Mini 1782 Game Over


User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #927 (isolation #0) » Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:40 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 923, pisskop wrote:Itslike its a new (awesomer) game now!

good job I subbed in then, we needed to balance it out.

i see there's a lot of time until deadline so I'll read up over the weekend
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #928 (isolation #1) » Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:43 am

Post by Maxous »

unvote
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #937 (isolation #2) » Sun Apr 10, 2016 3:02 am

Post by Maxous »

vote: Clumsy


I would focus on either Clumsy or A Plain Farmer.

The way I interpreted the early game, there was a lot of aggressive town-arguing going on between {Radiant Cowbells-Frozen Angel-Roshar} and then later with {Jake-Frozen Angel.}
I would focus on the people skirting around the arguments, trying not to get involved as I would think the scum players would really want to avoid getting dragged in to arguments.

i feel Clumsy's been overly quiet in general anyway.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #938 (isolation #3) » Sun Apr 10, 2016 3:07 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 936, Froot Loop wrote:I still think Jake/Max is a scum slot.

he was being obnoxious to the point where he nearly got policy-lynch'ed for his behaviour and would have if he wasn't replaced.

He wasn't being survivalistic at all.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #939 (isolation #4) » Sun Apr 10, 2016 3:09 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 857, Jeanne11 wrote:I am in a cage and the key is thrown away
Gently do the winds in the trees sway.

VOTE: Jake

In post 863, Jeanne11 wrote:Because he just is. I will always chase tunnelers as tunnelers will always be scum to me.


one last thing, this vote was crap and kinda scummy.
if there is a scum on jake's wagon here is where I would say it is.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #947 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:01 pm

Post by Maxous »

In post 944, Clumsy wrote:Ugh, yeah, I like it too unfortunately.

Unfortunately?

In post 945, Froot Loop wrote:Re: Max's post 937 - It's true that scum can hide away during a tunnelly TvT argument but I also think scum could dominate the thread like this.

i'm not saying the arguments *have* to be all town v town.
In my opinion, these ones were though.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #967 (isolation #6) » Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:41 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 950, shaddowez wrote:
In post 937, Maxous wrote:
vote: Clumsy


I would focus on either Clumsy or A Plain Farmer.
...snip...
i feel Clumsy's been overly quiet in general anyway.
Why APF?

The same as Clumsy, just to a lesser extent.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #968 (isolation #7) » Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:42 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 958, Roshar wrote:What is town arguing anyway?

it's a bunch of town-aligned players arguing amongst themsleves
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #986 (isolation #8) » Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:35 pm

Post by Maxous »

unvote


go on then
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #999 (isolation #9) » Wed Apr 13, 2016 7:29 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 987, Clumsy wrote:What would you like to know Max?

you said you wanted time to talk.

I kinda agree regarding Shadowez, I wasn't stoked with him popping in with a wall full of questions earlier.

In post 996, Roshar wrote:Oh, and Maxous was the first to unvote Clumsy. Hmmmm....

yeah, to prevent a quickhammer.
I would think you agree since you want the other replacements to catch up

besides from what i've seen you're case on me is you don't like me giving town reads on {FA,RC and yourself}
apart from the jake stuff
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1024 (isolation #10) » Thu Apr 14, 2016 2:20 am

Post by Maxous »

not bothering to quote but Radiant Cowbells and Frozn Angel both having a go at each other and trying to figure each other out would point towards them being town considering they're friends.
If either was scum I would suspect the scum would try and appease and buddy the other to get an ally in the thread.
Neither did that and I would town-read the slots for it.

Frozen Angel was really really obvious town anyway and pisskop has been town too so I would be near 100% on that slot.
Maybe I could look to quote something from Roshar but she was pro-active and the arguments were solid so she came across as a town read.

-

In post 1022, Nosferatu wrote:Evaluating the likelihood of Clumsy being VI vs scum.

what's your definition of VI.

In post 1003, shaddowez wrote:
In post 999, Maxous wrote:
I kinda agree regarding Shadowez, I wasn't stoked with him popping in with a wall full of questions earlier.

And what would you have rather seen? I mean, if you're scum I can understand why you wouldn't want me to try and figure out people's motivations or get explanations.

asking a bunch of questions can be an easy way for scum busy-work without doing much.
to answer your question: a bit more of an analysis of the information
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1031 (isolation #11) » Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:24 am

Post by Maxous »

jake was L-2. That's what I would consider close.
plus the last 2 votes from lowell and pisskop were policy lynching votes, if he was scum he would of toned it down because his behaviour was certainly gonna get him hanged to keep the game civil if nothing else.

