Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER


User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2049 (isolation #0) » Thu Sep 26, 2019 3:31 am

Post by texcat »

Could someone give me a synopsis of the tchill case?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2077 (isolation #1) » Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:32 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2054, profii wrote:I am not a fan of Bob. He initially voted for Elements for reasons 'setup spec'ing very early' etc

He then left the wagon, but came back when the lynch actually went through and when he put his vote on he said he didn't believe the macho/one shot claim.

My concern is that if I am casing a slot for being scummy I'd be like "woah guys I'm voting elements because he was setup speccing over in this post, plus now look at this macho claim it's gotta be BS" - i.e. case the whole ISO for a scum evidence - Bob didnt mention his initial setup spec concern when he votes due to his claim concern, which makes me believe he is looking for a reason to be on the wagon rather than actual scum hunting properly.

VOTE: Bob3141

Obviously I will hear him out but I'm just going to vote there for now.

I've looked at Tchill's ISO and someone is going to have to take me through the case here, he doesn't come across super town of the players I've looked at so far but I dont think he is the most scummy either at this point unless I've missed something of course.
In post 1739, bob3141 wrote:I was leaning toward elementis being town before his roleclaim. Due to his responses to my questions. So i am won't be voting tehre today
In post 1876, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Elementis

Dont beleive teh macho and one shot thing. Why even tell us?
The "I won't be voting there today" followed by a vote there caught my eye. I see Bob's explanation of not believing the role modifiers and it makes sense, and if Elements had flipped scum I would be pursuing Bob for his last minute bus, but I can't see why a scum!Bob would flip like this on a town wagon.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2116 (isolation #2) » Thu Sep 26, 2019 11:23 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2078, Alonzo wrote:Had a chance to read through yet texcat?
LOL. I've skimmed a little bit. If there's something important I should read in Day 1, could you point it out to me?
In post 2087, Rick Dalton wrote:Who is texcat? I like texcat, I’ve played with her many a times, I’ve hard caught a texcat in a game I didn’t play at all until dy 4, then I caught like 3 scum.

I like texcat.

Pocketed.
Warm and cozy in pocket, but are you sure it was you who caught me? I thought it was Cliff Booth, your stunt double, because I'm sure it was a stunt.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2285 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 27, 2019 10:07 am

Post by texcat »

VOTE: Garmr

It feels like Carca caught him in a lie, and now he's backtracking as fast as he can. I didn't understand why he claimed in the first place, and I really don't understand why he claimed and lied about his result. It feels a lot more like scum fake claiming when they thought they had a good shot.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2299 (isolation #4) » Fri Sep 27, 2019 10:31 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2286, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:Yes, because Scum would claim Voyeur of all the roles on the wiki. COME ON!
Scum!Garmr claimed voyeur because it uses the exactly the information that they had. When Gamma turned up dead, it would be easy to assume that the doc was on Carca. But they don't know who the doc is. Partly it's the timing of the claim for me. I don't think town!Garmr would have claimed. How likely is it that town has a watcher and a voyeur?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2336 (isolation #5) » Fri Sep 27, 2019 11:24 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2329, Garmr wrote:How to win mafia scum.
Lynch texcat

Did she flip scum

if yes congrats you lynched scum.


If no lynch lynch her town reads you'll have lynched scum congrats you won.


VOTE: Texcat
Wait. Is this coming from the person who just claimed to have lynched claimed town masons? When you were town?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2392 (isolation #6) » Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:23 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2391, Hopkirk wrote:We should solve the game together sometime. I'm sure we're thinking along the same lines here.
Anyone mind if we start just posting from our hydra account and not signing the posts?

-Hop
I don't mind.

-Tex
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2393 (isolation #7) » Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:24 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2391, Hopkirk wrote:We should solve the game together sometime. I'm sure we're thinking along the same lines here.
Anyone mind if we start just posting from our hydra account and not signing the posts?

-Hop
I don't mind either.

-Cat
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2423 (isolation #8) » Sat Sep 28, 2019 3:27 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 2421, Rick Dalton wrote:
In post 2260, Rick Dalton wrote:
In post 2201, Cliff Booth wrote:Richard my old friend, do you know what my role is based on the post I made about my role potentially being useless this game if it's role madness
N
o,
e
ven as people only look into the atmospheric nature, do you think I would know this from the beginning?
Follow the pattern of the bold, and it shows I thought you were a Neapolitan.

I give the hint when I say the beginning.
Vanilla cop is certainly what I thought Cliff was hinting at. Cliff, are you now claiming something else?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2424 (isolation #9) » Sat Sep 28, 2019 3:31 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 2395, Hectic wrote:Who's this? You new? I like you.
I'm YouAreGreat's sub. And Rick Dalton has already tried to pocket me; you might have to try harder than this if you want me to move over to your pocket.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2431 (isolation #10) » Sat Sep 28, 2019 6:26 pm

Post by texcat »

TChill, can you tell me why you're being Wagoned? No one else has volunteered to tell me.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2618 (isolation #11) » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:05 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 2615, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 2611, EeveeLution Army wrote:
In post 2609, Carcalilly wrote:What do you think of Billy's VT claim?

