In post 646, Sando wrote: In post 635, Alonzo wrote:this might take a while due to my poor edit-fu, but if you wanna whip up a top 5 townposts of the worst in the meantime, il be sure to give it a read.
Lol
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
nah mate, this just says you haven't read the thread well enough if you're asking me for my town-read justification on duckling.
For everyone else, reread
Sando 523 in light of Alonzo. The difference between Oxy and Alonza is fairly stark and falls exactly down what I'm trying to say about scum motivation vs possible town motivation. Alonzo isn't interested in proving me wrong just to destroy a TR of mine, he wants to lynch duckling, an admittedly noble goal. Oxy just sets out to destroy someone's TR without getting in there with the lynch and scum-reads.
@Quick - That post is also why your
582 is weak.
Okay, this is a topic apparently.
For what it's worth the actual motivation to "destroy your TR" was that
my patience was short last night
you were snippy when you asked me
In post 417, Sando wrote:Got any conclusions there or are we just gonna keep playing the questions game and pretend you're contributing content?
and I didn't handle it very well, so I snapped back
In post 419, Oxy wrote:I'm sorry. It's difficult to build conclusions from questions until people answer them.
So far I've concluded that this portion of your read doesn't seem valid.
but then you scum read me for dismissing your read without explanation - fair, enough.
so I gave you an explanation for why your read was bunk.
Believe it, or don't, but I haven't masterminded a plan to wedge the duckling from your town circle.