The jake-FA fight was a lot more personal than anything game related.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1077 (isolation #12) » Fri Apr 15, 2016 2:01 am

Post by Maxous »

skimming here, sorry.

clumsy seems like town just for writing a million posts when called out on content. Seems pretty absurd to do as scum.

I would be looking at Shadow or Huntress I think for the vote.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1087 (isolation #13) » Fri Apr 15, 2016 6:43 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 1078, Froot Loop wrote:Why Huntress? This is the second time you seem to have scumread someone without giving a reason.

I'm leaning town on Shaddowez. I like his post 950 - I think it's asking for and responding to clarification. I do think it was a bit early for his vote on Clumsy though.

what was the first time?
anyway, I didn't like what Jeanne posted and Huntress has read the thread but is struggling to put out thoughts to give us all.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1132 (isolation #14) » Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:28 pm

Post by Maxous »

In post 965, Froot Loop wrote:About Jake/Max, most of this is repetition but it's what I'm thinking:

1) I think he's presented conflicting information in the thread and then been misleading about it. I linked to the posts I'm talking about in post 663
2) The way Jake was posting at the beginning of the game and the way he reacted to questioning about his pre-game opinion makes me think that he wouldn't back down from being questioned. The argument that he would do this as town isn't applicable, for me.
3) I get a bullying impression from his interaction with FA. I think he was panicking and responded like this to FA's questioning.
4) His discussion of reads lists (post 356, post 446, post 472) is theory-based posting rather than analysis of the game.


can't really defend point #1. He was being obnoxious for the sake of being obnoxious
point #2 is a playstyle indicator, not an alignment one
point #3 - they don't like each other on a personal level, that is why they had that level of argument
point #4, he was grumpy/moany but that's not really alignment-indictive

-

vote: Huntress
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1157 (isolation #15) » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:11 pm

Post by Maxous »

Huntress took a week to briefly explain one read and pop up with zero town-reads.

That's why i'm voting her
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1159 (isolation #16) » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:31 pm

Post by Maxous »

yeah, I think Clumsy just over-committed to games and got lazy/unmotivated
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1161 (isolation #17) » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:48 pm

Post by Maxous »

He was talking about it earlier in the thread and I felt it was genuine.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1163 (isolation #18) » Mon Apr 18, 2016 1:35 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 1162, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Gotcha. So if Huntress comes in and says the same?

well that would depend on wheter or not Huntress DOES say the same, for her defence.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1179 (isolation #19) » Tue Apr 19, 2016 4:18 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 1171, Huntress wrote:
In post 1157, Maxous wrote:Huntress took a week to briefly explain one read and pop up with zero town-reads.

So taking the time to read the thread and giving my scums reads (plural, not just one) is scummy is it? Please explain that one for me. And why are you so concerned about my town reads?

because i suspect you are struggling to come up with reads and reasons for them.

In post 1177, mhsmith0 wrote:
In post 1077, Maxous wrote:skimming here, sorry.

clumsy seems like town just for writing a million posts when called out on content. Seems pretty absurd to do as scum.

I would be looking at Shadow or Huntress I think for the vote.
Why would this be absurd to do as wolf? Popping in to give enough content to diminish the momentum against you, then popping back out and returning to regularly scheduled non production, seems pretty wolf to me.

I admit Clumsy disappearing again weakens my feeling on that.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1208 (isolation #20) » Tue Apr 19, 2016 7:59 pm

Post by Maxous »

unvote, vote: Clumsy
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1237 (isolation #21) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:42 am

Post by Maxous »

it's likely this is a choice between two town anyway.

So, choose whichever
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1286 (isolation #22) » Sat Apr 23, 2016 10:33 pm

Post by Maxous »

I would say the nosferatu kill would implicate Lowell the most to be honest.
He was the only person nos was really against.

In post 1266, Lowell wrote:I'm with this thinking, and I take the blame.

VOTE: max

^
This was a pretty poor vote anyway.
sheeping titus and "taking blame" for a mislynch he didn't actually hard-push sounds off.

I would still say huntress is scummy, she seemed pretty content to let the mislynch go through without getting her hands dirty so to speak.

