Of all the players in this game, you legitimately feel the weirdest to me right now.In post 1044, Thespio wrote:Care to explain? is it that I dont follow your lead so you want me dead? or do you genuinely have some issue with me?
Newbie 1912 [GAME COMPLETE]
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
You're misrepping me right now, and this is a big reason you're a scum read. Because you regularly do scummy things like this.In post 1046, Thespio wrote:Right so for loopdan you had 'condemning evidence' for me your gut is guiding you? Im getting ready to my reads with a little more content, maybe that will help/hurt your opinion of me. Honestly rereading loopdans interactions you read kind of scummy, I saw your push as town, but that flip hurt you in my mind, your attitude was cocky and you werent willing to look at anyone else, then we come into D2 and you are upset i ask you for more reads and tell you not to tunnel.
I didn't get upset that you asked me for reads. Pretty sure I made that pretty clear.
I also wasn't upset that you asked me to stop tunneling people - you never did that, and you also agreed that I shouldn't stop tunneling people, so you know this, too, is wrong.
I was upset because you acted like you had some sort of control over my play "we arent gonna have you tunnel one guy."
As far as reading you for different reasons, pretty sure you agreed with me that something was wrong with the loopdan read, so OMGUSing me for approaching my other reads differently is also dumb. Stop.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
1. That's not true. Munch disagreed with everything I said yesterday, and you actually agreed with me for the first part.
2. It is misrepping me, show me where I posted that I was upset that you told me not to tunnel/asked me for more reads. Show me how I got upset about that. Cuz I guarantee this is not me being upset about reads:
It's not even me being upset about you thinking tunnels are dumb. It's me being upset about you saying "you aren't gonna do this."You and Magik are funny like this, acting like you have any control whatsoever about how I proceed with the gameday or like I have any intention of going through another loopdan situation again. Not to be an ass, but I don't care if I have your approval for anything I do. I'd really like to see more involvement from you, too. Pretty much anything past surface level reads and bad implementation of game theory/ generally too scummy to be scum behavior.
And quit with the FOS crap. Put your vote on me and quit sitting on the fence. And again, that's not how my reads worked, you're assuming a position for me and then attacking that instead of responding to what I'm actually saying.
This is another reason you're scummy, you're going to try and get me all riled up by responding w/ OMGUS, and when that doesn't work (again) you're going to be like "this is TvT" (again) and then assume everyone will townread you.
I can case you later but you've done a load of scummy stuff this game.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
LOL. Two things:In post 1056, Thespio wrote:
This was my initial thought, but the fact he lynched based on his own sense of logic D1 and now is fishing for wagons D2 to me seems utterly susp. Also why would he defend munch? is it not normal to say you made a mistake and look at the people who did too (intentionally or not?) The fact his wagon is all town but they lynched a townie is super sketchy to me.In post 1053, MagikHorse wrote:I'm still disinclined to believe that scum!Enter would do such a massive deathtunnel and draw so much attention to himself Day 1 knowing that Loop would flip town. That doesn't really make his play good, since it definitely hasn't been most of the game, but his motivations aren't reading sour to me as much as overly eager to case people instead of thinking everything through.
1. You pushed loop.
2. You pushed elements.
You pushed one more town wagon than I did. You pushed a PR to the point of claiming. "the fact they lynched a townie is super sketchy" actually wtf.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
1. Munch disagreed with me on both Loop AND elements. This is what you get for skimming my ISO instead of actually reading it.In post 1055, Thespio wrote:1. Munch agreed with you and hes near the top of your town list. Point made.
2. Any time you have to say "Not to be an Ass" its you being an ass. Unless you are naturally an ass (which I interacted with you and thought you werent) it tends to be because of emotional turmoil.
2.5 IM NOT VOTING YOU BECAUSE I WANT TO LOOK AT MUNCH AND RCE. You getting on me seemed off though which is the purpose of my post, you arent my first or second pick, but the guys i want arent engaging with me or in munches case interacting with anyone because they are opportunistically posting.
Thats where I am at.
2. You're misrepping me and hiding behind "you're a jerk." Stop. That's not an excuse.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I feel like this is the second (third?) post where someone takes Thespio's 2(two) points, makes an excuse for one, and then tries to validate the other through some strange jump in logic, with the landing being the assumption that if the second point is correct, the first one also is.In post 1059, MagikHorse wrote:
Let me just stop this right there. As I said in my response to Muh pushing on people gets more information about their alignment, and is generally a good thing to do if something is off there. The fact that it was a PR that was acting scummy and got pushed doesn't mean jack about the validity of the push, and Elements himself said that the points made against him were valid. This is not something you can hold against him like this.In post 1057, Enter wrote:You pushed a PR to the point of claiming. "the fact they lynched a townie is super sketchy" actually wtf.
His point is that you're townreading anyone who sided with you to kill Loop, and that is still pretty valid looking at your current readslist. Muh is actually a prime example of it in action, since you've said that Muh clearly had a reason to scumread Loop before your case pushed him into action, even though Muh never once put said reasoning out. It's altogether easy for anyone to say "Oh yeah, I totally believed this before your case", and I find it concerning that you just took him at his word.
Let's fix this here and now.
