I haven't ISO'd them, but from what I saw, I saw a lot of really weird stuff. What did you agree with with what they said since page 33?In post 932, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk I feel like what he's said is sensible and also feels naturalIn post 931, Quick wrote:Some of the things he has said has been a big "wut?" to me. I can try and fish out quotes but I think he said somethings that just don't make any Goddamn sense.In post 927, Gamma Emerald wrote:can someone tell me what the fuck they find suspicious about beef because I think he's town and no one has given a solid read other than like nsg and even then I didn't get much out of it
Large Normal 211: Scientific Mafia
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
To me it's a combination that your words ring a bit hollow and seems like you are just going through the motions.In post 936, Gamma Emerald wrote:can someone tell me what wooden even means
also profii why did you let UCV go just because he flaked, I thought you'd brought something up about him not liking scum-
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
I disagree with 4 of his 6 reads fundamentally. To me that means that there's a fair chance he might be on the other team than me.In post 949, Quick wrote:Even SRing someone for having a Reads list that is different than yours is pushing it pretty hard. Definitely not vote worthy. Like, in order for you to know that their reads are wrong in the first place either you have to be Scum or have perfect reads and it's fucking D1, so someone having a readslist you don't agree with and voting them for that is such garbage it's not even funny.
Plus you are being really results oriented and assuming your reads are correct for your read to have any merit whatsoever and both are not a good way to get a read. It's also an extremely shallow read considering you would first have to know the players reasons for each of their reads in their readslist and then have to refute their reasoning for each one which you are not doing at all.-
-
Gamma Emerald AnySurvivorAny
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 69109
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)
Rather than descend into the dpeths of madness wrt the claim he decides it's a joke. I feel like scum would prefer to hop on it. Could be possibly he's trying to play as the deep wolf here but the thought still feels fresh.In post 51, Beefster wrote:Ascetic miller neighbor claim is probably a joke.
VOTE: Nictis
It's a chainsaw defense, but I'll roll with this for now.
A very nuanced thought imo, even though the read on the situation is wrong.In post 598, Beefster wrote:Flavor Leaf is town.
Fakeclaiming to get out of RVS is just not something I see coming from scum.
Lots of people actually got on beef's ass on these but like it's a totally sensible thing I've done before. It shows he's being careful with is vote, and only voting when he feels confident enough to not care about what the wagon state as because the possibility of hammering scum is enough to outweigh the loss of discussion.In post 602, Beefster wrote:
Okay. I don't even care if this is a lolhammer anymore.In post 589, TwoInAMillion wrote:I'll back off FL amid public pressure but I still think he's scum ftr.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: twoinamillion
Die, scum.
This is a pretty natural thought imo wrt to Pine and NosIn post 848, Beefster wrote:With Pine and Nos both zeroing in on petty details, I think I can say semi-reasonably that at least one of the two is scum.
I don't know what to say about Mulch. I could kind of see it going either way with him.<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Right, and I am telling you that is shit. Look at what they do and their reasoning, not just their reads.In post 952, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I disagree with 4 of his 6 reads fundamentally. To me that means that there's a fair chance he might be on the other team than me.In post 949, Quick wrote:Even SRing someone for having a Reads list that is different than yours is pushing it pretty hard. Definitely not vote worthy. Like, in order for you to know that their reads are wrong in the first place either you have to be Scum or have perfect reads and it's fucking D1, so someone having a readslist you don't agree with and voting them for that is such garbage it's not even funny.
Plus you are being really results oriented and assuming your reads are correct for your read to have any merit whatsoever and both are not a good way to get a read. It's also an extremely shallow read considering you would first have to know the players reasons for each of their reads in their readslist and then have to refute their reasoning for each one which you are not doing at all.-
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
I think your reads are a major part of "what they do" They didn't provide reasoning, they just said this is who we should be lynching.In post 954, Quick wrote:
Right, and I am telling you that is shit. Look at what they do and their reasoning, not just their reads.In post 952, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I disagree with 4 of his 6 reads fundamentally. To me that means that there's a fair chance he might be on the other team than me.In post 949, Quick wrote:Even SRing someone for having a Reads list that is different than yours is pushing it pretty hard. Definitely not vote worthy. Like, in order for you to know that their reads are wrong in the first place either you have to be Scum or have perfect reads and it's fucking D1, so someone having a readslist you don't agree with and voting them for that is such garbage it's not even funny.