I can see it as an opportunistic claim from mafia but it would put them in an extremely bad situation unless scum has a way to stop nea. If he is vt idt we should lynch him but its a tough call
this makes 0 sense.
+1

VOTE: Eevee

And Hopkirk has earned a FOS for his suggestion about lynching Billy, followed by a quick reversal.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2619 (isolation #12) » Mon Sep 30, 2019 3:09 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 2612, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I'm glad there enough players in the game that my claim doesn't narrow down prs too much for scum, but the pros have been doing a decent job of that themselves by claiming w/o needing to.
And we will eventually have to start testing some of those claims, like Garmr's, because I think scum is in that mix.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2636 (isolation #13) » Tue Oct 01, 2019 7:04 am

Post by texcat »

Painfully slow....
In post 2631, Hopkirk wrote:Looks like Tex and Aaron are straight up scumclaiming.

Either that or very selectively reading and misrepresenting.

I said I have 3 scumreads. These are the three people I'd vote for today. You're presenting me saying I'd prefer to vote for tchill (who I'm voting now) and Aaron (who I voted earlier) as saying I backtracked. I'd prefer to vote Billy over anyone except Tchill/Aaron as is absolutely clear from my words and vote history. Texcat, I'd like you to reread then substantially expand on what you thought I meant because I'm struggling to see how town could reach that conclusion legitimately.
In post 2618, texcat wrote: And Hopkirk has earned a FOS for his suggestion about lynching Billy, followed by a quick reversal.
Yeah, reversal is the wrong word there. What earned you the fos was that you had Billy in your list of 3 when he's a definite town read for me because of the vt claim. When Carca asked about the VT claim, I would have expected a townie to say something like oh yeah I forgot about it; I'm taking Billy off the list. Instead you said
In post 2613, Hopkirk wrote:I don't want you to eat rope today since it's worth testing that theory, and Aaron/Tchill were bigger independent scumreads than you today. I've voted/ want to lynch Tchill/Aaron today.
And you never answered Billy's question about how exactly we were going to test that theory. You backtracked by saying that you don't want him to eat rope today, but you seem to still be open to lynching him and that seems scummy to me.

In post 2635, Cliff Booth wrote:
In post 2628, davesaz wrote:Still have that question on why you think it's beneficial to discuss your role possibly being neg util or useless.
is it not obvious?
NO.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2710 (isolation #14) » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:40 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2677, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 2152, Tchill13 wrote:lets see... texcat has done nothing. should we policy them? jk lol

i'll be more active today. not a fan of a PL push right after a ML then a nk'd mason.
I tracked this slot n1. They didnt do anything.
I can confirm that I did not do anything on N1.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2776 (isolation #15) » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:14 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2710, texcat wrote:
In post 2677, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 2152, Tchill13 wrote:lets see... texcat has done nothing. should we policy them? jk lol

i'll be more active today. not a fan of a PL push right after a ML then a nk'd mason.
I tracked this slot n1. They didnt do anything.
I can confirm that I did not do anything on N1.
@profii
Nice to know who's reading and who's not. TChill claims to have tracked me.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2788 (isolation #16) » Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:24 am

Post by texcat »

VOTE: Garmr
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2810 (isolation #17) » Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:29 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2789, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
In post 2788, texcat wrote:VOTE: Garmr
That was a fast hop on. Why?
I started the day with a vote on Garmr (), just going back to it. I think his recent posts have solidified my view of him as scum.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2814 (isolation #18) » Thu Oct 03, 2019 7:13 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2811, Garmr wrote:
In post 2810, texcat wrote:
In post 2789, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
In post 2788, texcat wrote:VOTE: Garmr
That was a fast hop on. Why?
I started the day with a vote on Garmr (), just going back to it. I think his recent posts have solidified my view of him as scum.
So you don't believe I targeted the masons?
No, I don't believe you're a voyeur.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2855 (isolation #19) » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:18 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2854, profii wrote:I would enjoy a garmr lynch

But I dont think he is smart enough to do those wacky claims as scum
I don't understand this. Are you saying he is smart enough as town? The scum have an entire team to help work out fake claims. Do you not think any of them are smart enough?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2863 (isolation #20) » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:39 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2859, profii wrote:I mean if you are town you can say what you mean and be like lol fake claim guys I'm so cRaZy

But as scum if you give a result that catches you out you're probably getting lynched and when you are on the minority team if you die the stakes are higher - taking such a risk would be dumb imo

But what was the risk, really? Who was going to catch scum!Garmr out? The doc was the only one, and that would be assuming that the doc exists and did not actually protect Carca. And generally trading a scum for the doc is not that bad a trade. Scum!Garmr just got really unlucky when Carca claimed ascetic on D2. Most might have thought that she would have at least hinted at it, if not outright claimed on D1. Plus he's still relying on the fall back position of cRaZy town, and so getting caught out seems like it was no risk at all.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2958 (isolation #21) » Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:13 am

Post by texcat »

Unofficial and probably wrong (but hey, at least it's here) VC
Alonzo - (4):
- Cliff Booth, bob4131, Garmr, Judge Joseph Dread
EeveeLution Army - (3):
- Rick Dalton, AaronFrost, gobbledygook
Garmr - (2):
- davesaz, texcat
Judge Joseph Dread - (2):
- Carcalilly, Titus
Tchill13 - (1):
- Hectic
Hopkirk - (1):
- Tchill13
gobbledygook - (1):
- Hopkirk
profii - (1):
- Alonzo

Not Voting:
Kop, EeveeLution Army, Billy Pilgrim, profii

With 19 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.


