Mini 1552 - Paranoia [GAME OVER]
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
You got a role?
still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Did he? I don't see it anywhere...In post 36, Dessew wrote:He said we would get our role PMs in 12 hours, right?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Huh, what now? Also, yay, role.
This is actually pretty funny now:In post 34, Empking wrote:especially if you don't want to assume we have third parties.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Yeah, but shos set it up.
So yeah, I agree we just let the police be police for now.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
No.No.In post 54, GreyICE wrote:Straw Poll: Does anyone think that any activity during the 'no role PM' time helped determine the scumteam? Or was it just for the police? Windblown got to talk during that time, so...still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Difficult question, fav role either town tracker or SK or Mafia RoleCop (haven't been either here yet), so as you can tell no fav alignment really.In post 60, Kovara wrote:
I am voting her because of the theory... kinda?In post 55, Garmr wrote:In post 50, Kovara wrote:well, uhm that answers that!
annyyywayyyy...
VOTE: LLD
I have a theory, A THEORY, but I don't know if I should share it... I'm kinda scared and my daddy says to not share things with strangers
Are you voting LLD because of this theory or is it something separate(Like a rvs)?
it's kinda a stupid theory anyway, though...
QUESTION:
what is everyone's favorite role/alignment?
mines Vanilla town!still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Oooch, abandoning the Muffin wagon already?
still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
I wouldn't think anyone would pick that police role...In post 66, GreyICE wrote:100% Town. I don't think this is a "U Pick" though. Or if it is, I'd certainly have liked to have been told about it.
PEdit: Serial killer is pretty hot.
@garmr, not for me before some more players have come here.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
*backs up* help, he is voting me!
Hi.
@garmr I agree, but I don't have anything...still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
In post 85, Kovara wrote:
Why isn't it?In post 84, dopog wrote:like even if it's jokey stubborn that's not great KovaraIn post 76, MTD wrote:I have no idea what Kovara is trying to achieve at the moment, natural guess would be getting out of RVS, but favorite roles really don't help there, do they?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
It says something like that, but with a negation, so it says, that some don't.In post 98, shos wrote:Eh well its not the same goal - i was trying to paraphrase - more like thecsame propaganda, the same cause, dunno how to paraphrase
I agree that Kovara hasn't been helpful, also, why do you think shos would have scumclaimed with that?
Also, how about that theory of yours?
Grey, can you please explain your vote?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
[quote="In post 104, Kovara" but I wasn't expecting the quick lynch :/In post 103, Kovara wrote: and he like, hammered me so :/
[/quote]
What are you talking about? How is 4 people voting you a lynch?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Any reason?In post 127, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Nope. My vote is happy where it is.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Well, we can just wait for the next VC, if Nobody Special's vote doesn't show up, we can forget it anyway.In post 157, Kovara wrote:nofuckthatstill the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Yes it is WIFOM. May I remind you that WIFOM, while bad, is not necessarily alignment indicative (especially when done this obviously)?In post 160, GreyICE wrote:
This is likeIn post 147, zMuffinMan wrote:
you probably wouldn't be reading me as scum if i actually were scumlld wrote:This guy is supposed to be good at scum? Please.
The actual literal definition of WIFOM
The actual literal definition
"I only play shitty and scummy if I'm town!"
Can we just lynch this motherfucker?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Agreed, he isn't contributing much.In post 161, GreyICE wrote:
Dessaw, read the above post. Seriously. That's what he calls content. Oh, and voting for the moderator. And whining that I'm scum and LLD is a bad player, because that must be why we have a scum read on him!In post 149, Dessew wrote:Because I'm slow, I guess, and thus I don't really get why there's a wagon on Muffin. Feel free to explain it.
He's just blatantly attacking everyone voting for him, and trolling. Fucking lynch players doing that, Dessaw. That's how you nail scum.
Everyone should explain in their next post why they're not voting Muffin.
Wtf? He isn't voting the moderator, nor did he ever.
Well, that's just trolling probably.
No, that's not how you nail scum. This is how you lynch players regardless of their alignment.
