In post 170, roflcopter wrote:reasons to move your vote off of eddie: just look how scummy old man is being!
unvote
vote: old man
(also mainly that eddie wagon just feels wrong on a gut level)
Parrrot vote with no input or actual scumhunting.
In post 172, Old Man wrote:
Compared to everyone else, he is a newbie. I'm not referring to "newbie" as in the neophytes who have no idea how to play Mafia in the newbie queue. I have made this very apparent. I mean that Eddie Cane is young to Mafiascum, and it
looks to me that the fast wagon on a player outside of the 'old-player' caste is NOT a mere coincidence
. I do not like it! Have I made myself clear?
I'm here to play mafia, not to find a job in Marketing. You are free to "not buy" what I'm "selling". I have an opinion on the Eddie Cane wagon and I'm making it clear as day.
Prove how it is alignment indicative or gtfo.
In post 178, Old Man wrote:I forgot:
UNVOTE: Chamber
VOTE: Tywin Lannister
To give the chamber slot and replacement some space while I'm V/LA.
I have real trouble understanding this vote oldman. You have been making points that are at least not insane about other players in this game that would lead me to think that you think that they are scum. Then you vote someone that is more or less off your radar
It's like, I would have guessed one of the more "contemplative" players would have voted for a read he contemplated. It seems, at least to me, like tywin was his least developed read at this point, and would not be the hop off of the rvs vote. I am not liking old man's play. Nor am I liking Pines.
In post 180, MagnaofIllusion wrote: In post 177, Old Man wrote:My intent was to determine your competency level as scum. Pine has helpfully offered his self-meta and opinion of his competencies as the two main alignments. I've yet to diagnose yours.
Perhaps you should take up those Marketing classes after all because this is a terrible, terrible sales job.
I'd love for others to weigh in if they think you honestly were trying to get me to disclose some sort of self-assessment as scum as opposed to a specific attempt to insult and undermine.
Anyone not OldMan - please weigh in on this issue.
yeah, the self-meta is obviously bullshit and reads as being hyper defensive when no one cares. If he is town, then he quotes self meta and plays towards his town meta. If he is scum, then he quotes his town meta and plays like his town meta. Either way it is purely a survivalist tactic designed to not get him lynched. I see no reason why town pine, who is under limited if any real pressure at this point, would feel the need to prempt meta attacks. So yeah, its some bullshit on Pine's part, it reads scummy and is worth a vote at this stage of the game in all honesty. ~that's at least the PGO's humble read.
In post 183, Pine wrote: In post 181, MagnaofIllusion wrote: In post 179, Pine wrote:See, if you perceive that OM is trying to put you on tilt in order to get scum!MoI to be reckless and make a revelatory mistake, that should obviate your scumread on him. But...it isn't.
Now I *do* suspect you, for this cogdis.
Um ... I think it is ScumOM trying to take TownMoI's focus away from finding scum besides himself and instead get into a wall battle that most likely serves to turn off most players. Where do you get the conclusion that I think it is a Town OM tactic and that it lessens my scumread on him?
I may have misinterpreted your "on tilt" comment. I accept this explanation for now.
more content less nothing posts from pine.
In post 184, roflcopter wrote:eddie i don't think you're scum but that doesn't mean i think all your reads are right. old man is all in on whiteknighting you, making your opinion of him pretty much the least consequential of anyone. don't take these things personally, difference of opinion in a mafia game should never be seen as "a slap in the face."
if i have to read one more seventeen sentence paragraph on the minutia of what constitutes a newbie under what circumstances i'm going to lose my marbles. from my understanding geriatric games are meant to free us from the shackles of overactive games that the average player couldn't keep up with. writing a novella every time you post causes just about the same problem, and old man is pontificating for the sake of burying this thread in his wordiness and trying to bait people into wall battling him. let's kick this game inaugural geriatric game off with an appropriate dose of dramatic irony by lynching the elderly.
tl;dr please help me feed old man the rope
1) the top part says nothing. Your a null read and I disagree with some of your reads... just like pretty much everyone else on the player list....
2) more contetentless and incorrect garbage. hyper active games feature swift changes in game state that require immediate action from players, where geriatrics do not due to post limit.
