I'd like to see what you have on NM when you're ready.In post 616, Quick wrote:Pretty sure duckling is Scum here. I just voted them to see their reaction. Given they went on a sporadic spontaneous posting spree that has little to do with the Sus on them, I think this shows they are Scum.
That said, I almost thing I have enough on NM for a SR as well as a PL so I am going back there. But more votes on the worst is welcomed. I just have to vote NM for the principle of it.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Thank you!In post 651, the worst wrote:Ceejay is adorable
In post 346, the worst wrote:people I don't really want to lynch atm are currently
the worst, Quick, Sando, mutantdevle, ceejayvinoya, Fumuki
therefore we've got 12 irl days to lynch somewhere in
pinturicchio, Spartan117, Alonzo, Iconeum, Oxy, Not_Mafia, Korina
In post 400, Sando wrote:Not-lynch - Duckling, quick, Fumu, Sando, Oxy
Would lynch - Pintu, Spartan, Alonzo, Ico, CJ, N_M, Korina
Unsure - mutant
Okay, this is a topic apparently.In post 646, Sando wrote:LolIn post 635, Alonzo wrote:this might take a while due to my poor edit-fu, but if you wanna whip up a top 5 townposts of the worst in the meantime, il be sure to give it a read.
For everyone else, reread Sando 523 in light of Alonzo. The difference between Oxy and Alonza is fairly stark and falls exactly down what I'm trying to say about scum motivation vs possible town motivation. Alonzo isn't interested in proving me wrong just to destroy a TR of mine, he wants to lynch duckling, an admittedly noble goal. Oxy just sets out to destroy someone's TR without getting in there with the lynch and scum-reads.
@Quick - That post is also why your 582 is weak.
and I didn't handle it very well, so I snapped backIn post 417, Sando wrote:Got any conclusions there or are we just gonna keep playing the questions game and pretend you're contributing content?
but then you scum read me for dismissing your read without explanation - fair, enough.In post 419, Oxy wrote:I'm sorry. It's difficult to build conclusions from questions until people answer them.
So far I've concluded that this portion of your read doesn't seem valid.
Sure, but you basically called my future pool 250 posts early.
523 explains why I read you as scum, I've explained the town motivation and the scum motivation in my eyes for what happened. Alonza has now shown a good example of the town motivation one for it.In post 655, Oxy wrote:but then you scum read me for dismissing your read without explanation - fair, enough.
Trying to deflect the attention you're starting to get?In post 603, the worst wrote:the more I review the more opportunistic and weird pintu felt in Pint/Mutant
Okay, cool, so you refused to psychoanalyse people based on motivation and are just going to stick to "the facts." Good luck with that.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
Unfortunately it's not dependent on me when I can discuss this, but up to NM.In post 650, ceejayvinoya wrote:I'd like to see what you have on NM when you're ready.In post 616, Quick wrote:Pretty sure duckling is Scum here. I just voted them to see their reaction. Given they went on a sporadic spontaneous posting spree that has little to do with the Sus on them, I think this shows they are Scum.
That said, I almost thing I have enough on NM for a SR as well as a PL so I am going back there. But more votes on the worst is welcomed. I just have to vote NM for the principle of it.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
I can do it, but I don't feel like it. Some of the points are "meh" while others tend to strike home pretty well. In other words, it's a Town making a decent case on Scum.In post 664, the worst wrote:Someone digest Alonzo's posts for me pleaseee
What the actual fuck? I literally posted what I believe is the motivation for scum vs town and you want to tell me I'm refusing to engage with motivation? Sando 523In post 660, Quick wrote:Okay, cool, so you refused to psychoanalyse people based on motivation and are just going to stick to "the facts." Good luck with that.
I needed a change of pace.In post 668, the worst wrote:HAHAHAHAHA WALL POST ISOING NOT_MAFIA ALONZO MARRY ME
I like your thinking.In post 671, Alonzo wrote:I needed a change of pace.In post 668, the worst wrote:HAHAHAHAHA WALL POST ISOING NOT_MAFIA ALONZO MARRY ME
Duckling was the complete opposite of vague there.vague.
The basic thrust of the argument from what I can gather, that duckling is constantly asking/demanding reads whilst providing few of his own. That's a reasonable point, but it's lost in the wall-post.Gimme One more read? for the road
