On the other hand,
[To everyone, is this color readable to you?]
In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.
In post 50, Taco Hemingway wrote:In post 47, Seanzie wrote:In post 42, Taco Hemingway wrote:your analysis thus far has 0 basis in logic. I have no choice but to conclude you pulled those posts out of your ass.Lol! The juxtposition of these two posts:PIn post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Taco, is Shrek also basing nothing in logic here? Shrek seems to think my assumption is fair, perhaps wrong, but fair. You seem to have the exact opposite opinion.you sure have selective reading, don't you?In post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
In post 52, Taco Hemingway wrote:And you aren't suspicious AT ALL how he reached that conclusion?"In post 48, Shrek wrote:its an hour into day ooooone bro im not gonna get heated over a minor sus. its not like hes hard accusing or anythingIn post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Not a single bit?
Because you and I both know its a garbage conclusion. So I know you should have a similar POV based on that.
In post 53, Taco Hemingway wrote:Oh yeah?In post 51, Seanzie wrote:It is a leap, sure, but it isn't a complete nonsense conclusion, and the point is to see how people react. So far, you are reacting very defensively.In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.
Please tell me more
If you're scum here, I hope you know that picking a fight with me was a huge mistake and will be your undoing.
In post 55, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't need to justify shit to you.
In post 57, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you disagree with my assessment that you're full of shit?
In post 63, Seanzie wrote:I've already made my intention very clear. I'm seeing how you react.In post 59, Taco Hemingway wrote:Lmao just realized I'm not on my main and I can't just tell you to go search my meta and see for themselves what you think of how I'm playing so far.
Regardless, why point out I'm defensive? What's your intent with that?
So far you look like a wolf who is pissed off that you got called out early. It is possible I'm misreading the situation, and townies can get defensive too, but the way you're lashing out about it suggests that you aren't dispirited town, but instead are frustrated wolf.
I could be wrong, so feel free to town it up, but for now, you're going at the bottom of my list.
In post 60, Taco Hemingway wrote:Seanzie, honest question that's important: what's the expected townie response to you when someone makes something up against them? What do you expect a townie to do in that situation.
In post 79, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you think this is an unreasonable conclusion to come to based on the first 2 posts?In post 19, Taco Hemingway wrote:So Shrek is an alt that's purposefully doing a gimmick. Cool.
T3 feels performative in their initial postings and replies, don't vibe with their tone so far.
In post 103, Taco Hemingway wrote:So to answer truthfully - I fudged it a little. I thought genuinely that your question was a bit weird to have as a reply to anything, like a scum who tries to desperately look like they are solving right off the bat. It was something to latch onto to push off of and move the game forward. You are partially correct. It was a trumped up shade that was meant to elicit a reaction from you.
I find your immediate defensiveness from it and your recent doubling down towny.
In post 211, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 103, Taco Hemingway wrote:So to answer truthfully - I fudged it a little. I thought genuinely that your question was a bit weird to have as a reply to anything, like a scum who tries to desperately look like they are solving right off the bat. It was something to latch onto to push off of and move the game forward. You are partially correct. It was a trumped up shade that was meant to elicit a reaction from you.
I find your immediate defensiveness from it and your recent doubling down towny.like a scum who tries to desperately look like they are solving right off the bat
In post 126, tris wrote:i have never found defensiveness to be indicative of scum. not in isolationIn post 121, Seanzie wrote:Why? Because my push actually had logic (albeit loose page 1 logic) behind it? I noticed a possible teammate interaction. I mentioned it in thread. You got super defensive about it, so I pushed more, and eventually you OMGUS'd me at the end of it. This is typical wolf behavior.In post 100, Taco Hemingway wrote:Your push and my gutread on entrance are not the same. Stop comparing it.In post 97, Seanzie wrote:If you are concluding that this is reasonable, but my push on you was not... well... idk what to say.In post 79, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you think this is an unreasonable conclusion to come to based on the first 2 posts?In post 19, Taco Hemingway wrote:So Shrek is an alt that's purposefully doing a gimmick. Cool.