1. Elements wasn't acting scummy. He said things that sounded scummy, but he wasn't acting scummy. I have a feeling someone isn't going to read the whole thing that I'm about to say, will take that first sentence, talk about how THEY THOUGHT elements was scummy and then consider my entire first point defeated, just because that's how most of these engagements have gone so far. Why you shouldn't do that, is because this point is completely and totally irrelevant of whether or not elements was acting scummy or not, Thespio's point against me was that I pushed town to lynch and that somehow makes me scummy. My point in return, is that he pushed two town players, and one of them was a PR, so calling me on this is dumb.
2. No, he's saying I'm scumreading anyone who disagreed with me, and that's an important distinction to make, because that's ACTUALLY wrong, and not just a correlation between my reads and what happened yesterday, as I previously pointed out.
The part two of point two here, is that you're ALSO wrong, because muh did provide reasoning for his read (spoilered later) and in addition, you're assuming that my town read is based on the fact that they agreed with me.
Spoiler:-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Actually stop saying things that are objectively wrong. Muh is in the bottom three (technically four) of my reads list. You can't just cherry pick what you want to read and ignore the facts.In post 1062, Thespio wrote:
Hmm, I must have misread him, regardless your bottom 3 are all people who weren't with you, and you were wrong, why are all the people on your wagon town?In post 1058, Enter wrote:1. Munch disagreed with me on both Loop AND elements. This is what you get for skimming my ISO instead of actually reading it.
2. You're misrepping me and hiding behind "you're a jerk." Stop. That's not an excuse.
2. Dude im not hiding behind anything, cool you think its susp i didn't want to hammer someone that evolved. I agreed he looked scummy until he got into it with you, as soon as he did i felt he was town, elements who hid all game, while actively watching the game. He looked scum, and when i was on V/LA he began posting. I didn't even see his PR claim until D2 because it ended before i could review what happened. More importantly, blaming the people who picked him up as susp on d1 is stupid, If anything it puts us as town. Loop flipped town, we read him as town at the end of the day, so we looked at the next susp player. Anyone who votes someone they think is town with a ton of time remaining is acting against town. If I kept my vote there I would have seen myself as scum.
PEDIT, i read your whole post you dummy.
1) Someone who lurks, shows up to post, calls someone town and votes them. These are all scum attributes. Im not saying the number of town you push makes you bad, the number of town you kill makes you bad. I didnt get on elements because i suspected a potential power role to post scummy things. And like I said above in this post, I was on V/LA when he came out.
2)Muh echoed you, hard, look at your own ISO. Make sure you arent reading people because they agree with you or you will get pocketed. which is what i think is going to happen in this game, today you will push me/horse, skum will wagon with you Then tomorrow they will push the other with you. then we all lose because you couldnt criticize people who agree with you.
Also I haven't pushed Magik today at all.
Who showed up to the game thread called someone town and then voted them? Please quote this for me because I'm pretty sure I've missed it.
And we got down to deadline w/ no lynch. Who was it yesterday who said they'd rather lynch themselves (conftown) than no lynch? Oh wait.
Your reasoning over calling me scummy because loop flipped town is only reasonable considering the fact that having less town players is worse for town. Under that same reasoning, pushing town players to claim PR and get NK'd is also worse for town. => Your reasoning here is dumb, please drop it.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
No, what's not cool is pretending a town flip means everyone on the wagon was scummy. I don't know how you still don't get the point of this: I'm not calling Thesp scum because he pushed elements and loop. I'm saying Thesp's reasoning for calling me scum based solely on the fact that I was on loop's wagon when he flipped town is bad, and showing him in an example that is easily accessible why that is bad.In post 1063, MagikHorse wrote:
What else was anyone gonna do to get some outside information going on here? There was no other "scummy acting" going on besides the lurking squad that wasn't going to respond in a decent timeframe to make the push worthwhile, which is coincidentally why the Muh wagon broke up Day 1. You're putting the blame on him for taking the only available road to try and get some better information on other players, which is overall not cool.In post 1060, Enter wrote:1. Elements wasn't acting scummy. He said things that sounded scummy, but he wasn't acting scummy. I have a feeling someone isn't going to read the whole thing that I'm about to say, will take that first sentence, talk about how THEY THOUGHT elements was scummy and then consider my entire first point defeated, just because that's how most of these engagements have gone so far. Why you shouldn't do that, is because this point is completely and totally irrelevant of whether or not elements was acting scummy or not, Thespio's point against me was that I pushed town to lynch and that somehow makes me scummy. My point in return, is that he pushed two town players, and one of them was a PR, so calling me on this is dumb.
Let me get this straight: You are drawing assumptions instead of asking questions, and you're blaming me for your failure? How does this add up for you?
Muh's reason is a very, very lackluster "I think it looks fake" with no explanation on why and "I agree with Enter on top of that". That barely qualifies as an explanation given how vague and easy to make up it is. Had he actually explained why it "felt fake" I'd be inclined to agree with you on that.In post 1060, Enter wrote:2. No, he's saying I'm scumreading anyone who disagreed with me, and that's an important distinction to make, because that's ACTUALLY wrong, and not just a correlation between my reads and what happened yesterday, as I previously pointed out.
The part two of point two here, is that you're ALSO wrong, because muh did provide reasoning for his read (spoilered later) and in addition, you're assuming that my town read is based on the fact that they agreed with me.
