In post 974, NicoRobin wrote:I clearly said '/in to replace' in the sign-up thread.......
In post 87, NicoRobin wrote:/in to replace
UNVOTE:
In post 974, NicoRobin wrote:I clearly said '/in to replace' in the sign-up thread.......
In post 87, NicoRobin wrote:/in to replace
Good to know I'm not the only one who feels this way.In post 965, Mewtaph wrote: Yes. You can take that vote as serious in that I haven't seen any other wagon was compelling enough for me to shift my vote. I don't buy how he's approaching the game state as genuine.
I think scum was onIn post 965, Mewtaph wrote:I thought ignoringIn post 936, Taly wrote:I didn't like the initial voting onIn post 772, Mewtaph wrote:I like u r a person 2 for town quite a bit actually, and I would be willing to do my first active sort to them, Taly or Varsoon.
I think NicoRobin is a decent point to poke with a stick before deadline rears too close, but is a bad wagon to get going near deadline in case they are really just apathetic!town.
I don't know why pinturrichio keeps pushing their content back repeatedly but it's not a great look.UP2when I first skimmed through it, the reasons for a scumread there lacked substance (PromptingMichael Scottto explain why he thoughtUP2'sposts were manufactured, that's the vote that most got my attention when it happened.)
I agree a bit onNico. A lurker lynch won't get anywhere, and I don't trust the fact that everyone is like"where's the scum at"?
:/ I get my vote onKokichicontradicts the above statement, but I'm working to change this.
Pintpushing content back... not a great look? Or scum-indicative?u r a person 2'sself-referential call for a wagon on himself by means of a vote over interaction was scummy. There is a part of me that thinks that scum would be looking for something to do outside of STW's wagon after it dissolved.
Please make a case, involving post links.In post 976, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: STW
Tough world.In post 974, NicoRobin wrote:I clearly said '/in to replace' in the sign-up thread.......
I don’t know what you expect me to respond to here. I’ve made myself pretty clear so if you’re still insure about something you’ll need to ask specific questions instead of asking for a response to a vaguely reasoned read.In post 952, Taly wrote:Alchemistis someone I want to sort more.
I can see scum take the positions he's had (namely the vote/rationality onSTW128 133, 153 and the vote/unvote ontoUP2734 and 736), but, alongside my other iffy/scumlean reads, a lot of people don't agree.
ProFlavor,Michael Scott, andPintneed an individual ISO for me to get thoughts rolling on them.
Mephisto reread/UP2 Wagon Evaluation/ProFlavor/Michael Scott/Pintare the areas of sorting I'm looking to absolve in the next 2 days.
What makes you think I’m not being genuine? This sounds like a you just made up a reason to keep your vote where it was during RVS.In post 965, Mewtaph wrote:Yes. You can take that vote as serious in that I haven't seen any other wagon was compelling enough for me to shift my vote. I don't buy how he's approaching the game state as genuine.
It was an open ended question, so I wasn't expecting any answer in particular.In post 936, Taly wrote:What answer were you expecting here?In post 765, Mewtaph wrote:Hey Gamma, can I ask you a question? Do you think that I should be town reading you this game?
I thought ignoringIn post 936, Taly wrote:I didn't like the initial voting onIn post 772, Mewtaph wrote:I like u r a person 2 for town quite a bit actually, and I would be willing to do my first active sort to them, Taly or Varsoon.
I think NicoRobin is a decent point to poke with a stick before deadline rears too close, but is a bad wagon to get going near deadline in case they are really just apathetic!town.
I don't know why pinturrichio keeps pushing their content back repeatedly but it's not a great look.UP2when I first skimmed through it, the reasons for a scumread there lacked substance (PromptingMichael Scottto explain why he thoughtUP2'sposts were manufactured, that's the vote that most got my attention when it happened.)
I agree a bit onNico. A lurker lynch won't get anywhere, and I don't trust the fact that everyone is like"where's the scum at"?
:/ I get my vote onKokichicontradicts the above statement, but I'm working to change this.
Pintpushing content back... not a great look? Or scum-indicative?u r a person 2'sself-referential call for a wagon on himself by means of a vote over interaction was scummy. There is a part of me that thinks that scum would be looking for something to do outside of STW's wagon after it dissolved.
Mmm, yes. This is how I feel too.
I'm not takingPinthaving to push his content back as scum indicative but I'm saying it would've been bad if posts along those lines continued, which I guess is pointless now.
It's in my ISO and emergent between my interactions with the STW slot.In post 978, Taly wrote:Please make a case, involving post links.In post 976, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: STW
I can't bring myself to read all the pages in this thread because of the back-and-forths and filtering out a mountain of words for a few content-advancing statements hasn't done me well for comprehension.
could you please reword this? I'm having trouble understanding what you're saying here.In post 965, Mewtaph wrote:I thought ignoring u r a person 2's self-referential call for a wagon on himself by means of a vote over interaction was scummy. There is a part of me that thinks that scum would be looking for something to do outside of STW's wagon after it dissolved.
I'd say it's because it's cold and you're hungry.In post 980, Tibor and Lumia wrote:If someone can explain to me why Meatloaf is stuck in my head, I'd appreciate it
...why has it faded?In post 977, Taly wrote:I think scum was on STW's wagon regardless of STW's alignment. He was L-1'd, and this is a large. Granted, I do have a townread on STW, but it's faded the past few pages, I still stick to them-town.
and lonely in the deeeeep daaarkkk niiiiiightIn post 986, Almost Chara wrote:it's cold
Oh niceIn post 543, Varsoon wrote:Just gonna bring this into overdrive, actually, and go for the dunk.
Day Vig: Shoshin the Worst
Taly's RVS post is what originally scumpinged me.In post 43, Taly wrote: so much opportunity to get pocketed!!
._. im gonna have to reread that playerlist movement night action stuff arent i?
not feeling thekokichiIC claim but i slight townvibe it anyway
VOTE: Almost Chara
RVS is bullshit but square up w me, both heads now
~ Taly
i literally do not know, Varsoon & AC have been speculating about it but it's not interesting to meIn post 995, Tibor and Lumia wrote:Oh niceIn post 543, Varsoon wrote:Just gonna bring this into overdrive, actually, and go for the dunk.
Day Vig: Shoshin the Worst
brass mentioned this but I wanted to see for myself what the deal was.
First impression would be this is a reaction test, but I think I saw V For Vendetta saying he meant this.
Since stw is still alive I'll ask: how did you survive, stw?
-Gamma "the hipfire king" Emerald
no idea what that means but I'm around for a bit so AMA if you want.In post 989, Shoshin the worst wrote:Posts like ProFlavor's last one SHOULD come >rand from scum because of how conspicuously weighted they are