Deadline:
(expired on 2019-10-10 05:35:11)
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #2962 (isolation #22) » Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:05 am

Post by texcat »

Unofficial, corrected, and probably wrong (but hey, at least it's here) VC
Alonzo - (5):
- Cliff Booth, bob4131, Garmr, profii, Judge Joseph Dread
EeveeLution Army - (3):
- Rick Dalton, AaronFrost, gobbledygook
Garmr - (2):
- davesaz, texcat
Judge Joseph Dread - (2):
- Carcalilly, Titus
Tchill13 - (1):
- Hectic
Hopkirk - (1):
- Tchill13
gobbledygook - (1):
- Hopkirk
profii - (1):
- Alonzo

Not Voting:
Kop, EeveeLution Army, Billy Pilgrim

With 19 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.


Deadline:
(expired on 2019-10-10 05:35:11)


In post 2961, Hopkirk wrote:Why's there still an eevee wagon going on.

-Hop
Why wouldn't there be? Did Eevee do something to change their minds? I'm still willing to
hop
er, jump back on her. And I noticed while doing the VCs that she has never voted toDay.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3170 (isolation #23) » Tue Oct 08, 2019 4:52 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3159, gobbledygook wrote:What is SB, Dave?
Took me 3 reads to figure out that it is SingleBall and MultiBall.
In post 3163, Alonzo wrote:The living embodiment of floaty and non committal, and whos vote should have been on me since I joined (and yesterday should have been all over Sharon Tate)
Huh? Rick's vote has been stuck on Eevee all day. How many different people have you voted for today? I don't get how you can be calling him noncommittal. And why should he have been voting for you exactly?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3225 (isolation #24) » Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:27 am

Post by texcat »

VOTE: Eevee
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3232 (isolation #25) » Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:48 am

Post by texcat »

I would rather lynch Garmr, but that doesn't seem likely. I voted you earlier and said in the post you quoted that I was still willing to vote you. My opinion did not change.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3258 (isolation #26) » Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:09 am

Post by texcat »

I make it as L-1.
Eevee has 3 and Hopkirk 3.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3289 (isolation #27) » Wed Oct 09, 2019 9:59 am

Post by texcat »

Who did you protect last night, Alonzo?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3369 (isolation #28) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:43 am

Post by texcat »

My coffee is still brewing, so things may clear up after I have some, but right now I don't understand a damn thing.
In post 3353, Carcalilly wrote:VOTE: Rick Dalton

Its either this or someone's trying to frame you.
In post 3354, Carcalilly wrote:If they are framing you, then maybe they left me alive because they knew I'd be in your ass for this.
Are we supposed to know what this is? Cause I'm clueless.
In post 3356, Hopkirk wrote:How big is the neighbourhood cliff? Probably looking at some town in there.

Kop can you give a reads list with enough detail that I can have any confidence you've caught up?

I'll post sometime after work.

-hop
Are you just assuming that Cliff is in the neighborhood?
In post 3362, bob3141 wrote:the traitor certainly though eve was scum no doubt

When he said i dont have PT with eve. As in being traitor not in teh main thread
The traitor knows who the scum are, doesn't he? He shouldn't have to
think
anything.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3372 (isolation #29) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:03 am

Post by texcat »

In post 2143, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2137, Rick Dalton wrote:
In post 2115, gobbledygook wrote:If this town let’s them continue with that nonsense it will result in a loss.
People say this, but the majority of games I do shenanigans I end up solving.

You can ask A50/Garmr about my trololol’ing all game as an IC.

You can ask Vorkuta/Alchemist/Una about my trollloling fake claim day 3 IC into Vig.
YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DID YOU FREELOADING BENEDICT ARNOLD

I ain't trusting you as far as I can throw you.
This was pretty clearly a crumb. I'm surprised no one seemed to catch it.
In post 2028, gobbledygook wrote:VOTE: Tchill

That vote hopping was opportunistic as
oven
.
I don't know what this means, but is it possible that Tchill was Gook's rolecop target?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3378 (isolation #30) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:16 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3373, Garmr wrote:
In post 3369, texcat wrote:
In post 3362, bob3141 wrote:the traitor certainly though eve was scum no doubt

When he said i dont have PT with eve. As in being traitor not in teh main thread
The traitor knows who the scum are, doesn't he? He shouldn't have to
think
anything.
This is daft since it's word play. It's easy to see what Bob is implying and the point of his case is the traitor knows who scum are. So why act like he doesn't know that?
Perhaps it was my lack of coffee, but I didn't see what Bob was implying. But now that I've had half a cup, I think I can see what Bob was getting at. Bob thinks that Gook knew that Eevee was scum and was quick to disassociate himself from her. Is that it?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3379 (isolation #31) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:20 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3375, EeveeLution Army wrote:
In post 3365, bob3141 wrote:See how he voted for titus then never realy did anything after that.