Plus you are being really results oriented and assuming your reads are correct for your read to have any merit whatsoever and both are not a good way to get a read. It's also an extremely shallow read considering you would first have to know the players reasons for each of their reads in their readslist and then have to refute their reasoning for each one which you are not doing at all.-
-
Gamma Emerald AnySurvivorAny
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 69109
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)
Why don't you do a background check instead of lazily FOSing someone for having reads you dislikeIn post 955, TwoInAMillion wrote:I think your reads are a major part of "what they do" They didn't provide reasoning, they just said this is who we should be lynching.<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
yeah, that's a shallow read and his reason for voting Nictis is based on chainsaw defense which is extremely weak.In post 953, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Rather than descend into the dpeths of madness wrt the claim he decides it's a joke. I feel like scum would prefer to hop on it. Could be possibly he's trying to play as the deep wolf here but the thought still feels fresh.In post 51, Beefster wrote:Ascetic miller neighbor claim is probably a joke.
VOTE: Nictis
It's a chainsaw defense, but I'll roll with this for now.
You think THAT is nuanced? Flavor could be doing anything and it ends up a big pile of nothing. It's not a nuanced read/thought, it's reading a player as Town who hasn't done a damn thing out of their Scum range.In post 953, Gamma Emerald wrote:
A very nuanced thought imo, even though the read on the situation is wrong.In post 598, Beefster wrote:Flavor Leaf is town.
Fakeclaiming to get out of RVS is just not something I see coming from scum.
You realize that you are encouraging YOLO hammers right? What on earth makes you think that is a good idea AT ALL? TIAM is probably the biggest lynch bait in this game and you think it's a good idea for someone to vote them for giving a read that isn't even particularly Scummy.In post 953, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Lots of people actually got on beef's ass on these but like it's a totally sensible thing I've done before. It shows he's being careful with is vote, and only voting when he feels confident enough to not care about what the wagon state as because the possibility of hammering scum is enough to outweigh the loss of discussion.In post 602, Beefster wrote:
Okay. I don't even care if this is a lolhammer anymore.In post 589, TwoInAMillion wrote:I'll back off FL amid public pressure but I still think he's scum ftr.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: twoinamillion
Die, scum.
Beef gave a TvS argument and like 95%+ TvS reads I see are dead wrong. You're just encouraging poor play at this point.In post 953, Gamma Emerald wrote:
This is a pretty natural thought imo wrt to Pine and NosIn post 848, Beefster wrote:With Pine and Nos both zeroing in on petty details, I think I can say semi-reasonably that at least one of the two is scum.
I don't know what to say about Mulch. I could kind of see it going either way with him.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
And you didn't ask them what their reasoning was so how the hell do you know how they got those reads?In post 955, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I think your reads are a major part of "what they do" They didn't provide reasoning, they just said this is who we should be lynching.In post 954, Quick wrote:
Right, and I am telling you that is shit. Look at what they do and their reasoning, not just their reads.In post 952, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I disagree with 4 of his 6 reads fundamentally. To me that means that there's a fair chance he might be on the other team than me.In post 949, Quick wrote:Even SRing someone for having a Reads list that is different than yours is pushing it pretty hard. Definitely not vote worthy. Like, in order for you to know that their reads are wrong in the first place either you have to be Scum or have perfect reads and it's fucking D1, so someone having a readslist you don't agree with and voting them for that is such garbage it's not even funny.
Plus you are being really results oriented and assuming your reads are correct for your read to have any merit whatsoever and both are not a good way to get a read. It's also an extremely shallow read considering you would first have to know the players reasons for each of their reads in their readslist and then have to refute their reasoning for each one which you are not doing at all.-
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
I don't think I should have to ask for people to not give randomly bad reads and give reasoning.In post 958, Quick wrote:
And you didn't ask them what their reasoning was so how the hell do you know how they got those reads?In post 955, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I think your reads are a major part of "what they do" They didn't provide reasoning, they just said this is who we should be lynching.In post 954, Quick wrote:
Right, and I am telling you that is shit. Look at what they do and their reasoning, not just their reads.In post 952, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I disagree with 4 of his 6 reads fundamentally. To me that means that there's a fair chance he might be on the other team than me.In post 949, Quick wrote:Even SRing someone for having a Reads list that is different than yours is pushing it pretty hard. Definitely not vote worthy. Like, in order for you to know that their reads are wrong in the first place either you have to be Scum or have perfect reads and it's fucking D1, so someone having a readslist you don't agree with and voting them for that is such garbage it's not even funny.
