______________
Axel, sure some scum lurk. And if there is meta to back that up on someone, sign me up for their Lynch. But luckily, you're talking about me and I have all kinds of meta you can look at. You will find games where I'm active as town, games where I'm active as scum, games where I'm less active as town, and games where I'm less active as scum. What every one of those games has in common is my activity depends on real life, not alignment. What you won't find is a game where I lurked strategically as scum. It's poor strategy and that is one opinion I've kept from the time I played my very first game right up to now. I was actually town in the only game where I intend tionally held back (beloved princess to be specific) and that didn't work out.
As for the wuestions I asked, it's simply what stood out to me when I was reading that part of the thread. Nothing more, nothing less. I even gave you what was going through my head on the posts you singled out. Can you tell me why it's not valuable to know the things I asked there? I can understand it looking outdated by the way, but that's where I was in my read.
Timing just means that's when I was looking at the thread. I don't sit around on my phone all day watching the thread for when I should post. I do it when I can. And no, I don't see how not seeing a joke can be taken as support for a wagon. If anything, it was me saying I had no idea what Eddie was talking about, which says nothing about Eddie's alignment or his wagon. Just that I was waiting to see where he was going with things.Axel wrote: Well, it's the timing of the post almost as much as the content of it. That was right after Chamber put down Vote #6, I believe. Vote #6 is no joke (or at least, it shouldn't be) Do you really not see where your post, immediately following that one, looks like tacit support for the wagon?
I'm going from memory here and have no time to check but could have sworn you said that about me, not tywin. Either way, I'd like to see the specifics.Axel wrote: Haven't actually made a case on Tywin yet. Mainly was just pointing out his own relatively low level of activity. I have not tried to dissect those long posts of his in great depth, but even from what I did read, I could see there were lots of generalizations and misrepresentations he was making. I imagine I will get around to pointing some of that out, later, if I decide to vote for him.
___________________
Will respond to everyone else another time.
That doesn't have a whole lot to do with this game; I can't quite meta him and that's old meta but it is my backdrop. Anyway, he spends most of that post bitching about the Eddie RVS wagon. I do not understand why that RVS wagon would cause him so much angst, he had to be so rawr about it. It was day one of a large when almost all wagons are started for shit reasons, and this one was okay reason wise, and are just to get something started. The game has to start somewhere. But he's acting like the entire game decided to go HARD on eddie and were trying to quicklynch him when that's not what happened. Nobody went hard like he claimed. Chamber didn't claim to have the game solved, so eh. Axelrod started the Pine wagon; I don't see where he sheeped? I don't understand the reasons for the petroleum vote - shading a potential pr because he said he didn't believe the claim? So bleh, but if I'm remembering our past experience correctly I didn't much like many of Tywin's stances or arguments but I townread him because he was so jumpy and reactionary. Probably more reactionary than I used to be or and sometimes still am because I fail at being better a lot :/