Mini Normal 1964 - Hell Is 56k Dialup - Endgame!

[Everyone Else]

VOTE: Transcend

Let's do this.

[Everyone Else]

VOTE: Everyone Else
Because most of us are town, but Everyone Else is mafia.

(Its the best i could come up with ok... )

vote transcend

[Everyone Else]

Guys no novels plz

bad doggy

[Everyone Else]

trans is this going to be one of those games where you're town and i hate it

why would you hate that trans is town? is it because he's good at busting you when you're scum? :O

[Everyone Else]

i'm starting to really think you might be....

who's who?

[Everyone Else]

Sorry for not being invested. I will try. So uh, who we lynching today?

[Everyone Else]

Lies ^

[Everyone Else]

all lies ^

[Everyone Else]

how about no

[Everyone Else]

how about no

How about you contribute to the game?
You signed up to play....so play.

This post makes it obvious you are lurking.

You know, tell us who you think is most likely scum and why?
Who’s most likely town and why?
And who do you think would be the best slot to Lynch today?

You know, play the game.

will try to work on that as soon as possible when im sober and when i have free time.

[Everyone Else]

VOTE: screenplay

[Everyone Else]

VOTE: screenplay

How dare you put me at L-3 unannounced, without reason or warning.
Hopefully everyone else will let me finish reading.

lol

[Everyone Else]

im getting voted on?

[Everyone Else]

sorry thanksgiving week and all

[Everyone Else]

will try my very best to catch up by tonight? but ugh ultra moon tho

[Everyone Else]

i'd say i'm fully in this game now even if i still haven't gotten around to wall iso-ing everyone yet - feel free to engage. the same goes for keychain, who i believe said something along the same lines.

Why no vote? Also, I don't think you've given your read on the Cy/Espe slot, I'd like to hear that.

Regarding Dunnstral vs EE: For me, Dunnstral is null. Voting there is literally a lurker-lynch. It looks a lot like he's only skimming a couple of recent posts each time he says anything, from his response to me and his vote on Espe. Your 701 is seriously weird. Dunnstral is an awful lynch for today and I'm sure you can do better than that.
EE is also lurking but his actions have been considerably more scummy. Every time someone votes him he appears and splashes around a bit. It doesn't seem like uninvested town, who I don't think would be so bothered by a bit of pressure. 462 and 506 were particularly bad as posts that looked like he was trying to exist in the game but contributed exactly nothing.

What benefit do you get out of trying to equalise the two?

VOTE: Espeonage

gut scummy

but why must you do this to the wagon

I'm

on

@keychain, can you explain your reads progression on cy? it seems like you came out of an early game interaction townreading him but there's about a 350 post gap where he doesn't come up at all until 517, where he's at the bottom of the list. what happened?

This can serve as my Cy case, which I promised I'd do last night but ah well.

517 was made after reviewing the ISOs of the players listed, which is when the change mostly occurred. However you've also missed signs of my townread wavering in 209.

Several things that I initially townread him for came across really scummy on reread. For example, I have no idea what I was thinking when I unvoted in 110 and said I "particularly liked point A" in 107. On reflection, the point takes some severe mental gymnastics. For reference:

A) My train of thought was not, "If I can trust this person, and Transcend has a higher than normal chance of being scum, then he should be prodded because he is more than likely scum in this game."

It was, "If I can trust this person, and Transcend has a higher than normal chance of being scum, he would probably have a higher chance of not playing because he is scum and does not want to play the same role once again, as he was the only person to not confirm." The reason I fell for the joke was because the statistics relied on behavior, especially the part about if someone replaced him. It's flimsy logic, yeah, but if you read my posts, I did not 100% agree with UC, I was just talking statistics so I could anticipate behavior.

Like ??? how did I townread this. The main problem I had with him was on him not reading the players in the game, and this is just a terribly convoluted excuse to have not been doing that.

The early Transcend meta thing still rings really false to me, though 18 suggests it really is a genuine misunderstanding because it looks like he thought that Transcend was less likely to stay in games where he's town so I'm conflicted over that one.

Then overly defensive in 61/72 and easily persuaded to vote by Katya in 76. 96 A) is a really bad excuse, in that from an early game post he decided to throw out everything he'd ever known about mafia to engage in some meta speculation about a player he didn't know not confirming for alignment-related reasons because... he thought everyone was going to be doing this?

I still dislike the solid townread on me in 107 considering how unsure he seems to be of other reads, and renewing it in 143 comes across really appease-y.
381 "been meaning to move my vote somewhere else" doesn't look like a town thought process - his vote was on a scumread of his as I understand it (Firaja) and it looks like he cares an awful lot about what he looks like.
400's "Like...isn't that questionable logic? Like even more questionable than my original blunder" is pretty icky, because he's acknowledging that he looks scummy but is trying to shift people scumreading him for it onto Transcend.

Those are the reasons he was at the bottom of my list. At this point I'm finding it hard to see his actions as town-motivated.


@Zach 692:

not really lurking, been busy. hey let me help.

@ MOD, I wanna replace out. Very busy right now and not invested in this game, sorry :/.

[Everyone Else]

Christ

Play the fucking game you sign up for

It is absolutely miserable for both alignments to have to deal with extreme amounts of replace outs.

Jeez

usually when i see someone rant about someone and include "both alignments" they're usually scum.