wagon
really? why don't you think id do that?In post 7, usesPython wrote: VOTE: Invisibility
Serious vote, I don't think scum!yessiree puts me in the small hood after replacing in my slot in Open 876
really? why don't you think id do that?In post 7, usesPython wrote: VOTE: Invisibility
Serious vote, I don't think scum!yessiree puts me in the small hood after replacing in my slot in Open 876
aren't you being a little optimistic here going for the BIG PLAY on day 1?In post 15, usesPython wrote:There's an argument to be made that if the small hood seems obviously solved that we just lim in the big hood and force scum to either shoot small hood and make the small hood scum more obvious or shoot in big hood and make the big hood scum more obvious. There's also the consideration that small hood scum can't hammer the big hood scum d1 without instantly losing the game.In post 13, yessiree wrote: im thinking we lim in the small hood today no matter what, are you thinkin what im thinkin?
-A
everyone always asks "who is connor" but nobody ever asks "how is connor" and i wont stand for thisIn post 22, Save The Dragons wrote: who is connor
imma drop my wisdom hereIn post 25, BurgerParty wrote: What happens if we multiply him
Are you trying to play against ur scum meta by not being conservative with ur vote?In post 30, Aureal wrote:In post 20, usesPython wrote: The vibe I'm getting from the hoods was that small hood was planned and then big hood was made from whatever else was left. I don't think Aureal is big hood scum because in that case why not just go all in with a yessiree/Python/Aureal hood?
-A
I would never set up the three of us in small hood here. Because that would mean the imminent demise of Team Sno-Cone. And that would be sad.
Ugh, I have to actually solve you again. VOTE: usesPython
LOL what the HECKIn post 40, Invisibility wrote: wait why are the neighborhoods just order of signups? I think scum tried to make neighborhoods with an unbiased mechanism so that we couldn't glean anything from them LOL
maybe it wasn't that obvious since no one noticed it straight away, but the choice seems more intentional than notIn post 45, usesPython wrote:No I mean why did scum specifically make it obvious that they let the hoods rand instead of letting it rand and letting people see AI hood choices where there are noneIn post 44, Invisibility wrote: oh true true. They must've decided that the order was acceptable enough over random neighborhoods so there's still probably stuff to glean from that. Not that I'll do much gleaning cuz I don't like doing meta (major player flaw. I just find it boring)
-A
In post 48, Aureal wrote:tbf I did kinda encourage yes to keep it low-key rather than stir the game up again and possibly get us more attention. And I'm really not too sure how you get the idea that he would expect a big active 1v1 from you because of what he expected your towngame to be before finding out it was your scumgame. Obviously he probably won't expect you to lurk as town after seeing how hyper-posty you were there, but that's just a you in general thing not you as town.In post 14, usesPython wrote:Then you kinda started lurking a bit and let town cannibalize themselves, if you put me us the small hood and didn't predict me POEing Invisibility as the small hood scum you'd have to be able to deal with a possible early 1v1 with me and I'm not sure you'd want to deal with that.In post 12, yessiree wrote: really? why don't you think id do that?
-A
i'm acknowledging this but i wont comment on anything more in light of recent revelationsIn post 49, usesPython wrote:Me getting into 1v1's is playstyle not anything specific to my alignment and my point was that if I can be that townie as scum then it's risky for me to be put in the small hood with him. And anyways that was before it was pointed out that scum let the hoods randIn post 48, Aureal wrote: tbf I did kinda encourage yes to keep it low-key rather than stir the game up again and possibly get us more attention. And I'm really not too sure how you get the idea that he would expect a big active 1v1 from you because of what he expected your towngame to be before finding out it was your scumgame. Obviously he probably won't expect you to lurk as town after seeing how hyper-posty you were there, but that's just a you in general thing not you as town.
-A
this feels a bit forced for a rvs vote? are you scumreading me based on that vote alone or are you just happy to vote in the small hood?In post 59, Merlyn wrote: I feel like I missed RVS already
Seems right to me, randomized or not there's still one scum per hood.In post 41, Invisibility wrote: boring! But we should still lim in the small neighborhood probably cuz better odds
VOTE: yesiree I don't like that you sheeped python with the vote on invisibility.
