Grand Idea GPick [Game Over]

Titus · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Tue May 19, 2020 8:32 am

VOTE: farside22

Hi.

Titus · Post Post #82 (isolation #1) » Tue May 19, 2020 4:57 pm

In post 78, Hoctac wrote:[Oh no. I checked my PT and he was my partner... I just made him scumslip.]

This is clearly in jest but please don't claim scum with a partner. There's rules against that sort of thing. I am all for fun and games, just watch the rule lines.

Titus · Post Post #84 (isolation #2) » Tue May 19, 2020 4:58 pm

In post 42, Doctor Drew wrote:Oh hey hello Titus, forgot you were in this game.

Also, was anyone here in the Extremely Bastard game from a few months ago?

Because my role is something that maybe I shouldn't hide.

Hi.

Titus · Post Post #86 (isolation #3) » Tue May 19, 2020 4:59 pm

In post 83, Quick wrote:Sup friends? How are we doing?

Page
Day 1 looks to be a big pile of nothing and that's all I
've
shouldn't read.

Fify

Titus · Post Post #152 (isolation #4) » Wed May 20, 2020 11:45 am

In post 129, Hoctac wrote:VOTE: farside

Might be a wolf. Not reading =/= scum. Not talking about cards when many already have =/= scum.

Why are you so serious? The last game we played together, you were quite jovial.

Titus · Post Post #156 (isolation #5) » Wed May 20, 2020 12:06 pm

In post 153, Doctor Drew wrote:Not gonna keep the quote tree going.

Quick, I should have listed myself as LA for the past week, so yes you are correct I am lacking content.

But, I do see people are still doing RQS stuff, so fuck that noise.

And it's early D1, you ain't giant posts of content out of me this early.

I like Drew as town for today at least.

Titus · Post Post #166 (isolation #6) » Wed May 20, 2020 2:39 pm

VOTE: Quick

Titus · Post Post #170 (isolation #7) » Wed May 20, 2020 3:18 pm

In post 169, ManateeDude wrote:Ircher is pinging me weirdly today

Which posts?

Titus · Post Post #229 (isolation #8) » Thu May 21, 2020 10:06 am

In post 215, Quick wrote:
In post 214, Chemist1422 wrote:[Why does scum have motivation to claim scum over town who thinks it's funny?]
Maybe you are intentionally not getting my point.

Claiming Scum is something you lynch. Why not?

Because it's obviously a joke? Day 1 is a bit of a joke anyway, so I'm not totally opposed. For those who take day 1 seriously, it's an excuse for scum to hide.

Titus · Post Post #239 (isolation #9) » Thu May 21, 2020 10:52 am

In post 229, Titus wrote:
In post 215, Quick wrote:
In post 214, Chemist1422 wrote:[Why does scum have motivation to claim scum over town who thinks it's funny?]
Maybe you are intentionally not getting my point.

Claiming Scum is something you lynch. Why not?
Because it's obviously a joke? Day 1 is a bit of a joke anyway, so I'm not totally opposed. For those who take day 1 seriously, it's an excuse for scum to hide.

I'd like a response to this Quick. My focus is limited right now, so please don't make me spend it chasing answers but sorting people.

Titus · Post Post #341 (isolation #10) » Sun May 24, 2020 3:21 am

I am down for Quick or Manatee. If Quick is town, I am really down for Manatee.

There's no reason town!Quick should be unlynchable on the top of my head. That's why I am ok voting Quick.

Manatee's defense of Quick seems far too over the top.

If Quick is town, I bet somewhere towards the end of his wagon were slots that knew Quick was lynchproof. Probably if he's scum too.

Titus · Post Post #342 (isolation #11) » Sun May 24, 2020 3:22 am

VOTE: Manatee

Let's get some dueling wagons going.

Titus · Post Post #343 (isolation #12) » Sun May 24, 2020 3:23 am

Oh I also have a yellow card.

Titus · Post Post #346 (isolation #13) » Sun May 24, 2020 3:36 am

In post 344, Chateau Lobby wrote:Woah. I don't think I have ever been on the same wave length as Titus. This is thrilling yet frightening.

Have we played together before? I don't recall you.

Titus · Post Post #362 (isolation #14) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:09 am

You want Quick to claim but you're voting boring because? A green card seems like a dumb thing to make up.

Quick and Manatee are far better lynches.

Titus · Post Post #364 (isolation #15) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:12 am

In post 363, Chemist1422 wrote:[Maybe it's dumb to make up, but it's definitely made up.]

Guy who is lynchproof D1 > guy who is being dumb NAI
Guy who is whiteknighting Quick > guy who is being dumb NAI

Titus · Post Post #366 (isolation #16) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:16 am

In post 365, farside22 wrote:
In post 362, Titus wrote:You want Quick to claim but you're voting boring because? A green card seems like a dumb thing to make up.

Quick and Manatee are far better lynches.
Why is that dumb and not scummy based on the role?

Because, boring gains zilch by claiming a green card. Eventually, he will have to answer for it if massclaim happens. It's not like the actual scummy things we've seen in thread.

Titus · Post Post #368 (isolation #17) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:20 am

In post 367, Chemist1422 wrote:[boring is claiming they received something which should not be possible to receive.]
[Therefore, they are lying.]

Should not =/= is impossible.

Didn't the mod claim tweaks were possible?

Also, what does boring claim by making up a green card?

Titus · Post Post #369 (isolation #18) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:21 am

** claim = gain

Titus · Post Post #370 (isolation #19) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:29 am

In post 7827, Korina wrote:
Get out of Jail Free

If this role rolls, send the player the spoilered image and nothing else. If
Go to Jail
is in play; the first time this player is lynched, they are rendered lynchproof. Instead of saying they are lynchproof or anything like that, instead post the spoilered image and say nothing else. Otherwise, they are a VT.

Spoiler:

Town-Aligned

Found this. I thought it could be Quick but the moderator announced he was lynchproof.

Titus · Post Post #375 (isolation #20) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:46 am

In post 373, ManateeDude wrote:
In post 362, Titus wrote:You want Quick to claim but you're voting boring because? A green card seems like a dumb thing to make up.

Quick and Manatee are far better lynches.
how on earth is voting someone who was lynchproof yesterday a better idea... do you not see the many issues with that?

Because there's not likely a role that's infinitely lynchproof. The moderator would declare that broken.

Titus · Post Post #379 (isolation #21) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:48 am

MD, why are you so invested in lynching anyone not named Quick?

Titus · Post Post #385 (isolation #22) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:50 am

In post 378, farside22 wrote:
In post 366, Titus wrote:
In post 365, farside22 wrote:
In post 362, Titus wrote:You want Quick to claim but you're voting boring because? A green card seems like a dumb thing to make up.