In post 186, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Aka OldMan wants to lynch a relational tell when he doesn’t believe the relations that tell is based on. Aka scum fabricating beliefs instead of actually scumhunting. Or distancing from a partner.
moi' great case on Oldman concludes with this. *shrug*. I'm suspending judgment at this point, but I don't think moi is entirly wrong in his analysis.
In post 193, hitogoroshi wrote:Done with moving. Will still be a little patchy as I get situated but I'm not V/LA at least.
I think I agree with
Old Man 147 that Tywin 99 is kind of just plain scummy regardless of Eddie/Pine, without it being super associative like I was billing it at first.
This is correct, simply because the argument would be strengthened by a relational tell does not then make tywin town. His posting could be scummy for other reasons. I need more content from him before I can form a read one way or the other. suspending judgment on this issue entirely.
In post 194, hitogoroshi wrote: In post 185, Pine wrote:I'm starting to come around to where you are on Old Man. There's a lot there that seems disingenuous and calculated, and I'm not a fan. I'll be keeping my vote on Chamber, but I could see moving there too.
I think roflcopter may be my spirit animal this game. We seem to be pretty in sync.
I don't like the vote hold - chamber is getting replaced out, and the OM wagon has more traction, so if you like it why not hop on a wagon in motion instead of keeping your vote camped on a dude who's leaving?
"It's for this chamber wagon I've been sitting on and barely talking about all game. come on pull up a chair"
[...]
Old Man's style is annoying to read without some flips. It's kind of the same tone I affected with Copper, where it's so deliberate it's easy to fake as scum.
Still don't like Pine or Tywin. Could maybe go for an Eddie wagon. But all three of those feel like they're in the state where I want to heavily index on their next few posts, so for now I kinda want to just flashwagon Kison and see what happens when he has to do something other than coast
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Kison
This post makes absolutely no sense to me. The first point quote is basically not to worry about any of the reads you actually have, but to simply vote for the wagon that has traction. A literal appeal to peer pressure here. The chamber wagon is also releativly new and lasted until page 5 or 6 really. I'll repeat that. Page 5. or. page 6. All day is a bit of a fucking stretch here, especially after the fallout of a really big rvs wagon.
I don't understand how old man's posting style is going to change to be enjoyable after flips..... More importantly, I ALSO DON'T UNDERSTAND THE LOVE FOR THE RVS WAGON. In essence I read this as hito being okay with either of the two bigger wagons, encouraging big wagons to get bigger and discouraging counter wagons. This reads to me as SCUM, trying to lynch whatever they can without caring much about the consequences. And then the off the fucking wall kison vote for little to no stated reason.
This post raises more questions than it could possibly answer. gawd. Massive scum points to hito I think...
In post 200, hitogoroshi wrote: In post 199, Kison wrote:My biggest takeaway from it is what I've already said: Axel, who didn't actually join the wagon but sorta kinda condoned it & threw his vote in with Pine instead. It really did read as "I don't want to be #7 on this thing."
But alignment-wise, how do you interpret not wanting to be #7 on that thing? To me, that seems to make sense for any permutation of alignments, but this post gives me the impression you have a specific takeaway you're drawing from it.
I have some trouble understanding why town would want to be in the position of the 7th vote on an already large bandwagon.
In post 217, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Kison on the other hand – I just feel his posting is “just there” for lack of a better phrase. Maybe he is indeed warming up. But everything he’s written certainly can come from either alignment easily I think. So I need more.
I agree with this point. I do feel as if Kison is phoning it in a bit and is not engaging as much with he content that has been posted as he could have.
AND SPEAK OF THE DEVIL BUT:
In post 228, Kison wrote:Spent the past 3 hours reading this game slowly instead of skimming and only made it to page 7
. Lots of people were entirely forgettable. Will finish & reread again coming from another angle.
For now, Old Man is still where I want my vote. Just about everything about his play rubs looks off since his... grand debut...
- Calling me town for my RVS vote of him is nutso. He spent an paragraph explaining it like it was some grand revelation.
- Then voting Chamber when his vote was basically identical to mine. His entire spat with chamber makes him look pretty bad actually.
- Big bad posts, lots of fluff. Why bring up the topic of alts & write a novel on it when it's not really relevant anymore? MoI's post #
reflects closely what I thought of it when I saw it.
Just about the only thing I agree with him on is not liking the Eddie wagon.