Plus you are being really results oriented and assuming your reads are correct for your read to have any merit whatsoever and both are not a good way to get a read. It's also an extremely shallow read considering you would first have to know the players reasons for each of their reads in their readslist and then have to refute their reasoning for each one which you are not doing at all.-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
How do you know their reads are bad?In post 959, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I don't think I should have to ask for people to not give randomly bad reads and give reasoning.In post 958, Quick wrote:
And you didn't ask them what their reasoning was so how the hell do you know how they got those reads?In post 955, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I think your reads are a major part of "what they do" They didn't provide reasoning, they just said this is who we should be lynching.In post 954, Quick wrote:
Right, and I am telling you that is shit. Look at what they do and their reasoning, not just their reads.In post 952, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I disagree with 4 of his 6 reads fundamentally. To me that means that there's a fair chance he might be on the other team than me.In post 949, Quick wrote:Even SRing someone for having a Reads list that is different than yours is pushing it pretty hard. Definitely not vote worthy. Like, in order for you to know that their reads are wrong in the first place either you have to be Scum or have perfect reads and it's fucking D1, so someone having a readslist you don't agree with and voting them for that is such garbage it's not even funny.
Plus you are being really results oriented and assuming your reads are correct for your read to have any merit whatsoever and both are not a good way to get a read. It's also an extremely shallow read considering you would first have to know the players reasons for each of their reads in their readslist and then have to refute their reasoning for each one which you are not doing at all.-
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
Because I am pretty confident in my game based on my record.In post 960, Quick wrote:
How do you know their reads are bad?In post 959, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I don't think I should have to ask for people to not give randomly bad reads and give reasoning.In post 958, Quick wrote:
And you didn't ask them what their reasoning was so how the hell do you know how they got those reads?In post 955, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I think your reads are a major part of "what they do" They didn't provide reasoning, they just said this is who we should be lynching.In post 954, Quick wrote:
Right, and I am telling you that is shit. Look at what they do and their reasoning, not just their reads.In post 952, TwoInAMillion wrote:
I disagree with 4 of his 6 reads fundamentally. To me that means that there's a fair chance he might be on the other team than me.In post 949, Quick wrote:Even SRing someone for having a Reads list that is different than yours is pushing it pretty hard. Definitely not vote worthy. Like, in order for you to know that their reads are wrong in the first place either you have to be Scum or have perfect reads and it's fucking D1, so someone having a readslist you don't agree with and voting them for that is such garbage it's not even funny.
Plus you are being really results oriented and assuming your reads are correct for your read to have any merit whatsoever and both are not a good way to get a read. It's also an extremely shallow read considering you would first have to know the players reasons for each of their reads in their readslist and then have to refute their reasoning for each one which you are not doing at all.-
-
Archwing Mafia Scum
-
-
Archwing Mafia Scum
-
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
Blame quick, not me, my point was valid.In post 962, Archwing wrote:can y'all stop flooding the thread with garbage?-
-
Archwing Mafia Scum
-
-
Flavor Leaf Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 42893
- Joined: July 17, 2017
- Location: San Francisco
I’m not consistently active in any games. I’ve gotten over 1k posts as both scum and town, and have had under 50 posts as both scum and town. Actually, not sure if that’s true for scum. I tend to ignore games sometimes when i’m Town because it’s a lot of work to figure things out.In post 919, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I think your suspicions of flavor are actually pretty validIn post 909, Archwing wrote:
IMO, Flubber is an OG version of Assemble. Lurky playstyle, doesn't post much, doesn't get too involved and throws out (apparently) random reads now and then. I dislike it, and find it hard to read. TBH it kinda lines up with what I was saying about Firebringer.... I'm not 100% sure how to read Flubber, it's kinda more of a gut thing. I've only played with him once (him town, me scum) and I've read a couple games with him in it. I get vibes. Not exactly my first lynch for today.In post 866, Egg wrote:Archwing can you talk to me about your scum reads on redflavor and Flubber? I don't recall either being called scum so far..