Quick and Manatee are far better lynches.
Why is that dumb and not scummy based on the role?
Because, boring gains zilch by claiming a green card. Eventually, he will have to answer for it if massclaim happens. It's not like the actual scummy things we've seen in thread.

In post 368, Titus wrote:
In post 367, Chemist1422 wrote:[boring is claiming they received something which should not be possible to receive.]
[Therefore, they are lying.]
Should not =/= is impossible.

Didn't the mod claim tweaks were possible?

Also, what does boring claim by making up a green card?
That makes no sense.
You want to lynch a player you don't know if really is lynchproof (which there are a few in the game design) and keep a player that got caught in a lie alive?

Who are you and what have you done with titus?

Quick renounced his lynchproof status. So there's a lie somewhere.

Second, my vote isn't on Quick but on MD because he is waking Quick.

Third, I don't believe boring is lying because he has no reason to. I'd explain what I think happened but boring would copy my answer.

Titus · Post Post #388 (isolation #23) » Sun May 24, 2020 6:52 am

In post 384, farside22 wrote:
In post 375, Titus wrote:
In post 373, ManateeDude wrote:
In post 362, Titus wrote:You want Quick to claim but you're voting boring because? A green card seems like a dumb thing to make up.

Quick and Manatee are far better lynches.
how on earth is voting someone who was lynchproof yesterday a better idea... do you not see the many issues with that?
Because there's not likely a role that's infinitely lynchproof. The moderator would declare that broken.
Ummmmmmmmm thats not broken if he can be killed.

Based on how few people died last night, I would say absolute lynchproof is broken here. Second, quick didn't claim total lynchproof. So, if he is, a vig has a guaranteed correct kill.

Titus · Post Post #393 (isolation #24) » Sun May 24, 2020 7:00 am

In post 392, Hoctac wrote:The silence is deafening. Is everyone scum here???

I don't want to be conftown. I want to live and play myself. I signed onto this game to play D1 and get better at my early game. Becoming conftown defeats that purpose.

Titus · Post Post #411 (isolation #25) » Sun May 24, 2020 7:34 am

In post 398, Hoctac wrote:
In post 393, Titus wrote:
In post 392, Hoctac wrote:The silence is deafening. Is everyone scum here???
I don't want to be conftown. I want to live and play myself. I signed onto this game to play D1 and get better at my early game. Becoming conftown defeats that purpose.
Not wanting to claim is one thing, but making this excuse is another.

T v A was particularly exhausting for me. I had to juggle all the interests of town, while knowing my play was being sabotaged. I don't want to die in my weakest part of the game. If that makes you scumread me, so be it. I specifically did not want a rematch because of how exhausting being a town treestump is. That's essentially what I would become.

Titus · Post Post #424 (isolation #26) » Sun May 24, 2020 9:06 am

In post 415, Hoctac wrote:
In post 411, Titus wrote:
In post 398, Hoctac wrote:
In post 393, Titus wrote:
In post 392, Hoctac wrote:The silence is deafening. Is everyone scum here???
I don't want to be conftown. I want to live and play myself. I signed onto this game to play D1 and get better at my early game. Becoming conftown defeats that purpose.
Not wanting to claim is one thing, but making this excuse is another.
T v A was particularly exhausting for me. I had to juggle all the interests of town, while knowing my play was being sabotaged. I don't want to die in my weakest part of the game. If that makes you scumread me, so be it. I specifically did not want a rematch because of how exhausting being a town treestump is. That's essentially what I would become.
I can confirm 2 per day though, assuming I can be protected in some way each night. So you wouldn't be alone. You wouldn't be "confirmed" for good either, since this game is bastard and cults/mid-game alignment changes exist.

Do you disagree?

Yeah, that's theoretical. it's not how I'd be treated though. I'd rather be lynched than be conftown again. So *shrug*.

Titus · Post Post #473 (isolation #27) » Sun May 24, 2020 3:35 pm

In post 457, Pigman wrote:
In post 389, Hoctac wrote:
Town Guesser

Each night, may submit 2
Guesses
of the exact roles of two separate players.
You will be told if 0, 1, or both of your guesses are correct. You will not be told which guess is correct for the case you get 1 correct.
You may not submit a guess for the same player more than once in the game.
For each correct guess, you receive a
One-Shot Doctor Heal.

Heals can be stacked, and multiple can be used in the same night along with the guesses.
You may self-target with a heal no more than once during the game.

In post 395, Hoctac wrote:Okay, so Titus is scum.
Can you ELI5?

@mod I've been away for the holiday weekend with very limited access. I'll be back in town Tuesday.

I would detest playing as conftown, therefore I am scum.

Titus · Post Post #487 (isolation #28) » Mon May 25, 2020 2:52 am

In post 486, farside22 wrote:Or your scum who doesn't want to be caught lying.

I can't disprove that. That's why I am accepting my lynch if you don't believe me.

Just use as much of the time as possible if you do decide to lynch me.

I can't sub out because that's clearly a strategic subout. I detest being conftown due to its exhausting nature and enjoyment > winning.

So if I get lynched, at least I'll try to get as much fun as I can.

Titus · Post Post #488 (isolation #29) » Mon May 25, 2020 2:53 am

My role is actually verifiable.

P.S. Farside, how's Ircher doing?

Titus · Post Post #491 (isolation #30) » Mon May 25, 2020 3:39 am

In post 489, farside22 wrote:
In post 488, Titus wrote:My role is actually verifiable.

P.S. Farside, how's Ircher doing?
Curious why you did that?

Why not? The goal is to put us in the best possible situation and I can't self target. Risk < Reward.

Titus · Post Post #492 (isolation #31) » Mon May 25, 2020 3:40 am

In post 490, farside22 wrote:If you want to know. He finds mantee scummy and i don't know why. Very tight lipped

Manatee is, but I asked less for the answer but more to prove I have zero intent of changing my claim. Since that's the concern.

I just ask you don't out me.

Titus · Post Post #500 (isolation #32) » Mon May 25, 2020 5:06 am

I would essentially be a treestump because I don't have the energy from T v A to play the wifom game, manage emotions (jealous, upset at my choices), and lead town from behind.

I would rather die.

Titus · Post Post #504 (isolation #33) » Mon May 25, 2020 5:08 am

In post 498, farside22 wrote:Risk??? I want a rationale for the risk. Wouldn't you want scum reads targeted instead? If not im going to want to know why.

This is exactly what I mean. I don't want scumreads paired because they get a private place to manipulate town.

I don't want my moves second guessed and manipulated.

Titus · Post Post #506 (isolation #34) » Mon May 25, 2020 5:12 am

In post 505, Ircher wrote:I mean, scum
already
have PTs to manipulate town... That isn't convincing at all...

Scum don't have PTs with town.

Titus · Post Post #509 (isolation #35) » Mon May 25, 2020 5:16 am

And none of those have benefits for town and suppose I am right. Very rarely am I right with my reads before VCA.