Makes me think he wanted to avoid lynching alonzo as he migth thought he was teh traitor. see how teh entire time he was probbing set ups rather than scum hunting

what are you talking about...? idt scum would know a traitor even exists. also ela is an easier way to shorten my name. (sidenote the "teh" procs my ocd. idk why you always type the like that)
I'm pretty sure that scum didn't know about the traitor or they surely would have caught Gook's crumb.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3392 (isolation #32) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:10 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3382, EeveeLution Army wrote:wait. i just realized carcalilly is alive. our wincon is pure
Sorry, I don't get this. Do you have a different wincon than I do?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3511 (isolation #33) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:05 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3460, Rick Dalton wrote:
In post 3375, EeveeLution Army wrote:
In post 3365, bob3141 wrote:See how he voted for titus then never realy did anything after that.

Makes me think he wanted to avoid lynching alonzo as he migth thought he was teh traitor. see how teh entire time he was probbing set ups rather than scum hunting

what are you talking about...? idt scum would know a traitor even exists. also ela is an easier way to shorten my name. (sidenote the "teh" procs my ocd. idk why you always type the like that)
Why wouldn’t scum know?

Actually, this is a normal. Scum ten billion percent know there was a traitor, and the traitor ten billion percent knew all the scum.
Is it possible then that Gook was vigged?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3515 (isolation #34) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:15 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3408, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 3406, Hectic wrote:What's the reason for claimed watcher/voyeurs to not reveal results?
There's no claimed watchers for one thing.

-Kork
Just a dead watcher. And since there's a backup tracker claimed, there might be a backup watcher too. But no reason for them to claim if they don't have a scum for us.
In post 3417, Garmr wrote:optimal claim order is
doc
tracker
me
Why are you still trying to out the doc????

VOTE: Garmr
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3516 (isolation #35) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:19 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3443, Hopkirk wrote:Not killing the Mason = Garmr town imo.
Huh? Can you explain this?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3517 (isolation #36) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:26 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3485, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:
In post 3396, profii wrote:He also says it's confirmed a scum doctor targetted a mason,
I am guessing this was after Garmr claimed but before Carca outed she was Ascetic? Cuz it looks like an attempt to push the Doctor who was expected to claim so as to confirm Garmr.

P.S. How does that make Garmr look? I am not sure myself, as I could see it both ways.
Huh??? Why on earth would a scum doc target a mason?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3524 (isolation #37) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:31 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 3523, EeveeLution Army wrote: Tbh who knows when he actually asked. The hosts been a bit here and there if you catch my drift
Mostly there and not here. :mad:
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3582 (isolation #38) » Tue Oct 15, 2019 6:51 am

Post by texcat »

Titus, Gobble clearly crumbed that he was traitor in , and his first post of the day was which I think could be a crumb of his role cop results, but I'm not sure how to interpret the italized oven.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #3758 (isolation #39) » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:57 am

Post by texcat »

VOTE: JJD
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4079 (isolation #40) » Mon Oct 21, 2019 10:07 am

Post by texcat »

I'm going to vote for Cliff whenever we're ready. No one ever knows the vote count. Worst case is that we get a conf town out of the deal. In the meantime,

VOTE: Garmr
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4080 (isolation #41) » Mon Oct 21, 2019 10:11 am

Post by texcat »

Cliff, could you possibly summarize the fruit situation one more time? Who you sent it to? And JJD's targets? Who claims to have received it? I could go back and look I know, I'm just being lazy.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4119 (isolation #42) » Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:15 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4106, Cliff Booth wrote:i dont think it's healthy for the game. Like I said I lied.

Anyone out there get fruit on night one? looks like we are doing this again
I am fruitless.
In post 4112, Cliff Booth wrote:oh shit I just realized something. I'm like 90% sure scum has a rolecop
They might have a backup rolecop?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4175 (isolation #43) » Tue Oct 22, 2019 4:32 am

Post by texcat »

Unofficial vote count cause we might never get an official one:

Cliff(5): Bob , Aaron, Titus , Carca , Hectic
Garmr(2): Cliff , Tex

Not voting(8): Kop, Billy, Rick, Eevee, Hopkirk, Garmr, davesaz, profii
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4178 (isolation #44) » Tue Oct 22, 2019 4:49 am

Post by texcat »

Davesaz and Carcalilly are mod-confirmed to be town.
Profii is town because he was Gobble's neighbor.
Billy is town because he claimed VT early on and I believed him.

If Cliff flips town, we then can confirm both Billy and Bob.

Rick has claimed doctor, but he's an actor so I don't put much stock in it.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4234 (isolation #45) » Wed Oct 23, 2019 8:05 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4227, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I feel like scum is fine with Cliff being the lynch. I thi k that's either because he was determined to be able to be sacrificed, which is consistent with what happened yesterday, or it's because he is going to flip town. If he flips scum, then texcat is probably leading scum candidate tomorrow for trying to redirect the lynch. If he flips town I dont know where that leads us. I'd like a a swer from hopkirk on his progression vis-a-vis me and I think we're still waiting on answers from Rick and Lilly about fruit.
Huh? I did park my vote on Garmr while waiting to vote for Cliff until everyone had a chance to post. I would hardly characterize that as redirecting the lynch.