T3 feels performative in their initial postings and replies, don't vibe with their tone so far.
The only thing that gives me pause on my read is the fact that I know you can be very rude and arrogant as town, so some parts of your reaction can be explained by that. I will have to see how you play moving forward, but your T3 "gut read" (Is it a gut read? Calling T3 performative doesn't feel like a gut read, but an analysis of his posts) is bad, so 0 points from me there.
In post 125, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay but I can't just take your word for it y'know.In post 122, Taco Hemingway wrote:regardless your read on me is wrong here if you are legitimately scumreading meIn post 118, Taco Hemingway wrote:oh nvm i misread your post i thought you said "despite"
In post 126, tris wrote: i have never found defensiveness to be indicative of scum. not in isolation
In post 127, Dwlee99 wrote:Tris we are town block now. Okay?
In post 144, Taco Hemingway wrote:Well generally, I expect a townie to react with defiance when accused of something that is implying they are scum. A scum would be much nicer because they know the accusation is true and thus seek to justify and placate.In post 139, Seanzie wrote:In post 133, Taco Hemingway wrote:Seanzie: I don't know how to expect a townie to react here
Also seanzie: i am so sure that taco is reacting like scum hereNope, that isn't what I said at all. Townies can react in all sorts of ways, so I cannot enumerate all towny reactions for you. asking "how would a towny react in this situation?" is not a productive question since it is unanswerable.
This should be able to explain my most recent movements
In post 148, Shrek wrote:its like the first two hours of the game literally half of the people havent contributed yet. chill.
In post 167, Shrek wrote:town leaning:
taco: i think him acting defiant was kind of a bad look for him so early on in the game, but scum would probably not go THAT far to the point of attacking seanzie like that for simply throwing out a light read. like why would he start to tunnel there instead of just leaving it at a convenient point instead of going on with all the effort for several pages. that doesnt seem like mafia to me
In post 218, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 148, Shrek wrote:its like the first two hours of the game literally half of the people havent contributed yet. chill.When this chilling time of yours will be finished?
In post 167, Shrek wrote: i know im town so im not reading too much into it.
In post 173, Shrek wrote: if you want i can actually claim my role just so we dont like. mislynch right in the beginning of the game. i dont really care if i'm a nightkill since my role is not very useful and it would alleviate suspicion from me so i'm more than happy to be open right now.
In post 182, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Yeah I like shrek tonally. He feels open. Up to 141 I felt this already. He has a strange looking wall after that though, there were some points in there that feel wrong to me.
In post 227, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 217, LuciferMorningStar wrote:what's with the votes? Are they purely for meme purposes. I do not see the point in voting anyone on Day 1 after there have been no night actions performed. So I will not partake in any voting until Day 2 (if the Mafia doesn't kill me).No, not meme purposes.
You'll place your vote on who you think is suspicious, then the conversation/argument will be going on about the vote or around the wagon, that's the way scumhunting happens here.
Not placing any vote on day 1 is suspicious + we have to eliminate someone in Day 1 and will use the flip info on Day 2.
In post 224, Taco Hemingway wrote:oh I'm copying scum osuka's game.. in a game that I was scum in?In post 206, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.Defensive response.
In post 50, Taco Hemingway wrote:In post 47, Seanzie wrote:In post 42, Taco Hemingway wrote:your analysis thus far has 0 basis in logic. I have no choice but to conclude you pulled those posts out of your ass.Lol! The juxtposition of these two posts:PIn post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Taco, is Shrek also basing nothing in logic here? Shrek seems to think my assumption is fair, perhaps wrong, but fair. You seem to have the exact opposite opinion.you sure have selective reading, don't you?In post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbhShadingSeanzie.