If I was voting Muffin right now, that would be for a policy lynch and I don't do policy lynches.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Heh, you are right, I didn't even notice that, never changes my vote out of RVS, thanks for pointing out.In post 164, GreyICE wrote:
...In post 163, MTD wrote:If I was voting Muffin right now, that would be for a policy lynch and I don't do policy lynches.
You are voting for Muffin right now.
The fuck is this?
I mean the fuck is this?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Kovara I thought my vote was there anyway.
Expl.: I still don't see what he thought to be achieving with his questions.
Also he made pretty stupid cases on Dessew and dopog, that are illogical at best.
I don't really buy into the "I thought I was lynched thing".still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
@Kovara: I thoght this, followed by "dopog is obviously scum" to be your "case", because otherwise I don't know where you would be coming from with "obviously". But you are right ofc calling them scum without having a case is much better /sarcasmIn [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5688554#p5688554]post 141[/url], Kovara wrote:
ohmaigod you're... you... you totally missed the point of that post :/ and did you even read the reads I was able to form?In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5687046#p5687046]post 128[/url], dopog wrote:
So umm @Kovara?
It's not great because, sure you may be asking a question to get out of rvs, but pushing people to answer your "question" or else seems as if you're just asking questions for questions sake!
I was not trying to kill your fun [ sorry if? I actually did : ( ] just, thought it was pretty scummy to jokingly go "guys they're not answering my questions!" because there can't be THAT much purpose behind that question....
Serious question- how much experience do you have with forum mafia?
there was a fair amount of purpose behind my question
one year here, two more offsite
I will come to the rest later.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
I get what you are saying about changing their posting style before and after role, but I do not agree.
I agree it changed, I do not agree you can conclude to them being scum. I mean, ofc you play differently when you have no idea whatsoever what you will be trying to achieve in the future. I think the point you are missing is that inb4 you don't jknow what you will be, so you play in a way that doesn't affect the later game (e.g. Scumhunting not possible etc., therefore I think playstyle would change after the role PM about equally as much regardless of alignment.
Your thought process seems genuine though, and I see you were at least trying to get somewhere with that question (btw there is a reason why RQS isn't used much anymore: it doesn't really help). So although I don't agree with the methods and your conclusions I do think you are town.
UNVOTE:
I have no idea whom to vote right now, what is your case on dopog, then?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
If you are so desperate for a vote, fine
VOTE: GreyICE
because of reasons I stated earlier (@dopog: I did, actually, read my posts, if I say something about someone that is obviously scummy, I don't feel the need to explicitely point that out.)
Also Private is lurking, yes, but that is null in itself. so anyway,
@Private: Feel like sharing thoughts?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
It doesn't exist except that I don't think a wagon on scum would form like this (without anything scummy, really)In post 202, GreyICE wrote:Say, out of curiosity, where does this grand conviction that Muffin is town come from, oh he who does not know where his vote is?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
@Grey: Because not contributing muchis not a scumtell
And no, what you are doing would not help me get a read there, because when he is lynched, he is lynched. You are pushing a quick lynch and not engaging in any senseful discussion, that is what prevents me from getting a read.
I am not trying to shut your interactions with him down, I am not aggressively attacking them, either, I am trying to get you todo some real interactioninstead of just screaming "SCUM" at him.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
WTF? In 164 you "start" talking to me, I answer in my next post, youIn post 287, GreyICE wrote:#164 I start talking to MTD. #168, there's muffin to fucking attack me and spam shit and try and stop me getting any reads. I don't like MTD's posts, but I've had ZERO chance to get any decent interaction with him because of PAGES OF BULLSHIT. Shos? PAGES OF BULLSHIT. Fucking new guy replacing Nobody Special (and NS replacing out is more than a bit of a scumtell, he doesn't like playing scum)? PAGES OF BULLSHIT.never talk to me again. How is that muffin's fault?