VOTE: Cliff L-2 I think

Cliff
, if you are town, can you confirm that you sent fruit to Kop on N1? He said he did not receive any fruit.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4257 (isolation #46) » Wed Oct 23, 2019 10:32 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4235, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
In post 4234, texcat wrote:
In post 4227, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I feel like scum is fine with Cliff being the lynch. I thi k that's either because he was determined to be able to be sacrificed, which is consistent with what happened yesterday, or it's because he is going to flip town. If he flips scum, then texcat is probably leading scum candidate tomorrow for trying to redirect the lynch. If he flips town I dont know where that leads us. I'd like a a swer from hopkirk on his progression vis-a-vis me and I think we're still waiting on answers from Rick and Lilly about fruit.
Huh? I did park my vote on Garmr while waiting to vote for Cliff until everyone had a chance to post. I would hardly characterize that as redirecting the lynch.

VOTE: Cliff L-2 I think

Cliff
, if you are town, can you confirm that you sent fruit to Kop on N1? He said he did not receive any fruit.
Eeeew. Really bad post. Tries to act like they didnt move votes, is trying to get Cliff to out the purpose of this before we have all the answers in (we're still waiting on Rick and Lilly)
What do you mean move votes? Where exactly am I supposed to have moved votes?
Cliff already implied that he sent fruit to Kop. I just wanted him to confirm.
Rick & Lilly have both had adequate chances to tell us about fruit. Rick seems to be avoiding the question for some reason, and who cares about Carcalilly? No one would send fruit to a mason.
Cliff Booth wrote:Getting really impatient for an answer. As in I want to just out what actually happened. I dont want to self hammer. In fact I would really rather not even be at L-2 right now. Scum are the only ones that know I'm telling the truth about being town and I think the cat is trying to get rid of me before I can hurt their team.

Did you miss Kop's reply in ?
In post 4236, Hopkirk wrote:@Tex: Cliff should 100% be the lynch. Cliff likely just self hammers at L1. Are you voting him because you're happy for the day to end?
Yes, I'm happy for the day to end. And I agree, just like I did about 20 pages ago, that Cliff should be the lynch.
In post 4246, Hopkirk wrote:Let's not hammer until we've forced Kop to actually exist.
ROFL :lol:
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4258 (isolation #47) » Wed Oct 23, 2019 10:34 am

Post by texcat »

Hmm, let's try that link again:
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4274 (isolation #48) » Wed Oct 23, 2019 11:22 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4261, profii wrote: Tex why do you think cliff implied fruit went to kop?

When he made the post I assume you are referring to, rick hadn't (still hasn't confirmed) but kop has, as you quote

So you've jumped to kop when it actually looks like it's going to be rick
In post 4191, Cliff Booth wrote:Since I've basically exposed the entire reason I'm wanting an answer for this anyway, I should clarify that the person that I actually sent fruit to on night one hasnt answered yet.
In post 4192, Cliff Booth wrote:Is kop even in this game still
These posts were before Kop answered.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4293 (isolation #49) » Wed Oct 23, 2019 3:30 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 4282, Cliff Booth wrote:I'm a simple loyal fruit vendor. I sent fruit to jjd on n1, billy n2, and bob n3.
Isn't this the same claim you made 30 pages ago? I thought you had some new secret info you were going to reveal.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4322 (isolation #50) » Thu Oct 24, 2019 5:51 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4310, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Actually let me match this a second, then I probably won't post for at least 12 hours.

Assuming 5 scum, we have today and tomorrow to mislynch. I'm basically considering 5 people as conf!town. So theres 4 more townies in that pool of 9 I identified earlier. So we're probably to the point that scum is not gonna kill in that pool unless we give them a reason to, like 1 of them claims a PR. And we have at least 1 town or that can investigate the claimed prs and 1 1 town pr that can investigate the claimed VTs. If we keep Cliff alive, he can investigate at least one of the VT claims.

Assuming we mislynch, scum kill a conf!townie and Cliff gets an inno, then we're at 5 conf!townies and the lynch pool is down to 7 with all five scum there.

If we mislynch, and Cliff gets a guilty, we only have 4 conf!townies, but we have a guaranteed kill for LYLO or we could lynch that that day.

Look, if we trust Cliff (which I do) town can basically PoE this for a win. If we force a mass claim now, i think it enhances our chances.

I think we should mass claim. I already claimed, so did Profii, Cliff, and Garmr. If I have a choice, i want to popcorn to texcat.

On a side note, did Garmr claim n3 target?
Are you all forgetting that JJD had a guilty on Cliff? Are we forgetting that Cliff did nothing about JJD until he got pressed? I also don't like Cliff's tactic today of wait, wait don't lynch me yet, I've got something important to say, I'll tell you what really happened ...... oh, it's the same thing I already told you. I think he's scum, but even if he's town, he needs to go so that we can confirm Billy and Bob.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4324 (isolation #51) » Thu Oct 24, 2019 5:55 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4321, AaronFrost wrote:I'm cool with popcorn style mass claim.

tex is next Billy popcorned them, then tex picks someone and we keep on going.