Also, you have yet to give us any information to the contrary regarding your reads. With a lack of information for why you read people as you do, we must fill in the blanks with what we see, and that's exactly what it looks like from the outside perspective. You have only yourself to blame for that by not explaining your reads basically at all unless you're tunneling them.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I'm not discussing muh right now, because if I do I'll be biased to TR him based solely on the fact that I'm in the middle of an argument with both of you, and you continuously misrepresent and fail to understand the points of my case. Once we have this worked out, I'm more willing to approach my reads from a place of dispassion and I'm less likely to put them somewhere other than where they really are.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Oh I see what you're getting at. I disagree that that was scummy, but p sure we had that discussion before.In post 1068, MagikHorse wrote:
Elements with this string of posts, although he technically voted Loop and then called him Town, not the other way around:In post 1065, Enter wrote:Who showed up to the game thread called someone town and then voted them? Please quote this for me because I'm pretty sure I've missed it.In post 563, Elements wrote:post 562 seems utterly irrelevant to anything. Can people stop letting loopdan waste time and lynch him VOTE: loopdanIn post 567, Elements wrote:i don't think you're scum.I think you are townbut the lynch that will give us the most information when you flip. The rest of the conversations going on are the same thing that's been going on for two days and all it's doing is making people angry with the gameIn post 580, Thespio wrote:WAIT, WTF IS THIS. If he is town you get the same info as if he is town, how does this make any sense, can we all quickly evaluate Elements?
The wagon came shortly thereafter.In post 599, Elements wrote:this was poorly worded it sould've been: "i think loopdan is town, but his lynch will tell us the most information"-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Wait let me get this straight: Your argument is that scum guaranteed did not vote loopdan? LOLIn post 1071, Thespio wrote:
Elements did:In post 1065, Enter wrote:Who showed up to the game thread called someone town and then voted them? Please quote this for me because I'm pretty sure I've missed it.
This was his post after voting loopdan in post 163In post 567, Elements wrote:i don't think you're scum. I think you are town but the lynch that will give us the most information when you flip. The rest of the conversations going on are the same thing that's been going on for two days and all it's doing is making people angry with the game
I agree that you just being on the wagon doesnt make you scum, i do think like i said that the majority of your scum (as you pointed out there was 1 outlier) are all the people who didnt want to kill town. Why in gods green earth wouldnt i just have agreed with you as scum, you have a loud voice, your posts are walls, scum imo would want you pocketed, or want you to think they were in your pocket. seriously do the math, 2 of the 7 of us are bad, so only 5 town, scum would have spent most of yesterday preparing to ML today. so loopdans ML is where we should start, that makes horse town (admittedly this makes my munch read wrong) Munch town, im obv town. RCE is still in deep shit from their predecessor and they didnt vote to save town they just didnt vote at all.
Let's go down the list of reasons you didn't hammer:
1. WK points
2. Scummy quickhammers
3. Dragging out day for town points = more town points
4. Looked like loop would get lynched anyways and you'd get points for not being on it.
Now let's talk about how it's super funny that this reasoning appears out of thin air after we've been in day two for a while and it completely flips your munch read, but it makes so much sense to you? Lol
We already had this discussion. I can quote myself at you, or you can read my ISO. Either way, he didn't just say "loopdan I think you're town" and vote him. Pls stop cherry picking your arguments.In post 1072, Thespio wrote:
So if i said "Enter I think you are town" and voted you, that would make you tr me?In post 1069, Enter wrote:Oh I see what you're getting at. I disagree that that was scummy, but p sure we had that discussion before.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Good. Vote me please.In post 1074, Thespio wrote:Ultimately elements was a mistake, but his string of posts was the most scum filled thing i had seen all game, loops activity made me see them as town, prior when they were avoiding confrontation i saw your point. So when i see yesterday, with the 5 of you on loop, 2 of those 5 ruled out (horse because he was on elements for legit reasons, and elements being dead, it leaves the remaining 3 as susp.
WTF are you misrepping here?
I didnt hammer because i wasnt online, when i posted intent i didnt get back on until he was dead. Im running theories here, your wagon contained scum. PERIOD. you are now in my bottom two because i miss read munch. so you are my first suspect.
and yes, i know he didnt in the same post, but he called him town, voted him, then called him town again. can you literally stop tunnelling and objectively evaluate your wagon? or is that to hard, at this point ignoring you progresses this game more then interacting with you. you arent building you are muddying the game.
First I want to get some things straight real quick tho:
1. The fact that elements was a mistake IS THE POINT. Loopdan was also a mistake, and the fact that you excuse elements but not loop is what I'm pointing out as flawed.
2. You've been misrepping me and "muddying the game" since I scumread you a couple posts ago, which is the same thing you did the last time I scumread you.
3. There is no wagon on you, stop using buzzwords to sound like you know what you're talking about.
4. Your argument is that loopdan flipped town => there was scum on his wagon. But what I'm trying to get you to realize, is that if Elements wasn't a PR, he also would have flipped town, and loopdan wouldn't have flipped at all. And you would be scumreading an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT SET OF PEOPLE. Someone even dropped an intent to hammer on elements.
I'm pointing out how absolutely DEVOID OF LOGIC your argument is and you're calling me scum and misrepping me.