either that or they straight up disrespected the whole playerlist with that choiceIn post 74, BurgerParty wrote:The timer for picking hoods hasn't even run out yet, it was probably done by someone who either couldn't care less, or someone who doesn't know the playerlist very well so the choice doesn't matter to them.In post 71, yessiree wrote:
maybe it wasn't that obvious since no one noticed it straight away, but the choice seems more intentional than not
it's intentionally done to make it seem... not intentional? it could be specifically done to deny info behind neighborhood choices
how does Invisibility have better posts than me, like you mean they use fancy words or literary techniques something?In post 82, usesPython wrote: UNVOTE: Invisibility
VOTE: yessiree
Combo of Invisibility having better posts and yessiree not posting in the hood
LOL evidently, but now i gonna go be a light bulb in the small hoodIn post 92, Save The Dragons wrote: Do you think there's the potential for pocketing in the small hood
okay i'll bite, what about that post from cakez makes u feel like it's a town postIn post 99, ActionDan wrote:Town postIn post 97, SirCakez wrote: i don't really have feelings on anyone in small hood yet, tbh they all feel a little scummy to me
but this isn't what u said earlier, you said it was to discredit invisibility which was kinda of nonsensicalIn post 101, Merlyn wrote:I'm thinking that the yesiree vote could be an attempt to create a false sense of solidarity with python.In post 67, Aureal wrote: How does sheeping someone's vote discredit the person being voted?
if you can't see that, it seems my goals are beyond your comprehensionIn post 102, Merlyn wrote:I feel like it's not helpful to speculate on this? Real question, what does it gain?In post 71, yessiree wrote:maybe it wasn't that obvious since no one noticed it straight away, but the choice seems more intentional than notIn post 45, usesPython wrote:No I mean why did scum specifically make it obvious that they let the hoods rand instead of letting it rand and letting people see AI hood choices where there are noneIn post 44, Invisibility wrote: oh true true. They must've decided that the order was acceptable enough over random neighborhoods so there's still probably stuff to glean from that. Not that I'll do much gleaning cuz I don't like doing meta (major player flaw. I just find it boring)
-A
it's intentionally done to make it seem... not intentional? it could be specifically done to deny info behind neighborhood choices
how likely of that in Litres?In post 106, Invisibility wrote:I think Yesiree is the most likely scum in the hood but I dunno how how much water this argument holds (in gallons) considering his choice was 50/50. Like, yeah he could be doing that but I don't think it's more likely to be the caseIn post 101, Merlyn wrote:I'm thinking that the yesiree vote could be an attempt to create a false sense of solidarity with python.In post 67, Aureal wrote: How does sheeping someone's vote discredit the person being voted?
ok but thats also what you said yesterdayIn post 125, Invisibility wrote: lol same I'll be serious awesome player tomorrow
I agree on the latter but the timing of this vote is super weirdIn post 127, Invisibility wrote: VOTE: Merlyn
pretending that I've never seen a neighborhood in my entire life I think Merlyn's cases against Yessiree are bad
I blinked in 2020In post 140, usesPython wrote:The small hood chat is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnaturalIn post 139, Aureal wrote: I am sure someday, after the game, this will all make sense.
Okay, no, I'm still not sure.
-A
In post 158, Merlyn wrote:that is some mighty fine hair-splitting there, my friend. I think placing a vote on someone does indeed discredit them, and I think you might have had an ulterior motive in doing it.In post 113, yessiree wrote:but this isn't what u said earlier, you said it was to discredit invisibility which was kinda of nonsensicalIn post 101, Merlyn wrote:I'm thinking that the yesiree vote could be an attempt to create a false sense of solidarity with python.In post 67, Aureal wrote: How does sheeping someone's vote discredit the person being voted?
why discredit specifically tho? why did I feel the need to discredit someone who hasn't posted yet
like there could be a number of reasons for me to vote Invis at the start and discredit is pretty low on that list. I think that is mainly why it felt off
In post 162, yessiree wrote:why discredit specifically tho? why did I feel the need to discredit someone who hasn't posted yetIn post 158, Merlyn wrote:that is some mighty fine hair-splitting there, my friend. I think placing a vote on someone does indeed discredit them, and I think you might have had an ulterior motive in doing it.In post 113, yessiree wrote:but this isn't what u said earlier, you said it was to discredit invisibility which was kinda of nonsensicalIn post 101, Merlyn wrote:I'm thinking that the yesiree vote could be an attempt to create a false sense of solidarity with python.In post 67, Aureal wrote: How does sheeping someone's vote discredit the person being voted?