In post 52, Taco Hemingway wrote:And you aren't suspicious AT ALL how he reached that conclusion?"In post 48, Shrek wrote:its an hour into day ooooone bro im not gonna get heated over a minor sus. its not like hes hard accusing or anythingIn post 45, Taco Hemingway wrote:weird reaction to someone who just called you scum, wouldn't you say?In post 43, Shrek wrote:yeah thats a fair assumption to make tbh. it would be a good distancing tactic if it were the real thing so im fine with you thinking that until more info comes in. i know im town though so obviously i can confirm its wrong but i understand my word dont got much weight there. honestly im happy youre poking at stuff already tbh
Not a single bit?
Because you and I both know its a garbage conclusion. So I know you should have a similar POV based on that.Pocketing attempt toShrek.
In post 53, Taco Hemingway wrote:Oh yeah?In post 51, Seanzie wrote:It is a leap, sure, but it isn't a complete nonsense conclusion, and the point is to see how people react. So far, you are reacting very defensively.In post 46, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't genuinely believe that Seanzie actually made that kind of leap of logic in accusing Shrek and I of fake interactions.
In fact, my errors in how I perceived them should have tipped them off easily that this was a genuine interaction. It's a complete nonsense conclusion that is meant to discredit 2 people at once.
Please tell me more
If you're scum here, I hope you know that picking a fight with me was a huge mistake and will be your undoing.ThreatingSeanzie.
In post 55, Taco Hemingway wrote:I don't need to justify shit to you.In post 57, Taco Hemingway wrote:Do you disagree with my assessment that you're full of shit?Scum posts.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=86324
Check this game, they arecopyingscum!osuka's play here.
VOTE: Taco Hemingway
In post 226, Taco Hemingway wrote:you don't know town me lmaoIn post 208, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 60, Taco Hemingway wrote:Seanzie, honest question that's important: what's the expected townie response to you when someone makes something up against them? What do you expect a townie to do in that situation.Though it wasn't aimed at me, I want to express my thought here.
Town!you should have handled the situation by not using emotion or overly defensiveness on the small reaction test.
Usually some scums use thisrude behaviortactic to dominate town which you clearly know
In post 231, Taco Hemingway wrote:
No really i think its hilarious you think i would copy someone else's scumgame when mine is plenty fine. I don't copy.
Am i still trying to pocket shrek btw?
So you're calling me suspicious because I don't want to risk lynching a town member? Which seems to be the case most of the time with these Day 1 lynches, based on the other games I've looked at. Out of the 5 players that have been voted I only have a high suspicion on one of them. I highly doubt either Taco or Salsabil are Mafia. I could say that placing a random vote on day 1 is suspicious and that the players placing votes are doing so to show themselves off as a confidentIn post 241, LuciferMorningStar wrote:In post 227, Salsabil Faria wrote:[quote="In post 217, LuciferMorningStar"what's with the votes? Are they purely for meme purposes. I do not see the point in voting anyone on Day 1 after there have been no night actions performed. So I will not partake in any voting until Day 2 (if the Mafia doesn't kill me).No, not meme purposes.
You'll place your vote on who you think is suspicious, then the conversation/argument will be going on about the vote or around the wagon, that's the way scumhunting happens here.
Not placing any vote on day 1 is suspicious + we have to eliminate someone in Day 1 and will use the flip info on Day 2.
In post 17, Pavowski wrote:Hi all! May the odds be in your favor,unless you're mafia, in which case, a plague on your house.
The gods have dictated that I should VOTE: Taco to kick things off, and so I shall. Even though I love your username.
In post 245, Taco Hemingway wrote:Ah fuck it i was waiting on salsa to actually pull themselves deeper into the moonlogic they have developed on me because it doesnt feel genuine at all coming from them like they pulled out the meta of another player to say im scum when i literally was in that game as scum as well as played against them as scum too.
If I'm scum here I'm not trying to spew everyone who attakcs me as town. As town idgaf bc i dont have an agenda.
Shrek stating they were from more survivor oriented games makes sense for their reaction being more pacifying as i understand that survivor and such relies on making friends not enemies.
@Pavowski what do you think of Salsa thus far?