Also out of curiosity, what is it that you think that I'm misrepping you on?-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
LOL who can't take pressure? I voted you and you reacted like this:In post 1077, Thespio wrote:You cant take any pressure, you get all flustered, feel like you are being misrepped which you arent. shitpost with stuff like this:
which isnt even anything to do with my post.In post 1073, Enter wrote:Wait let me get this straight: Your argument is that scum guaranteed did not vote loopdan? LOL
Let's go down the list of reasons you didn't hammer:
1. WK points
2. Scummy quickhammers
3. Dragging out day for town points = more town points
4. Looked like loop would get lynched anyways and you'd get points for not being on it.
M8 chill, im being objective, i didnt tunnel someone into oblivion, and even while questioning you notice i still have someone i suspect more. Ill grant you it might have been a mistake, but you still miss the mark everywhere else.
Spoiler:
And yeah, it does have to do with your post, you said
Please actually chill and pay attentionWhy in gods green earth wouldnt i just have agreed with you as scum-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I'm not asking you to read my mind, I'm asking you to ask questions if you have them, because I, also, cannot read your mind and know what you need/want more information on.In post 1078, MagikHorse wrote:The first bit of 1066 is already being discussed between the two of you, so I'm cutting that piece out since it's no longer relevant.
Nice loaded question, but that doesn't do much to change the fact that you can't expect us to be able to read your mind. If you don't explain things you're just leaving yourself open to interpretation, which is your own consequence of not explaining them.In post 1066, Enter wrote:Let me get this straight: You are drawing assumptions instead of asking questions, and you're blaming me for your failure? How does this add up for you?
Take a moment if you need to to get over the arguments you've just been in/are still in, then please enlighten us on your reasoning instead of just tossing blame at us for misunderstanding your unexplained reads. That's honestly a better way to kill that off as an argument than arguing the validity of filling in your holes.
Lol . So now you're assuming every time someone puts down a vote, they're "fishing for wagons?" What even is that?In post 1079, Thespio wrote:
dude you hard core were fishing for wagons, you popped your vote down, saw someone vote me, and voted me because reasons. XD you are so anti town that if you arent scum you should re-evaluate your play style.In post 1075, Enter wrote:There is no wagon on you, stop using buzzwords to sound like you know what you're talking about.
And regardless, that doesn't change the fact that there is STILL no wagon on you, which makes what you said STILL wrong.
Also, I thought I was your primary target? Why is your vote still not on me?
Finally, I'm "anti town" because I put votes on people that I think are scummy? Please explain yourself more here, because I'm not the person that has been misrepresenting people all of day two.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Dude, you overreacted to my vote on you, immediately called me scum, and followed up by continuously misrepping my arguments, ignoring the points I have against you and trying to answer points I didn't make against you, you're telling me I'm anti-town w/ because "popped my vote down, saw someone vote you, and voted you because reasons" - which is strange, because I'm the only person voting you right now (hence, did not "see someone else vote you") so your argument for why I'm anti town is because I voted you because reasons. You're the one failing to be objective here. Please figure out what you're doing and fix this.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
This is circular logic at it's finest. My hands are actually shaking right now because I don't understand how you cannot comprehend what you are saying. Let's try and break this down into small, easy-to-swallow pieces, alright?You flipped out when i suggested we not ignore your skummy wagon.
1. You say that I am wagoning you when there are literally no other votes on you.
2. You say that I flipped out because you said that I am wagoning you.
3. Your explanation for why I was flipping out is because you accused me of wagoning you.
4. Your explanation for me wagoning you is a quote wall of me flipping out.
5. You say that I flip out because you accuse me of wagoning you
6. You say that I am wagoning you as an example of me flipping out.
Please. I don't know how to explain this in simpler terms. Maybe someone else can explain it to you, but this is actually very bad.
I've explained multiple times how you're misrepresenting me. Just because you ignore my explanations doesn't cause them to fail to exist.Dude we talked about this D1, I want to look at PVTs slot. I want RCE to explain the shiftyness of their slot and why their vote didnt move.
Also im not failing to be objective you are just arent explaining yourself you just say you were misrepped.
Please vote me if I am your prime target right now.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
It's already yielded frustration, I honestly feel like you're just trying to get moral high ground here, even though you're the one that made the mistake. Whatever, it doesn't matter. Can you please explain why Thespio's logic is circular to him in better words than the ones I used?In post 1085, MagikHorse wrote:
After dragging on the whole first day in a quest to get more information including detailed readslists, why would you think I wouldn't want this? Readslists are always better off with descriptions of why people are there or what has changed since the last time, with no exceptions I can think of. More information in general is better unless there's a reason not to put it out (e.g. suspecting that someone is a PR).In post 1081, Enter wrote:I'm not asking you to read my mind, I'm asking you to ask questions if you have them, because I, also, cannot read your mind and know what you need/want more information on.
Either way, just prove us wrong if you can by explaining them. This argument is pointless and is only going to yield frustration.
Ofc you do, I bet you don't understand a word in it either, you just know he's on your side and you're looking for someone to help you not feel dumb for the past couple pages.In post 1086, Thespio wrote:
I agree with this.In post 1085, MagikHorse wrote:
After dragging on the whole first day in a quest to get more information including detailed readslists, why would you think I wouldn't want this? Readslists are always better off with descriptions of why people are there or what has changed since the last time, with no exceptions I can think of. More information in general is better unless there's a reason not to put it out (e.g. suspecting that someone is a PR).In post 1081, Enter wrote:I'm not asking you to read my mind, I'm asking you to ask questions if you have them, because I, also, cannot read your mind and know what you need/want more information on.
