Well I am very happy too.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
VOTE: iamveryhappy
And blue.In post 11, Invisibility wrote: fire can be red
In post 23, iamveryhappy wrote:Yeah whatchu wanna talk about?In post 19, ItalianoVD wrote: What’s up my peeps. First game back outside of TM.
Well I am very happy too.
VOTE: iamveryhappy
good having a happy person other than me
wanna talk about it?
Yeah whatchu wanna talk about?In post 23, iamveryhappy wrote:good having a happy person other than meIn post 19, ItalianoVD wrote: What’s up my peeps. First game back outside of TM.
Well I am very happy too.
VOTE: iamveryhappy
wanna talk about it?
Being in the Interregnum Multiverse I can confirm this.In post 29, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Did you know fire can be invisible?
Whew, being alive, being in love, having family, just to name a few. You?In post 31, iamveryhappy wrote:how you are happyIn post 27, ItalianoVD wrote:Yeah whatchu wanna talk about?In post 23, iamveryhappy wrote:good having a happy person other than meIn post 19, ItalianoVD wrote: What’s up my peeps. First game back outside of TM.
Well I am very happy too.
VOTE: iamveryhappy
wanna talk about it?
Not to mention burn at 365 degress celsiusIn post 42, iamveryhappy wrote: ethanol fires are quite invisible too
Yes.In post 44, Invisibility wrote:we need you to weigh in on the ongoing fire discussionIn post 41, T3 wrote:I used to play on my kindle paperwhiteIn post 14, iamveryhappy wrote: Oh wait, no. Kindle is my main choice of communication
Really? AlreadyIn post 45, Invisibility wrote: Fire (the individual) is giving me town vibes
I'm greener than money.
Ohh yeah that's right. I think we were both town iirc. Hopefully it's true for this game as well.In post 55, fireisredsir wrote:chromavalon, very brieflyIn post 21, ItalianoVD wrote: Also what’s up Fire. If memory serves me right I think we played a game together right?
So true.In post 69, Invisibility wrote: not that having silly conversations about unrelated things is bad. Actually we should do more of that. Much better than people getting super angry over a forum game lol
Speaking of which @Ausuka: Was that a serious vote?In post 68, Invisibility wrote: oh yeah no I'd already thought that but there didn't seem to be all that much gameplay discussion except for theHu Taothing I think
Well dang I want town vibes.In post 96, Invisibility wrote:yesIn post 89, ItalianoVD wrote:Really? AlreadyIn post 45, Invisibility wrote: Fire (the individual) is giving me town vibes
Gotcha. Way too early to ask for elaboration so we'll let it marinate for a little bit.In post 99, Ausuka wrote:To the extent any vote on page 2 is serious, yeahIn post 97, ItalianoVD wrote:Speaking of which @Ausuka: Was that a serious vote?In post 68, Invisibility wrote: oh yeah no I'd already thought that but there didn't seem to be all that much gameplay discussion except for theHu Taothing I think
In post 100, Invisibility wrote:maybe for a candy barIn post 98, ItalianoVD wrote:Well dang I want town vibes.In post 96, Invisibility wrote:yesIn post 89, ItalianoVD wrote:Really? AlreadyIn post 45, Invisibility wrote: Fire (the individual) is giving me town vibes
Wait. What's a candy bar without chocolate?In post 105, Invisibility wrote: I do not like chocolate and am allergic to peanut butter!
Eh yeah. One could also say that the reason for the vote is based off of elaborate vibes.In post 104, fireisredsir wrote: hu tao has posted a total of one word
i feel like the vote is kinda self explanatory
one might say it is not elaboratable
Cool. I was serious about letting it marinate, but thank you.In post 108, Ausuka wrote: I don't have any issue elaborating but it's probably the expected answer - I think while it's also playstyle dependent, scum are more likely to make that kind of minimalist entrance / feel less comfortable engaging at the start.
