zMuffin as scum I feel would want a game with little effort so he could coastIn post 3124, Sakura Hana wrote:Or that he bused Numbers when he didnt need to?
Nah that's not muffin's style as scum i think.
Nah, muffin scum is the type of player who would be MORE active if he's scum if anything.In post 3126, MathBlade wrote:zMuffin as scum I feel would want a game with little effort so he could coast
Then vote FA.In post 3130, Katsuki wrote:
Pretty sure drinking cyanade is a better alternative than voting mathblade leader at this point.
I'd be fine with leader votes being between FA, sakura, muffins.
My notes show that I noted Sando down as winding Titus up to no discernible reason. I did put that vote before a wall of quotes, so there's a possibility that I really didn't make it obvious. But thatIn post 3097, zMuffinMan wrote:i did. this is pretty obviously false. you voted sando in 2132 and the ONLY mention of titus from sando that you could legitimately argue comes close to this before that post was his first post (2065) and you'd have to stretch the definition of "winding someone up" pretty far to say that fits the description because that's just a read...In post 3094, Drixx wrote:Go back and read you and Titus in ISO from start of day 2. You are legitimately winding Titus up with no goal that I can discern. It's not only NOT BS, it's precisely how I always operate.
You are legitimately playing as if you were assigned Village Idiot and your goal is to get lynched and win the game. I cannot recall a single post you've made that was substantive AND wasn't trolling and/or over the top sarcastic. You are not targeting only one person with it, and even if I wanted to say that you are mostly targeting me with it ... there's a wild difference between what I can accomplish by checking interactions between two other people and what I can accomplish if you are targeting me with a trollfest.In post 3100, zMuffinMan wrote:if winding up titus is soooooooo scummy, then i'm the scum lord, yet sando's rather tame #2065 is what made you vote him despite all the misgivings you apparently have with me?
haha yeah, i believe that
There's actually a non trivial chance (if your claim is correct) that someoneIn post 3105, Sando wrote:I don't think I've ever actually directed anything towards Titus D2. All I really said was that she's continued along the lines of D1 and done self serving speculation, and I've pointed out that I think it fairly likely scum voted for Titus to be leader.In post 3094, Drixx wrote:Go back and read you and Titus in ISO from start of day 2. You are legitimately winding Titus up with no goal that I can discern. It's not only NOT BS, it's precisely how I always operate.
That's not winding up...
I just need this quote in my ego for post-game. If you're dying to know why, it's about the conversation RE: replicating town play. Going to ask math to evaluate something unrelated to this game but after this game is over for obv. reasons.In post 3113, MathBlade wrote:@Drixx — I said you SHOULD be paranoid of me.In post 3090, Drixx wrote:Apparently this somehow wasn't clear before - Sando you got voted because you were literally intentionally winding Titus up to no possible town purpose. There was no good motivation to do what you were doing. It was toxic to the game state and so you are either scum and you were doing it to try and get Titus chasing in circles (which would merit re-evaluating Titus) or you were town doing it and just not giving a shit that you were making the game toxic.
Your response to being voted over it was the entire point of the exercise. Let's say I'm not exactly feeling great about your response.
@Math - Bullshit on the idea I shouldn't have a serious side-eye on you for the foreseeable future. Cerb and I were final scum in a game alone as final scum for months and in that game we literally played precisely how we would as town. We literally from the outset of the game all the way through made decisions and took actions that were what we would have done if we were town that game. It came down to someone deciding they would rather lose with us than lose to us in the LYLO we picked, because said person was unwilling to actually put in the time and effort to try and figure it out.
So ... if he and I can lay down a game where there is literally no possible way to logically arrive at any conclusion other than we were town ... so can you ... and you can probably do it with a lot less work than it took us.
I also said you were reaction testing.
I don’t get where I said you shouldn’t.
And I have disagreed with you several times on the whole “I did what I always do as town bit”, People don’t. That is a fact. When you squash some differences newer smaller ones always emerge. So much so even professional liars convince themselves of their reality to try to help or just don’t speak. I get that you believe that but the answer is you’re different as the alignments and I can see it. And you can choose to scumread me for it. However that doesn’t change the fact you were different in a noticeable way.
It’s your belief you’d have acted the same and buddied me but the evidence says otherwise. Similar to how people think they would act one way but psychology tests/hidden cameras show another.
I maintain what I said and I still think you are town but if anyone thinks their games are 100% similar needs a reality check. I have been working on mine for decades and got it close but there is about 5 people on MS that just know instantly what alignment I am and I am still working with them when not in active games to find out why.
Umm ... so basically scum!muffin would be constantly posting just like we see in this game?In post 3128, Sakura Hana wrote:Nah, muffin scum is the type of player who would be MORE active if he's scum if anything.In post 3126, MathBlade wrote:zMuffin as scum I feel would want a game with little effort so he could coast
yesIn post 3139, Drixx wrote:Katsuki was the claimed cop guilty mason liar right?
I'm not sure I can rationally view a play style which consists of just sarcasm and trolling to be alignment indicative. Where in all that trolling and sarcasm do I find motive?In post 3141, Sakura Hana wrote:You know what, fuck this, i dont even know what to believe in anymore.
Drixx, first of all, what you've said muffin is doing is something he recently did in a town game, plus that's his playstyle as far as memory serves, and it's part of the reason I like playing with him, i find his snarkyness and sarcasm funny to read.
Granted im not that great at infering little differences, I ask that if you're town at least take a look at his play in minuet's trio and tell me if you find something different enough to warrant a difference in alignment.
Because it reads as "oh he did terrible in Civ so don't listen to anything he says"In post 3016, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Why???In post 3008, Gamma Emerald wrote:and this is just disgusting imoIn post 2680, Titus wrote:He was in Civ too.In post 2677, Ankamius wrote:I'm talking about police academy 1 in that example, Math.
I mean like whether she specifically does it or just flakesIn post 2773, Frozen Angel wrote:pardon me when I'm checking the 30 pages I must check!
I remember her doing that as both alignmentsIn post 2087, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wait what
I recall some sort of meta wrt Yume replace outs meaning something but I forget the exact rule
What is the point of this conversation, you're saying the exact same thing as I see itIn post 2796, Sando wrote:Not if we'd told you to only give 3 people powers...which was what MB was intimating.In post 2793, Titus wrote:If we get 3 power claims, then we'd suppose at that point I gave 2 scumbuddies powers in that setup and just lynch me.
"Hey Titus give X, Y, Z superhero powers"
X, Y, Z confirm they got powers
Cool! You're free to go Titus!