VOTE: Salsa
In post 257, Pavowski wrote:Seems to be tunneling on you. Feels early for that to me, but then apparently you two have history playing against (or with, or whatever) one another so maybe they spotted something that trips their radar?In post 245, Taco Hemingway wrote:Ah fuck it i was waiting on salsa to actually pull themselves deeper into the moonlogic they have developed on me because it doesnt feel genuine at all coming from them like they pulled out the meta of another player to say im scum when i literally was in that game as scum as well as played against them as scum too.
If I'm scum here I'm not trying to spew everyone who attakcs me as town. As town idgaf bc i dont have an agenda.
Shrek stating they were from more survivor oriented games makes sense for their reaction being more pacifying as i understand that survivor and such relies on making friends not enemies.
@Pavowski what do you think of Salsa thus far?
VOTE: Salsa
In post 261, Taco Hemingway wrote:Dwlee spewed town on a red salsa flipIn post 251, Salsabil Faria wrote:Dwlee99maybe town here because I don’t think scum!them need to ask this question, seems like they wants to sortPavowskihere.
In post 262, Taco Hemingway wrote:What is the difference between my town and scum game, in your view?In post 249, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 231, Taco Hemingway wrote:
No really i think its hilarious you think i would copy someone else's scumgame when mine is plenty fine. I don't copy.
Am i still trying to pocket shrek btw?The wording was wrong....It's more about showingI'm being aggressive which keeping attention towards me, so I can't be scumand using this as a shield which imo scum indicative. Like you fake claim as scum, but other players also do this, so this is copying, my wording was wrong for that. Also mentioned it on other post but you seems to cherry picking my posts.
No, you're not trying to pocket them which makes me think you & them aren’t same alignment most probably.
In post 263, Taco Hemingway wrote:Man having several games to reference as meta to dunk people's arguments feels good
In post 270, Taco Hemingway wrote:Salsa is uncharitable to a degree that is egregious where they are ignoring entire threads of logic to paint me as scum and ignore any other possibility. That doesnt really come from town. The fact they used a game i was literally in as scum and compared me to a scum partner...who i tried to coach but who wasn't really following me, is peak hilarity to me. Like bro - how desperate are you to make me a mislim here?
In post 271, Taco Hemingway wrote:If salsa can show some analysis that is more than 1 dimensional towards me, such that Seanzie did - i would be more predisposed to believe their progression on my slot. As is, it feels they are simply searching for whatever they can to isolate anything that can be framed as "scummy".
In post 273, Taco Hemingway wrote:Whats the definition of omgus?
In post 278, Taco Hemingway wrote:Why should we believe that you are town?
In post 281, Taco Hemingway wrote:Youre selectively avoiding my points in order to avoid responding to them.
I dont care how much you claim you're tunneled on me - youve been made aware of it so if you are trying to sort in good faith you'll put an effort to read my intent.
In post 282, Taco Hemingway wrote:I will drown your shallow push with a torrent of my deeper analysis
In post 283, Taco Hemingway wrote:Strange. Youve never finished any completed games with me as town - thus this was a bit of a trick question.In post 279, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 262, Taco Hemingway wrote:What is the difference between my town and scum game, in your view?In post 249, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 231, Taco Hemingway wrote:
No really i think its hilarious you think i would copy someone else's scumgame when mine is plenty fine. I don't copy.
Am i still trying to pocket shrek btw?The wording was wrong....It's more about showingI'm being aggressive which keeping attention towards me, so I can't be scumand using this as a shield which imo scum indicative. Like you fake claim as scum, but other players also do this, so this is copying, my wording was wrong for that. Also mentioned it on other post but you seems to cherry picking my posts.
No, you're not trying to pocket them which makes me think you & them aren’t same alignment most probably.Agenda.
And no - that's a very shallow buzzword reply. I can meta analyze for you but I'll summarize it for you: ij a few words:
Static, light TMI, uncharitableness, complacency
In post 284, Taco Hemingway wrote:Obviously every game is different, but i can link you all my scum games and thats what pops up regularly. NOT what you are accusing me of
In post 288, Taco Hemingway wrote:Stop defending your shit logic with shutdowns and instead ellaborate on it or acknowledge its flawed.
