You'll forgive me for not discussing possible outs for the player being guiltied because she always reads chronologically. Or you won't, but that would be moronic.In post 5363, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also this @Jingle, plus mastina reads in order anyways always so she’ll never get to the climax before the buildupIn post 5358, Creature wrote:Let's wait two days for mastina to comment on it anyway
I'd like to point out that it is the combination of these, not either individually that is the potential scumclaim. Of the two, the former is far more alignment indicative.In post 5282, Jingle wrote:Scumclaim, I think.In post 5196, Creature wrote:I believe I got an incriminating result on mastina (barring redirection)
That's a stupid theory.In post 5377, NicoRobin wrote:If there is a guilty, you sheep it, no questions asked. Not doing so just gives the guiltied party wiggle room to get out of the guilty.
For the record, the former response is not game related in any way?In post 5376, Creature wrote:Oh, it was a inner joke because I'm nihilist IRL.
IIn post 5375, Shoshin wrote:What's the problem with those posts?
I find this complaint unnecessary when a bunch of things are currently happening. This is THE most active and productive the thread has been since I joined the game.In post 5378, THE MEME MEN wrote:Or we can progress the game, not let it die again, since waiting on futile things is, well, futile.
Hm. What was the source of the townread in the first place?In post 5387, Shoshin wrote:Jingle is back to null because his reads are really bad and poorly explained.
I suggest you reread the context of that quote then.In post 5389, Creature wrote:No, it isn't. You said nihilism and I said hi because that's my belief, I didn't realise it was actually game-related.In post 5384, Jingle wrote:For the record, the former response is not game related in any way?
Her not being a rolecop would violate the second of RC's game specific rules. TBF, so does Shoshin's role, but this would be an explicit violation and not an implicit one.In post 5404, Lady Angel wrote:And now you're a cop again.
I haven't ever believed NR was scum, afair.In post 5404, Lady Angel wrote:the two people who most vocally believed you were scum.
@shoshin.
Code: Select all
[hurt]Playername[/hurt][code] or by just generally making it obvious to me you want said player gladiated. I've been including votes because if you want them lynched you presumably don't mind them being gladiated.
The goal was to speed up the game to prevent even more flakiness.It appears to be manipulate the shit out of people, obvscum, and have a buddy claim scum with her D1.In post 5448, THE MEME MEN wrote:Don't know about her scum meta though.
I would’ve won anyway and the sequel isn’t broken by flavor.In post 5491, mastina wrote:Sure, yeah, if you're running a game where the Crew of Serenity is all the good guys and their enemies are all the bad guys, flavor becomes alignment-indicative (I abandoned ship on that review for good reason ), but in any competently designed game where flavor is alignment-indicative the nontown have safeclaims for flavor. In a game like this one though, role is done separately from flavor.
I don't want to make a sig bet, because I can't remember if those are allowed. But I'll apologize somehow if my mastina ends up endgaming town despite the fact that I've literally been advocating she die before endgame since replaced in.In post 5546, NicoRobin wrote:Also, to everyone who townreads mastina: I want you to write that you will apologize in public for making us lose on purpose in your next post.
I presumably have information I'm not supposed to have. At this point, I'm nearly 100% sure that I'm not supposed to have been sent said information, because RC hasn't told me that I was supposed to be sent that info. I believe it is most likely that RC is discussing with a listmod how damaging to the game state it is that I have that information, to which the answer is "not very". Still if the game wasn't already impossible to get replacements for, I probably would already have been replaced.In post 5580, WhemeStar wrote:Did jingle ever reveal why he thought he would get mod killed
5 confirmed innocent results or Maximum number of scum players remaining x2 +3, whichever comes first.In post 5593, NicoRobin wrote:And furthermore, when exactly do you plan to lynch her?
Yes, I think you’re valuable as a conftown. Not only are you a pseudo investigation (results not immediately damning or clearing but rather indicative) the clearing of you forces ~5 reevaluations. The proof that you are scum would cause at least mastina and me to reevaluate. You’re a high contention slot and having your alignment confirmed, or pseudo confirmed, is high value here.In post 5601, NicoRobin wrote:Okay, so, would you really want me as conftown?
Furthermore, if we're both town and she is disloyal, then the gladiate won't work. She might also refuse to do it.
How about those?
If FB and Invis replaced out because they're scum who don't think scum has a shot at winning anymore, then why bother playing the game to an inevitable conclusion?In post 5650, Aristophanes wrote:It may seem bad form but I can adhere to lynching the dead slots to keep the game going. I myself would have replaced out long ago if not for the difficulties in finding replacements.
I do better once the playerlist is culled anyway, and we're probably sitting alright with like, what, 2 scum dead already?
I wouldn't be remiss if the game were called, but that's selfish. We have a good chance of bagging this game, especially with what seems like another slam dunk scum lynch on the way! But only if the game continues!
I was sheeping FB, so, VOTE: Invisi
Gladiating and confirming you is more about proving jjh right or wrong than about changing the weight of your opinion. If you're proven to be scum, jjh has to reevaluate and pull himself out of this tunnel, giving more for me to read from him. This tunnel comes across as incredibly scummy to me, but the self meta is weirdly compelling for something I usually just ignore, and there's a chance to read him better if a hard reset comes. If you're scum, on the other hand, it means that MY read of the thread is off and I need to reset.In post 5781, NicoRobin wrote:@Jingle Do you really want a blubbering idiot who can't tell her right hand from her left as a conftown, eh? Especially since Vecna and many others agree that I am irrational and not making any sense.....
Okay.In post 5779, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am willing to modkill up to 2 slots. If a third slot after that replaces and is empty for 5 days I will be calling the game.
I will be modkilling Invis in 3 days from now, I think.
1. It's Judge Judy and Executioner.In post 6011, NicoRobin wrote:So......
@JJH @Jingle Your 'analysis' was wrong after all, and that means you were either so damn stupid or you're both scum with mastina and Porkens. I am your Judge, Jury and Executioner. What do you have to say for yourselves?
3/4 of those are very probably town.In post 6012, Nero Cain wrote:So we are killing all of Vecna, Jingle, JJH and NSG right?
Night 3.In post 6033, THE MEME MEN wrote:sorry if this is a dense question but are you saying you were roleblocked night 3 and could not talk about it day 4 or that you were roleblocked day 4 and couldn't talk about it day 4?In post 6032, Jingle wrote:Oh, I was roleblocked yesterday. I was not allowed to talk about the roleblock yesterday
-rh
Wrong logic.In post 6048, Vecna wrote:Because either you or JJH was covering for the Mastina kill getting jailkept on N2.
It specifies success on 'Town' and failure on 'Mafia'. There is no mention of what happens on 3p. Implication, there is no 3p. Not hard confirmation, but positive likelihood.In post 6055, Vecna wrote:Read it, the disloyal description of the gladiate.
1 shot deathproof and capable of stopping anyone currently voting from changing that vote for the rest of the day.In post 6072, Nero Cain wrote:JJ is a claimed deathproof or something.
