Reading more carefully, you should be able to figure out that was a witty entrance post.In post 30, Greeting wrote:Greetings!
No witty entrance post?In post 18, Enchant wrote:Hello Everyone.Enchantconfscum.
VOTE: Enchant
VOTE: Greeting
Reading more carefully, you should be able to figure out that was a witty entrance post.In post 30, Greeting wrote:Greetings!
No witty entrance post?In post 18, Enchant wrote:Hello Everyone.Enchantconfscum.
VOTE: Enchant
Are you interpreting their post as withholding information? It looks to me like they answered both of your questions. I'm not sure what your complaint is here.In post 127, Vivax wrote:The point is that I did.In post 126, UNOwen wrote:Because the alternative is you got spooked by "hello everyone".In post 123, Vivax wrote: Why does it seem more likely?
Suspicious attempt at saying "don't expect much from me".In post 124, Vivax wrote: Tell me what his post looks like to you and I’ll answer.
Fine, have it your way if you want to withhold information.
VOTE: UNOwen
Are you sure about that? His response there seems to fit as an opinion on geraintm's entrance. It seems like you interpreted it as a characterization of your own post, but I don't think there's really any reason to believe that's more likely than him simply answering your question.In post 145, Vivax wrote:No, Owen didn’t post an opinion on geraintms entrance. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Seems that he believes geraintm was making pre-emptive excuses for his own play being lacking (game is larger, set-up is weird, implying he won't be able to keep track of what is going on) and UNOwen thought that was suspicious.In post 147, Vivax wrote:Okay, what‘s his opinion on geraints entrance in your own words?
And how do you think you look? You ask him a question on another player. He gives you a reasonable answer. You misinterpret it and take it to be about you. Then, even after having the misinterpretation pointed out to you, you insist that he must have been refusing to answer you and that his answer was actually talking about you when it's a stretch to even believe that the comment could apply to you.In post 151, Vivax wrote:UNOwens ISO looks like I‘m the only other player in this game.In post 148, Prince of Paterson wrote:Seems that he believes geraintm was making pre-emptive excuses for his own play being lacking (game is larger, set-up is weird, implying he won't be able to keep track of what is going on) and UNOwen thought that was suspicious.In post 147, Vivax wrote:Okay, what‘s his opinion on geraints entrance in your own words?
He‘d show interest into getting more out of gera if what you said was true.
Explain why that makes them more likely to be scum?In post 351, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: EnchantIn post 320, Enchant wrote:FancyPants* - lurk idk
Vivax - troll town
MalcolmTucker - prob maf
Greeting - idk always failed at reading
Firebringer - hot null would't care to vote
Fredrick A Campbell - can afford to die
Dwlee99* - lurk
Crescent - eh idk
Lowell - prob town
bugspray - always failed at reading
PookyTheMagicalBear - always mafia
geraintm - prob maf
UNOwen - idk i started yawning at this guy, pretend that's there's something funny drawn at next 3 persons and i call it a day, too much effort for me
Prince of Paterson
Andante
MegAzumarill
When has Enchant ever made a reads list
When I see something that interests me, I'll engage with it, but I generally find that getting stuck in the trenches early doesn't really accomplish much for me and usually just increases the noise in the thread. I tend to prefer mostly sitting back and observing, especially early in the game. This game is a little more stagnant than some, though, so I do think some more proactivity could be useful here.In post 442, Crescent wrote:Speaking of Prince, he has notably fallen off a cliff since his vote on Fred. He has two posts since then in almost 48 hours. Any good vibes that vote made me feel are all but gone. When he made it, he was feeling proactive. Now he just feels lazy.
How is it a bad thing to pressure others to make them more readable? If everyone lets people get away with not posting content then we have very little chance of ever solving the game.In post 455, Lowell wrote:Also I'm done with the "vote X until I hear more from them" bit. That applies to others also.
Then why not give any sort of reasoning why, to help convince others to wagon there? As well as making post 387 which will only make people think that you aren't to be taken seriously.In post 459, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:my opinions this game are that Meg is scum and I would like to yeet them
So do you think Meg's reaction to your push was indicative of them being scum?In post 462, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't like stating "reasoning" because it makes scum feel more self conscious if you push them without stating reasoning because they don't know what you caught them on and freeze up
Hadn't really thought Meg was scummy previously, but this is actually fairly convincing reasoning. I'm okay with this, maybe Pooky is right after all.In post 539, UNOwen wrote:Since Meg hasn't answered still, the reason I'm asking about his opinion on the wagon is that I'd expect someone who had the reaction they had to the mini pileup on Fred would also show a bit of concern about scum being involved in the almost completely unexplained five vote wagon against himself. Responding to it by ignoring the votes and instead accusing FancyPants of tmi for calling it a bad wagon doesn't seem consistent. To me it looks like Meg couldn't tell whether the wagon was a bluff or not and didn't want to risk looking scummy by overreacting.