In post 1269, JohnnyFarrar wrote:For me it's the willingness to believe what's his name was just busy instead of lurker scum but not that other person. Makes her reads seem arbitrary.

I've mentioned 3-4 times that the scum-read on huntress is not a lurker lynch :igmeou:
it's because of her struggle and unwillingness to give and explain reads.

In post 1285, Froot Loop wrote:Max didn't respond to my questions until I pushed him on it. Could be that he felt like he didn't need to because he was feeling particularly secure.

because you're asking me to defend a lot of BS that Jake wrote.
I can't, I would simply suggest, just look at previous games from himself - you will see largely the same behaviour.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1293 (isolation #23) » Mon Apr 25, 2016 3:02 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 1292, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I saw you respond once to the idea when I posited it here, but that was hardly a defense from the accusation.


Don't worry about it.
I was tired and being a bit snippy.
Maybe I wasn't clear before but I think it's scummy because she has struggled to come up with content to give. I don't think it's case where she's just lurking, I think suspect she
can't
come up with much which would indicate a scum struggling with the game.

i'll vote lowell though because i'm really not inclined to just ignore the nos night-kill.
People will argue WIFOM but nos was not an obvious kill nor a universal strong town-read so i'm inclined to think there was a particular reason for it.
Not like Lowell has been a shining beacon of town play regardless

vote: lowell
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1317 (isolation #24) » Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:20 pm

Post by Maxous »

In post 1295, Titus wrote:Why did you ignore my question?

it's answered in #

In post 1299, Huntress wrote:I've replied to this already, but you apparently just ignored it.

i don't mean to be a broken record but people keep asking me to clarify

In post 1309, Froot Loop wrote:Can you quote what makes you think this?

she was pretty slow to give a stance on the competing wagons.
but yeah, fine it's not the strongest point in the world.
Last edited by Ircher on Tue Apr 26, 2016 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1330 (isolation #25) » Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:33 pm

Post by Maxous »

In post 1318, Titus wrote:Why are you voting Lowell out if wifom and not Huntress who you have a scumread on based on play?

idk. I was seeing if anyone would say anything because there is little to work with here.
i thought re-voting huntress would just be pointlessly beating the same drum

In post 1323, Huntress wrote:Because you still haven't backed up your claim that I'm "struggling" yet you keep repeating it as if it's a fact, which it isn't.

you have literally only elaborated on one read.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1407 (isolation #26) » Wed Apr 27, 2016 9:53 pm

Post by Maxous »

In post 1298, JohnnyFarrar wrote:As for your explanation I just can't bring myself to assume scum is lost, well, ever, really.

what? this point?

Well I don't agree. Faking reads is a lot harder than getting reads.

In post 1350, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Advocating Max's NKA. "There was no reason for Nos to be NK'd tbh " is just wrong. Maybe Nod crumbed or slipped.
(1)
Maybe they had some power that revealed Nos's role.
(2)
Maybe Nos seemed just a little too smart to let live (Nos has beat me before, I can attest)
(3)
. Maybe scum was comfortable so they just rolled some dice. You don't
know
(unless you're scum) so trying to make it seem like that kill tells you anything and then trying to push a lynch because of it is just stupid.
(4)


1) then where is it.
2) not for a night 1 kill
3) If his reads were accurate yes. If I have considered this and the reason I looked into it is exactly because he wasn't a target I would of expected.
4) I get this practically every time I do Night-kill Analysis. Anyway, it wasn't as if it was the sole reason i'm looking at lowell. If his play was particularly town I would more inclined to ignore it. but it isn't.

edit: the neighbour thing is talked about later. yeah, it's possible scum didn't want to be stuck with a town-neighbour throughout the night. More chances to slip up.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1408 (isolation #27) » Wed Apr 27, 2016 9:58 pm

Post by Maxous »

In post 1397, FA_Q2 wrote:
In post 1371, Huntress wrote:
In post 1330, Maxous wrote:you have literally only elaborated on one read.

I'm only pushing one read at the moment. The others are sitting on the back burner because I want to reread some stuff in context first and then update my reads. I should be able to do some of that tomorrow.

Your vote preceded the back and fourth between lowell and rosh. What are your thoughts on lowell's charge?

huh.

so I read this, looked back and you're right.