Also It is just stupid to attack muffin for making noise, when basically all he has done is answer to you.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
That's anIn post 287, GreyICE wrote:And all you do is attack me. Insult me. Yell at me. [...] Shit at me at EVERY FUCKING TURN.exactdescription of whatyouhave been doing.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Why would they have been useless? Especially would they have been more useless than if greyICE flipped scum?In post 308, zMuffinMan wrote:greyice is most likely scum - in the unlikely event greyice flips town, your slot and LLD have been completely fucking useless for the entire game
Also, right now, it is more probable we get a flip of you, not grey.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
OR it's all the people not reading what he is saying, hm...In post 320, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:See you keep saying this, but given how you are saying it to so many different people in this game, maybe you should be looking at the common denominator. (hint: It's you! You're the scum!)
still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Ok, this now.In post 291, GreyICE wrote:
Because the next few pages are nothing but MUFFIN BULLSHIT.In post 289, MTD wrote:WTF? In 164 you "start" talking to me, I answer in my next post, younever talk to me again. How is that muffin's fault?
Also It is just stupid to attack muffin for making noise, when basically all he has done is answer to you.
As for him answering me
Actually
I'm curious
MTD, why don't you summarize all of his answers to me. Do tell me how many original answers he comes up with.
NO, it is because the next pages areyouwildly accusing him and him answering to it. It was entirelyyourchoice not to follow up on it.
Ok, as I do this, you do me a favor and summarize your original arguments for him being scum k?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
I missed the one for guyett, but after reading it let me rephrase: Do me a favor and summarize your original arguments for him being scum, that are not either already explained in a way that makes them non-alignment indicative(1.) or misreps/made-up(2.,4.), k?In post 339, GreyICE wrote:
I summarized it for Shos.In post 338, MTD wrote:Ok, as I do this, you do me a favor and summarize your original arguments for him being scum k?
Guyett replaces in. I summarize it for Guyett.
Now you want a summary. I mean why? Go find one of the other summaries. Use LLD's summary, she hit the key points. There's literally no point to another summary.
What is the point of asking for a summary, MTD?
That leaves only 3. for me, which I still don't really see as a scumtell, for once because I had a similar thought at that point (not that you were lyncher but maybe some kind of jester).still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Post 168: answer to #164: You call his post WIFOM, make a "synopsis" of it, he says you are misrepping him (IMO reightfully so)
169: answer to 161: You saying he is not producing content, him saying you don't either.
175: answer to 174: You saying the scum motivation behind his actions was to stop things from happening, avoiding to take stances and not contributing, him answering that this doesn't show scum motivation, that you are only attacking him for a single non-alignment indicative (due to him allegedly not having read the thread) post and calling you out for selectivity.
183: Answer to 180: You making a scumtell out of him accusing you of selectivity, him explaining that case again.
197: to no post in particular: Restating the case after you ignoring it in your previous posts.
205: reply to 199: well just read it, he is (rightfully) calling all of your points misrepsbecause they are, also restating his point.
210: reply to 208: You jumping at another post of his, calling it a scumtell, him explaining the thought process. Also accusing you of tunneling and not scumhunting (again).
211: sitll@ 208: You saying he thought he is not immune to scumslips, him agreeing, also some WIFOM he calls out himself.
214: @213: You say me or Dessew are scum, he asks you questions about that. You ask him to make an analysis in case you are town, he does that. You ask him something that has been discussed in length before, he gives you the same answer, then points out this is a bastard game so he can't be sure voting there was pointless.
217: @216: you saying his wagon is all town, he says it's unlikely for scum to avoid it altogether if he is town, then some analysis on the other ones on the wagon. You stating your case on me, him tentatively agreeing but questioning the possible scum motivation. You ask him about possible scum reaction to the police faction, him saying he doesn't think they are necessarily town and also that he wouldn't do what he has done, because of no profit for scum.
218: still @216: You restate you find it suspicious he "hunts" for third party, he restates his answer.
230: @231: see above
234: @232: see above
242: probably @241: again attacking your "scumtell"
252: @243: You say he was answering for shos, he points out he didn't but you didn't answer the question.
254: @250: You lay out your "case" on him, he attacks it, saying your points(links) are wrong/misreps (they were), asking how they were what you said they were (to which you didn't answer), then see above.
255: @253: You going back on 252 insisting he was interrupting you (for no reason), him again explaining how he didn't.
