We don't like this scum coasting. More light on this...In post 1299, Flavor Leaf wrote:I actually don’t really like this.In post 1290, Light Ethos wrote:If you want to push Krazy, we'll need your case for it. You had reasons for it before Krazy posted his read list, but you haven't gotten around to posting the case.In post 1249, Flavor Leaf wrote: Krazy/Sasha it is, then.
Krazy should definitely be the one, though.
It’s not in one post, sure, but I’ve definitely cased Krazy enough and made enough points on him that it would be redundant at this point. You’re just choosing not to look at it that way here because it’s not a “case” it’s just post. But my Third Degree Boon (my name’s tactic that i word play from my main account) where I go deep interaction is my best way at showing said person is scum.
In post 1234, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m the only one not misguided, Crimson.
That’s a discredit by Crimson protecting Krazy subtly.
Scum points for Crimson.
I thought you denied this was happening? Am I misunderstanding that you are making scum associations pre-flip?In post 1200, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 1189, Light Ethos wrote:@Crimson:
1. What's your take on the ongoing disagreement between Naomi and me?
2. Do you lean town on Flavor Leaf after his push on Krazy?This is also scummy points for LE.In post 1190, Light Ethos wrote:@Flavor Leaf: When is that case on Krazy coming?
Looks like he’s trying to change the subject of he game now that there’s pressure on them.
In other news: