello texcat and Iraon

also DUNN you need to get on this plain farmer wagon pal

" Zachalstrika "

Zachstralkita · Post Post #467 (isolation #64) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 1:59 pm

In post 466, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Iraonavp

ihu

Zachstralkita · Post Post #469 (isolation #65) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:08 pm

In post 468, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 467, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 466, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Iraonavp
ihu
Hint: that's the kappy slot

Vote with me for once?

i know that's the FUCKING KAPPY SLOT but farmer is scum.................................................................

hey iraon

how do you feel about being scum?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #474 (isolation #66) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:23 pm

In post 473, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 470, iraonavp wrote:Dunnstral, why are you voting me? I haven't even finished reading the thread, and I'm
town-aligned.

Pedit: I cannot answer that question because I am
town-aligned.
Here we go

LMFAOO

iraonavp wrote:Dunnstral, why are you voting me? I haven't even finished reading the thread, and I'm town-aligned.

Pedit: I cannot answer that question because I am town-aligned.

Hey friend I'm sure you've been scum before in at least one game. I'm sure a part of it has integrated into your aura.

Your rigidness on answering that question makes the likelyhood of Kappyslot being scum go up at least 34%

Zachstralkita · Post Post #476 (isolation #67) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:39 pm

I can use numbers however the fuck I want. And he's one of the few people calling you town so I'd like him if I were you LMAO

Zachstralkita · Post Post #480 (isolation #68) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:44 pm

In post 477, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 476, Zachstralkita wrote:I can use numbers however the fuck I want. And he's one of the few people calling you town so I'd like him if I were you LMAO
That's not how it works unless Bins is townreading me

What did you just say

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 476, Zachstralkita wrote:I can use numbers however the fuck I want. And he's one of the few people calling you town so I'd like him if I were you LMAO
I say it for your benefit. If this was a real game, someone who does use numbers would tear you to shreds for throwing out numbers like that.

Okay so since it's not a real game how about you cut down on the amount of fucks you're letting go so freely

Zachstralkita · Post Post #483 (isolation #69) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:49 pm

In post 481, iraonavp wrote:
In post 315, Bins wrote:Other people have said the reasons.

It's mainly just vibe.
At least I don't go and pick apart evidence trying to find something that isn't there.
A lot of your posts have bugged me. Most of which people have pointed out all ready.
I find it funny that you're pissy at me but Ranger has voted you without reason as well.

I say why I initially vote Kappy. And I further say his next few posts bug me because they feel fake and forced. That's pretty much it cause that's all he's done (I also say I don't like his Dunnstral vote).
This is a
scum-aligned
way of looking at things.

Dunnstral, why do you think Ranger is
town-aligned
?

I'm so tickled

Zachstralkita · Post Post #487 (isolation #70) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:56 pm

Dunn why is he redirecting his energies if he's scum

Zachstralkita · Post Post #497 (isolation #71) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:10 pm

LMAO I like how Bins pops in just in time to defend herself

a plain farmer wrote:ey Bins:
In post 461, a plain farmer wrote:@Bins: Did you learn anything from your Kappy tunneling?

In post 490, iraonavp wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral

I think you and Bins are scum-aligned together, I don't trust your defense.
Don't scum normally try to avoid overtly defending each other? What makes it scummy in this case?

You think I will let you escape with your life.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #498 (isolation #72) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:11 pm

see my one vote may not be much now but it will blossom into more and i will end you @a plain farmer

Zachstralkita · Post Post #508 (isolation #73) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:19 pm

In post 499, a plain farmer wrote:With great power comes great responsibility, Zach. You've been given a great power. You're not being very responsible.

It's not so much as a power as a heavy inconvenience to those who would seek to destroy me.

Anyways, to get to the crux of the matter I'm quite sure you're just fabricating your townie-ness in statements and you're trying to ask questions that would make you seem as if you care for this discussion at all.. when I can see that you don't.

I'm conf so rather than refute me in any capacity you just have to make it seem as if I'm sniffing in the wrong direction

But I am the seeing eye-dog (not the hearing-ear dog) of scumhunting. They call me ZachstralK9kita.

It's okay, I'll slowly wait for you guys to pick up on this as well.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #517 (isolation #74) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:30 pm

In post 509, Dunnstral wrote:

SMH Zach is......... nvm

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 508, Zachstralkita wrote:I'm conf so rather than refute me in any capacity you just have to make it seem as if I'm sniffing in the wrong direction
Don't think you need any help with that

Zachstralkita wrote:But I am the seeing eye-dog (not the hearing-ear dog) of scumhunting. They call me ZachstralK9kita

MY LACK OF HEARING DOES NOT AFFECT SCENT DETECTION

anyways IRAON MY MAN STEPPING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION

Zachstralkita · Post Post #524 (isolation #75) » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:38 pm

In post 518, Transcend wrote:VOTE: a plain farmer

YES SSSS

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 517, Zachstralkita wrote:anyways IRAON MY MAN STEPPING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION
Are you serious?

LicketyQuickety wrote:VOTE: dave
And you, too?

SO WHEN I COME HOME ON THE ONE-WAY....WHEN THAT HAND GO FOR THE PANTS LIKE AL BUNDAY YOU COULD BE MARRIED WITH CHILDREN THAT HOUSE GON SEE WILD GUNPLAY

Zachstralkita · Post Post #568 (isolation #76) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:09 am

In post 562, Bins wrote:How is your avatar bigger than 100x100?!