Although UNOwen used the word "concern", I don't think that's exactly what he meant, or at least not how I see it. More that there's an inconsistency between the way that Meg responded to the wagon on Fredrick and the wagon on themself. As town, Meg would be more informed that the wagon was bad that they would be about the Fredrick wagon. So I would expect them not to be "concerned", but to be suspicious, or think that scum were taking advantage of the wagon in some way. That defensiveness and pushback can sometimes be scumread, however, so as scum they may choose to ignore it and hope it goes away. There's not really any drive to investigate if the reasons for being wagoned are valid, which is something that they already indicated they cared about when considering the Fredrick wagon.In post 542, Vivax wrote:You think Meg gives off the impression that they'd show concern at something?
Limming scum would be interesting, and I'm trying to do that.In post 643, Vivax wrote:Have you ever considered trying to *make* it interesting through your own actions? This isn't a spectator chat but that's how you play.In post 640, Prince of Paterson wrote:Lee isn't scum, I don't think. They don't seem to care much about keeping up appearances. The difference is probably simply that this isn't a very interesting game so far.
I don't know if this was intended to be a dumbtell, but I am having trouble believing that someone who early on was reading carefully enough to be noting down interactions as non-partnered and correcting the mod on votecounts would not notice who the nightkill was.In post 784, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I'm kind of thinking the reason I was townreading PookyTheMagicalBear is useless due to WIFOM.
In post 275, Datisi wrote:
In post 375, Datisi wrote:
In post 506, Datisi wrote:
Here is why I think a Fredrick flip would be both a high chance of being scum and also informative.In post 675, Datisi wrote:
There's one vote on you. I don't know why you're so concerned about your supposed imminent demise.In post 1177, Unsure wrote:But the truth is im in full preservation because mt wagon has faltered and im not feeling fred and i know that means i die because im the other wagon so yes i have some aversion upin self reflection i kinda feel that to engage means to get better reads and i dont have time yet
Have you read my 1160? It feels like either you haven't, or you're being intentionally dismissive of what I (and others) think is valid reasoning.In post 1310, Firebringer wrote:fred is a trash wagon yet no one wants to move or do anything else but wait till it pushes through.
Everyone immediately dismisses my mala push.
Its like most people don't care that much for fred wagon but are so indiifferent they just waiting for it to be decided for them.
Kind of annoying
Sure, I can go into more detail later if you'd like. The short answer is that by the end of day yesterday I started to feel like Firebringer was scum regardless of Fred's alignment. I don't expect to convince you of it and will probably switch to whichever wagon out of Enchant and Unsure needs more momentum. It's mostly a vanity vote. I don't think either are a quick jump though, as both were in my pool of most likely scum.In post 1394, Crescent wrote:Yeah there is a virtually 0.00% chance you are getting me to vote Fire over Enchant, Owen, orIn post 1391, Prince of Paterson wrote:I'm okay with an Enchant elim. I think that one of my townreads is likely wrong. Could be Greeting, I suppose, but he might be right about Unsure.
VOTE: Firebringeryoutoday.
I wasn't even trying to get Fire to vote Fred there, I merely pointed out how bad his argument for defending him was, and frankly Fire jumping to Fred as a result isn't a bad look, especially given it also made Gamma do the same, and Gamma just died and was town.
....And it led to a quick scumhammer by Enchant, of course.
Very much dislike the quick jump onto Fire. The quick jump on Unsure is a lot more understandable.
"I'm ok with an Enchant elim"
*Votes Fire while giving no reason for it*
You're gonna have to explain that Fire vote for me in detail because this looks like scum saying he's ok with killing another scum, but voting town for no damned reason.
Greeting, it's possible for people to both think that you're town and also disagree with your reads and direction. You might end up being more correct on your reads than I am, I was wrong on Fredrick, but I haven't found your cases convincing so far. I think you look for very different things when making your reads and it makes them hard for me to connect to or agree with.In post 1396, Greeting wrote:I am wondering why, in spite of being townread so widely, my reads, which I feel are very widely substantiated, are not being shared by the vast majority of players. The fact that there are players who supposedly townread me and whom I townread (Crescentcomes to mind) and who for some reason keep refusing to work with me leads us nowhere. It's giving me a real headache and making me wonder if there is a point in me even speaking about my scumreads anymore.