Either way, just prove us wrong if you can by explaining them. This argument is pointless and is only going to yield frustration.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Someone please help Thesp understand why his logic is circular. I'm about to have an aneurism.In post 1088, Thespio wrote:Talk about not reading posts-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
So now your argument is every time someone changes where their vote is, they're looking for a mislynch? Funny, you changed your vote a lot yesterday to gain traction. I also didn't move my vote very much at all yesterday.In post 1091, Thespio wrote:Puts vote on X (no traction) >> puts vote on Y, player is active and replies >> keeps vote in hopes others will misslynch because scum or anti town. Very linear.
You still aren’t reading my posts.
Also this is different from the circular "fishing for wagon."-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
How about you don't respond to more than a few words of my post, and often in a way that makes literally no sense whatsoever.In post 1094, Thespio wrote:
How about because you only responded to half of my post?In post 1093, Enter wrote:You can't just accuse someone of not reading your posts just because you don't like/don't understand what they say.
How about this:
We solve this whole thing:
You quote whatever part of whatever post it is you want more responded to that I missed, and then you try and respond to all the parts of my posts that you missed (I would quote them for you but I have to go do something really quick). When I get back, I'll quote for you anything else I want you to respond to.
Then we will work through each and every one of your arguments and discuss why some of them are circular, some of them are dumb, and some of them I might have misunderstood or I might have been dumb on. Seem fair?
PEdit: I don't want you to make my argument for me, it's not my argument, it's Thespio's. You've made arguments for him several times.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
The worst part of this is the fact that this whole time Magik could be helping, but I get the feeling he doesn't like me so he'd rather watch me flounder for words with Thespio and argue semantics an attempts at moral high ground than actually fix this situation, and in the meantime Thespio is sitting here making arguments for me being scum and I can't even get to why I disagree with his arguments because the basis behind his arguments are inherently flawed.
To top it all off I have the same dilemma today that I had yesterday w/ Loopdan: Does bad play excuse scummy play?-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Yeah. The worst part is I'm tempted to TR him, but I hate positively responding to emotional outbursts like that or even encouraging discussions to be had in the manner we just had it.In post 1102, MagikHorse wrote:Yeah, no dice Enter. Telling me to take his words and put them in a certain way only manipulates the result. That wouldn't be my case at all, nor would it be his. That's aside from the fact that I'm already having difficulties understanding everything going on in this muddy mess, and I'd rather not waste my time trying.
As I said you're both flipping out here, and I don't think either side is truly listening to the other fully.
I feel like people are looking to me to lead town again today (and maybe I'm off in this) but I really honestly don't want to after yesterday. I don't feel strongly in any of my reads, I can give basic explanations for them later, but my Thespio push is an attempt to sort. I was kind of hoping to see someone else take an angle on this and push it somewhere that made sense.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Yeah we can talk about RCE. I agree he's my #1 as well.In post 1104, Thespio wrote:Oh i see where the communication failed. I dont think that makes you someone fishing for wagons. Also not sure why the mod said that RCE was right about a vote being on me if they didnt actually vote me. but whatever. maybe i misunderstood it, saw you jump your vote and your reason wasnt really a reason. That to me looked like an opportunistic, fishing for wagons. Then your reaction seemed super antagonistic and survivalist and you had no votes which seemed off. Can we look at RCE now? you arent my #1 he is, and honestly now that i understand what you were talking about i wouldn't say you are in my bottom two anymore.
Were on better grounds in my mind, sorry about the doubt, i stand by that some evil bastard was on your wagon. perhaps PVT being afk is why they didnt hammer.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I'd like to see you have reads and push them.In post 1136, MagikHorse wrote:
I'd like to see town play from you too.In post 1135, Enter wrote:I don't think "scared" is the correct word.
I'd like to see town play from magik and RCE today.
And "frustrated" might be a better word.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Alright, I think I see the problem. Gimme a sec:In post 1140, MagikHorse wrote:
I have a scumread on Muh and am actively pushing things on him and countering his points against me. What more do you expect right now?In post 1138, Enter wrote:I'd like to see you have reads and push them.
And "frustrated" might be a better word.
You are going to drive me insane. I don't know why this is so funny to me, but it is. Alright. Anyways, back to the point:In post 1142, Thespio wrote:
Looking over muh all he does is echo, but just a tone less aggressive than who he is echoing, there’s no original arguements, the verbage they use give them an out, if we flip RCE and they are green muh could easily say they were hesitant on the wagon and that they weren’t going all out. I want rce to stop being lazy and engage but that makes me feel like they are town, certainly scum would be more survivalistic. This makes muh a my new #1 and RCE a close second.In post 1140, MagikHorse wrote:
I have a scumread on Muh and am actively pushing things on him and countering his points against me. What more do you expect right now?In post 1138, Enter wrote:I'd like to see you have reads and push them.
And "frustrated" might be a better word.
VOTE: Muh
Here's what (I think) the big problem is:
muh: I want all of your thoughts. Don't quote anyone, if you can avoid it. (Post numbers are fine, it's hard to follow train of thoughts through quotes, however). It's fine if you summarize your scum reads at the moment, but I'd like you to talk in depth at least on all your town reads.
Munch: Same thing. Only your town reads (we have your scum reads already) although if you want to talk about anything new you've found as far as scum are concerned, I don't think anyone's stopping you. If you just want to talk about how your reads have changed from yesterday and the like, that's also fine.
Thespio: Also, if you would be so kind, drop all your town reads. Explain in detail.