Most important question in this thread

ALSO IRA town. And I'm not just saying that cause he's voting scum

))

Zachstralkita · Post Post #579 (isolation #77) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:48 pm

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 574, Dunnstral wrote:

Just because Kappy replaced out doesn't mean he was mafia
Why do you even play this game?

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 577, texcat wrote:I'm finally here, but haven't fully caught up yet. Y'all are posting so much I'm not sure I'll ever get caught up. Anything on particular I should pay attention to while I read?
Why even play?

No fun allowed.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #583 (isolation #78) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 1:14 pm

In post 582, Dunnstral wrote:My bad can't quite live up to LQ's high standards of play

Don't worry, it's not a real game.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #585 (isolation #79) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:31 pm

Okay so this game is moving kinda slow like a ... lily pad.. in .. qui c k sand

a plain farmer is trying to act as if these votes on him do not exist and hope they will go away by... ignoring them.

this is not town behavior however.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #589 (isolation #80) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:16 pm

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 586, texcat wrote:Anything on particular I should pay attention to while I read?
Not really if you still haven't read,
you can tune out Zach if you'd like

Dunn stay taking these subliminal shots at ya boy tho........................................... when he's been of relatively little use this game

Zachstralkita · Post Post #593 (isolation #81) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:19 pm

Dunnstral wrote:He's also the VI in case you weren't aware

So to be like you all I have to do is sheep Ranger's reads and lock clear bins? and also toss my vote at not scum?

Dunnstral wrote:OK so I have mixed feelings about both Ira and LQ, not sure I'd want to lynch them

You wanted to lynch both of them without fail about 2 pages ago

I'm actually going to push the case for Dunnscum after we LYNCH FARMER

Zachstralkita · Post Post #595 (isolation #82) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:22 pm

In post 594, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 590, Dunnstral wrote:He's also the VI in case you weren't aware

@MOD,
I'm replacing out of this game.

LMFAO

Zachstralkita · Post Post #600 (isolation #83) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:32 pm

In post 599, Dunnstral wrote:
I'll be nightkilled by then

Also no you're not

Actually Farmer isn't a bad vote right now

I'M IN THE 7 LOOKIN FOR HIM BANDANA ON THE SCOPE, I'LL COOK TIL YOU MELT I GET TO FLAGGIN DOWN WHIPS LIKE IM LOOKING FOR HEL-

Did you say something about a Farmer vote...

Zachstralkita · Post Post #607 (isolation #84) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:48 pm

In post 602, Dunnstral wrote:Much like myself, it was both cute and funny, while being serious

Now you're REALLY being funny

Zachstralkita · Post Post #613 (isolation #85) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:02 pm

In post 608, texcat wrote:Maybe I should try to find a sense of humor. Cause I don't get either one of those posts. If I were going to vote Zach, I'd have at lease given a reason, like his thumb is too close to the CAPLOCK key.

This is a scumslip. I don't know what universe you get your keyboards from, but my thumb is on the other side of my hand relative to the CAPS LOCK key.

a plain farmer wrote:
@mod: I'm voting iraonavp

Hi texcat. You'll come across a part of the game where LQ and Dunn have this back-and-forth that's mostly noise. If you want to see what it looks like without them, copy this into the address bar:

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... &start=200

Why are you preventing texcat from acquiring information? However filler-filled that information may be?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #623 (isolation #86) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:05 pm

I don't like Smithereens's tone at the start of 396, actually.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #628 (isolation #87) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:19 pm

Smithereens wrote:What are your thoughts on my tone Zach?

Nice spontaneous appearance.

In post 396, Smithereens wrote:
In post 373, Ranger wrote:(There's a reason 372 is a scumclaim. Free town points to the player who can figure out why!)
If you have something that nails scum on Day 1, why hold it in?

The implication behind Ranger's post was painfully obvious, and our in-house psychologist here not picking up on that but being able to diagnose aspergers through text is pretty funny.

Nevermind that, the choice of words is also wonky. " Why hold it in?" would imply Ranger is at fault therefore aiding scum. It reads to me like you're trying to force something and seem overtly towny.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #632 (isolation #88) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:31 pm

In post 631, Smithereens wrote:
In post 628, Zachstralkita wrote: The implication behind Ranger's post was painfully obvious, and our in-house psychologist here not picking up on that but being able to diagnose aspergers through text is pretty funny.

Nevermind that, the choice of words is also wonky. " Why hold it in?" would imply Ranger is at fault therefore aiding scum. It reads to me like you're trying to force something and seem overtly towny.
To be fair I've played fewer games here on MS than any other player I'd wager so I'd ideally like my questions to be taken seriously. What's obvious to you isn't obvious to everyone iow.

Ranger appears to know that LQ is scum, however I have strong reasons to suspect the opposite. At that point in the game you might have noticed that Ranger was one of my scum reads, so pointing out that my choice of words seem to imply my belief in her guilt is to be expected no?

On the LQ business, can you sum the case against him? The other players appear to assume he is scum and this includes yourself if I'm not mistaken.

You would be mistaken. I'm advocating heavy for LQ town.

Anyways I'm relatively new to this site so...I'm just bullshitting with you. Or am I.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #634 (isolation #89) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:38 pm

In post 633, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 632, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 631, Smithereens wrote:
In post 628, Zachstralkita wrote: The implication behind Ranger's post was painfully obvious, and our in-house psychologist here not picking up on that but being able to diagnose aspergers through text is pretty funny.