I'm almost certain we don't have a vig.
I think we should postpone the claim until Day 5, but am willing to start if our conf town (Dave, Profii, Carca) think it's better to claim now.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4333 (isolation #52) » Thu Oct 24, 2019 7:28 am

Post by texcat »

Spoiler: Aaron does not like anything I do
In post 4224, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 4079, texcat wrote:I'm going to vote for Cliff whenever we're ready. No one ever knows the vote count. Worst case is that we get a conf town out of the deal. In the meantime,

VOTE: Garmr
tex could be Cliff's partner is he flips scum. Don't like this bizarre attempt to distract from the Cliff/JJD situation.

Why the vote on Garmr?
In post 4295, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 4234, texcat wrote:
In post 4227, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I feel like scum is fine with Cliff being the lynch. I thi k that's either because he was determined to be able to be sacrificed, which is consistent with what happened yesterday, or it's because he is going to flip town. If he flips scum, then texcat is probably leading scum candidate tomorrow for trying to redirect the lynch. If he flips town I dont know where that leads us. I'd like a a swer from hopkirk on his progression vis-a-vis me and I think we're still waiting on answers from Rick and Lilly about fruit.
Huh? I did park my vote on Garmr while waiting to vote for Cliff until everyone had a chance to post. I would hardly characterize that as redirecting the lynch.

VOTE: Cliff L-2 I think

Cliff
, if you are town, can you confirm that you sent fruit to Kop on N1? He said he did not receive any fruit.
Don't like this vote either.
In post 4332, AaronFrost wrote:Worst case scenario if we lynch Cliff today is that we end up in LyLo tomorrow but that's only if there's 6 scum remaining. 7 total scum in a 21 player game seems like too much, even with a traitor.

I don't like how eager tex is to end this day when we have plenty of time left. I get not wanting to waste time but I would hardly say the day is stalling right now.

First he doesn't like my vote on Garmr because he thinks I'm redirecting the lynch(!). Then he doesn't like my vote on Cliff. Now he's characterizing me as being overly eager to lynch Cliff. Something stinks. It might be some weird confirmation bias, but I don't like it.

Aaron, I don't think I am over-eager, but I am ready for day to end. I don't see what more we can hope to accomplish today and I think that things will be clearer when we've resolved Cliff.

I will continue to argue that we should lynch Cliff and I don't like that Billy seems to be arguing against lynching him. And I don't like that Billy says that Profii and Dave agree with him.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4352 (isolation #53) » Thu Oct 24, 2019 11:15 am

Post by texcat »



But if you scroll down to the bottom of the page, there's a place where you can select Titus's posts.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4393 (isolation #54) » Fri Oct 25, 2019 10:55 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4384, Hopkirk wrote:I'm intending to vote Cliff. I'm not going to be doing this before Kop gets replaced.

Has Kop asked for replacement? Has he even been prodded?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4398 (isolation #55) » Fri Oct 25, 2019 1:09 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 4395, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 4393, texcat wrote:
In post 4384, Hopkirk wrote:I'm intending to vote Cliff. I'm not going to be doing this before Kop gets replaced.

Has Kop asked for replacement? Has he even been prodded?
In the last month he's made no meaningful posts. A couple of comments on setup stuff but no actual content, no comments about players.

Last we heard was 2-3 days ago where it was unclear whether he'd keep playing. He's due a prod again.
@mod
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4416 (isolation #56) » Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:25 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4413, EeveeLution Army wrote:But texcats claim would be useful
Why? What use would it be?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4556 (isolation #57) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 5:54 am

Post by texcat »

I still see no benefit in claiming today. But, as I said before, if our conf townies, Dave, Carca, and Profii want claims, I will go along with it.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4792 (isolation #58) » Mon Nov 04, 2019 8:31 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4774, Hopkirk wrote:Eevee flips scum, we're just waiting for his fakeclaim.
We already have Garmr's fake claim, and I think Eevee claimed VT.
In post 4782, Garmr wrote:Rick your avoiding answering who you doctored?
Who did you watch last night? Are you avoiding that question?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4915 (isolation #59) » Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:45 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4888, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 4869, Garmr wrote:Sigh I didn't know if doctor existed back then it could of been a jailkeeper ect. I wanted scum to hunt a imaginary doctor and not shoot the mason it's fucking simple. I didn't expect the actual real doctor/protective role to be fucking stupid.
I'm buying this with a grain of salt all due to Gamma's mail. Gamma thought he had you figured out so I'd assume you knew we were legit once we contacted you. So I fully understand why you would've done that.
What does this mean? Did Gamma Emerald send Garmr mail on N1? Are you sure the mail went through or did Gamma Emerald die before he mailed it? Can you tell us what the mail said?
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4917 (isolation #60) » Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:26 am

Post by texcat »