I don't care if these take a couple days to work on and they don't have to be huge. Basically what this is a consistency check (so we can observe opportunism later in the day/ check against past/future reads/ look for scumbuddies when someone flips later). I think this should significantly clear up reads.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I honestly don't care if Munch answers my question, I asked it because RCE hasn't and I wanted people to see why I'm townreading her. I think the last two posts are indicative of what I mean. For further evidence you should look at our discussion at end of day yesterday.
I have no intention of ever seeing a Munch lynch go through to the amount that I can control it.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Just funny things I've noticed:In post 1151, RCEnigma wrote: he's still voting me-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
You seem unsure.In post 1153, RCEnigma wrote:Yeah that's pretty hilarious?-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I'm sorry. I've probably been awake for too long, but I'm not following what you are getting at.In post 1155, Munchmellow wrote:
I just want to point out, that it is majority to lynch, so 5/9. And if theoretically RCE still wouldn't be voting it's 5/8, so considering that, if elements wouldn't claim and would get lynched, 2 people would have to be the same (on both wagons).In post 1075, Enter wrote:4. Your argument is that loopdan flipped town => there was scum on his wagon. But what I'm trying to get you to realize, is that if Elements wasn't a PR, he also would have flipped town, and loopdan wouldn't have flipped at all. And you would be scumreading an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT SET OF PEOPLE. Someone even dropped an intent to hammer on elements.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
The chance that he, also has hurt feelings over my play is very slim, I think, due to his posts showing no frustration with me. Your speculation here, therefore, is unnecessary. I'm sorry you got offended that I was wrong, but I feel like there's a bit of a double standard here in that you, also, were wrong, and you, also, helped push a Lynch while I insisted they were town.In post 1160, MagikHorse wrote:
Or becoming extremely irritated with a specific player that shouldn't be lynched at this time.In post 1159, RCEnigma wrote:Experience doesn't have anything to do with being overwhelmed or losing interest.
Due to all of this and the fact that feelings have barely any place in mafia, may I suggest that we stop taking potshots at each other and win the game so we can both forget the other exists?-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
@Magik:
Please explain how the loopdan vote "reeks of convenience" in a way that a vote on any other player does not.
Here's how I see it:
At the time of Muh voting Loopdan there were three other viable wagons as shown here:
The only way that I see it being "convenient" for muh to vote Loopdan is if the other wagons were on scum, and since there's only two scum in this game, that's not possible.In post 152, Nauci wrote:
Not even considering the fact that you're implying that you, Thespio, and/or RCE is also scum, but I'm having trouble finding your case for ANY of them being scum.
You just managed to write three paragraphs of words accusing him of agreeing with me and pushing for the lynch of the player he thought was scum.
In addition to you accusing him of this, the irony of the matter is that you're in a pretty similar place. A large majority of your posts are large sums of words that defend Loopdan, defend yourself, and talk about how muh was scum. This is what I was talking about earlier when I meant I'd like to see you push something. If you think that just pushing Muh as scum is fine and fulfills that requirement, fine, but I'm going to hold you to that, and you can't call someone else out for doing the same thing.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
You're right, I did make an assumption here that I shouldn't have made. I will try to justify it, however, by asking why on EARTH you were talking about yourself here, that doesn't push the game forward in any form or fashion. Please find a way to get over your feelings and play the darn game.In post 1166, MagikHorse wrote:That wasn't about him as much as myself as a decently experienced player who feels this way. You took this as referring to him, even though it was never meant to.
Still, I'm more offended that you're repeatedly refusing to listen than being wrong. Town will blunder about, make mistakes from time to time, and overall be wrong and I blame nobody for that. Doesn't change the fact that the fewer interactions we have between each other, the better.
Also, RCE says things in a sensible manner, that doesn't make the things he is saying sensible.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Alright, here's my problem with the game right now:
If I am wrong in my reads today, we will likely go to LyLo tomorrow, so it's really important that I'm right.
There are a couple major forces pushing for lynches today. There's a Muh push (which I'm hesitant on), a Munch push (which I'm opposed to) a Thespio push (which is viable, but I'm not sure about) and an RCE/Magik push which I've grouped solely because I feel identically on them (the pressure is mostly off of my opinion of what is and isn't town play or correct play as well as PoE.)
I also recognize that my reads this game were very wrong as far as Loopdan is concerned and I probably have little more trust in my current reads than RCE does, so here's my plan to rectify the situation:
At some point today I will draw up everyone's reads in my own post and words to the best of my ability and then also case them (including other people's cases) to the best of my ability. I will try to keep it relatively short and not get too wordy with it. If I write something wrong, don't crucify me, this is why we're doing this. Just tell me what you disagree with and we will get it all worked out.
After we have fixed everything, we will then work from there. Dog d good?-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I forget how much I hate not knowing if I'll be there tomorrow. There's so much I want to say, but if I say it, it doesn't help. The more I think about this game, the more it feels like it's a puzzle with a single piece out of place.
The problem is I definitely see where you're coming from. And... I usually agree on the whole apathy thing... but the discussion I had w/ Munch at end of day made me almost certain she's town. If someone can read through that and tell me they think she's scum, that's fine.In post 1222, RCEnigma wrote:I don't know if it's the lack of evaluation this game or the stubbornness regarding reads. I can't put my finger on it but it's made me less invested in the game. Skellen is still trying to gamesolve so that's probably selfish of me. Her and Magik I probably never lynch.