Nevermind that, the choice of words is also wonky. " Why hold it in?" would imply Ranger is at fault therefore aiding scum. It reads to me like you're trying to force something and seem overtly towny.
To be fair I've played fewer games here on MS than any other player I'd wager so I'd ideally like my questions to be taken seriously. What's obvious to you isn't obvious to everyone iow.

Ranger appears to know that LQ is scum, however I have strong reasons to suspect the opposite. At that point in the game you might have noticed that Ranger was one of my scum reads, so pointing out that my choice of words seem to imply my belief in her guilt is to be expected no?

On the LQ business, can you sum the case against him? The other players appear to assume he is scum and this includes yourself if I'm not mistaken.
You would be mistaken. I'm advocating heavy for LQ town.

Anyways I'm relatively new to this site so...I'm just bullshitting with you. Or am I.
there is no need to WIFOM as IC.

I was referring to my aggravated interrogation of his statements. I was trained for this.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #636 (isolation #90) » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:45 pm

In post 635, Smithereens wrote:lol but you ended the convo and I didn't get what I wanted from it?

See, that's just what I'd like you to think.

Oh the whole LQ thing... people think he's scum for his reads and ... some other fuck shit actually you're better off not asking me... I don't parlay into faulty logic it disrupts my processing capacity ty ty ty ty . tty .. ty

Zachstralkita · Post Post #661 (isolation #91) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 5:54 am

davesaz wrote:Which alignment needs to hide what they do? Which alignment can afford to be totally open? I'm being open...

Are you town for tunneling on it, or scum for ignoring the clear signs in the followup conversation?

Except you shouldn't be able to tell because someone can read "open" while still hiding a

lot

.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #665 (isolation #92) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:10 am

In post 664, Ümläüt wrote:Still scumreading Ira as well. His 'reads' come out of thin air and make no sense, yet correlate highly with lynchability. He scumreads Dunn, the easiest target in the game.

This comes apart when you realize he scumreads Bins as well. It seems you're being the opportunistic one here.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #667 (isolation #93) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:18 am

In post 666, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 665, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 664, Ümläüt wrote:Still scumreading Ira as well. His 'reads' come out of thin air and make no sense, yet correlate highly with lynchability. He scumreads Dunn, the easiest target in the game.

This comes apart when you realize he scumreads Bins as well. It seems you're being the opportunistic one here.
this is pre-flip.. which is bad.

My point is Bins does not correlate with lynchability. By any means.

Also Riddleton still very probably scum

Zachstralkita · Post Post #752 (isolation #94) » Tue Jun 21, 2016 5:15 am

iraonavp wrote:Ranger does not believe that any of me, LQ, or Umlaut are scum-aligned.

I am almost certain that Ranger is scum-aligned and trying to get me lynched because I naturally look suspicious. She is using smirking, shrugging off rhetoric to make it seem like she is certain on having caught the scum-aligned team, when she hasn't and she knows it. And look how she is voting me even though claiming a stronger read on LQ. Ranger never explains reads but this is easy to hide behind, that's what she's doing here and it's too easy to trust her, inventing your own reasons when she never had any to start with.

Hmmm... I don't know if I like how that one sentence reads at the beginning. But in the event that Ranger is scum, I'm sure she could convince you all to throw puppies off of highways and stuff and no one would bat an eye.

In post 713, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 708, davesaz wrote:Starting my rereads. Transcend isn't doing anything that I would consider to be information gathering. I get a weak scum read from the overall effect. It feels like wanting to look active but not really knowing how to begin.

Going to +1 this

VOTE: Transcend

Zach don't quote this post

In post 723, Dunnstral wrote:[Bins]
[Ranger, Smithereens]
[davesaz, LicketyQuick]
[Umlaut, texcat, a plain farmer]
[transcend, iraonavp]

With texcat being pretty null for me

Notably I have transcend in my bottom tier

VOTE: iraonavp

Zach don't quote this post

Mandatory quoting.

In post 709, Ranger wrote:So I finally earned my title {Top Tier}!
It's a hard-coded title, too.
Anyone can earn it.
All they need is:
25 games worth of perfect reads,
20 times nightkilled by scum, including at least once AS scum (multiball),
And 25 town victories.
If you have fulfilled these conditions, you too will earn the title {Top Tier}! It's a level beyond Survivor.

(Reading.)

That's... that's not fair ;-;

Anyways I still believe my buddy Ira's gonna flip town-aligned. and THEN I"m GOING TO LAUGH AT YOU

Also Transcend you have to admit you've been lackin this game.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #753 (isolation #95) » Tue Jun 21, 2016 5:16 am

In post 736, iraonavp wrote:Make sure that if you lynch me to lynch Ranger and never lynch LickityQuickity, no matter what.

I know my opinion is irrelevant here, but I'm 100% on the never lynch LQ part. Maybe not never because I don't like absolutes. But not today for any of the reasons anyone has listed because they're all awful.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #788 (isolation #96) » Wed Jun 22, 2016 10:55 am

In post 785, Dunnstral wrote:Zach be less useless

ur voting town tho?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #805 (isolation #97) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:08 am

In post 802, iraonavp wrote:Okay, here are some relevant post links.

In post 798, iraonavp wrote:A plain farmer's response to LQ's supposed scumslip was very scum-aligned. He acknowledged that it was a scumslip, yet maintained that "Scumslips are usually just townie brain farts". He never gives a clear read on LQ. His response indicates that he knows that LQ is town-aligned, yet still doesn't want to miss an opportunity to make him look bad, or vote him if the tide turned against him.
416, 426.