I'd rather put town in the best possible position. So I did that.

Titus · Post Post #513 (isolation #36) » Mon May 25, 2020 6:27 am

Her logic.

No one gets my logic. That's why I am the moonwalker and don't want my exact role out there. I don't get the freedom to pair obvtown anymore. The benefits of pairing obvtown way outweigh the downside but there's a chance scum find my role so I have to be suboptimal now. I was hoping you guys would just say neighbors.

Titus · Post Post #611 (isolation #37) » Tue May 26, 2020 11:31 am

In post 604, Quick wrote:Hi, Titus. How are you feeling rn?

Better but it's Tuesday and that's date night. I'll be reading up tmo.

Titus · Post Post #628 (isolation #38) » Tue May 26, 2020 4:25 pm

Manatee's a cool guy to hang with but probably totally scum.

Titus · Post Post #630 (isolation #39) » Tue May 26, 2020 4:27 pm

In post 602, Ircher wrote:Voting Third party is a waste of time. We have actual scum to find.

If Quick was third party, why is there more people defending him over yesterday when mafia lynchproof is a thing.

If he's mafia lynchproof scum could vote him yesterday with impunity and deny town information.

So why 3rd party over mafia?

Titus · Post Post #631 (isolation #40) » Tue May 26, 2020 4:28 pm

Also, I had a strange dream last night that SirCakez was town and TSE made him lynchproof.

Titus · Post Post #632 (isolation #41) » Tue May 26, 2020 4:29 pm

In post 575, Two Girls One Vote wrote:this game has zero flips lol

VOTE: boring

~girl who enjoys it

Why boring? I know it's against my interest but boring feels town.

Titus · Post Post #633 (isolation #42) » Tue May 26, 2020 4:32 pm

I like Dr. Drew

I look forward to talking with Battle Mage. The last game I subbed into he was a badass who stuck up for himself. Even though he was wrong, I got why he was. I want to see that fire here.

Titus · Post Post #636 (isolation #43) » Tue May 26, 2020 4:51 pm

In post 635, boring wrote:
In post 633, Titus wrote:I like Dr. Drew

I look forward to talking with Battle Mage. The last game I subbed into he was a badass who stuck up for himself. Even though he was wrong, I got why he was. I want to see that fire here.
Unless he's secretly shakespeare or a rap god, I think we'll have to take what we can get. I'm pretty impressed, myself.

Which he do you mean? Both BM and Dr Drew are male.

Titus · Post Post #641 (isolation #44) » Tue May 26, 2020 5:31 pm

TSE, put my mind to rest. My mind was being insane when I dreamt you're the reason Quick is unlynchable or was.

Titus · Post Post #655 (isolation #45) » Wed May 27, 2020 5:04 am

My bet is Quick is mafia. It's an easy defense to make of a partner and noise to appear to be scumhunting. I am outvoted on Quick but let it be known I will always be down to lynch Quick.

Titus · Post Post #658 (isolation #46) » Wed May 27, 2020 11:46 am

In post 657, ManateeDude wrote:the silence in this thread is deafening

Yeah, almost like scum like this state and want to lurk this out.

Titus · Post Post #662 (isolation #47) » Wed May 27, 2020 12:44 pm

VOTE: BM

I want to see BM's passion.

Titus · Post Post #663 (isolation #48) » Wed May 27, 2020 12:45 pm

If Chateau keeps his vote on Quick or does not additional hunting, I might vote there but MD wants it.

Titus · Post Post #687 (isolation #49) » Wed May 27, 2020 3:00 pm

TSE might be a jester.

Titus · Post Post #716 (isolation #50) » Wed May 27, 2020 3:33 pm

In post 712, ManateeDude wrote:also can we stop with 3p reads? they dont do good theyre literally just an excuse to be non-comittal

I agree here.

Titus · Post Post #719 (isolation #51) » Wed May 27, 2020 3:48 pm

In post 714, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Ircher or Titus is Lyncher if Quick isn’t Fool/Jester.

I am confirmed not lyncher.

Titus · Post Post #775 (isolation #52) » Thu May 28, 2020 3:49 am

VOTE: CL

Titus · Post Post #836 (isolation #53) » Thu May 28, 2020 4:37 pm

I am currently having a battle with depression. I am not VLA but please be understanding if I don't post as well as I usually do. This is NAI. I will try to hang in there for one more game day but if my depression gets worse, I may sub out. I am taking it day by day. If I do sub out, it will be across all games.

Xpost all games

Titus · Post Post #864 (isolation #54) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:41 am

VOTE: Two Girls One Vote

Titus · Post Post #869 (isolation #55) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:59 am

In post 866, Quick wrote:
In post 864, Titus wrote:VOTE: Two Girls One Vote
For what reason? Do tell Titus.

Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.

Titus · Post Post #872 (isolation #56) » Fri May 29, 2020 6:42 am

In post 871, Quick wrote:
In post 869, Titus wrote:
In post 866, Quick wrote:
In post 864, Titus wrote:VOTE: Two Girls One Vote
For what reason? Do tell Titus.
Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.
Okay, that doesn't mean Two Girls is actually Scum though. Guilty by association? You can do better than that.

The first two comments are not "guilt by association". Being present only when pressured and lacking memorable content are not associative indicators.

I am willing to take a backseat when a) I don't have the energy to drive, b) the wagons I want most are vetoed and c) the lynch being pushed isn't bad.

Just don't claim things that aren't true about my play and say I can do better.

Titus · Post Post #874 (isolation #57) » Fri May 29, 2020 7:02 am

I admitted 2 and 3 are association reads. Alone, they wouldn't be sufficient. It's those combined with point 1. All of them are reasons to vote Two Girls.

Also, I am clearly still playing this game. At no point do I say I am not playing this game. Taking a backseat =/= no incentive to play. I don't have as much energy to actually push through a lynch on BM or you.

Titus · Post Post #877 (isolation #58) » Fri May 29, 2020 7:07 am

In post 875, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Titus, what’s your read on Farside?

Town. I felt the way she scumhunt day 1 was pretty town. Her interactions with me were very transparently town as well. She doesn't automatically accept or reject a conclusion but weighs all the factors imo.

Titus · Post Post #884 (isolation #59) » Fri May 29, 2020 1:32 pm

VLA this weekend

Titus · Post Post #909 (isolation #60) » Sat May 30, 2020 2:10 am

In post 907, ManateeDude wrote:im town
our d1 lynch was quickhammered but
deathproof

no N1 kill
various claims including a card distribution role
cases made for the two top wagons today
gamestate is d e a d

Someone else tell me this is odd or is it just me?