Heck yeah I want town vibes and guess I gotta do better because Fire got them for almost nothing.In post 118, iamveryhappy wrote: I really dislike post 98 here
"I want town vibes"
like you gotta earn them yourself
also seems like lazy scum
We were vibing and just flowing with the thread.In post 125, iamveryhappy wrote: you literally asked for a candy bar for town vibes?
scum would gain a precious day of survival for doing this, given that we don't know the setups, you may be a doc, a cop, a jk, whatever, it would also kinda stop you from using an investigative role on them, or would encourage you to use a protective role on them.
Exactly. This.In post 122, Invisibility wrote: what would scum gain from requesting town vibes? Do you think I would just hand them over
We as in the entire game. Not just me and Invisibility.In post 129, iamveryhappy wrote: I don't like the use of the word "we" here
I wasn't gonna say anything yet because it's really not much to say for an RVS wagon early. Obviously I wouldn't want it to get pushed through if you're town, but I think early on having some type of wagon movement/development is good.In post 141, Cook wrote: i’m confused why there isn’t much discussion about my wagon when four people are on it
In post 158, Ausuka wrote: I think wagons are protown and the concern feels overblown to me
ThisIn post 164, Ausuka wrote:I think early wagons are fine, I think e-2 is really not that big of a deal, and I don't think the wagon is 'rushed' - I like the Cook voteIn post 159, HighPrincessErinys wrote: There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.
It does get things moving at least.In post 159, HighPrincessErinys wrote: There's nothing protown about rushing a wagon to E-2 within like 4 hours of the game starting.
You must not have played a lot of games because it's a pretty common thing.In post 178, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.
In post 178, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.
In post 179, Cook wrote:agree with you there. i don't know if it's even an issue, but regardless, i think it's respectable to be offended at a wagon on me when the game's barely startedIn post 178, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.
In post 180, Invisibility wrote:yahIn post 177, Cook wrote: doubt a townie would have lolhammered anyhowthis is reasonable!In post 178, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.
Hmm. Somebody here is scum.In post 181, Asri Teroka wrote:Yes.In post 179, Cook wrote:agree with you there. i don't know if it's even an issue, but regardless, i think it's respectable to be offended at a wagon on me when the game's barely startedIn post 178, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.
In post 200, Hu Tao wrote:Hello. Looks like you were almost.. Cooked earlierIn post 196, Cook wrote: hu you have posted precious little this game! i get it though, we're all busy![]()
![]()
In post 239, Asri Teroka wrote:Leaves cook and Asri for what? Your delusions? You sound fake and aligned here, this one is placing you in the 'not taking serious pile.'In post 217, ItalianoVD wrote: Going back to 215. I like HighPrincess and Invisibility for town. It's just a certain townie tone to their posts, especially Invisibility. This leaves Cook and Asri.
For now VOTE: Asri
It's really late here though.I'll have to go more in depth tomorrow. Ciao peeps.
This one isn't convinced you actually formed a townread on Erynis.
Furthermore, what you seem to be doing is hunting mis-elims, not scum.
In post 241, Asri Teroka wrote: And you're also sheeping Ausuka posts that can be NAI and are generic throwaway statememts.
Yeah which is why I said it'd be okay to let it marinate more because I knew the reason would be exactly what she said. I did ask her if the vote was real.In post 219, fireisredsir wrote: my comment was about finding it strange that italiano seemed to be making a show of not asking ausuka to elaborate, when it seemed to me that it would be obvious what she was thinking
So Cook, you say you don't know if it's even an issue. What are you talking about here because isn't what this is all about?In post 179, Cook wrote:agree with you there.In post 178, HighPrincessErinys wrote: Either way this one is suspect of the wagon getting so far so fast on so little reasoning to vote.i don't know if it's even an issue, but regardless, i think it's respectable to be offended at a wagon on me when the game's barely started
Don’t like this rolefish.