His tone is extremely conciliatory because he is talking from a position of weakness, he knows he's in the minority. He tried to convince me to read LQ as scum-aligned, when he was reading me as scum-aligned too. This shows that he knows I'm town-aligned, and that his scum-aligned reads are fake.
496, 528, 674, 679.

He repeatedly and awkwardly asks why people are reading him as scum-aligned, rather than trying to find the scum-aligned players. His goal this game is to avoid getting lynched. He wants something concrete that he can use logic to fight against, because he wants an escape route. In contrast, it doesn't bother me that people are voting me for no reason, only that people are voting me.
530, 573 (wanting to stop people leaving his counterwagon, but still shows a similar thing), 687.

LET"S GOOOO

Zachstralkita · Post Post #808 (isolation #98) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:07 am

In post 807, Dunnstral wrote:Halfway through the day and nothing from RiddletonSlot

Why would Riddletonslot say anything if Riddleton replaced out and mod is in process of searching for said replacement?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #825 (isolation #99) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:55 pm

I'd rather prioritize defending iraon than lynching farmer, if that makes sense.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #830 (isolation #100) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:06 pm

In post 828, Bins wrote:
In post 227, Transcend wrote:hey bins:

on a scale of 1-10

1 being, DANG THIS DUDE JUST VOTED MAFIA WE SHOULD SHEEP HIM

and 10 being, HOLY FUCK THIS GUY'S VOTE WAS BLATANT SCUM. ROPE HIM

what do you rank kappy's vote on dunnstral?

In post 254, Transcend wrote:yo smith how do you feel about a kappy lynch

im feelin' it

im feelin' it reaaaaaaaaal good
Ok idk what I was saying this sounds like me scum
But it's still pretty town imo
I like the sudden shift in Transcend's tone in these posts

Just quick iOS-ing again transcend wasn't as good as I had led myself believe tho
Tbh all my town points I was giving him are on fake-able posts (see above)
I get bold like that as scum
The feelin' it real good looks sort of forced now that's I'm looking at it again

iOSing hehehe hit up apple

Zachstralkita · Post Post #834 (isolation #101) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:26 pm

In post 833, Titus wrote:VOTE: Iraonvp

Notes: Bins is scum, looking to jump on a wagon and reverse a prior held townread under short constraints.

So, either iraonvp is scum or farmer is. Famer looks town.

Iron is scum.

So if Bins is scum and it's 50/50 between iraon/farmer(but you've decided already), are you simply voting iraon because it's an actual wagon at this point?

Something about that wording just seemed weird to me.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #849 (isolation #102) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 8:50 pm

In post 847, iraonavp wrote:Ranger, if you're telling the truth about your reads (you aren't), then you wouldn't even need to make that post trying to convince everyone, if it was so obvious.

I ask that nobody trust Ranger, anyone who needs to ask for people's trust is not worthy of it.

I will advocate for you my comrade

If your lynch comes to fruition however and you flip scum my trust will be betrayed for all eternity.

It won't tho bc you're town.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #886 (isolation #103) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 5:37 am

I'm down with giving Ranger a rope scarf.

Zachstralkita · Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:36 am

P sure Titus/Transcendslot is good

The way Smithereens is going at Bins makes me... I'm not sure how to respond to that. I get the feeling he always reads too much into things, or there's another motive behind it.

Zachstralkita · Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:22 am

In post 900, Titus wrote:
In post 886, Zachstralkita wrote:I'm down with giving Ranger a rope scarf.
No.

Yes!

You agree 100% with Smithereens's analysis on Bins?

Zachstralkita · Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:28 am

In post 905, Titus wrote:
In post 903, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 900, Titus wrote:
In post 886, Zachstralkita wrote:I'm down with giving Ranger a rope scarf.
No.
Yes!

You agree 100% with Smithereens's analysis on Bins?
Yup.

And Umlaut's on iraonvp.

oh.......i c........

Fear not, iraon. I will defend you until my last breath. Unless they kill you, then all I can do is say I told you so.

Anyways iraonvp replaced Kappy, right? Kappy's last post before subbing did not strike me as a scumpost, despite what he said prior.

I'm still not sure why this farmer wagon isn't more of a thing.

Zachstralkita · Fri Jun 24, 2016 11:33 am

iraonavp wrote:
In post 908, Dunnstral wrote:just to reiterate: iroanavp is mafia
I'm neither iroanavp nor scum-aligned!

You could be so many things. You could be like a knight. Or the ship captain from Why Am I Dead At Sea. These phrases are immaculate.

Zachstralkita · Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:18 pm

Are you followinf Lynch All Liars or something? Cause that doesn't really prove ira is scum.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #925 (isolation #109) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:18 pm

Ümläüt wrote:
In post 921, Zachstralkita wrote:Are you followinf Lynch All Liars or something? Cause that doesn't really prove ira is scum.

I think Lynch All Liars is an
awesome
policy and I don't see how it's at all controversial. Like, pick one: lying about your own understanding of the game state is

townish

NAI

scummy
Hint: This is not a trick question.

This is just the icing on an incredibly scummy cake. We could pretend it never happened and Ira would still be the scummiest player in the game.

D. What I do.

2. That's subjective and not really true, nevermind that he's going to flip town.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #930 (isolation #110) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:35 pm

In post 928, Dunnstral wrote:RC mafia?

why are you ASKING i thought your reads were EXCEPTIONAL

also RC=riddleslot? RC mafia

Zachstralkita · Post Post #932 (isolation #111) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:42 pm

In post 931, Smithereens wrote:
@Zach, I get the impression that you're like the official committee for the rebuttal of ideas, so why don't you posit as to who the scum are + why so we can have the pleasure of dismissing it entirely.

