[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10558947 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1902 l Amphibians l Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #27 (isolation #1) » Thu Nov 22, 2018 2:10 am
Postby Doughboy »
People shouldn’t be afraid to lynch the IC if they truly think he’s scum. The SEs can answer questions about theory and that’s really the only job of an IC.
Post
Post #45 (isolation #3) » Fri Nov 23, 2018 8:31 am
Postby Doughboy »
In post 41, skitter30 wrote:Because she's looking at this game and comparing it to how she reacted as scum in a game of irl-mafia (as opposed to, say, how she reacted as town)
Post
Post #143 (isolation #7) » Mon Nov 26, 2018 6:00 am
Postby Doughboy »
I need to reread the game to refresh my memory on everyone. When I get time that do that I’ll post my thoughts on him. From what I remember early on, nothing realy pinged me but I’ve been absent for a while.
Post
Post #194 (isolation #9) » Fri Nov 30, 2018 12:11 am
Postby Doughboy »
When a player claims scum it’s easy for scum to stay off the wagon. So I’m with overkill in that regard. I don’t know why anyone thinks my vote looked bad, a player claimed scum and asked to be lynched. I don’t see why any townie would do such a thing. I actually think maybe we should lynch numbers but I need to catch up on the game better.
In post 204, Doughboy wrote:I have seen both quick hammer so it's not really something you can hang your hat on
I disagree, gametheory would state its a scum move, it doesnt benifit town, and they have yet to even post since, and havent been prodded. you dont want to even dwell on the fact that a duo beginner team might decided to misslynch, have the quick hammer player lay low, meanwhile other scum pushes a second misslynch?
we aren't talking about game theory. We are talking reality. The sad fact is lots of townies quick hammer, some have a policy to always quick hammer on day 1, and others just think it's funny. quick hammers aren't AI imo, but you are free to have a different opinion.
Hell I quick hammered once as town in a newbie game I think.
Post
Post #219 (isolation #15) » Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:55 pm
Postby Doughboy »
In post 215, skitter30 wrote:what do you think of overkill's claiming scum and his later claiming that his friend stole his phone and posted it as a joke
also the fact that the two people who are saying they think scum weren't on the wagon are people who themselves were on the wagon is not a good look imo
Haven’t really thought about either to be honest. So I have no opinions on it right now
Post
Post #228 (isolation #16) » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:22 pm
Postby Doughboy »
In post 226, skitter30 wrote:it read as shading to me, and i did not appreciate it
Sorry you can’t take a joke. Get a sense of humor.
In post 226, skitter30 wrote:ok, so can you think about both of these things and give an opinion?
Idk why. It’s kind of pointless.
1. I have no way of verifying if it was a joke by him, if his friend did it to Fuck with him, or if his friend posted his actual role. I don’t think the mod would intervene so I have to ignore it especially since what happened day 1.
2. The fact 2 people are saying scum could possibly not be on the wagon is a statement nobody can prove or deny other than scum themselves. Since I’m obviously one of these people, I don’t think it’s a red flag. If you do, cool beans. I’m not going to worry about something stupid like that.
Post
Post #231 (isolation #17) » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:39 pm
Postby Doughboy »
I don’t have any reads. I was behind day 1, town trolled and ruined the game and I don’t really know where to go from here. You can’t analzy the lynch wagon. You can’t analyze the NK. It’s basically day 1 all over again.
In post 231, Doughboy wrote:I don’t have any reads. I was behind day 1, town trolled and ruined the game and I don’t really know where to go from here. You can’t analzy the lynch wagon. You can’t analyze the NK. It’s basically day 1 all over again.
I disagree; i think its entirely possible to form opinions on the day1 wagon, and i also think its scummy of you not to have reads at this point
In post 240, Doughboy wrote:Oh I missed the “why” in that last sentence. My bad.
Ao rereading that, I didn’t actually consider that an actual reason. Since you are saying it is, I dislike your vote even more
Ok, explain why you dont like it
Because yotta deserved to be lynched. He was going to hammer regardless who corrected him.
He had posted a couple of hours before so the fact that he was still around doesn’t mean much. I check the thread a bunch of times sometimes without posting. It’s basically a weak reason to take advantage of somebody and I see that more scum motivated than town motivated, especially when there is already one bad vote on them.