PlayersStatusRoleDeath
Kop
Pine
Alive
Billy Pilgrim
Alive
Likely VT - rec'd fruit from Cliff
Cliff Booth
Dead
Town Loyal Simple Fruit Vendor
Lynched Day 4
Rick Dalton
Alive
Claims nonconsecutive doc
Sharon Tate
Alonzo
Dead
Town Macho
Lynched Day 2
Hectic
Alive
EeveeLution Army
Alive
Claims VT
Gamma Emerald
Dead
Town Mason Mailman
Killed Night 1
Judge Joseph Dredd
Dead
Town Disloyal Simple Fruit Vendor
Lynched Day 3
Elements
Dead
Town Macho Watcher
Lynched Day 1
Titus
Alive
Hopkirk
Alive
roosterfoster
gobbledygook
Dead
Mafia Traitor Rolecop Neighbor
Killed Night 2
Carcalilly
Alive
Ascetic mason
Garmr
Alive
Claims voyeur, but lied about N1 results
Tchill13
Blatant Scum
Dead
Town Tracker
Killed Night 3
davesaz
Alive
Innocent child
profii
Dead
Town Backup Tracker Neighbor
Killed Night 4
bob3141
Alive
Likely VT - rec'd fruit from Cliff
Skellen
AaronFrost
Alive
YouAreGreat
texcat
Alive


I didn't include Hectic's miller survivor claim. Did I miss any others? Town certainly looks overpowered. Overpowered and not doing very well so far.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4949 (isolation #61) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:56 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4919, davesaz wrote:In particular what does it tell you about scum?
I love the pedantic and condescending Socratic method, and so will play along.

Let's start with the doc situation first. The presence of the Macho players would tend to indicate a protective role (although I've certainly played in games where the mod just threw that in as a red herring). The fact that Rick, our claimed doc, is still alive would make me think that scum have a strong arm that can kill through protection. Or they have a roleblocker to block him every night. Of course, Rick could be fake claiming, either as scum or as town trying to protect the doc, and if scum know that, it would also explain his being alive.

The scum have killed the tracker and the backup tracker. So I'm guessing that if they have a ninja, it's not the same person as their strong arm and they prefer to kill with the strong arm.

I would normally think that scum would have a rolecop of some sort, but the traitor was a rolecop. Perhaps they might have a vanilla cop of some sort.

And JJD's role would indicate that there is at least one goon.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4950 (isolation #62) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 4:26 am

Post by texcat »

In post 4923, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
In post 4920, EeveeLution Army wrote:cant two vt claims that claimed fruit be mafia goon ?
He was loya and simple. If we actually received fruit on the night that Cliff sent it to us, then we're vt. If we got fruit when JJD sent it to us, then we'd be goons.

If the result is faked, then all bets are off.

That chart was missing 2 vt claims. Hopkirk and Aaron.


Can Titus then tex claim please?
Noted. Thank you.
In post 4931, Hopkirk wrote:Texcat didn't really post anything after the Alonzo lynch. Lack of follow up on Eevee there makes me doubt his committal to the lynch. Kop flips scum if Tex does.

@Texcat: how do you read Hectic? You haven't expressed a read on him this game. How do you feel about Eevee and Titus?
I'm unable to make heads nor tails out of the you and Hectic. I didn't like Eevee's reaction to Billy's VT claim, but I've liked her posts more since then. Titus has been uncharacteristically quiet, making her even harder to read.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #4997 (isolation #63) » Sat Nov 09, 2019 5:10 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 4995, Titus wrote:We should still be lynching Garmr.
+1
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5010 (isolation #64) » Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:14 am

Post by texcat »

Pine (6)(L-1)
: Billy , Hectic , Davesaz , Aaron , Garmr , Bob
Eevee(1)
: Rick
Garmr(1)
: Titus
Hectic(1)
: Carcalilly
Titus(1)
: Hopkirk
Aaron(1)
: Eevee

Not voting(2): Pine, Texcat
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5025 (isolation #65) » Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:26 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 5014, Billy Pilgrim wrote:This is complete bullshit. Kop/Pine, texcat, and Titus have all dragged into another day without having to claim. Titus gets lynched tomorrow, and I need a claim from tex like yesterday.
Why? I prefer to keep my role to myself if I can't help town with my claim. If I already had some info that would help town, I'd have claimed it. I'm willing to go along, but only if Carca and Dave, our conf town, think it's best to claim.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5083 (isolation #66) » Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:11 am

Post by texcat »

I'm still here. I'd like to hear Garmr's results from last night. And I wonder who Rick protected.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5125 (isolation #67) » Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:54 am

Post by texcat »

In post 3470, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:
In post 3379, texcat wrote:I'm pretty sure that scum didn't know about the traitor or they surely would have caught Gook's crumb.
If I was scum I simply wouldn't have noticed it, because I'm not American and I had no idea who Benedict Arnold was. (I've just googled it now after you brought it up).

Of course, the chances are really slim the whole scum team contains no American players.. (but I'm just trying to keep myself in the suspects pool so as not to get shot at night). :P
I'm beginning to think the chances are high.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5181 (isolation #68) » Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:05 am

Post by texcat »

VOTE: Garmr

I am also willing to lynch Hectic and Hopkirk. This is based, in part, on the fact that scum missed the blatant Benedict Arnold crumb from the traitor.