And yes, some of you people who say are townreading me are lying scum who just know that there is not enough suspicion to scapegoat me and throw me out.
In post 1577, Vivax wrote:And the three mentioned went for Meg all around the same page. So it was some kind of super mindmeld, or cooperation at least.
Timeline is a bit off here. UNOwen voted Meg before any of these, to put the wagons at 5 on Meg, 4 on Fredrick. He then stuck with the wagon all the way to the end. His reasoning later in 539 was what convinced me to vote Meg.In post 1573, Vivax wrote:Votecount analysis is easy to manipulate. If you see Crescent, Andante and Prince coming in with the oomph wagon on Meg, you might want to start to cover your butt if you don't feel like fighting.
That said, for the way I reacted negatively to that I could be a decent push here, but I get the feeling the remaining mafia don't want to try that.
Only thing I ask is that if I do get elimmed at some point, you consider carefully whether you could be wrong about this. I hold the opposite opinion. Pooky and UNOwen's votes were the least likely to be a bus because of the way they campaigned for more votes and gave genuine, nuanced reasoning. Fire's vote and interactions with the wagon were mostly centered around buddying Pooky and didn't really have anything to do with Meg at all, until it looked like a Meg elim was unavoidable, at which point there was some obligatory attempt at interaction. The subsequent kill on Pooky locks them in as appearing to be of one mind and doesn't allow Pooky the chance to question if he's being buddied by scum.In post 1578, Crescent wrote:Also, Fire is the least likely to be a bus on that train, just because of the way he and Pooky interacted. To start day 2, I said it "Generally isn't ever a bus".
Presented in this way, my actions line up with your interpretation, so it's fair in a way, but I don't think it really fits what happened. My vote on Pooky was to pressure him to give more content, not to discredit him. I didn't feel like he cared about pushing for Meg to be eliminated despite it being presented as his strongest read, and I thought that had possible scum motivation. So I prodded him to explain more about his read on Meg and why he found them scummy. I found out through this discussion that he did actually care and had reasons for not explaining his rationale earlier. That prompted further discussion, which in the end helped to convince myself and I think others that Meg was scum. I don't ever discredit Pooky's reasoning, I ask him for more instead. I'm not sure how I as scum would benefit from that approach.In post 1578, Crescent wrote:Prince's vote to try to discredit Pooky comes a mere 9 posts after Meg, a train led by Pooky, becomes the vote leader. Prince's vote on Meg comes just 8 posts after Lowell puts a 5th vote on Meg.
So basically, he ignores the train until it's at 4 votes, then tries to discredit it by going after it's leader.
Part of me can see where you're coming from, but another part of me gutreads the struggle as town. One aspect of that is that I relate to some extent. I'm voting Enchant but I don't have a strong reason why. It's been easier for me to find townreads than scumreads in this game as well. I also don't think he really has this level of difficulty faking scumreads as scum, and so to some extent I believe that he is just being honest with his views on the game and is genuinely struggling to find a scumread that he's confident in.In post 1583, Unsure wrote:We should be focusing on an MT elim anyway. He's really, really struggling for scumreads.
Okay, but it isn't really about convincing. You gave a read that was supported by a narrative that is simply not accurate. What is your opinion now that you know the basis you provided is false?In post 1584, Vivax wrote:I think I can't convince mafia, so I'll wait for a few townreads of mine to show up and see what they think.
Which are logically the ones who aren't my scumreads.
Restate your reasoning for why he is mafia? What makes you so confident?In post 1617, Vivax wrote:Just 4 more votes on Owen for another mafia down, presumably. Not voting that outs you.
This isn't really true at all. His 539 is a good reason and it convinced me to vote Meg. So it wasn't an RVS vote, he did give a reason, and it did convince others to vote there.In post 1630, Andante wrote:my tldr of it is, UNOwen never actually outed a reason for voting Meg, it was just an RVS vote that kinda stayed, andlike, what bothers me, is even as the wagon picked up speed, UNO did absolutely nothing to go "yeah guys vote meg!" so like, yeah... some people generally don't move votes around too much, this feels like it started as "I'm gonna RVS vote meg for distance" but then, meg wagon actually picked up, and UNO couldn't justify hopping off so just stayed.In post 1628, Crescent wrote:The tl;dr of all of it is I think Prince is quite a bit more likely to be scum than Owen, and I think Owen's chances of town go up if Prince is scum just because of how consistently he has and continues to mirror him.