When Bins/Ira both flip town I will have the pleasure of laughing at your bullshit entirely.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #939 (isolation #112) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:05 pm

Smithereens wrote:
In post 932, Zachstralkita wrote: When Bins/Ira both flip town I will have the pleasure of laughing at your bullshit entirely.
I see you have a lot of town reads. Could you be a dear and delete all the names you associate with town from this list..?
Ranger
LicketyQuickety
Iraonavp
Smithereens
a plain farmer
Ümläüt
Bins
Radiant Cowbells
Dunnstral
Zachstralkita
Titus
davesaz
texcat

Ranger
Smithereens
a plain farmer
Radiant Cowbells
Dunnstral
davesaz

Zachstralkita · Post Post #945 (isolation #113) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:24 pm

I tried to stop this, sorry ira.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #947 (isolation #114) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:25 pm

In post 941, davesaz wrote:I think it might have been easier to ask for a reads list.

Titus, why didn't you freak out like you did in the other game with this setup?

Who calls anyone null-aligned? Why aren't people just town or scum. Or even townreads and scumreads. The hyper sensitivity to including the -aligned modifier makes me think of someone trying to avoid being called out on being too definite in their reads. It's been bugging me the whole game, but null-aligned is a tipping point.

pedit: I was going to vote for Iraonavp but with Dunn's vote don't want an accidental hammer. Gotta post this and update my vc.

He uses -aligned in the place of scum/town - nouns always

Zachstralkita · Post Post #948 (isolation #115) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:26 pm

By the way that's an awful fucking reason to vote for someone.. that is an awful fucking reason.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #953 (isolation #116) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:48 pm

Why does he have to be weird? Why can't he just be different?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #966 (isolation #117) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 4:39 pm

Sorry dave, you're reading this like a fucking english teacher.

He's using -aligned to denote being a member of said group. Null is neutral. Aligned with neutral ad in that person sits on the same level as the other neutral reads.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #994 (isolation #118) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:28 pm

^ THIS fucking guy is really the one talking about whose reads suck??!

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:41 am

Dunn just gave ITH then called him fucking town... wtf does that accomplish? You didn't want ro listen when he WASN'T L-1 that strikes me very oddly

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 9:37 am

I am confused are Titus and RC actually the same person? That's not possible, right?

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 12:43 pm

VOTE: Ranger

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:26 pm

See RC puttin in WORK

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:28 pm

Titus is Town because of how much I likrd Transcend. This may be a bad indicator because I normally TR Transcend, but his entrance is not one scum would make.

Ranger scum.

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:29 pm

In post 1094, Ranger wrote:By the way, Zach, your play reminds me of a couple of other ICs.
Named Fire Hermit and pistachi0n.
You'll understand what I mean after N1.

Why AFTER N1? Is a ghost gonna visit me? Or am I gonna BE a ghost! Because I'm dead.

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 2:42 pm

Listen cake boy of course I'm not gonna die because I'm also the 1 shot BP IC.

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:28 pm

In post 1109, Titus wrote:
In post 1108, Dunnstral wrote:^Look at the setup we're in
Thanks for ruining that.

If he said yes, we lynch him.

Why would you lynch the IC? The mod-cleared IC?

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:08 pm

You're about to HAMMER TOWN

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:14 pm

In post 1116, Titus wrote:
In post 1110, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 1109, Titus wrote:
In post 1108, Dunnstral wrote:^Look at the setup we're in
Thanks for ruining that.

If he said yes, we lynch him.
Why would you lynch the IC? The mod-cleared IC?
LOL. I'm dumb.

lmfao

Zachstralkita · Sat Jun 25, 2016 5:39 pm

He already claimed.

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:01 pm

VOTE: Ranger

come on guys, let's have a GOOD lynch for a change!

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:26 pm

i to ol l d u guyyyyyyyyys

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:47 pm

Smithereens wrote:You think that Dunn died because his reads were correct, and so you're trying to claim that you're town?

Nah. I think you killed him with that in mind. And now surprise, you bring it up after he dies.

so bins is scum but you vote dave???

bins is town btw

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:47 pm

ill update with reads list sometime tonight

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:48 pm

In post 1128, Dunnstral wrote:Don't forget i'm spicing things up day 2

He may have been trying to bait the NK. Goodnight sweet prince.

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:51 pm

What did Ranger mean by that, btw ^

I guess I'll find out before we kill her

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:53 pm

In post 1160, Bins wrote:actually maybe that's a good thing for ranger would scum be that obvious? fuck

i'm half awake and i'm quad posting call me tmmr

pedit - she means you're useless so scum won't kill you

But but... I found scum!

Man, no one's ever nice to me.

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:00 pm

In post 1162, Ümläüt wrote:Posting quick, doing bedtime with the kids right now.

Zach, did you ever actually case Ranger? Because if so I don't remember it.

Well Ranger is relying on " Hey I'm Ranger, my reads and my play are awesome and fuck you " which is a viable strategy because without my assistance I don't think you guys would ever have gotten around to killing her. (Plus, Ira's dead!)

plain farmer is my SECOND scumread

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:15 pm

In post 1170, Titus wrote:Cuz I want to agree with people but Ranger isn't getting my vote.

RC is going to pop in here and do what has to be done.

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:51 pm

In post 1177, Ümläüt wrote:
In post 1165, Zachstralkita wrote:Well Ranger is relying on " Hey I'm Ranger, my reads and my play are awesome and fuck you " which is a viable strategy because without my assistance I don't think you guys would ever have gotten around to killing her. (Plus, Ira's dead!)
That... that's your case?