like there could be a number of reasons for me to vote Invis at the start and discredit is pretty low on that list. I think that is mainly why it felt off
I said what i said in the small hood for a reason, it was meant for you guys to read not the whole game, if you seriously telling me to posture like that in the main thread by saying the words i said in the small hood im literally gonna DIESOFCRINGEIn post 174, usesPython wrote: Like if you want an explicit example of what I wanted to avoid with that first post it's stuff like yessiree explaining his Merlyn unvote in the hood instead of in the main thread
-A
Two sides of the same coin really, so there's not much relevance of one side being better or worse than the otherIn post 145, Invisibility wrote:what's weird about posting seriousness before I said I would like I would get it if I promised something and never delivered but like you got an advance of the Vizzy brainsmarts. That's like a better deal rightIn post 144, Invisibility wrote:well I was gonna reread later and then I just felt like rereading then insteadIn post 134, yessiree wrote: especially when they just said they weren't gonna be serious posting right before making that vote
huh?In post 164, ActionDan wrote:To answer your question, this and the other one I quoted were perfect reflections of my own thoughts. It is highly unlikely either of those were faked. Thus town.In post 112, yessiree wrote:okay i'll bite, what about that post from cakez makes u feel like it's a town postIn post 99, ActionDan wrote:Town postIn post 97, SirCakez wrote: i don't really have feelings on anyone in small hood yet, tbh they all feel a little scummy to me
B being worse than C doesn't make C not bad, partner I guess we'll just have to agree to disagreeIn post 194, Invisibility wrote:not going up on promises is scummy though cuz you're actively avoiding playing like if you can't actually drum up a response in the timeframe. I fail to see how this is true for being early lol I think that's NAIIn post 186, yessiree wrote:Two sides of the same coin really, so there's not much relevance of one side being better or worse than the otherIn post 145, Invisibility wrote:what's weird about posting seriousness before I said I would like I would get it if I promised something and never delivered but like you got an advance of the Vizzy brainsmarts. That's like a better deal rightIn post 144, Invisibility wrote:well I was gonna reread later and then I just felt like rereading then insteadIn post 134, yessiree wrote: especially when they just said they weren't gonna be serious posting right before making that vote
i think it boils down to 3 pointsIn post 199, ActionDan wrote:Whys that?In post 191, yessiree wrote:huh?In post 164, ActionDan wrote:To answer your question, this and the other one I quoted were perfect reflections of my own thoughts. It is highly unlikely either of those were faked. Thus town.In post 112, yessiree wrote:okay i'll bite, what about that post from cakez makes u feel like it's a town postIn post 99, ActionDan wrote:Town postIn post 97, SirCakez wrote: i don't really have feelings on anyone in small hood yet, tbh they all feel a little scummy to me
im glad i asked because this is bad reasoning even without the context of the quotes in question
In post 202, Aureal wrote:
Wow, I must hang out in the wrong crowds. I've been scumread for that multiple times in games where I just couldn't not find scummy things about everyone.
He is BASED, let him cook, we bing chillingIn post 295, Aureal wrote: Can someone translate Flavor Leaf for me? I think he might be speaking Mafia and I don't understand that language.
do you think actiondan was having trouble getting into the game and just piggybacked off ur post because he had more experience playing with you?In post 251, SirCakez wrote: yes vs Dan feels TvT I see where both are coming from it's just a logical clash
i think it can be AI, i knew it's early and he wasn't fully settled in the game thats why i gave him something to lean on so we can pick his brain, but i got an wasn't what i expectedIn post 252, Invisibility wrote: I can understand using this argument in some contexts if you think AD is being evasive, but I don't think this makes very much sense right now. Yeah, AD's argument isn't concrete, but like, we're so early in the game. What can ya do? I don't think it's AI.
i AM the 3rd wheel tho, it really feels like python and invisibility claimed small hood their home and im just a bum sleeping on the couchIn post 283, Flavor Leaf wrote: I’m not 100% yessiree is town like I was a little while ago, but still feels most likely for more reasons, such as they’re the 3rd wheel in the neighborhood. The other two are driving it forward.
i think i tend to agree with the reads hereIn post 284, Flavor Leaf wrote: I think STD wanting big hood to post more is townie for the same reason I think Cakez finding all 3 small hood scummie is town.
ActionDan is a hard one to truly town read here, but I get why he was town reading Cakez.
it's inherently a scummy thing to say, especially since the thread was predominantly small hood posting, so it's deliberately taking a neutral position and not changing the dynamics of the small hood conflictIn post 432, Aureal wrote:In post 431, yessiree wrote: the thoughts flowing from cakez mostly feel authentic, i think scum!cakez would be more selective and filtered in what he posts, and i dont think cakez would hold the position "all 3 small hood are scummy" as scum, especially given the timing of it, when most big hood players are not doing much, having that position would be stick out like a sore thumb but he did it anyway
I really don't get how "all these players are scummy" is a hard thing to say or sticks out?
how is Invis aware enough to notice the hood order is not random but fumble so hard on simple logicIn post 351, Invisibility wrote:wouldn't that mean you think Yess is scum lolIn post 325, Save The Dragons wrote: i think scum in the small hood is taking the lead
i don't know who it is though. need to re-read or iso dive and that might not happen today
right after this post in the small hood you also joked about coordinating a quickhammer on your own slot, are you also gonna tell me what wasn't a joke too?In post 371, usesPython wrote:I wasn't joking about quickhammering yessireeIn post 370, Invisibility wrote: VOTE: Python
I would like to pressure for reasons I think are correct. I held off on this vote cuz Python was acting like besties with me (including (jokingly?) suggesting we quickhammer Yess) and I wanted to sniff out if pocketing was happening but that's not going to happen anymore.