I am never voting Rick, Carca, Titus, or Aaron.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5257 (isolation #69) » Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:21 am

Post by texcat »

In post 5255, bob3141 wrote:Eve- bob, hopk, billy, hectic, aaron

i make it
It looks to me like a whole bunch of scum are on that wagon. That just moved Eevee over to my town column.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5281 (isolation #70) » Sun Nov 24, 2019 4:51 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 5181, texcat wrote:VOTE: Garmr

I am also willing to lynch Hectic and Hopkirk. This is based, in part, on the fact that scum missed the blatant Benedict Arnold crumb from the traitor.

I am never voting Rick, Carca, Titus, or Aaron.
Still willing to vote Garmr Hectic or Hopkirk. Rick made a dreadful hammer after a horrible vote by Aaron, but both remain on my don't lynch today list. Carca and Titus remain on my never lynch list.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5313 (isolation #71) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:17 am

Post by texcat »

In post 5286, Titus wrote:Texcat, why am I on your never lynch list?

VOTE: Garmr
Because I think you are town. You agree with me about Garmr.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5314 (isolation #72) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:21 am

Post by texcat »

In post 5307, Hopkirk wrote:(Titus/Texcat/AFF/Hectic) are the 'let's lynch Garmr block. I still have a townread on Garmr. None of them have addressed the main reason I've given for this despite me mentioning it at least twice to Hectic yesterday.
@Titus@Texcat@AFF@Hectic

Why does Garmr actually make that claim. It's such a bad fakeclaim for scum to make for so many reasons at that time.

All of them are pushing for him despite how much the rest of that block is pushing for him- despite the fact I think I'm the only non confirmed town who doesn't want to lynch Garmr. @Hectic especially: why did AFF/Texcat want to lynch Garmr yesterday so badly?

I want to lynch (Titus/Tex/Aff) today then have a look at Hectic before making the final decision. That's almost definitely the scumteam though.
I don't think it's a bad fake claim at all. It was a good, safe, early fake claim. Garmr was just unlucky that Carca was ascetic.

On the other hand, I think it was a terrible town claim if Garmr is actually town.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5340 (isolation #73) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:10 pm

Post by texcat »

VOTE: Garmr
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5359 (isolation #74) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:09 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 5358, Hectic wrote:VOTE: Texcat

Probably never getting a claim out of her.
I refuse to claim unless a known townie asks me to claim.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5382 (isolation #75) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:19 pm

Post by texcat »

Vt
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5395 (isolation #76) » Tue Nov 26, 2019 3:31 am

Post by texcat »

In post 5383, AaronFrost wrote:tex why were you so hesitant to claim VT? And why am I on your 'never lynch' list? You've been dodging most of the questions directed at you.
I'm not lynching you today. After your horrible vote on Eevee, I'm willing to reconsider later.
I was reluctant to claim because the people who were asking and trying to direct the mass claim were mostly in my scum column. I was hoping by refusing maybe they'd waste some night actions on me or kill me.
In post 5388, Hopkirk wrote:@Titus: Ever going to go over who else you want to lynch after Garmr? Assuming a Garmr scumflip.

Same question @Tex and probably @Aaron.
Pretty sure I've already answered who my top 3 are.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5397 (isolation #77) » Tue Nov 26, 2019 3:49 am

Post by texcat »

In post 5396, Hectic wrote:
In post 5300, Hectic wrote:
In post 5281, texcat wrote:
In post 5181, texcat wrote:VOTE: Garmr

I am also willing to lynch Hectic and Hopkirk. This is based, in part, on the fact that scum missed the blatant Benedict Arnold crumb from the traitor.

I am never voting Rick, Carca, Titus, or Aaron.
Still willing to vote Garmr Hectic or Hopkirk. Rick made a dreadful hammer after a horrible vote by Aaron, but both remain on my don't lynch today list. Carca and Titus remain on my never lynch list.
Why are you never lynching Titus, and unlikely to lynch Aaron?
In post 5363, Hectic wrote:
In post 5359, texcat wrote:
In post 5358, Hectic wrote:VOTE: Texcat

Probably never getting a claim out of her.
I refuse to claim unless a known townie asks me to claim.
Want to answer why you're never lynching Aaron or Titus?
How can you be so sure of them when most likely it's 4 scum in {Aaron, Titus, Texcat, Garmr, Hop, Hectic}.
You're basically saying it's the other 4 if you believe Bob and Rick's claims.
@Texcat
I feel like I've said all of this numerous times already. Titus is town. Look at her vote record. Look at her meta. She's never missed a breadcrumb. I'm not so sure about Aaron after his vote on Eevee. And Bob's claim is iffy. Rick's claim looks good, but his play is not what I would normally expect. I don't know right now who I would pick for the 4th scum.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #5550 (isolation #78) » Sat Nov 30, 2019 4:59 pm

Post by texcat »

Well played scum! Can't wait to see the scum thread; why did y'all kill the traitor?

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”