Your lack of belief is going to be our downfall.

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:40 pm

Town

Titus
Bins
LicketyQuickety
Smithereens(begrudgingly)

Neutral
texcat (scumlean tbh)
RadiantCowbells(only here because I would like more content)
Umlaut(scumlean because of the fucking Ira situation.)

I want to note that a lot of his pushing on Ira was based on Ira's inconsistencies (see 865.)

Scum
Ranger
davesaz

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:43 pm

I think Lynch all Liars is just an excuse to kill someone in most situations and can be advantageous to scum.

RadiantCowbells wrote:Don't townread Smithereens.

I don't like the conclusions that he comes to, but I believe they come from a town-ish mindset. Like the Bins interaction

RadiantCowbells wrote:Zach we in for some trubz.

;(

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:52 pm

In post 1201, RadiantCowbells wrote:Page 1:

Zach: {Zach}

Page 2:

Zach: {Zach & Cody}

lol ok dunnstral.

Question:
Bins, Dunnstral, do you guys have history?

Page 3:

Zach: {Strawberry Zacquiri}

Page 4:

Zach: {Banana Zacquiri}

I'm so happy.

RadiantCowbells wrote:Transcend has been universally townread in every game that I've seen with him where he was scum. I was the only towny that called him as scum in any of them.

I am very wary that Titus got a scum slot. I'm more sure that Smither is scum atm though.

You're right about the Transcend deal, I just got worked by him last mini

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:53 pm

RC can I have a few sentences on Smithereens scum?

Zachstralkita · Tue Jun 28, 2016 5:12 pm

In post 1216, davesaz wrote:
In post 1101, Dunnstral wrote:Zach you're not dying n1 just chill
Probably the reason that Dunnstral was killed.

In post 720, davesaz wrote:Reread of Dunnstral - chatterbox, weak town based mostly on a desire for lively conversation being more likely to be town motivation than scum. Not sure I understand the motivation behind mentioning he's likely to be NK.

Did he scream when you strangled him to death, dave?

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:53 am

In post 1234, Ranger wrote:
LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't see another train happening like the ira one at this point so: VOTE: ira
^This was a scum vote, by the way.
VOTE: LicketyQuickety.

Titus wrote:Hey Ranger, who should WE lynch?
All of {Umlaut, texcat, LicketyQuickety}.

I meant it yesterday. Obviously, with four names it was near-impossible for literally all of them to be scum. So I knew I was likely wrong about one. I see nothing in the flips that makes me thing I was wrong on the others.

This is full of no.

LQ is gonna be town so you're wrong twice. AND NO ONE'S GONNA SCRUTINIZE YOU FOR IT.

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:56 am

also @umlaut on my texcat read, it's just a lack of solid content tbh

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:23 pm

In post 1277, Smithereens wrote:
In post 1246, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 1234, Ranger wrote:
LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't see another train happening like the ira one at this point so: VOTE: ira
^This was a scum vote, by the way.
VOTE: LicketyQuickety.

Titus wrote:Hey Ranger, who should WE lynch?
All of {Umlaut, texcat, LicketyQuickety}.

I meant it yesterday. Obviously, with four names it was near-impossible for literally all of them to be scum. So I knew I was likely wrong about one. I see nothing in the flips that makes me thing I was wrong on the others.

This is full of no.

LQ is gonna be town so you're wrong twice. AND NO ONE'S GONNA SCRUTINIZE YOU FOR IT.
There are people wanting to strangle Ranger rn as we speak. The Ira mislynch is certainly fuel for that. However don't discredit the points of someone you believe to be scum simply because you think they're scum. I think this post by Ranger carries a decent point regardless of her alignment. LQ was one of the players bashing on the Ira wagon because he appeared to know that Ira was town. Next minute, he goes and votes Ira, simply because he doesn't think he can kill anyone else. The point being that LQ was the only person town reading Ira on the wagon, he knew Ira was going to flip town. Therefore why did he kill Ira?

Re Ranger, town don't become scum because they get things wrong. It's quite normal to be wrong in mafia, that's how the game is played. You look like you're getting fustrated with Ranger when Ranger was simply one name on a wagon of people who were incorrect, and not even the more suspicious of names.

I didn't fight for LQ's life all of Day 1 just to have him get bumped off.

I fought for Ira's life too, but you saw how that went.

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:32 pm

Smithereens wrote:
In post 1280, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 1277, Smithereens wrote:
There are people wanting to strangle Ranger rn as we speak. The Ira mislynch is certainly fuel for that. However don't discredit the points of someone you believe to be scum simply because you think they're scum. I think this post by Ranger carries a decent point regardless of her alignment. LQ was one of the players bashing on the Ira wagon because he appeared to know that Ira was town. Next minute, he goes and votes Ira, simply because he doesn't think he can kill anyone else. The point being that LQ was the only person town reading Ira on the wagon, he knew Ira was going to flip town. Therefore why did he kill Ira?

Re Ranger, town don't become scum because they get things wrong. It's quite normal to be wrong in mafia, that's how the game is played. You look like you're getting fustrated with Ranger when Ranger was simply one name on a wagon of people who were incorrect, and not even the more suspicious of names.
I didn't fight for LQ's life all of Day 1 just to have him get bumped off.