In post 231, Doughboy wrote:I don’t have any reads. I was behind day 1, town trolled and ruined the game and I don’t really know where to go from here. You can’t analzy the lynch wagon. You can’t analyze the NK. It’s basically day 1 all over again.
Freudian Slip?
Doughboy wrote:I don’t like the votes for numbers. You don’t even have a reason and the reason the other person gave is bad.
So you’re reaction to a quick hammer makes me susp. You wrote it off so easy, and the fact you don’t think d1 was substantial in anyway makes me susp too. Numbers corrected the post instead of questioning the post, that definitely enough for susp. You are my number one scum lean rn though.
Don’t like your push regarding the quick hammer. Especially after I explained it’s nai, you didn’t back off it’s scummy and I tbink scum motivated. Taking advantage of lhf
Post
Post #293 (isolation #34) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 5:39 am
Postby Doughboy »
In post 292, Thespio wrote:*Neapolitan, Tracker, or doctor counter claims would be contrary to overkill, if you are a pr and not one of these 3 do not claim.
Just neo is contradictory. Don’t mislead people please.
Post
Post #301 (isolation #38) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:11 am
Postby Doughboy »
You don’t need to memorize it though. It’s posted on page 1. When calling for counters I’d expect you to check especially since you like to use the wiki.
Post
Post #307 (isolation #40) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:41 am
Postby Doughboy »
In post 303, skitter30 wrote:yeah someone semi-broke the setup - there was a whole strategy where if there was a 1shot bp they could claim first on day 1 and basically be an ic till they died (ie if someone claimed on a later day after people already asked for the bp claim it would be taken as a scumclaim, or scum could cc day1 but then there's a 1v1 day1 that containing one scum)
so they spent a while coming up with a new setup (the current one)
And people have tried to break this one. I will say that whoever suggest tracker claiming day 1 is wrong and should not be listened to. I made this mistake and it doesn’t break or even semi break the game.
Post
Post #308 (isolation #41) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:45 am
Postby Doughboy »
In post 306, Thespio wrote:I think ive thoroughly explained it was a misunderstanding, also your vote is from before, you said the reason was because of my policy lynch push. which i had to drop when the player subbed out
1. I’d have to take your word for it. I don’t believe you.
2. Just because you moved on due to the player replacing out doesn’t excuse your previous scummy push
3. And you didn’t really move that far from it, you voted numbers for not being concerned with the hammer. That’s you basically scum reading the hammer (which you shouldn’t) and instead of going after the person who did it, you are going after the people who realize it wasn’t anything to scum read.
You still come off looking bad. You should have at least stuck with your push despite the replacement.
Post
Post #310 (isolation #42) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:50 am
Postby Doughboy »
I don’t have reads on all the active players rn. For now tracker claim is legit until otherwise countered. I’m scum reading you. The rest idk how I feel about them yet.
Post
Post #314 (isolation #44) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:00 am
Postby Doughboy »
In post 311, skitter30 wrote:i mean i don't think anybody suggested trying to do that to break the game; he claimed tracker because he was at l1
No not this game. Im just throwing it out there as an FYI since you brought up game breaking strategies. I tried to do that in a previous game. It didn’t work and everyone agreed it’s not a good strategy.
In post 311, skitter30 wrote:p-edit i also find it scummy that you only have the one read at this stage
can you maybe link a scumgame?
Sorry I’m not going to do favors for people I scum read. I’m content with what I’ve done for now. Day is ending and I don’t feel like moving my vote to somebody else.
Post
Post #317 (isolation #46) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:13 am
Postby Doughboy »
I already said day one was basically a waste. I can’t scum read people for being in the wagon and I can’t scum read people for being off the wagon. I can sort of use NKA for the kill but even that isn’t reliable. I called out both votes earlier by you and skitter as bad. I still believe that. I think the fact the tracker said he’d do some ISO’s to sort people and voted without doing that is bad but he’s in cc’d so I can’t realy do anything about that right now.
He gave no reason for voting me. I did ask him how he cleared you because there’s isn’t anything in his iso that explains that.
You’re 2nd vote is equally bad
Skitter’s vote on me is also bad because he misrepped me. I didn’t vote you for misleading people. I’m not scum reading you for misleading people. All that did was make me feel better about my scum read. Like if somebody does something scummy and then does something else scummy after that, that supports your read. It isn’t the basis for it.
Sorry I’m not going to do favors for people I scum read. I’m content with what I’ve done for now. Day is ending and I don’t feel like moving my vote to somebody else.