And i asked you what the definition of omgus is. Answer it.
In post 289, Pavowski wrote: Gun to head? Right this minute?
Taco - Town
Seanzie - Scum
T3 - Town, barely
Shrek - Town
In post 297, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 289, Pavowski wrote: Gun to head? Right this minute?
Taco - Town
Seanzie - Scum
T3 - Town, barely
Shrek - TownIf you thinkTacois town then whyShrekis town to you but notSeanzie?
In post 299, Taco Hemingway wrote:Yes, so we agree that the definition is a player who votes someone else solely on the basis that the other player voted them?In post 296, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 288, Taco Hemingway wrote:Stop defending your shit logic with shutdowns and instead ellaborate on it or acknowledge its flawed.
And i asked you what the definition of omgus is. Answer it.I'll do what I want to do, you don't owe me.
Can't believe you're using LAMIST card rn!! So much for playing several games....
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... d_You_Suck
In that case: consider that isnt what happned here.
In post 300, Titus wrote:Taco, Sasil your fight is drowning out my attempts to ease back in. Can you talk about your reads on other slots?
In post 308, Zyla wrote: Salsabil is mostly null with a slight town-lean, but then there's this post.I'm not sure what about this particularly fits LAMIST, could you elaborate?In post 296, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 288, Taco Hemingway wrote:Stop defending your shit logic with shutdowns and instead ellaborate on it or acknowledge its flawed.
And i asked you what the definition of omgus is. Answer it.I'll do what I want to do, you don't owe me.
Can't believe you're using LAMIST card rn!! So much for playing several games....
In post 312, Seanzie wrote:When you wake up (or before you go to bed if you want), please elaborate on your reads of me and Dwlee.In post 309, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 300, Titus wrote:Taco, Sasil your fight is drowning out my attempts to ease back in. Can you talk about your reads on other slots?It's my bedtime, so can't hear from me for a long time of period eventually.
Townlean:Seanzie
Nulltown:Dwlee99
Nullscum:tris
Scumlean:Taco HemingwayorShrek
Rests are null for not enough content or I can't formulate any read on them yet.
In post 318, Seanzie wrote:I did look at your ISO, and there isn't much there about me or Dwlee.In post 313, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 312, Seanzie wrote:When you wake up (or before you go to bed if you want), please elaborate on your reads of me and Dwlee.In post 309, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 300, Titus wrote:Taco, Sasil your fight is drowning out my attempts to ease back in. Can you talk about your reads on other slots?It's my bedtime, so can't hear from me for a long time of period eventually.
Townlean:Seanzie
Nulltown:Dwlee99
Nullscum:tris
Scumlean:Taco HemingwayorShrek
Rests are null for not enough content or I can't formulate any read on them yet.Check my ISO, it's there.
For me, the only post where you take a stance about me is here:
A naked "town post". Is this the only thing you're townreading me for, or is there more? Also, what exactly makes this such a townpost in your mind, enough to put me as your top townread?In post 207, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 63, Seanzie wrote:I've already made my intention very clear. I'm seeing how you react.In post 59, Taco Hemingway wrote:Lmao just realized I'm not on my main and I can't just tell you to go search my meta and see for themselves what you think of how I'm playing so far.
Regardless, why point out I'm defensive? What's your intent with that?
So far you look like a wolf who is pissed off that you got called out early. It is possible I'm misreading the situation, and townies can get defensive too, but the way you're lashing out about it suggests that you aren't dispirited town, but instead are frustrated wolf.
I could be wrong, so feel free to town it up, but for now, you're going at the bottom of my list.Town post.