Titus · Post Post #910 (isolation #61) » Sat May 30, 2020 2:11 am

In post 878, Quick wrote:
In post 877, Titus wrote:
In post 875, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Titus, what’s your read on Farside?
Town. I felt the way she scumhunt day 1 was pretty town. Her interactions with me were very transparently town as well. She doesn't automatically accept or reject a conclusion but weighs all the factors imo.
Okay, but you can still be Scum just giving a
TR on Town...[[//b]/quote]
In post 879, TemporalLich wrote:
VC 2.10Two Girls One Vote (4) - Iconeum, Ircher, Chateau Lobby, Titus
Chateau Lobby (3) - ManateeDude, boring, farside22
Titus (2) - Hoctac, Saladman27
Saladman27 (2) - Battle Mage, Chemist1422
boring (2) - Two Girls One Vote, hellbooks

farside22 (2) - Quick, TrueSoulEnergy

Battle Mage (1) - Doctor Drew

Not voting: Pigman

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch.

Day 2 will end in (expired on 2020-06-03 02:15:00) or when a lynch is reached.

farside22 is V/LA until June 1st.

Iconeum has Weekend V/LA, and is V/LA until June 2nd.

Errors in VC 2.8/2.9 fixed

Iconeum has Weekend V/LA, and is V/LA until June 2nd.

The bolded there too.

Titus · Post Post #912 (isolation #62) » Sat May 30, 2020 2:13 am

Ugh formatting broke. Point is Quick said farside was town while voting farside.

I get the feeling Quick Manatee and One Vote are all scum together.

Titus · Post Post #915 (isolation #63) » Sat May 30, 2020 2:15 am

In post 914, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 912, Titus wrote:Ugh formatting broke. Point is Quick said farside was town while voting farside.

I get the feeling Quick Manatee and One Vote are all scum together.
Quick is quintessentially confirmed Jester.

Fucking keep up Titus.

~girl who likes it

He already was lynched once. If Quick was jester he wins

Titus · Post Post #921 (isolation #64) » Sat May 30, 2020 2:22 am

In post 917, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 915, Titus wrote:
In post 914, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 912, Titus wrote:Ugh formatting broke. Point is Quick said farside was town while voting farside.

I get the feeling Quick Manatee and One Vote are all scum together.
Quick is quintessentially confirmed Jester.

Fucking keep up Titus.

~girl who likes it
He already was lynched once. If Quick was jester he wins
Someone else stopped the lynch Titus. I am betting money on it. Quick is jester who failed in getting his win and is now half trolling and half pretending to "solve".

~girl who enjoys it

Oh Quick's pretending to solve alright but that's not making him a jester. Rather his team knew he was death proof and had zero fucks given as to whether he was lynched. Notice how Manatee said Quick was death proof rather than lynchproof. I don't think that's an innocent mistake.

Titus · Post Post #1020 (isolation #65) » Sun May 31, 2020 6:08 am

In post 1007, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 945, Ircher wrote:That's a bad analogy for several reasons. The first of which that in real life, many guilty people actually do admit to their crime (i.e.: plea bargains). Aside from that, mafia is different. The dynamics and evidence are different. Scum have a legitimate reason to stay in the shadows, and they also possess a good reason to come out of the shadows to avoid their lynch.

pedit: My second point still stands. Mafia is different because guilty people are not incentivized to start talking in real life. They let the lawyer do the talking for them. In mafia, you don't have a lawyer to defend yourself, so if you're scum, you have to do your own defending.
this is all false. first of all, in real life most crimes are bullshit and you should citizen's arrest the cops.
second, i do have a lawyer to argue for me. i come in this thread and make a big mess to make things interesting, and then the girl who enjoys it more comes and argues on my behalf. so you are a big fat liar.

- the money

Hey! No one said you were my client. You sure are right about cops fucking up though.

Guilty scumfucks do have lawyers though. They're called townbeards.

BBL.

Titus · Mon Jun 01, 2020 12:34 pm

I was VLA and you got prodded BM. I am ready and willing to talk when you are.

Why are you supposing a lynch on a contested slot is unproductive?

Titus · Post Post #1071 (isolation #67) » Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:50 am

I am beginning to think maybe I should move over to CL. BM's vote is bothering me. It could be a bus, and slots like Quick moved away from CL.

Titus · Post Post #1075 (isolation #68) » Tue Jun 02, 2020 4:07 am

In post 1073, Chateau Lobby wrote:
In post 1071, Titus wrote:I am beginning to think maybe I should move over to CL. BM's vote is bothering me. It could be a bus, and slots like Quick moved away from CL.
Be careful, or you might get a SR from Manatee with this type of non-committal votes.

But the fact that our brains were in sync for a little bit meant the world to me.

Please reconsider.

Meant the world to you? I am not sure who your main is but no one should think of my day 1 reads that highly.

Also, Manatee SRing me is no big deal. I already SR them. This feels more like a threat rather than a plea.

The tone in this post is all over the place.

I hadn't even voted you and you're pushing me to reconsider.

What is your read on BM?

Titus · Post Post #1127 (isolation #69) » Wed Jun 03, 2020 5:59 am

I have faked PRs as scum. He could have a scum based PR too.

TSE is likely third party.

So this means nothing.

Titus · Post Post #1184 (isolation #70) » Sat Jun 06, 2020 3:12 pm

VOTE: BM

Titus · Post Post #1275 (isolation #71) » Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:43 am

In post 1263, farside22 wrote:Also I would vote ircher as well. He's making not sense at this point and just reads as flailing scum.

This is why I loverized Ircher and Quick. I was wrong on Two Girls, so I went sleeping mode.

I got a blue card btw.

Titus · Post Post #1277 (isolation #72) » Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:48 am

In post 1276, Ircher wrote:You apparently didn't loverize me cuz I didn't get such a message.

That was my choice. So I guess I was blocked then.

Titus · Post Post #1285 (isolation #73) » Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:57 am

In post 1283, Bingle wrote:
In post 1280, Ircher wrote:Bingle is a bit too keen on getting rid of me.
Titus has now twice in a row used their night action poorly. Thankfully someone blocked them this time or something.
Are you fucking kidding?

I'm 'too keen' to lynch obvscum who apparently fakeclaimed vig and is opposed to giving town shots at multiple lynches because 'figuring out who to lynch in two days is impossible'?

Titus targeting obvscum and universal 3p read for loverization is a poor use of a night action?

LMAO

Pull the other one, it has bells on.

Just your daily reminder that you should be claiming the Card you got at the beginning of the night.

Baah.

I like your posting today. Who are you voting?

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:01 am

My being blocked is more evidence Quick is mafia. Who would block me from getting rid of a 3p anyway?

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:03 am

VOTE: Ircher

Not sure Ircher's lying, but his play here regardless is proscum. I am with Bingle and Farside.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:08 am

Ircher only lies if he's scum with Quick anyhow.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:14 am

In post 1297, Bingle wrote:
In post 1293, Ircher wrote:pedit2: Already claimed a green card.
Yeah, your complete refusal to participate in protown abuse of a scum power role OR back up how doing so isn't a good idea with anything more than nonsense is a pretty strong cornerstone of my case against you, but thanks for pointing that out again.