Skellen to answer you partly. It's not that I feel there is doubt, the alternative I posed is unlikely but to me is the only way that Munch is town here fmpov. Thus my surety on her flipping scum.
If Muh flips scum munch is just the partner, I doubt much vs Magik today was scum theater, Thespio would deserve some consideration. I know you discounted Munch/Thespio together and I think the logic is sound there.
Munch/muh would fit the scum apathy theory Loop brought up and based on both day 1 wagons being town it points to the advocates/sheep votes and not the leaders of the lynches.
Enter this probably narrows your Poe down to just me but afaik your accusations on Magik/less so loop were in part for leading a counterwagon in Elements. I don't see the scum motivation behind getting Elements wagon going when a strong wagon against Loop as town was already rolling. Sure it makes sure at least one of the two flips and the danger of a wagon flipping on scum is nullified but it was pretty apparent Loop was going to be lynched despite his VT claim.
Maybe I'm old, maybe mafia has changed a whole lot since I last played, but I tunnel people. A lot. It's a thing I thought I was pretty good at (I used to be pretty accurate, if I remember correctly) and I'd open almost every game taking everyone out of RVS with a pretty hard tunnel. And I used to be able to tell who was scum and who wasn't (with some degree of inaccuracy, but it was pretty good) based on how players reacted (even the player I was tunneling.) The "You could be anyone IV" was a great example of that.
But this game I actually cannot tell. Loopdan reacted how I expected scum to react, how I've seen them react (I wasn't even really meaning to tunnel him, just shove him in the right direction), but everyone else has played a pretty solid game. Which makes me feel bad, because once I was certain loopdan was scum and my push turned into a tunnel, I felt certain in my ability to find scum based off of that, and now I just feel like we're in a really messed up state.
So big props to scum. You've really played well on this one. Whoever it is, you've got me all befuzzled, and even the other people here are just trying to PoE because almost everyone makes sense as town.
It was based on loop/Thespio being scummier than PvT and I couldn't see the two being on a team together. Loopdan flipped town => Pvt is pretty null.Btw, @Enter, after making your case against Loop and Thespio being his partner, you said PvT is town. Why did you think that?
I figured out what your avatar was, BTW. Took me awhile, I know, but I didn't see the blue man in the background 'til I started actually looking to sort how you were reading each player.
BTW, would you agree that your reads are something like this:
Enter - town
Skellen - town
Magik - scummy
RCE- scummy
Muh - scummier
Thespio - scummiest
Congratulations!In post 1180, Thespio wrote:@All, ill be using some V/LA I just got a job offer at a competing firm, I will still try to reply to Munch, and contribute but for the next 3 days ill be V/LA as i switch jobs!
Anyways. Kinda big post coming up in a sec.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
So, this game is rough. I went back through Skellen's posts to see what she's thinking, but her thoughts pretty much just mirror my own.
I have two options here, I think:
1. Ignore my experience that insists that activity is not alignment indicative and consider Munch/Muh.
2. Ignore the debacle that was yesterday that insists that accuracy is not always indicative of scum and consider Magik/RCE.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Ha. What a curse.RCEnigma wrote:Lol I feel for you man, the curse of being a universal townread.
Let's weigh our options:
Muh: Doesn't post much, but when he does post, I agree. Maybe he's got me in his pocket, but the things he writes make sense to me. If I scumread Muh, I think I also have to scumread Munch, because I don't see him being scum w/ RCE/Magik
Magik: Posts a lot of things I disagree with. Insistence on Loop being town seems like a white knight (because I was pretty convinced he was scum, as was a lot of the rest of town). I can see where he comes from, sort of, where he says things opposite to me because he's frustrated with my disagreement. However, even in the past when I've defended someone, I've noticed when their nose is up my rear, and if I ever see someone manage to sweet talk Magik like Loop did again, I'll probably get diabetes on the spot. Trying to get white knight points for loop makes sense from my perspective, however, because that whole day I could tell loop was probably going to be lynched. So. Did Magik just have really good reads when it came to loop, but bad ones as far as elements was concerned? Did he also manage to not notice the way loop talked to him, reacted to him, or does he not care?
The other problem with Magik: I've had to ask him for reads past his initial entrance. I don't know about the rest of the players, but usually when I play mafia and I don't know what to do or where I'm going, I just drop reads. It's a pretty good way to catch people up on where you are in the game and you can all help each other get on the same page. Unfortunately, Magik has done little this game except push elements and defend loop day one, and push muh day two. Is he so certain muh is scum? Maybe PoE. If I scumread Magik, I think I also have to scumread RCE, because I don't see him being scum w/ Muh (maybe munch?)
TL;DR
Muh
- Low activity
- Had to ask for reads
- would have to scumread Munch
Magik
- Good read on loop (when p much no one else did)
- Bad read on elements
- Had to ask for reads
- would have to scumread RCE
---
I don't know, but I'm leaning Magik over Muh here.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
This is particularly difficult, because I would normally townread both of these players pretty hard (I think), but I can't just put Magik and Muh together. (right?)
Munch: Low-ish post count. Again, when she posts, I don't necessarily agree, but I can see that argument coming from town. Big seller for her on the townread yesterday: the conversation we had over elements/Loopdan. Big reason she might be scum: She's currently pushing Thespio -which is normally a good idea, but when we're crunched for time, we should try to keep it to people who have been discussed in detail and have some pressure on them for a lynch and while Thespio is kind of scummy, he hasn't been in discussion for a large portion of the day (or maybe he has, this day flew by) and I don't feel comfortable with a flash wagon at this point.