For Dwlee:
I don't necessarily agree with the idea that scum!them wouldn't ask this. Is this meta based, or based off how wolves play? Also, there is a TON of other stuff in Dwlee's ISO. Do you have any more thoughts about anything else regarding them?In post 250, Salsabil Faria wrote:Dwlee99maybe town here because I don’t think scum!them need to ask this question, seems like they wants to sortPavowskihere.
Saying "check my ISO" was not satisfactory here. You haven't given much content on these slots, so I'd like to see what you're thinking here.
In post 330, Seanzie wrote:I would expect if you were town here, you'd at least be able to explain via one or two sentences the jist of your reason for townreading me and leaning town on Dwlee.In post 324, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 318, Seanzie wrote:I did look at your ISO, and there isn't much there about me or Dwlee.In post 313, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 312, Seanzie wrote:When you wake up (or before you go to bed if you want), please elaborate on your reads of me and Dwlee.In post 309, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 300, Titus wrote:Taco, Sasil your fight is drowning out my attempts to ease back in. Can you talk about your reads on other slots?It's my bedtime, so can't hear from me for a long time of period eventually.
Townlean:Seanzie
Nulltown:Dwlee99
Nullscum:tris
Scumlean:Taco HemingwayorShrek
Rests are null for not enough content or I can't formulate any read on them yet.Check my ISO, it's there.
For me, the only post where you take a stance about me is here:
A naked "town post". Is this the only thing you're townreading me for, or is there more? Also, what exactly makes this such a townpost in your mind, enough to put me as your top townread?In post 207, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 63, Seanzie wrote:I've already made my intention very clear. I'm seeing how you react.In post 59, Taco Hemingway wrote:Lmao just realized I'm not on my main and I can't just tell you to go search my meta and see for themselves what you think of how I'm playing so far.
Regardless, why point out I'm defensive? What's your intent with that?
So far you look like a wolf who is pissed off that you got called out early. It is possible I'm misreading the situation, and townies can get defensive too, but the way you're lashing out about it suggests that you aren't dispirited town, but instead are frustrated wolf.
I could be wrong, so feel free to town it up, but for now, you're going at the bottom of my list.Town post.
For Dwlee:
I don't necessarily agree with the idea that scum!them wouldn't ask this. Is this meta based, or based off how wolves play? Also, there is a TON of other stuff in Dwlee's ISO. Do you have any more thoughts about anything else regarding them?In post 250, Salsabil Faria wrote:Dwlee99maybe town here because I don’t think scum!them need to ask this question, seems like they wants to sortPavowskihere.
Saying "check my ISO" was not satisfactory here. You haven't given much content on these slots, so I'd like to see what you're thinking here.Not up for any hard work atm.... will give reasons later if feel to.
UNVOTE: Shrek
VOTE: Salsabil Faria
In post 343, Zyla wrote:Do you still feel that they're important?In post 340, Dwlee99 wrote:It doesn't help because of how late the second one is, when there was plenty of time for Pav to react to anything that had actually happened.In post 326, Zyla wrote:How does the fact that they are joke posts factor in? Do you still feel that they're important?In post 323, Dwlee99 wrote:This is howIn post 194, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay I'm kind of trolling: so 17 is LAMIST and then 119 is a bad reaction to something which doesn't comment on 100 posts that had happened between his first and second posts.
In post 349, Dwlee99 wrote:308 - the read on me is bad and shallow, the post cjosen by Zyla wrt Salsa areIn post 346, Taco Hemingway wrote:can you point out where you think zyla scumtold?
In post 351, T3 wrote:Shrek is locktown.
In post 369, Titus wrote:I wanna vote Dwlee but it's pure gut.
In post 412, T3 wrote:Oh yeah, Galaxis didn't /in the newbie queue. And she acts like a child from what I gathered but knows how to use phbb forums lol
In post 414, Titus wrote:This is an odd game with so many newbies and hyperposters. I'm struggling to keep up.
I think Sabsil is town but it's a weaker read.
In post 424, T3 wrote:[be mildly annoyed at]Galaxis[/be mildly annoyed at]
In post 448, Salsabil Faria wrote:Nah, I don't think so.