That should be enough for now, still don't know why you needed me to do this except solidifying my scumread on you.
Seriously, you are forcing me to focus on muffin when considering you, because for the biggest part of the game you only talked to/about him, that sucks.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
I am not gonna answer to this, everyone with a brain can see this is stupid, at least if they have read the thread.In post 341, GreyICE wrote:No, MTD. You've made it brutally clear you will consider nothing I've said. Despite stating you have no town read on Muffin, you have shown up here for two purposes. One is to dump a useless vote on Kovara when I pointed out you were voting Muffin despite defending him. The other is to brutally attack me, and me alone, every time the Muffin wagon seems to move forward.
You can't even answer simple, basic questions. All you do is reiterate that you need a summary, and scumplain about how shitty the case is. Given your inability to answer simple, basic questions, or even give a good summary of why you believe Muffin is town, I have less than zero desire to interact with you.
If you can't even pretend to be reading what I'm writing and achieve the minimum level of human interaction I'd expect out of a potato, fuck off.
My vote will stay on you., now to talk to the rest.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
So why do you like him?In post 332, Kovara wrote:
Grey has actually been Ad homming the entire game.and, there is the fact that the only people that I like are LLD and Grey. everyone else is super duper sketchyIn post 324, PrivateI wrote:In post 319, zMuffinMan wrote:are you actually retarded?Just don't...do your ad hom attacks as much as you want, (and believe me, they have been noted) but leave that crap out of this game.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
@LLD: This:
Is actually the best case on Muffin I've seen in this game, but still it isn't conclusive IMO, after rereading I think the same could be said about Grey, and even better so.In post 221, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:what do you think you accomplish with your posts above? you're arguing with someone who thinks you're scum and will almost certainly not change his mind. You're not stupid enough to not realize this.
So the only real intent you can have in making this drawn out bullets for bullets/points for points argument with him is to frustrate outside readers and create apathy towards you and he, so that people fall off your lynch wagon. Very common scum strategy, but very obvious.
Besides, you also stooped to asking "why me" which is death anyway, so.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
In post 362, GreyICE wrote:
I directly quoted you, Muffin.In post 360, zMuffinMan wrote:
that is NOT what i said at all - and once again you're fucking misrepresenting what i've said about itgreyice wrote:"I'm voting someone to see if there's secret votes the mod isn't counting" is completely fucking horrible.
Here's the link: http://forum.mafiascum.net/posting.php? ... []=5692870
Is your only response to anything I say "you're scummy" or "misrepresentation"?
@Guyett:You notice how he cuts off all conversation by yelling "MISREPRESENTATION" at the top of his lungs and complaining about how scummy I am?In post 214, zMuffinMan wrote:as is, i think there's a possibility votes are secretly counted for the detectives but not registered in the votecounts, but i don't see much good in testing that at the moment, so i'm not
--> Definitely NOT a direct quote.
-->NOT even the same meaning.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Well, while I don't think it is necessarily a thing scum would do, I still understand why he sees possible scum motivation there as voting for someone who can't actively answer you etc would be a way for scum to avoid taking clear stances early in the game.In post 367, zMuffinMan wrote:you cannot seriously think there's scum motivation in my vote on empkingstill the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
He did sayIn post 365, GreyICE wrote:Your first idea was "Oh I read EMPKing was unlynchable AND HADN'T READ THE THREAD" (something Antihero noted AFTER THE GAME STARTED - SO YOU COULD HAVE ONLY LEARNED IT BY READING THE THREAD)In post 191, zMuffinMan wrote:i hadn't read the thread it was late, couldn't be bothered reading, saw OP, saw he was "unlynchable" in a bastard game, figured i'd see what happens, voted, went to sleep.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
True for you.In post 369, GreyICE wrote:And yes, there's lots of scum motivation to go third party hunting and avoid making firm opinions and actually scumhunting. Look how shitty it is to fake scumhunting. Even if you win this debate with me, you'll just have one dead townie and even more questions tomorrow.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Great stuff, but that wasn't my point, the point is, if he is town, you have gained nothing from this day, because all you did was to convince yourself that he is scum. Your answer to this is "but he can't be town" and that is a mindset that is either scummy or really bad play.In post 375, GreyICE wrote:
Quoting this because I put some work into responding to MTD and I'm tired of my posts being lost in the general noise.In post 373, GreyICE wrote:
Not in the least. If I'm wrong about muffin, I'm wrong about muffin. If I get mislynched because of it, it happens. I am quite willing to gamble the game that this sort of INTENSE discomfort at attention and behavior does not come from town.In post 371, MTD wrote:
True for you.In post 369, GreyICE wrote:And yes, there's lots of scum motivation to go third party hunting and avoid making firm opinions and actually scumhunting. Look how shitty it is to fake scumhunting. Even if you win this debate with me, you'll just have one dead townie and even more questions tomorrow.