-A
i dont but i'm inclined to now, im thinking flavor leaf is probably right that the perception of threats of on ur own slot is just you projecting ur own pushes on othersIn post 380, usesPython wrote:Cakez, Dan, you, Invisibility, and probably yessiree all have me at the bottom of their reads lists, you tell meIn post 378, Flavor Leaf wrote:nevermind. 2 posts.In post 210, SirCakez wrote: i feel tonally that python is still the scummiest one from the small hood
when I read most invis and yessirree posts I feel like I can see the town thought process and I don't see that in python's posts
but nonetheless, you're acting like they wear leading a giant rebellion on you
-A
i disagree with ur disagreementIn post 441, Aureal wrote:In post 230, yessiree wrote: i think it boils down to 3 points
one is that "it's a solution looking for a problem" - it feels like you decided sircakez is town first and then found something by which to townread him rather than the other way around, so it doesn't feel like you arrived at the conclusion organically
two is you're not giving anything concrete to the rest of the players to discern the validity of it, you're just saying sircakez is mirroring your thoughts that can't be faked so he's town
three is you're doing it in a way that's making it more about spewing urself town rather than focusing on the read itself
I don't agree with any of this but the second point, but I don't see it as a problem and certainly not scummy like apparently yes does? It's just a townread that isn't going to be very convincing to other people.
why wouldn't scum do something to be in the best position possible? especially when it was freeloIn post 459, Aureal wrote:Why does a scum Cakez need to do something to try to gain a better position?In post 436, yessiree wrote:it's inherently a scummy thing to say, especially since the thread was predominantly small hood posting, so it's deliberately taking a neutral position and not changing the dynamics of the small hood conflictIn post 432, Aureal wrote:In post 431, yessiree wrote: the thoughts flowing from cakez mostly feel authentic, i think scum!cakez would be more selective and filtered in what he posts, and i dont think cakez would hold the position "all 3 small hood are scummy" as scum, especially given the timing of it, when most big hood players are not doing much, having that position would be stick out like a sore thumb but he did it anyway
I really don't get how "all these players are scummy" is a hard thing to say or sticks out?
but i think yall are focusing too much on what was said and are not considering whatcouldhave been said by scum!cakez that would put him in a better position
ok then, if python get to E-1 i'm auto hammering no capIn post 464, usesPython wrote: The self quickhammer was a joke, the quickhammer on you wasn't
i dont agree with that, also you can't deepwolf in the small hood if you're gonna lim in small hood on day 1??In post 477, usesPython wrote:You weren't before? Small hood town and small hood scum should both be auto-hammering any small hood at E-1 baring exceptions like a strong tr as town or deepwolfing as scum, it's why I warned people earlier about bringing people to E-1 with small hood off wagonIn post 476, yessiree wrote:ok then, if python get to E-1 i'm auto hammering no capIn post 464, usesPython wrote: The self quickhammer was a joke, the quickhammer on you wasn't
-A
"no cap" just means "no joke"In post 478, Aureal wrote:In post 476, yessiree wrote:ok then, if python get to E-1 i'm auto hammering no capIn post 464, usesPython wrote: The self quickhammer was a joke, the quickhammer on you wasn't
This shit is just triggeringintense angerin me probably partly due to another miserably long workday in a miserable unseasonable heatwave, so I'm probably going to just wait for some point when I will hopefully be cooler to respond. Because all I want to do right now is scream and fume about how people are apparently intentionally trying to be hard to understand with some BS slang?!?
i knew that since the startIn post 81, yessiree wrote: i mean from the pov of any of us the other 2 are gonna be 50/50 of being scum and thats about as good as my reads go on day 1 anyway
im kinda not feeling dragons scum tho, just a gut feelingIn post 488, SirCakez wrote: I kinda want to lim in the big hood today actually
I feel we have a good shot there compared to little hood
bro, big hood was supposed to take center stage ever since small hood yielded, you forgot the memo?In post 566, Save The Dragons wrote: i have no idea
In post 620, usesPython wrote:Why do you need more time to vote Oclax? Just flash wagon them if you want, 24 hours is more than enough time to get it doneIn post 619, Invisibility wrote: if there weren't two seconds left in the day it would be funny to vote the Oclaxian Empire
-A
??
whats p1/p2? is it like a system thingIn post 598, Oclaxian Empire wrote: grim: your vote is still bad fyi, i want to read the game, but i really think ur slot is scum based off p1/p2, and ur vote here.