The light of Tuscany wavered
And swung through the pool
From top to bottom.
I loved your wet head and smashing crawl,
Your fine swimmer's back and shoulders
Surfacing and surfacing again
This year and every year since.
VOTE: Lefty
my point was, you're criticizing fluff posts "especially early", but early game when nobody has done anything yet is when i would say fluff posts are fineIn post 67, Tchill13 wrote:no not really. just play and do town things.In post 64, wavemode wrote:you're saying you prefer statements like "im town pls love me" in the LATE game?
This actually reminds of a mini where boon vastly overreacted and self-voted his early RVS wagon, then was largely left alone by this very reasoningIn post 93, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I actually think Lefty is newb town - scum tend to shy away from addressing their wagons (and potentially inviting direct confrontation) and try to look unbothered about being pushed. I guess Lefty could be over reacting scum but it doesn't feel like that to me.
On Invis I lean town weakly. I don't think scum!Invis makes 101 with no hesitation or qualification the way he did. Not sure what he would stand to gain from it, unless he'd played with me before and knew that I make observations like thisIn post 123, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Wave, can you talk about Byron and Invis being in your town reads please?
I understand that possibility (small as it might be - the wagon was clearly formed for serious reasons), but at the end of the day I'm not claiming it would have gotten him lynched to vote there as scum - I'm just saying he had nothing to *gain*. It would have been a risk for no benefit to vote and offer no dialogue or reasoning there, IMO, as opposed to giving some reasoning and attempting to look like a contributing townie. UNLESS, as I said, it was a 5D chess move to fool the observant. In my experience this flips town 8 times out of 10In post 133, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Thanks for response Wave, I disagree with reasoning on Invis vote as I could easily see it being qualified as RVS.
Oh, come on now, be objective. Does this REALLY read to you like a push for your throat? What does scum gain from 107, making points that he himself admits (several times, in other posts) are not necessarily scummy but anti-town? "scum who don't want to backtrack on a read" ehhh byron was not under any pressure to start taking shots at you. He created this whole stink unprompted. If he's scum here, he must think he can not only get you lynched but also recover from your town flip afterward. But he's not playing to that objective whatsoever. He seems to just really want to know what the fuck is up with your read lol. Usually once I reach the position of "if this person were scum, he'd have to actually just be fucking retarded" I set them aside. Like,In post 133, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I disagree on Byron as well - this feels like scum who don't want to backtrack on a read. Trying to stay consistent/how they think they would act as town.
it does, to a large extent, and i never claimed otherwise. the game is still rather early, and hunting for town is more productive atm than hunting for scum.In post 178, Tchill13 wrote:this just tells me your list lacks reasons.
yes but what you're still not seeing is that his play and rhetoric does not at all line up with this objective, as I've explained repeatedlyIn post 392, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:you don't think scum do what BV did? Kind of push someone but not push them enough so they are in the spotlight upon the flip?
in my case there's too much game narration in 211 for my likingIn post 408, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Also, can someone talk to me about the Performer wagon because I don't get it.
No I can't order them meaningfully but I can group themNosferatu wrote: can you order them?
I'm colorblind
I've explained many of them already. Who do you want to know aboutIn post 493, Lefty wrote:With this list can you give any sort of reasoning on your town/scum reads?
The fact that they're null for me...?In post 493, Lefty wrote:Or if there’s anything in particular that’s keeping players in your null group?
411In post 494, Performer wrote:Why do you think I'm scum?
I know tommy is low content but, again, there's still substance to his play that I don't likeIn post 498, Lefty wrote:Let’s start with the SRs on Tommy/Teacher.
Garmr and Invis dropped to null because i raised the bar somewhat. both were green based on some small thing i noticed that i liked but in the grand scheme of things after rereading the game i decided it was too hasty for me to make that designation. both of them have play in this game that could easily be faked by scum. so, even though if i were guessing, i wouldn't put them in the scumteam, i also wouldn't directly oppose their lynches at this stageIn post 498, Lefty wrote:When did Invis go from a town lean back to null? Garmr and TChill haven’t done anything AI yet iyo?
Because we still have 11 days and there's other lynches i would prefer to see? obviously discussions about compromise will happen if the deadline starts to wind downIn post 529, Garmr wrote:If invis has dropped to null why not join me in lynching him?
that's quite a predictionIn post 549, Garmr wrote:2.You constantly defend your own appearance even throwing shade at others to defend yourself (post 554).
is almost anIn post 273, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote:I expected scum to rectify the dissonance between the post & the push, & either break-off from the wagon & find another (possibly omgus), or make a more pronounced push on BBT. Neither happened, BV's pretty much town as far as I'm concerned.
There's been no point in this game where I wanted invisible dead. I was Town leaning on him for a while, then I colored him gray to remain cautious but I still didn't think he was scum at that point - there were just a lot of other people I considered townier than himIn post 764, Tchill13 wrote:Idc about that. That's not what I asked.
You didn't want to before. Why? What has solidified over time that's keeping you from doing it now?
as others have mentioned, BV didn't avoid being on the wagon, he hopped off it once it was at L-1In post 923, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Good posting, but...In post 920, wavemode wrote: nail in the coffin that pushes him further down for me is him being one of three people who avoided the invis wagon and me leaning town on the other two
There were 4 people who avoided the Invis wagon - Nos, teacher, Lefty and Byron. Can you just clarify who you're talking about in relation to your reads?
you're getting the perspective mixed up. i'm speaking from the perspective that there is a pool of three players who, potentially, are scum who thought, "my buddy is on this wagon, i'd rather not vote with him". BV is not one of those peopleIn post 937, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:With super bad reasoning. That made no sense.In post 933, wavemode wrote: as others have mentioned, BV didn't avoid being on the wagon, he hopped off it once it was at L-1
to clarify, i townread BV for other reasons, but those have nothing to do with my "nail in the coffin" comment which you asked aboutIn post 939, wavemode wrote:you're getting the perspective mixed up. i'm speaking from the perspective that there is a pool of three players who, potentially, are scum who thought, "my buddy is on this wagon, i'd rather not vote with him". BV is not one of those peopleIn post 937, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:With super bad reasoning. That made no sense.In post 933, wavemode wrote: as others have mentioned, BV didn't avoid being on the wagon, he hopped off it once it was at L-1
In post 949, Performer wrote:Wave, why do you tr byron for "other reasons?"
In post 129, wavemode wrote:<snip>In post 123, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Wave, can you talk about Byron and Invis being in your town reads please?
On Byron I lean town sort of strongly. His posts bleed genuine motives. The disagreement he has with you seems to simply be a clash of playstyles. I hate to be THAT guy, but this smells like TvT.
In post 141, wavemode wrote:
<snip>
Oh, come on now, be objective. Does this REALLY read to you like a push for your throat? What does scum gain from 107, making points that he himself admits (several times, in other posts) are not necessarily scummy but anti-town? "scum who don't want to backtrack on a read" ehhh byron was not under any pressure to start taking shots at you. He created this whole stink unprompted. If he's scum here, he must think he can not only get you lynched but also recover from your town flip afterward. But he's not playing to that objective whatsoever. He seems to just really want to know what the fuck is up with your read lol. Usually once I reach the position of "if this person were scum, he'd have to actually just be fucking retarded" I set them aside. Like,In post 133, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I disagree on Byron as well - this feels like scum who don't want to backtrack on a read. Trying to stay consistent/how they think they would act as town.maaaaaayyyybeeeebut we can deal with him later if he is. In my experience this flips town 99 times out of 100
In post 566, wavemode wrote:I might as well mention that the last observation of 273
is almost anIn post 273, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote:I expected scum to rectify the dissonance between the post & the push, & either break-off from the wagon & find another (possibly omgus), or make a more pronounced push on BBT. Neither happened, BV's pretty much town as far as I'm concerned.exactrepresentation of precisely what i have been saying about BV the whole game, just in different words. and is one significant reason i lean town on GEO
in fact probably the only way I'd see scum!GEO is if i believed he directly plagiarized this specifically to garner a townread from me. at present i see no evidence of that and lots of evidence to the contrary
wait so what do you mean i was dodging questions...? I remember detailing for you specifically why i had you as scum, and why tchill was where he was in my reads listIn post 962, Performer wrote:@wave I had a question of why you thought chill and I were scum. Also, 667