Huntress votes Roshar for a quite a while.
Lowell and Roshar have a big back and forth and then Huntress...writes #1371 and pops out again.
like, didn't even address or comment on it at all.

yeah..yeah.
she likely is scum afterall

unvote, vote: Huntress


additional point: I thought jeanne was scummy and I think Huntress is. 2 people independently scummy in the same slot? (not to mention how KT was a pile of null)
This is prolly where I want to go.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1414 (isolation #28) » Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:49 am

Post by Maxous »

why not.
We're speculating why the scum-team decided to kill nos.
dunno why so many people are having a fit over it.

-

In post 1411, Titus wrote: His big deal is Huntress didn't comment

my big deal is read her ISO Titus.
what do you see?
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1440 (isolation #29) » Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:54 pm

Post by Maxous »

In post 1430, Froot Loop wrote:@Titus - I agree that Max is still scummy. He's voted for Huntress before so this is going back to a previous thought. He seems kind of apathetic and isn't responding much to the suspicion on him. This is subjective, so I don't think it's AI, but it's not doing anything to change my opinion.

well, what do you want.
I'm trying to explain to people to lynch the lurk-scum but everyone is being a backseat driver nitpicking
how
i'm trying to push the read.
Somebody explain why they think she's town then.

In post 1437, mhsmith0 wrote:
Max, what is your opinion on the allegations made by Lowell against roshar?

roshar is still town, response still makes me believe that.
not sure about lowell, i'll come back to him.

sidenote: If Lowell is town I think APF is scum based on APF's vote earlier. Just my feeling.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1441 (isolation #30) » Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:56 pm

Post by Maxous »

lemme put this way.

I didn't get a town-read on Kain Tepes' posting.
I thought Jeanne11's posting was poor.
I don't like Huntress' posting.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1461 (isolation #31) » Fri Apr 29, 2016 12:17 pm

Post by Maxous »

i have glazed over this game a lot but let's see.

RadiantCowbells
Titus
- I thought RC was towny on my first read. Titus is tunneling me and wanting to talk even though she won't talk about huntress with me so i'm finding it hard to have an opinion on her here.

mhsmith0
- He seems okay. Could be scum though.

KainTepes Jeanne11
Huntress
- as i said, i didn't like any of the 3 players in this slot.

Froot Loop
- Yeah, seems townish. Pretty assertive and prodding without jumping down people's throats

Frozen Angel Pisskop
JohnnyFarrar
- Frozen Angel and Pisskop were both really town so I would be very inclined to think town here.

Maverick1102
FA_Q2
- I've glazed over FA quite a bit but I did like Maverick as town

shaddowez
Garmr - Maybe scum? Shaddowez was very null to me

a plain farmer
- Could be scum I guess. Coasting a bit and arguments seem to be critiqued quite a bit? I fully admit I haven't paid close attention to him recently though

Lowell
- Seems a bit hard to read but eh, if I had to choose gonna go with town atm.

Roshar
- Still think she's town. The late-day freakout at Clumsy etc. seems a lot more town than scum, IMO
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1479 (isolation #32) » Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:16 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 1477, Roshar wrote:Would have preferred to wait until max replied to me, but he essentially ignored my post a second time.

which one.
people have asked me a million things this game.

i gave my reads list on the previous page. Only change since is that I would put mhsmith0 a bit likelier to be town after #.
putting solid effort in constructing reads there.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1488 (isolation #33) » Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:07 pm

Post by Maxous »

so I was thinking APF is scum but now APF is hard-defending me and i've gotten confused again.

meh, sorry i wasn't involved enough to point out the scum-team here but i would deffo say huntress anyway.
enough of this "I can't read her because she isn't giving me much to go on".
like, yah think there might be a reason for that? it's called lurking and it's a pretty effective scum-tactic.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1495 (isolation #34) » Sun May 01, 2016 9:57 am

Post by Maxous »

if i had something super-awesome i would of already said it.

but i don't

vt
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #1497 (isolation #35) » Sun May 01, 2016 10:02 am

Post by Maxous »

In post 1493, Garmr wrote:Also before clumsy he doesn't really push that hard and his reaction to jake vs frozen was weird to me it's like he was trying to keep in it and be active while making sure not to get to drawn into if you know what I mean(don't know if I conveyed that right).

yeah, i remember thinking APF was skating on the sidelines a little too much during that *and* the FA-RC-Roshar arguments
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”