RCE: Makes a lot of sense. Says a lot of sensible, relatable things. But he says things I remember being like "that's actually wrong" - for example, when discussing elements/loop for which lynch gives us more information. He also works with Magik in a lot of things, it looks like, but not directly. And for some reason his tone goes... weird... sometimes and maybe that's just my brain being picky. I think I would normally townread this player, but we're in a tough spot and I can see most of his play coming. He also brings up things that pinged me the first time I saw them (but disregarded because I was distracted by loop) like this:
muh opened with a self-vote in RVS. I really dislike that. I have only ever once been tempted to self-vote in RVS and that was when I was scum and too scared to vote anyone else for fear it might give away who and where my partner is. I wanted to call Muh out for it, but loop was so scummy so I jumped him instead. This might be what pushes me over the edge, though, to voting Muh/Munch instead of RCE/Magik. This is .. hard.
TL;DR
Munch:
- Low-ish post count
- Townsided posting
- Discussion over elements/loop
- Pushing Thespio
RCE:
- Sensible/Relatable
- NAI
- Discussion over elements/loop
- Weird tone
- Works with Magik a lot
- Makes good points.
I don't know if you guys see this how I do, but in a strange way, I see a lot of similarities between Muh and Magik in my head, and same for Munch and RCE. This is truly difficult. It might come down to me voting Muh because of his opening post. I don't want to do that. I want to blame scum having day talk, but I legitimately feel like every one of these players would make town feel weaker if they were gone. I don't think I've ever played in a game where it was so darn difficult to see someone is scummy or not scummy, and I definitely don't think I've ever congratulated a scum player on their play before and been sincere about it (and definitely not before the game was over).-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
It might be that my pride is the largest item standing in the way of a muh vote, and while I sincerely hope that's not the case, I'm starting to believe that it might be.
... Screw it. 1205 looks like town!Magik. I think I can see scum!Magik unvoting for town points and then trying to re-vote later to hammer Munch (if for some reason a wagon appears on her), but looking at the vote count right now... Magik and RCE could hammer Muh, but they haven't. RCE hasn't even set up for it. I don't know if they're trying not to end up in the VCA at end of day, but at this point I'm starting to sound really paranoid - moreso than calculated.
You have the benefit of the doubt, today, I think. Day ends in <6 hours. I feel really crappy about this, but this is my leap of faith:
VOTE: muh
That's L-1.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
You're not helpful.In post 1239, RCEnigma wrote:You know I'm not budging on Magik, you'd have to convince the rest of town.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
I know this is my fourth post in a row and at this point I'm bordering on terrorism. I apologize.
By wagon on someone sensible, I mean a sensible wagon on someone sensible. If you put Skellen at L-1 and expect me to hammer I'm just going forget this game ever happened and hope someone NKs me tonight.In post 1243, Enter wrote:I'm going to bed. I can still swap my vote in the morning if I realize that everything I did tonight was based on sleeplessness and there's a wagon on someone else that looks really sensible.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
So the words in my previous posts aren't coming out like I mean them to, but I hope you see what I mean.
I see what you mean on RCE, munch. I do want to say that it's also really weird RCE scum reading the slot that he replaced into. That's also something that I have only ever done as scum. I honestly don't know.
UNVOTE:
I'll vote again before I leave in the morning (an hour or so before day end). RCE is.. yeah-
-
Enter for the homies
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Don't worry, I can math, but you're not at L-2 yet.In post 1266, muh316 wrote:We're in LYLO right now. It's not a good idea to throw around votes like that. Putting someone at L-2 can easily turn into a scum rush and we'll lose.
@Munch, what happened? You missed the vote by 6 minutes.
@Enter, weren't you supposed to come online after you had unvoted me?
If you were town, you wouldn't be asking the questions you're asking.
And TBH I'd like to have been, but I didn't wake up to my alarms. Sucks, doesn't it?
We're making up for it today.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
Anyone present was responsible for the hammer on D2.In post 1268, muh316 wrote:
Why's that? A no-lynch is definitely more advantageous for scum. The two of you were responsible for the hammer on D2.In post 1267, Enter wrote:If you were town, you wouldn't be asking the questions you're asking.
But I think I see where you're coming from now? Still feels wrong and I expect differently from you.
This day is a mess.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
MyLo, not LyLo, but same concept since we're not no lynching.In post 1270, Thespio wrote:
Yeah it kind of pisses me off, munch should have just hammered, now we are in LYLO and we could have got scum, still think its muh but im not going to vote until later in the day to avoid a lolhammer loss.In post 1269, Enter wrote:Anyone present was responsible for the hammer on D2.
But I think I see where you're coming from now? Still feels wrong and I expect differently from you.
This day is a mess
Honestly?
We flip muh right now. I don't see a point in waiting. What are we going to get out of the day?
Either we're wrong and scum get a win, or we're right and we get another chance.-
-
Enter for the homies
- for the homies
- for the homies
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: December 27, 2018
1. I thought Skellen was the obvious choice for the kill last night, but I can see why you would disagreeIn post 1271, Thespio wrote:Also Im trying to deduce why scum would kill skellen over Enter, skellen wasnt as townie as enter is.
2. Because they thought I was more likely to vote Magik/RCE.