I don't normally like to boast, MTD, because it's rude, and because I don't think that "I am the lord of scumhunting, sheep me" is in any way productive. But I am not at all bad at it. I can offer you links from the past that show exactly that. Now I have been on hiatus some time, and recently joined 4 games (this is one). Now, the following is a site rule:
You can see my other threads I am posting in and view them, along with all of my previous games by clicking this link.Do not talk outside the game thread about an ongoing game except where explicitly allowed to do so by your role/moderator. Likewise, do not use bbcode to hide secret messages - this equates to discussion outside the thread.
I may have some confidence in my abilities. I feel I have earned it from many, many, many completed games. And this is one of my stronger scumreads.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
I agree with you (probably) that these phrases don't necessarily mean the same, although "do not count towards the living population" does seem to imply unlynchable.In post 379, GreyICE wrote:
Hey MTDIn post 379, zMuffinMan wrote:this is what unlynchable was referring to btw
i used the word unlynchable because it's easier than saying "don't count towards the alive population"
I want you to say, on record, that it makes sense that he used "unlynchable" as a shorthand for "doesn't count towards the alive population"
And not from Antihero's post #48 where the moderator clearly states he's unlynchable.
This is the post in question by the way.
Guyett, same question.In post 191, zMuffinMan wrote:
i hadn't read the threaddopog wrote:@muffin why vote empking after pI did?
it was late, couldn't be bothered reading,saw OP, saw he was "unlynchable" in a bastard game, figured i'd see what happens, voted, went to sleep.
however I believe the point you are missing is, that at the point in time he made that post he in any case already knew they are unlynchable, so I think him using it in retrospective does actually make some sense. Also it is well possible that at the point of him writing this he did not remember exactlyhwhathe read in the OP, I think "not counting towards the living pop" does at least warrant the same reaction.
I know this is speculation, but why would he try to put up such a big web of lied just to back uponevote he could easily label "didn't read the thread at all"?still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Yeah, got that, but why do you feel the need to point that out especially at this point?In post 395, Kovara wrote:(also, if anyone didn't catch my claim before, I'm hated)still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Agreed, we should hear what he wants to say first.In post 434, GreyICE wrote:Not that I don't find the sudden activity from certain people and the flash wagon fascinating
But wait for shos
I don't really know about Dessew, he very conveniently jumped onto that muffin wagon, not contributing anything new but just reiterating arguments by LLD and Grey. OTOH there isn't much more I find to be scummy as there isn't much more from him at all.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
I am not sure what he is exactly, I think "normal" scum and some third party are both well possible, but I would lynch him in each case, because it means him playing against town, doesn't it?In post 441, shos wrote:MTD: why are you voting Greyice? do you think he is scum, rather than lyncher or jester? what do you think of the other peeps on Muffinwagon?
As I said, I am interested in the Dessew wagon, as the way he voted for muffin looked bad, dopog didn't look good for similar reasons, LLD I can actually well imagine as town at the moment, because her thought process at least made some sense to me, even though I don't agree.
Private, well, he hasn't really given us anything of value yet, so I can't tell exactly.
@Private: I would like this:
In post 233, PrivateI wrote:with the promise of future, more in-depth examinations of Muffin and shos specifically
@shos: Are you definitive the police is protown?still the same old MTD