Where was Titus' role confirmed D2? Boring's list just had her as confirmable role.

My role was confirmed D1. I neighborized Farside and Ircher which had the side effect of making them lovers. I found Farside's push on Ircher quite townie for that reason. I believe they would still die if Ircher was lynched.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:15 am

In post 1299, Ircher wrote:
Suicide Bomb: Bingle

I hope this is real because Quick should die then if my theory holds.

If my theory is wrong, this better be a troll.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:21 am

In post 1304, Ircher wrote:
In post 1301, Titus wrote:
In post 1299, Ircher wrote:
Suicide Bomb: Bingle
I hope this is real because Quick should die then if my theory holds.

If my theory is wrong, this better be a troll.
So you believe I lied about not getting loverized again... Okie-dokey then....

Bingle's trajectory this game does not feel town whatsoever.

No. I don't believe you lied unless you're scum with Quick. I'm hoping that's the case. Otherwise, you just blew up my biggest townread (if real).

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:27 am

In post 1308, Bingle wrote:
In post 1306, Titus wrote:No. I don't believe you lied unless you're scum with Quick. I'm hoping that's the case. Otherwise, you just blew up my biggest townread (if real).
He's not scum with quick, he's probably scum suicide bomber who realized his lynch was inevitable and wanted the utility of his role.

It's not like 3p Quick was going to contradict him on not being loverized when doing so just kills 3p Quick.

If Ircher and Quick are scum together, the proper play is to deny my loverization and hope people think Quick is a jester. Ircher plays to survive. That route is less likely for Ircher's suicide bomb to be real, as doing so would kill them both in exchange for you.

3p Quick could live forever. He didn't die last night afterall.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:28 am

In post 1309, Ircher wrote:
In post 1306, Titus wrote:
In post 1304, Ircher wrote:
In post 1301, Titus wrote:
In post 1299, Ircher wrote:
Suicide Bomb: Bingle
I hope this is real because Quick should die then if my theory holds.

If my theory is wrong, this better be a troll.
So you believe I lied about not getting loverized again... Okie-dokey then....

Bingle's trajectory this game does not feel town whatsoever.
No. I don't believe you lied unless you're scum with Quick. I'm hoping that's the case. Otherwise, you just blew up my biggest townread (if real).
Then why do you think Quick's slot still dies if I die from that ability today?

I am hoping you lied. Hoping =/= thinking

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:43 am

In post 1312, hellbooks wrote:
In post 1300, Titus wrote:My role was confirmed D1. I neighborized Farside and Ircher which had the side effect of making them lovers. I found Farside's push on Ircher quite townie for that reason. I believe they would still die if Ircher was lynched.
so you can loverize every night? can we leash it?
+ what's the utility to claiming cards, bingle?

We can. I was being as protown as possible with my selection. I think scum knew I'd be blocked and/or Quick was scum. (Arguably N2 deathproof is an option). That's why no one argued to leash me yesterday.

Quick should be one of my targets. The other I'll sheep a TR unless my target is specified.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:44 am

In post 1315, boring wrote:Bingle/Titus, please tell me if I'm following all this correctly:

If Ircher is loverized and lying and we lynch him, it kills Quick/Starbucks for us, which Hellbooks claims is investigated as 3p bomber, which would help us sort Hellbooks and gets Quick/Starbucks killed without lynching in case they're lynchproof or under a lyncher.

Yes, but that requires Ircher to be lying. Ircher and Quick/Starbucks are loverized if Ircher lied. Big if.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:51 am

In post 1318, Bingle wrote:
In post 1313, Ircher wrote:There is little benefit to claiming cards. It wastes time and gives scum info on whi to kill.
No. It does neither of those things.

It gives scum 0 nightkill info because the cards change between the claim and the nightkill. It doesn't waste time because double fucking lynches.

Just your daily reminder that you should be claiming the Card you got at the beginning of the night.

Wouldn't scum just not claim a card though or claim the wrong color?

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:54 am

In post 1319, boring wrote:
In post 1317, Titus wrote:
In post 1315, boring wrote:Bingle/Titus, please tell me if I'm following all this correctly:

If Ircher is loverized and lying and we lynch him, it kills Quick/Starbucks for us, which Hellbooks claims is investigated as 3p bomber, which would help us sort Hellbooks and gets Quick/Starbucks killed without lynching in case they're lynchproof or under a lyncher.
Yes, but that requires Ircher to be lying. Ircher and Quick/Starbucks are loverized if Ircher lied. Big if.
And there's like zero chance that we can trust Starbucks to tell the truth if they are.

@Bingle - I got red

True. However, if Ircher's suicide bomb is real, we can infer not mafia/aligned with Quick/Starbuck. That's because killing them both would be too risky unless compulsive.

If Ircher lied, his bomb is fake 99% of the time.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:58 am

In post 1322, boring wrote:I think Ircher is just being dramatic. It's just today's version of the vig gambit.

Makes sense. I hope so because Bingle is obvtown.

You should join us on Ircher.

Titus · Sun Jun 07, 2020 11:04 am

In post 1324, Bingle wrote:
In post 1315, boring wrote:Bingle/Titus, please tell me if I'm following all this correctly:

If Ircher is loverized and lying and we lynch him, it kills Quick/Starbucks for us, which Hellbooks claims is investigated as 3p bomber, which would help us sort Hellbooks and gets Quick/Starbucks killed without lynching in case they're lynchproof or under a lyncher.
Yes, roughly.

Given the confirmation of Titus' role we're in world A Ircher is lying about being loverized with a susp actor OR world B someone RB'd Titus. If the source of the RB becomes known, that is helpful. If the source of the RB doesn't become known and Irch flips town, we know a RB exists and is scum controlled, which is valuable because it puts another scum role outside of the pool of confirmed roles.

If Irch flips scum who was loverized with Quick, it kills Ircher, who is scum, and Quick, who is in a mechanical 1v1 with hb, solving hb without requiring us to gamble on a potentially game ending lynch.

Irch is independently scummy, and firmly in the lynch pool.

It's the literal definition of a win/win/win scenario.

Plus, we get more KPN to solve with. Trying to lynch me, rather than leash me is confirming less town controlled KPN too. Just saying.

Titus · Post Post #1335 (isolation #88) » Sun Jun 07, 2020 1:04 pm

In post 1332, farside22 wrote:
In post 1331, Battle Mage wrote:Que sera sera, whatever will be, will be
J'adore tu, ma magnifique belle Annie
Not much for me to add, as nothing has progressed
Titus and Farside voting conftown has scarcely been addressed
but although my motivation is at an all time low
town should heed my warnings and take things nice and slow

VOTE: Titus

Gotta go fast!

ROGNTUDJUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Titus can you put him as a liver with tse.

Just for funz!

VOTE: Ircher

BattleMage would have been my choice if I was deciding selfishly. As for TSE, I am capable but this game needs Starbuck/Quick dead. If that slot flips with Ircher, I am totally down for that.

Titus · Post Post #1358 (isolation #89) » Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:14 pm

@Bingle, I had a Yellow card yesterday.

Titus · Post Post #1388 (isolation #90) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 2:24 am

In post 1387, Iconeum wrote:If any of the lovers are killed and it chainkills Ircher/Quick/Fark and they flip all town, Titus is confscum.

Farside's loverize expired.

Titus · Post Post #1389 (isolation #91) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 2:26 am

My loverizations end the following day.

So N1 through D2 etc

Titus · Post Post #1390 (isolation #92) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 2:26 am

Farside can verify that.

Titus · Post Post #1392 (isolation #93) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 2:35 am

In post 1391, Iconeum wrote:Any reason Farside can verify that, and not Ircher?

Well Ircher could too but Ircher's an unreliable narrator.

Titus · Post Post #1395 (isolation #94) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 2:54 am

In post 1324, Bingle wrote:Yes, roughly.

Given the confirmation of Titus' role we're in world A Ircher is lying about being loverized with a susp actor OR world B someone RB'd Titus. If the source of the RB becomes known, that is helpful. If the source of the RB doesn't become known and Irch flips town, we know a RB exists and is scum controlled, which is valuable because it puts another scum role outside of the pool of confirmed roles.

If Irch flips scum who was loverized with Quick, it kills Ircher, who is scum, and Quick, who is in a mechanical 1v1 with hb, solving hb without requiring us to gamble on a potentially game ending lynch.

Irch is independently scummy, and firmly in the lynch pool.

It's the literal definition of a win/win/win scenario.

This is why we should lynch Ircher Ico.

Titus · Post Post #1397 (isolation #95) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 3:04 am

In post 1396, farside22 wrote:Titus: why did you go from putting 2 town reads as lovers and why did you pick ircher and quick this time?

My ability was outed. I was hoping I could keep it as just neighbors so that we could get the most town utility and not have the risks involved. Since the downside got outed, there's no way I could risk two town slots being killed.

I did consider Hoctac and Quick but I wanted proof of vigness existing and to handle a scumread of my locktown.

Titus · Post Post #1400 (isolation #96) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:06 am

In post 1395, Titus wrote:
In post 1324, Bingle wrote:Yes, roughly.

Given the confirmation of Titus' role we're in world A Ircher is lying about being loverized with a susp actor OR world B someone RB'd Titus. If the source of the RB becomes known, that is helpful. If the source of the RB doesn't become known and Irch flips town, we know a RB exists and is scum controlled, which is valuable because it puts another scum role outside of the pool of confirmed roles.

If Irch flips scum who was loverized with Quick, it kills Ircher, who is scum, and Quick, who is in a mechanical 1v1 with hb, solving hb without requiring us to gamble on a potentially game ending lynch.

Irch is independently scummy, and firmly in the lynch pool.

It's the literal definition of a win/win/win scenario.
This is why we should lynch Ircher Ico.

There you go Chemist.

Titus · Post Post #1405 (isolation #97) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 9:46 am

In post 1404, Chemist1422 wrote:Did titus claim her card from last night

I did. I was yellow. I am blue now.

Titus · Post Post #1425 (isolation #98) » Mon Jun 08, 2020 4:52 pm

Pigman's reads are so off the wall I don't think they can come from scum.

Titus · Post Post #1440 (isolation #99) » Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:45 am

Ircher, how do you feel about Starbuck dodging whether or not you were loverized with them?

Titus · Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:10 pm

In post 7825, TemporalLich wrote:
Townie

(role up to mod discretion)

The moderator chooses your role but not your alignment.

In post 905, Shadowmod wrote:
Alien Pheromone Seeder

Loverizes two people for the night and following day, giving them Day- and Night Talk.

Since this is still a thing, my literal role is Townie. I literally would have been conftown if Hotac guessed my role. I picked page 314 because it's my birthday.

The mod then assigned me Phermone Seeder.

Titus · Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:11 pm

Since this is still up for discussion and all the negative side effects are out, I figured it best to just outright claim

Titus · Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:18 am

In post 1500, farside22 wrote:I got jipped. The PT closed after the day ended.

Not a mistake. After the day ended, you weren't lovers anymore. You only have the PT for as long as you're lovers. The night talk portion is probably if some crazy role makes me a day actor.

Titus · Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:27 am

Hi MorningTweet!

Titus · Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:28 am

BM is posting elsewhere and not here. Just sayin'.

Titus · Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:03 pm

In post 1556, Ircher wrote:Why should town!me out Iconeum when he is in no danger of being lynched? That makes no sense, and if I did that, you'd call me out for it and rightfully so.

Re: Tracker --> ????????????? I have not softed anything of the sort.

Your last few posts shows just how tunneled you are on me.

In case you get lynched, Ico would be conftown.

If you got lynched without Ico pushing the issue, Ico would have a claim scum could use against him.

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:35 am

I loverized Starbuck and Iconeum, assuming scum would kill Iconeum.

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:35 am

In post 1611, farside22 wrote:
In post 1604, Porkens wrote:Good morning

I shot drew; you’re welcome.

Also there are no aliens in this game, and bingle is conftown
Also boring claimed coconut townie already.

VOTE: pork

VOTE: Pork

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:36 am

Yellow card

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:23 pm

In post 1627, Porkens wrote:I don’t know what hellbrooks motivation is to lie, but if he rolecopped me he knows I’m not alien sympathizer.

I’m a kind of joat.

I think a full claim is in order. Not go find it but an actual fullclaim.

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 4:54 pm

What did you do n1 Porkens? Can you link to your role?

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 5:11 pm

This is still confusing me.

If the entire role from alien sympathizer was rerolled then Porkens is basically confessing to being a WW. You can't have a town aligned alien sympathizer and his role isn't Townie (unlike mine).

Am I moonlogicking this or did Porkens out himself?

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 5:20 pm

How could you be a town alien sympathizer though?

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:13 pm

In post 1669, Bingle wrote:
In post 1654, Titus wrote:Am I moonlogicking this or did Porkens out himself?
I’m struggling to see how he didn’t. If there’s redirection shenanigans why didn’t scum redirect hb to one of the conftown to kill her? If hb is lying why? If porkens spontaneously became a ninja why would scum give a power like that to someone other than a teammate?

Where are all the wolf kills though?

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:36 pm

What if there was a mass block night 2? I struggle to see there's traditional scum with the amount of nightkills in the game although the mod said there must be. :/

Titus · Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:39 pm

Scratch the mass block. Hoctac died night 2.

Given Iconeum didn't out his loverization again, I am beginning to think Quick is ascetic.

Titus · Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:10 am

TSE, do you have any thoughts on Porkens at all?

Titus · Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:24 am

No one has found BM's role. TSE claims that BM is town but when pressed he doesn't claim anything that actually shows BM is town but just a really strong read there. There was a discussion yesterday about that.

Titus · Sun Jun 14, 2020 3:39 pm

TSE, in order to believe I am scum, you have to believe Porkens is lying or there's some other scum phermone Seeder and Morning Tweet lied about checking that out.

If Porkens is honest, then there are no aliens. The only scum Phermone Seeder is an alien. Thus for me to be scum, Porkens must also be scum.

I'm not scum but if you want to make the case I am, the only logical move is to join me.

Welcome to moonlogic TSE.

Titus · Mon Jun 15, 2020 5:40 am

In post 1713, Starbuck wrote:It's my birthday!

Happy birthday!

Titus · Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:56 am

In post 1752, farside22 wrote:
In post 1750, Iconeum wrote:
In post 1744, farside22 wrote:
In post 1739, Morning Tweet wrote:[haven't we gone over why Titus is likely town enough yet?]
The role could be any alignment and a few thing from titus doesn't make sense.
She started by targeting me and ircher saying she town read both of us. Why loverize 2 people you town read? Then she targets ircher with quick. She never really explained her change of read on ircher and lastly i feel a great sense of buddying coming from her towards me.

My role changed to VT.
ok why don't you try to answer your own questions about Titus?
Why does scum!Titus try to loverize two people it 'townreads', only to then not kill them?

See that made no sense day 2 for me either. But again why did she change it day 3 then? What happened to her town read on Ircher?
Do you know?

No one knew my role was a Loverize Day 2. I wanted two TRs to work together. Loverizing Hoctac with Quick would ensure Hoctac's death if a town vig existed. The moment I was outed, I had to change tactics. That's why I was hoping you would say just neighbors.

The reason I picked Ircher is because I was wrong the day before. Because I was wrong, I sheeped my biggest TR (Farside).

The next night, I loverized Ico and Quick because of the lack of a town vig and someone scummy shooting Hoctac. I figured the same group would shoot Iconeum.

Titus · Thu Jun 18, 2020 2:49 am

Can someone explain why Looker took off?

Titus · Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:13 am

In post 1825, Starbuck wrote:
In post 1794, Looker wrote:With current wagon dynamics, I'm willing to claim if both hellbooks and Starbuck request it
Why is this a thing? You're at like L-2. Just do it.

If this stalls any further, I'll say fuck it and Porkens claim is inconsistent as fuck but leashable at least.

Titus · Sat Jun 20, 2020 10:59 am

In post 1905, Starbuck wrote:
In post 1903, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Do you think Titus is scum?
I'm not sure just yet. I don't know why you'd loverize a conftown person with someone accused of being 3p if you're protown.

I expected Iconeum to die.

Titus · Sat Jun 20, 2020 11:00 am

In post 1910, farside22 wrote:
In post 1891, Starbuck wrote:
In post 1890, Looker wrote:Is Starbuck a vanillaizer or a bomb?
I'm definitely not a bomb, but I am DA BOMB, though. *ba dum dish*

But yes, my role is that of Town Neopolitan Vanillaizer. I don't know if Quick was trying to breadcrumb with the VT claim or if he was just trying to stay low key. Idk because I'm not him.

He didn't use the ability on N1, I didn't use it on N2 because I didn't really know who it would be good on then, and to test it, I tried on farside last night because it seemed her ability was past its use and it would be good to see. She is exactly what she said she is, by the way.
Doesn't this mean hb is lying scum then?

VOTE: hellboots

They'd have to be lynched then no? Otherwise how would the game end on a Quick lynch?

Titus · Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:48 am

In post 1939, farside22 wrote:Im starting to feel like nobody wants to lynch lying scum.
Someone prod me when they do.

I can not understand anyone's views that say not to lynch caught lying scum because it could be X.

Fuck that shit.

Welcome to my world since Day 1.

Titus · Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:50 am

VOTE: hellbrooks Fuck it.

Titus · Tue Jun 23, 2020 6:21 pm

I targeted Porkens and Looker. I think the reasons there should be obvious.

Titus · Tue Jun 23, 2020 6:23 pm

In post 1978, Morning Tweet wrote:[great call farside and the rest!]

[but wait]

[does this mean the 3p bomber exists and hellbooks was just guessing that the 3p bomber was Starbuck?]

Looks like a job for Bingle to see if it's possible with his chart. I'm too lazy to check.

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:44 am

In post 1991, Bingle wrote:
In post 1981, Titus wrote:I targeted Porkens and Looker. I think the reasons there should be obvious.
:/

You should have loverized Starbuck and one of them. We still don't know why Starbuck survived D1 and there is absolutely no guarantee that a vanilla-izer isn't town.

UNVOTE:

We should be lynching in Looker/Porkens, but if we can lynch a blue card in Looker/Porkens that's preferable.

I'm Yellow.

Farside claimed that Starbuck lived day 1. I townread Farside.

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:53 am

I feel the wagons on me have been mafia driven all game.

They knew my role, but not my alignment, was in the game. They looked via search and only found alien, so it was an easy place to park.

It's also why Hoctac had to die. They probably strongmanned him or something. Eventually, my townie claim could be verified.

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 3:00 am

In post 2011, Starbuck wrote:I just saw Porkens' claim on Titus, too. That's not a bad wagon either. I'm just preferring those who were trying to steer us away from the hellbooks lynch.

Porkens definitely qualifies. Plus, he admitted to alien hunting over mafia hunting. Mafia have kills. Aliens don't. They may not even exist either.

We also still have a mafia card dealer in play too. It makes sense to hunt that.

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 3:03 am

It also could be my role that has them scared to kill. It might be worth losing one mafia to kill a mass role claim slot. It's not worth it to kill anyone else given the sheer numbers mafia likely have.

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 3:40 am

In post 2014, Starbuck wrote:but it didn't make sense to me that you hitched that idea to Iconeum, as confirmed town.

Also, who did you really loverize on Day 3? Because I was NOT loverized with Ircher.

Hoctac had just died. I wanted to push scum if they shot conftown again.

I was roleblocked N2. I attempted to Loverize you and Ircher.

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 3:44 am

In post 2014, Starbuck wrote:That's why my thinking is in one or both of Bingle and MT.

I think it's Porkens or Looker. MT is possible, but hasn't been pushing for my lynch. That's what mafia want.

Bingle has claimed self-watcher and admittedly caught Porkens in a lie. In order for Bingle to be mafia, Porkens must be too. Porkens claimed a successful clear on Bingle. Bingle denied that clear when there was no reason to do so.