Redflavor is not being Redflavor. He's quiet, not really scumhunting, not active at all... I don't like it so much. Not the redflavor I'm used to seeing (which isn't much, but I've seen more of Red than I have of flubber).
He's definitely more active as town
I also start shit posting and not doing much yet still post when I’m townCHECK OUT MY HOW TO PLAY AS SCUM GUIDE Maybe it'll help you catch me
”Yeah, the moment I realized Flavor was scum I stopped trying because I’m sure as hell not beating him.” - Clemency
”Not bragging about myself as much as I'm actually praising the Scum player of the year...and probably the decade.” - Almost50
"Just accept that FL is too good as scum, period." - Clidd-
-
Archwing Mafia Scum
-
-
Flavor Leaf Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 42893
- Joined: July 17, 2017
- Location: San Francisco
Everyone keeps saying things like “this isn’t out of Flavor’s scum range”
I mean, okay, nothings out of my scum range. You could use that for anything.
Easiest way to figure that out is to just let the game go further. I’m EASY to read late game.CHECK OUT MY HOW TO PLAY AS SCUM GUIDE Maybe it'll help you catch me
”Yeah, the moment I realized Flavor was scum I stopped trying because I’m sure as hell not beating him.” - Clemency
”Not bragging about myself as much as I'm actually praising the Scum player of the year...and probably the decade.” - Almost50
"Just accept that FL is too good as scum, period." - Clidd-
-
Flavor Leaf Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 42893
- Joined: July 17, 2017
- Location: San Francisco
I was responding to something Quick said while quoting a Gamma post referring to me.
CHECK OUT MY HOW TO PLAY AS SCUM GUIDE Maybe it'll help you catch me
”Yeah, the moment I realized Flavor was scum I stopped trying because I’m sure as hell not beating him.” - Clemency
”Not bragging about myself as much as I'm actually praising the Scum player of the year...and probably the decade.” - Almost50
"Just accept that FL is too good as scum, period." - Clidd-
-
Flavor Leaf Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 42893
- Joined: July 17, 2017
- Location: San Francisco
Oh, it quoted something. I didn’t mean to quote that. Yeah, you’re right Arch. That’s my badCHECK OUT MY HOW TO PLAY AS SCUM GUIDE Maybe it'll help you catch me
”Yeah, the moment I realized Flavor was scum I stopped trying because I’m sure as hell not beating him.” - Clemency
”Not bragging about myself as much as I'm actually praising the Scum player of the year...and probably the decade.” - Almost50
"Just accept that FL is too good as scum, period." - Clidd-
-
Gamma Emerald AnySurvivorAny
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 69109
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)
In post 965, Archwing wrote:or you could respond without quoting a 10+ quote pyramid. just a thought<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”-
-
TwoInAMillion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: July 21, 2017
-
-
Flavor Leaf Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 42893
- Joined: July 17, 2017
- Location: San Francisco
In post 971, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 965, Archwing wrote:or you could respond without quoting a 10+ quote pyramid. just a thoughtCHECK OUT MY HOW TO PLAY AS SCUM GUIDE Maybe it'll help you catch me
”Yeah, the moment I realized Flavor was scum I stopped trying because I’m sure as hell not beating him.” - Clemency
”Not bragging about myself as much as I'm actually praising the Scum player of the year...and probably the decade.” - Almost50
"Just accept that FL is too good as scum, period." - Clidd-
-
Flavor Leaf Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 42893
- Joined: July 17, 2017
- Location: San Francisco
I think two’s town.CHECK OUT MY HOW TO PLAY AS SCUM GUIDE Maybe it'll help you catch me
”Yeah, the moment I realized Flavor was scum I stopped trying because I’m sure as hell not beating him.” - Clemency
”Not bragging about myself as much as I'm actually praising the Scum player of the year...and probably the decade.” - Almost50
"Just accept that FL is too good as scum, period." - Clidd
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.