You seem to think it's "super clearing" that UNO didn't move wagons? I mean, Meg is definitely not scum's most powerful role... I genuinely don't see how UNO's meg vote is "so clearing" as you seem to think it is
Not cleared, but probably made less likely to be scum. We don't know how many doctors there are. I don't think the result is something that should be relied on to prevent his elimination, but I also don't think it should be ignored completely. To speculate on the setup a little bit, we haven't had any other results claimed after two nights. I expect town to have some investigative power. If the odd-night gunsmith is one of the only investigative roles, I would expect it to not be completely useless, and thus would expect there to be fewer mafia doctors. That's making a lot of assumptions, but the point is that we may know more about how useful the result is as the game progresses.In post 1639, UNOwen wrote:Prince is correct, we know only that there'sat leastone mafia doctor in this game, so Lowell isn't cleared even a bit.
Why did you give any credence to bugspray's result in the first place?In post 1637, Prince of Paterson wrote:Unfortunately, flipping a mafia doctor would not fully clear you. It has already been mentioned that the mod has previously made a setup with multiple mafia doctors.
Isn't your vote on UNO? Do you still think he's scum, or has your mind changed?In post 1696, Andante wrote:like, none yall can give a solid reason to yeet UNO, so like... what are we doing
You should not allow Firebringer to get away with using this to push for a Malcolm elim tomorrow. Please.In post 1714, Firebringer wrote:super not helpful but im fairly certain one of malcolm/prince is scum.
And it has almost nothing to do with their interactions together. I just read each individually and don't think they make sense as a team.
Fixed.In post 1781, Prince of Paterson wrote:One thing I want to be clear on: you should not allow Firebringer to get away with using this to push for a Malcolm elim tomorrow. Please.In post 1714, Firebringer wrote:super not helpful but im fairly certain one of malcolm/prince is scum.
And it has almost nothing to do with their interactions together. I just read each individually and don't think they make sense as a team.
You're right that on a surface level it is confusing, but Crescent likes to find associations prior to flips, there's already a wagon on me, and she has prior suspicion of me. The point about Greeting only really makes sense if Greeting is defending me as a scum partner, anyway. So I think it's a reasonable thought and a reasonable vote.In post 1786, Vivax wrote:Prince I don‘t know what your read on MT is at this point after having a look at your ISO.
Apologies if I missed it, but that‘s relevant if you are calling FB mafia for pre-pushing Malcolm.
Crescent casing Greeting so extensively and then voting Prince confuses me.
What about my townflip?In post 1790, Crescent wrote:Quick summation:
Prince scumflip means Greeting scum, Owen town, Insure town, Enchant..Town?
Last scum maybe just Mala?
Hopefully everyone understands now how wrong this was. I don't think you had any reason to take control of the game previously, but you are clearly capable of doing so whenever you decide you want to. This is why I think you as scum would kill Pooky. He would be your main threat for denying you that position after he successfully caught a scum on day 1, and now he can be a martyr who also happened to be your buddy.In post 1783, Firebringer wrote:i think its fairly obvious i have no influence on anyone this game to make any elim i want happen
An inconsistency it is not. If you took some time to give what I said and the situation some careful consideration, you would see that. Crescent did the same thing with Fred, see 1142 and others. I think it's a dangerous way to play that can lead to wrong assumptions (for example, her assumption that Enchant and I are scum together), but it is consistent with her playstyle. And in this situation, it would be illogical for her to vote Greeting first.In post 1845, Vivax wrote:I just realized how funny it is that someone with such polished, detailed posts as Prince is keen on defending one of the votes on their wagon that acted inconsistently in the process.In post 1791, Prince of Paterson wrote:You're right that on a surface level it is confusing, but Crescent likes to find associations prior to flips, there's already a wagon on me, and she has prior suspicion of me. The point about Greeting only really makes sense if Greeting is defending me as a scum partner, anyway. So I think it's a reasonable thought and a reasonable vote.In post 1786, Vivax wrote:Prince I don‘t know what your read on MT is at this point after having a look at your ISO.
Apologies if I missed it, but that‘s relevant if you are calling FB mafia for pre-pushing Malcolm.
Crescent casing Greeting so extensively and then voting Prince confuses me.
Of the four people I called town, Malcolm is probably the one I'm least confident on, but I do still believe him to be town.
TMI level: Defending own voters
(possibly)