Can anyone else come up with a lack of kills aside from scum being afraid of my loverize?

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 3:52 am

In post 2018, farside22 wrote:
In post 2013, Titus wrote:It also could be my role that has them scared to kill. It might be worth losing one mafia to kill a mass role claim slot. It's not worth it to kill anyone else given the sheer numbers mafia likely have.
Last time im saying this.
The loverization is only good for the day. It does not occur or continue into the night.

Then my role pm is not just a mistake but an outright lie.

Titus · Wed Jun 24, 2020 4:12 am

In post 2020, Starbuck wrote:
In post 2018, farside22 wrote:
In post 2013, Titus wrote:It also could be my role that has them scared to kill. It might be worth losing one mafia to kill a mass role claim slot. It's not worth it to kill anyone else given the sheer numbers mafia likely have.
Last time im saying this.
The loverization is only good for the day. It does not occur or continue into the night.
I can also confirm this. My loverization with Iconeum began at the start of day yesterday and ended with end of day.

The fact that we're at Day 5 and this isn't clear to the person who is loverizing people is concerning.

It's literally not what my PM says, which is so demoralizing. My role PM is literally saving town but because of the mod, I will likely be lynched.

The mafia will get away with knowing about my role and lynching it too.

Town had a role that could verify claims but what was the point when scum know every role in the game. They know I am a townie.

Titus · Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:48 am

In post 2168, Porkens wrote:N1 - Farside & (Ircher?) (no nightkill)
N2 - Ircher & Starbuck (Quick) (hoctic nightkillEd)
N3 - Iconeum & Starbuck (drew vigged by porkens)
N4 - Looker & Porkens (no nightkill)

Sooo if the loverized is also RB then I farside+looker is a real possibility.

But pheromone seeder doesn’t roleblocked soooooo not that likely I suppose

This position is why I feel scum want to lynch me. The one night I was roleblocked there was a kill. No one claimed being the reason for the nightkills stopping

despite a confirmed second mafia that knows all roles

. The most logical reason is that scum are afraid to kill because they don't know who I will target.

Titus · Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:51 am

In post 2159, Looker wrote:Is it safe to say that two members corroborating a fakeclaim could be aliens at this point?

I'd go with TSE and BM fakeclaiming at this point. They've done even less than I have and I am obligated to be mysterious. TSE and BM have largely coasted despite TSE's claim being largely unverifiable and his play being 100% pro mafia.

Titus · Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:06 am

TSE claims a clear on BM and no one has investigated them since despite my suspicions.

Titus · Thu Jun 25, 2020 8:19 am

In post 2174, farside22 wrote:
In post 2168, Porkens wrote:N1 - Farside & (Ircher?) (no nightkill)
N2 - Ircher & Starbuck (Quick) (hoctic nightkillEd)
N3 - Iconeum & Starbuck (drew vigged by porkens)
N4 - Looker & Porkens (no nightkill)

Sooo if the loverized is also RB then I farside+looker is a real possibility.

But pheromone seeder doesn’t roleblocked soooooo not that likely I suppose
Titus claimed her target n2 but ircher said he wasnt loverized.
As far as i know, no one else claims to have been rb.

Porkens did I believe. That's my memory though.

Aside from TSE's claim, what do you think of him?

Titus · Thu Jun 25, 2020 10:35 am

VOTE: Looker
Baaah....

Titus · Thu Jun 25, 2020 10:40 am

In post 2214, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 2213, Titus wrote:VOTE: Looker
Baaah....
Bingle - still stand by your assessment of Titus? voting without explanation for someone who:

A. Is highly likely to be town
B. Has already been run up, and claimed.

Seems a bit desperate - not genuine scumhunting in my book. Defending ManateeDude perhaps?

Why is Looker likely to be town? What did Looker claim?

I'm a bit out of it, so I am just sleeping my biggest TR at the moment.

Titus · Thu Jun 25, 2020 4:32 pm

VLA 48 hours minimum. My health isn't doing so hot and I might get jury duty next week. I'll still try to post but there is no loopy mental status akin to VLA.

Titus · Fri Jun 26, 2020 12:13 pm

I think whether or not HB was meant to live to endgame or not depends on the number of players on his team. We know he had at least one. If there's only that one, they likely bussed when they saw the lynch was inevitable but hard protected until then. If there's two or three, early bussing might be a thing or one might be off. They could have refused to bus at all. If there's four or more, no one bussed. It's all pretty speculative and makes assumptions about the setup.

Titus · Sat Jun 27, 2020 4:22 am

In post 2299, farside22 wrote:Looker, thought on CL claim

Where did CL claim?

Titus · Sat Jun 27, 2020 3:38 pm

In post 2314, Starbuck wrote:I'm not sold on either Manatee or Chateau. So far, it just seems like two easy pushes and I don't like it.

I need more words from them and Battle Mage should lay out what he knows.

I'm in the same place. I feel that TSE, Manatee and CL have been lurky or active lurky. TSE, Porkens and Looker should be under threat more if not mafia. Porkens and Looker, if both town, have a two for zero mislynch capability. Yet instead the focus shifts. Why wouldn't Porkens and Looker be very static wagons if both were town?

I'm not saying I TR TSE, Manatee or CL. I wouldn't shed a tear if they were lynched. I just feel there's better options.

Titus · Sat Jun 27, 2020 3:40 pm

In post 2318, Starbuck wrote:After a real quick search of the role thread, most of the roles that can't claim are scum-based.

I'm tired of how stalled out this game is and since no one else wants to look at those who were defending HB yesterday, I'll bite.

UNVOTE: Unvote
VOTE: ManateeDude

If my memory serves, that's Porkens Looker and TSE but my memory might be off given how unwell/stressed I am.

Titus · Sat Jun 27, 2020 3:43 pm

In post 2321, Starbuck wrote:No, I'm more referring to Bingle and MT, there.

No one wants to join me in the hot tub and for mimosas on that wagon, so I'll let y'all slide right now. However, they both, but especially Bingle need to be looked into.

Look, if Bingle's scum, you might as well consider me pocketed because his play FMPOV has been very protown. I just can't see Bingle being scum.

Titus · Sat Jun 27, 2020 6:47 pm

VOTE: Manatee Dude

Le hammer. Game is stalling. I am not getting my preferred lynches, so I'll settle for not hot garbage.

Titus · Mon Jul 20, 2020 4:22 pm

I want to give an honorable mention to CL. Fighting on in those circumstances was rough.

I think in general the aliens got boned by the lack of nightkills by mafia and the wolves. Then they both ganged up on the aliens. I suspected my death was coming, so we used my loverize to take out two targets. Also, that loverize role PM needs to be a lot clearer. I almost got misexecuted for that and it wasn't my fault in the slightest.