Okay then, do /me/ this favour or present a more plausible lynch. I don't find your case against Thespio very persuasive.
That’s not my job. Im sticking with my vote on him. If you don’t like it, you find a more plausible one.
Post
Post #326 (isolation #49) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:36 am
Postby Doughboy »
In post 321, Thespio wrote:Work on this, otherwise it seems scummy to not look at a whole game and instead look at one person without actual reason. You claimed my policy lynch was scummy but its standard to push people who quick hammer to L-1 and force a claim since scum only benefit from this.
It’s not standard though. If anything id argue it’s standard to not look at who hammered but who put the player in position to hammer. I don’t need advice on how to play, thanks for offering but I’m fine with what I’m doing. Thank you and I appreciate your concerns. I’m not worried with how people look at me.
In post 321, Thespio wrote:I dont Understand why us looking at the last lynch puts you off so bad, it seems scummy to disuade us from looking at a quick lynch, if the hammer yesterday was scum they would have guidance in their day chat. they have that advantage.
I don’t think I have the power to forcibly stop anyine form looking at the day one lynch. I do have the power to use my own experiences to form opinions which is what I’ve shared. If you disagree with my opinions, that’s cool. I disagree with yours and I feel yours make you look like scum.
As explained earlier. They are NAI. I’ve quick hammered as town. I’ve seen others as well. There are even players who have a reputation of doing it. So you can’t say with any sort of certainty that a person who quick hammers is more likely to be town or scum. That’s my opinion. You don’t have to listen to it, but you can’t get mad at me if I scum read you for it.
Never said you did. You clearly don’t understand context. I accused him of omgus voting me. I thought it was you that voted me which is why I apologized.
In post 321, Thespio wrote:again, please explain why trying to pressure a quickhammer is bad, it baffles me you still are hung up on this, but explain it to me.
Idk why I need to keep explaining the fact that quick hammers are NAI. You either agree or disagree. Me explaining it over again doesn’t really seem useful. But ok.
Quick hammers are done by both town and scum. I’ve done it as town, I’ve seen town do it, there are even people who are known for doing it. You can’t say with any degree of certainty that a person who quick hammers is scum or not.
Better? Or do I need to do it again?
In post 321, Thespio wrote:you really dislike us looking at the hammer. Why?
Quick hammers are done by both town and scum. I’ve done it as town, I’ve seen town do it, there are even people who are known for doing it. You can’t say with any degree of certainty that a person who quick hammers is scum or not.
In post 322, Thespio wrote:Youre unable to scumread anyone at all even in day 2?
Obviously not since I have a scum read. Not sure how you got that from this post.
Post
Post #336 (isolation #53) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:55 am
Postby Doughboy »
I’m not scum guys. I haven’t done anything scummy imo. These reasons for voting me are bad. Just because you disagree with who I’m scum reading and why doesn’t make me scum.
In post 333, Doughboy wrote:you said I was pushing him for misreading the chart. That’s not accurate
Im really hoping you are scum and not just anti-town, but skitter is saying you should have trying to push me as misrepresenting not based on the hammer. because you not wanting us to count the hammer is susp.
I’m neither scum or antitown.
Skitter said I’m scummy for pushing you for misrepresenting. That’s not what I did at all.
Post
Post #341 (isolation #55) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:00 am
Postby Doughboy »
In post 337, skitter30 wrote:i think we have a disagreement over what the word 'pushes' means - i think you calling him scummy constitutes as 'pushing', and i think that's where part of the confusion here comes from
Pushes in mafia means the reason why somebody is being called scum. So if your definition is something else than yes we have different definitions.
He’s scum for the way he’s trying to take advantage of the quick hammer which is universally known as non AI (at least on a half a dozen sites I’ve played including this one).
His “mistake” was either genuine or it wasn’t and he’s now passing it off as one. It all depends on how you read him. If you town read him, you believe his word. If you scum read him, his word is meaningless
In post 310, Doughboy wrote:I don’t have reads on all the active players rn. For now tracker claim is legit until otherwise countered. I’m scum reading you. The rest idk how I feel about them yet.
one scumread
think the tracker claim is legit (i don't really call this a read, but whatever)
don't have reads on anyone else
disagree that i'm misrepping you here
You can’t take me giving a read and then dismissing it as not having one. I have a scum read and a town read. That’s 2 so you did misrep me.