I fought for Ira's life too, but you saw how that went.
I think I was also Pro-LQ yesterday. However what you're suggesting is that we let certain players go uncontested because we've defended them in the past. What if LQ is scum? He'll basically win the game simply because he knows he can get away with killing people he knows are town and laughing at the fact that he can literally tell us that a player is town before publically hammering them.

Props to you for calling Ira correctly, but I'm not under the delusion that you're a perfect reader. Why do you make of the fact that LQ basically Lolhammered Ira?

It's not a good look for him, but I'm not sure if it circumvents my townread. I definitely didn't like it at all.

Well, the game doesn't function on my reads anyway, so do what you will. And it looks like RC has it in for you.

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:05 pm

Smithereens, wouldn't that kinda be counterproductive, the situation that you're describing, if she WAS scum?

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:25 pm

In post 1295, Smithereens wrote:Oh.. I see how you know

Excuse my stupidity... that could've ended badly.

UNVOTE:

I'll work from that assumption, however in my opinion you should be looking for scum, not town if you know what I mean~

uh oh my sensor readings are off the charts here

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:57 pm

In post 1297, Smithereens wrote:Bins will understand it lol. I'm quite relieved you don't.

That's great, fucking A, it just looked bad to me but since you had a clear goal in mind I don't mind being stupid.

Zachstralkita · Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:03 pm

Smithereens wrote:If it makes you feel better I can't read sarcasm through a screen so I'll take that literally.

I meant that one literally. I think.

Zachstralkita · Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:56 am

ya LQ you're taking a very laid back position on this you could just assist your handy-dandy IC! not to mention compared to your very forward stance on the ira wagon

Zachstralkita · Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:46 pm

Smithereens wrote:RC, your reads are pretty much categorically incorrect. I don't know why because you haven't said anything about them, but it really does look like you're trying to diametrically oppose what we already know for whatever reason... >.>

Are Ranger's reads not categorically incorrect?

I also agree with the Bins unvotes plan. Not the Bins votes plan.

Zachstralkita · Thu Jun 30, 2016 5:30 pm

#1349 by Smithereens is bad. Really bad.

Zachstralkita · Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:27 pm

In post 1379, Ümläüt wrote:
In post 1365, Smithereens wrote:By saying that my reads etc are not credible ergo you need to retract a town read that you never previously said you had, you're clearly setting the stage for yourself to be able to scum read my later. Yeah you were probably excited by the prospect that you might not need to waste a NK.
Cool story, bro.

(Seriously, why do you need to posit such an elaborate motivation? The more details you add the more likely you're wrong. It's strictly more likely that someone is faking a case on you
for some reason
than that someone is faking a case on you
because they need to get rid of you but want to save an NK.
)

Was that a VT soft from him, btw? I can't see why he's a waste of an NK otherwise.

Zachstralkita · Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:06 pm

Zachstralkita · Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:10 pm

I want to say it's a 75% side eye type of deal given that Ranger and LQ are basically flipped for me so you will not be able to quell my wrath if LQ flips town

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 4:06 am

Hello friends this Titus announcement has got me on the edge of my fucking mountaintop

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:43 pm

*deploys LQ summoning beacon*

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:48 pm

looks like i need to shift my line of questioning

VOTE: texcat

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:50 pm

I don't know Ranger but I'm not sure an SK would be that forward

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:02 pm

hey im callin it right now, ranger GF you can refer back to this post in endgame when we all die

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:07 pm

SK picks Inv. Immunity or BP pregame, they can't pick both.

the SK possibility is if investigation immunity was picked thus making said SK appear town

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:12 pm

I uh... I don't want LQ to be quite honest

I just think texcat has been a bit empty in terms of good wholesome town contributions so I thought to incentivize her with fear or death, or catch scum like getting two birds stoned at once

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:58 pm

texcat, if your vote is still on Titus that would imply you don't believe her claim. So why is the information she gave relevant if you don't believe it? And why do you not believe it?

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:03 pm

Consider the fact that Titus will most definitely not be the lynch today given the facts and work from there? You're not even trying to diffuse these votes on you.

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:06 pm

That makes sense, I'd still lynch texcat over LQ today.

Or... Smithereens!!!!'

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:22 pm

Ok fair there will be ample time to convince us

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:27 pm

RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't townread you rn titus. talk to me about that.

I think this post is kind of redundant.

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:05 pm

texcat wrote:Fine?? Is that a case?

It's not actually

RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Texcat

fine.

maybe

maybe we've been magnifying glassing the wrong fire ant this entire time

Zachstralkita · Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:10 pm

In post 1445, Titus wrote:I'm not opposed to voting LQ. I think LQ was fishing on if I had a guilty or innocent on Ranger anyway...

That doesn't seem like what he was doing to me. I was totally suggesting an RC vote!

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 5:02 am

What benefit does it serve Titus to fakeclaim one-shot cop unprompted?

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 5:02 am

ESPECIALLY TO RUIN MY PLANS

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:41 am

I don't support this LQ vote btw

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:14 am

By the way LQ (and dave), Dunn said that to me cause I've been pretty fucking useless thus far, so it was a no-brainer that they'd gun for someone else.

Dunn obvtowns everywhere he goes, it shouldn't be something that you're reading into that much.

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:33 pm

In post 1479, texcat wrote:
In post 1478, Ümläüt wrote:(I guess if it came down to those two I'd rather lynch texcat than LQ since she's contributing less. I was townreading her pretty strongly yesterday for bringing up Transcend's behavior, but she hasn't really done anything since then.)
Why do people keep saying this? Do I have to spam the thread for yall to think I'm doing something?

No you just need to like.. hunt... for the scum.. remember

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 3:43 pm

texcat wrote:And finding another scum slip from LQ before his known scum slip? Does that not count as scum hunting?

Could you pretty please point out both of these scumslips?

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 3:44 pm

In post 1483, Smithereens wrote:
In post 1478, Ümläüt wrote:
VOTE: Davesaz

(I guess if it came down to those two I'd rather lynch texcat than LQ since she's contributing less. I was townreading her pretty strongly yesterday for bringing up Transcend's behavior, but she hasn't really done anything since then.)
You talk about the LQ vs Textcat issue, and you vote Dave as if it doesn't concern you at all. What is the vote on Dave for?

I'm quite sure earlier in that post he said it was way too early to be narrowing it down to two people.

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 3:56 pm

So yeah but I'm not sure how that exactly constitutes a scumslip.... assuming someone is Town is not necessarily scum-indicative as it's a pain in the ass to treat everyone as neutral in every single statement that you make.

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 4:08 pm

I'm sorry but that seems too fucking dumb to be a scumslip, say what you want

Nevermind that some people can read sarcasm very well through text, while others have absolutely no indication for it

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 4:09 pm

Also I seem to have forgotten about plain farmer but no one seems to want to kill him

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 4:31 pm

Tru but I was one of the wholehearted advocates of NOT doing that.

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 5:53 pm

ok thamnks for your input I believe it is valuable at this point in time

I'm drunk as a fucking monkey's tail tho so umm............

Ranger wrote:
a plain farmer wrote:{LQ, dave, Umlaut, texcat}
Literally the only name here I wouldn't lynch is dave.

Why is that?

I'd be more inclined to lynch dave than Umlaut. and texcat's reaction stuff reads kinda town.

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:06 pm

Ranger wrote:
Zachstral wrote:Why is that?
Because I actually have experience with dave enough to know he's not scum.

Yeah! I totally have that down as a valid reason 100%!

Zachstralkita · Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:09 pm

What's your case on Umlaut BTW?

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 3:43 am

texcat wrote:
In post 1488, Zachstralkita wrote:So yeah but I'm not sure how that exactly constitutes a scumslip.... assuming someone is Town is not necessarily scum-indicative as it's a pain in the ass to treat everyone as neutral in every single statement that you make.

In post 1490, Zachstralkita wrote:I'm sorry but that seems too fucking dumb to be a scumslip, say what you want

Nevermind that some people can read sarcasm very well through text, while others have absolutely no indication for it
I can agree that neither of the slips is, by itself, conclusive. But I do think they add to what I think is a growing body of evidence. When I was reading through LQ's iso I also noticed that he seemed focused on himself. He asked people how they were reading him. Again, not conclusive, but something that I think scum do more than town.

ok besides LQ who are your scum reads?

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 5:59 am

Hey! We should pioneer a Plain Farmer lynch!

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:54 am

So you don't give a shit about Titus' claim? LOL

How do you expect to not get lynched when you don't work off of the information given?

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 9:05 am

? Town can do stupid things. Town can also do stupid things to spite people.

What motivation does Titus have for lying and clearing Ranger?

Yes there is an off chance that Ranger is still scum, but I feel like the whole situation bumps her down on the list of priorities at least for today

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 12:57 pm

VOTE: a plain farmer

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 1:13 pm

In post 1525, texcat wrote:
In post 1492, texcat wrote:Although a bunch of people wanted to kill him on D1 before the push on Ira.

In post 1493, Zachstralkita wrote:Tru but I was one of the wholehearted advocates of NOT doing that.

In post 1524, Zachstralkita wrote:VOTE: a plain farmer
Huh? Can you explain what changed your mind?

oh i thought you were referring to LQ with that conversation

if you look at my day 1 I wanted to kill a plain farmer but I switched to Ranger

NOW I AM BACK

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:10 pm

Psst. Sheep my vote!

Zachstralkita · Mon Jul 04, 2016 3:33 pm

I'm also trying to defend LQ so...

Zachstralkita · Tue Jul 05, 2016 3:40 am

texcat wrote:
In post 1543, a plain farmer wrote:
In post 1518, LicketyQuickety wrote:You have played a fairly analysis heavy game up to this point. Why the gut read now?
I suppose that's how I've looked so far, but gut has informed all of my prior reads as well even when they were also based on other things. Right now I feel like my texcat scumread is simply stronger than any of my others.
This looks like a load of crap.

Vote him

Zachstralkita · Tue Jul 05, 2016 5:05 am

In post 1548, Bins wrote:Prediction :
LQ
is just gonna be the Ira of d2

FTFY!

Zachstralkita · Wed Jul 06, 2016 9:28 am

In post 1550, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 1541, Titus wrote:
In post 1537, RadiantCowbells wrote:Transcend/Smither still makes sense without LQ ftr.

Just putting that out there in case this doesn't go well today.
VOTE: RC

Why do you have to be scum in our last game together?
I am not scum.

She obviously said that for a reason. Now my interest is piqued.

Oh wait she probably said it because you inferred that she was scum LMFAO

Zachstralkita · Wed Jul 06, 2016 1:26 pm

In post 1554, texcat wrote:Oh, yay, we're back!

Zach, tell me why I should vote APF.

Omitting LQ from the situation, you yourself said he was the scummiest of players

seeing as LQ is town and I'm trying to derail a mislynch, I am opting for you to join me in voting our mutual scumread because I am hated by the townspeople.

Zachstralkita · Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:08 pm

Did you fall back on the whole Ranger situation, or...

Also I can't save you if you're voting Bins.