Axel's later posts look better. Nothing particular stood out other than those 2 early posts where he votes Pine. However, one thing I don't like is despite a high level of content, he seems pretty reluctant to take strong stances. There's Pine/Eddie & "chamber is a bit dodgy" in response to my earlier question. Has anything changed here?
Firebringer's walls stood out & leave a lot to be desired.
Firebringer:
Who besides MoI do you think is scum?? Your read on him is cRaZeE IMO. I made it through your posts. Somehow. I still have no idea where you stand on pretty much anything else except wanting a Pine town block. And you like Chamber. I don't think you're trying.
I'm sleepy.
1) is correct, his reaction test was dumb.
2)Explain your read on the chamber vote better.
3) He does fluff post a lot.
I will agree that Axel's more recent posting is better. I will also agree that I have not seen him take strong reads as of yet. Chamber is a bit fucking dudgey, and so is pine. Eddie not so much.
I don't really have any issue with fire's posting to be perfectly honest. it seems fine to me at least.
In post 232, insanity018 wrote:I still think
Old Man's
posts are superficial in actual content. I still like many of Magna's posts regarding Old Man.
THIS IS NOT TRUE. They are fluffy, but he actually does say some shit. It isn't like he is saying nothing, just using too many words to make minor points. THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE between these two. (Your foflcoptr case is good and your vote well justified. I too suspect him. Also wall wars are bad if they are about meta or other such stupidity).
In post 234, Old Man wrote:Okay, I've had enough. Korts's biased mod intervention pretty much made the game unenjoyable for me when he overlooked how Magna starting being a dick to myself and other players first. And, I didn't even use abusive language, at the least let us settle it among ourselves. Anyway, I am no longer enjoying myself.
What the hell are ya'll smoking with this personal attacks non-sense narrative for this game? No really, someone pass me the bowl please.
In post 237, Old Man wrote: In post 236, Axelrod wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but is this "You will be mod-confirmed as Town at the start of D2?"
I am able to manually request for the mod confirmation of my slot as Town at any point from D2 onwards.
why. just why. Why the hell would you claim this d1. explain.
vote:pine
In post 245, roflcopter wrote:ok i can't find it, maybe somebody else said that, too much to go digging for right now
whatever, axel is scum anyway
axel why is your vote still parked on pine? do you still think eddie is scummy (you said early on that you would vote him if not for being at l-2 already)? do you have any other scumreads yet? because for all you've written this game, what i can remember of you is voteparking on pine, cheerleading the eddie wagon, giving kmd a red flag for being on the eddie wagon, and repeatedly defending old man while not quite calling him a townread.
This is in fact the reason why one would vote for axel if they thought he was scum. I don't have a real issue with the vote, I just think there are more scummy people than him atm.
In post 246, Kison wrote:Echoing Pine, no point lynching Old Man today if we'll see whether his claim is legit tomorrow. I'm also skeptical of it.
UNVOTE: Old Man
VOTE: Firebringer
I've got a rope with your name on it, boi. Tell me who the scum are. Besides MoI.
well, there is another vote out of nowhere. I'm liking pine and kison as scum at the moment. inconsistent reads. odd votes. little justification. A lot of no content posts... hmm.... the two reads are unrelated and I can find no relational tell between the two. They are similar in nature though. firebringer is VI on a bad day, null on a good one.
a good vote and a good catch-up post as well. No reason to view tywin as scum. Stays null.
I read hitos wall as reactionary and silly. At one point he mentions that eddie and pine were nothing players (far from the truth as they are much of the talk of the town), and an encouragement to go ahead and vote with the wagon that has currently built up steam.
More scum points to hito, enough that I would be willing to vote if pine doesn't deserve it more.
In post 265, roflcopter wrote:what if old man is some kind of powerful scum role that they just really need to have alive on night one?
fuck no are we lynching oldman d1. If ya'll end up following the above line of thought then this town is full of degenerate morons. Scum points to rofl for suggesting actual idiocy.
This is a non-bastard game
..... The quick and dirty explanation is that we can always force oldman to confirm himself under threat of lynch, thus if he doesn't then we can always kill him. The wifom is only of some rb happening. CERTAINLY not something we want to go ahead and resolve d1 when scum will most certainly have to try and kill him at some point, and adding in possible doctor saves or "Free" resolution to his alignment via scum kill. so fuck no are we doing that. Also even in the worst case, he get's rb'd, scum still waste the shot on him, so we get another cop roll or other such investigates...
after a wank.