I read tonally so if I’m townreading people it’s because they’ve posted something that to me sounds like it comes from town. Sometimes I don’t always give details as to why I townread.In post 377, Asri Teroka wrote: Invisibility understood it well enough. This one simply said your townreads felt fake, you felt like you were pushing for mis-eliminations and that nothing you said in that one 'associative' post made any sense.
Meaning it didn't feel like a town case, bluntly.
This one likes voting ItalianoVD for now independently.
A team like Ausuka/ItalianoVD/Iamveryhappy would be clumsy but there are patterns.This one is not sure where to slot Erynis in. A lot of silent voices so overall this one has said their say.
No, not a real claim.In post 386, KatyKimFanClub wrote:Is this a real claim? Why would you even claim?In post 365, ItalianoVD wrote: Invis is my mason buddy. Stop playing Invis.
So you were you serious or are you still playing? Like I can't tell if you are playing a character here or you for real.In post 569, iamveryhappy wrote: I still don't like this defense
Parked for now.
I'm forced to be happy, as I told you in our first interaction
help me
Well I'm pretty good at townreading players and I trust in it a heck of a lot more than my scumreading ability. It helps me solve games more than scumreading people ever could. I actually get asked in every game I play why I so easily townread slots. Experience will do that, what else can I say?In post 570, Black wrote: I don't think IVD's strong townread of Invisibility makes a lot of sense tbh. I'm more inclined to believe this is an informed read rather than one developed naturally. And the mason thing just feels like a buddying attempt when I look through the lens of scum!IVD
Still planning on iso'ing this today to get a better idea of where I stand
If you're asking if you've continued to feel towny then yes, you have.In post 571, Invisibility wrote:have I maintained thisIn post 567, ItalianoVD wrote: Early on when everyone was fluffposting Invis interacted with me in a way that I thought was loose and fun which I don’t think scum would/could be able to maintain.
I think they could be partners based off of 419 and 420. It's a weird interaction for me and I'm wondering why Cook would say it the way she did. "Scum or Town Pr?" It's kinda specifically suspicous. Then happy's response just seems disjointed. I read it multiple times and sounds like what should be in a scum PT.In post 574, fireisredsir wrote:can you elaborate on thisIn post 567, ItalianoVD wrote:I could also vote for iamveryhappy and probably Princess, but I just don’t think scum would be that clumsy around a wagon the way Princess was. I could be wrong about that though.
Oh lol. This is interesting.In post 576, Cook wrote: gonna be honest i'm liking iamveryhappy less and less as the day goes on
Actually no, not independently. As I told Fire, after reading those two posts again they continue to sound weird. Cook for the early wagon stuff on top of that post.In post 577, Ausuka wrote:Can you elaborate on your read on Cook? I could maybe get how that post could make you think cook and happy could be partners, although I'd like elaboration on that too, but how does it make Cook scum independently of happy?In post 567, ItalianoVD wrote: 420 makes me think happy and Cook could be partners or happy is town
I think for now I’m voting VOTE: Cook.
I'm not normal. I'm an unorthodox type of player, but there is always a method to my madness.In post 582, iamveryhappy wrote:really hate this postIn post 579, Cook wrote: i'm still not totally convinced on italiano, but the claim walkback is a face-saver in my book
like
the u-turn is really the thing that makes it worse
"I did it to show how much invis is town or smth"
why can't you just do it the normal way and NOT claim mason in the first place
In post 624, Cook wrote:"someone who wants to not die"In post 623, ItalianoVD wrote: I think they could be partners based off of 419 and 420. It's a weird interaction for me and I'm wondering why Cook would say it the way she did. "Scum or Town Pr?" It's kinda specifically suspicous. Then happy's response just seems disjointed. I read it multiple times and sounds like what should be in a scum PT.
I get it and it does make sense but saying it the way you did and where you did in the context of this game made me frown. I won’t not believe your answer, but I’ll have to see what happens as the game progresses.In post 625, Cook wrote: that's what scum or town pr is for me