Mini Normal 2139: No Flavor Allowed - Game Over

[Ircher]

Day 4 VC #8

Firebringer (3) (L-1): Auro (2173), Hoctac (2180), Zulfy (2193)

Umlaut (1): Looker (1825)
Hoctac (0):
Zulfy (1): Firebringer (2227)
Looker (0):
Not Voting (2): Micc, Umlaut (2242)

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch a player.

This phase will end on May 31, 2020 4:00 PM EDT (GMT-4:00) or in (expired on 2020-05-31 16:00:00).

Moderator Notes

1. If you have regular weekend V/LA, you must either notify me each time or set V/LA tags each time.
2.

Please note the prod timers. You will be prodded after 32 hours on Tuesday-Friday.

3. Micc replaces Morning Tweet.
4. Firebringer replaces Blatant Scum.

[Micc]

thoroughly was probably not great word choice. i grazed over a lot of the pages that were just ame being secretive about their claim for no real reason.

but i have you iso and I can search for the words 'scum equity' and find two hits. none of which weigh the risk/reward of lynching BS slot on the assumption that it is a traitor.

you seem to be taking it as a given that he's a traitor. yeah we'd lynch there if it was a 99% scum lynch, but I've not seem a compelling case for that slot being more scummy than anyone else in the game.

[Looker]

tell me who to vote

Umlaut

VOTE: zulfy

ehh i don't really care right now. Zulfy works as a vote till i actually have thoughts.

I'm thinking Umlaut and Auro/Zulfy

traitors are gay and are probably not in this game my dude.

The game doesn't factor in sexual orientation

ohh ircher designed this.

Yeah there could be traitors. Ircher has bad taste in roles/game design

Jesus

---

• People are rioting everywhere.
  
• I'm wavering between Auro and Zulfy (prefer Auro at this point), but I won't be unvoting Umlaut.

[Looker]

Shouldn't the votecount say Firebringer instead of Blatant Scum?

Changed. Thanks.
~Ircher

[Micc]

i do need to spend more time understanding how the cakez wagon went down. don't feel like ive really analyzed that yet.

Looker, there's a non zero chance I get a result on umlaut tonight. id really rather keep that option on the table

[Firebringer]

The game doesn't factor in sexual orientation

r u sure?

[Firebringer]

Uhh how come you don't consider Hoctac?

because zulfy is always scum and ur interactions with me come of as scummy. I have no thoughts on hoctac

Hey, Forebringer. Why do you assume/write off Umlaut as town?

ehh i like his posts and interactions with me

Guys I don’t care if BS/fire is a traitor. Normal traitors aren’t worth lynching. Just ignore him if you think that’s the case.

i should never be ignored

[Umlaut]

Micc, I don't think we should lynch Firebringer today but you should still care whether he's a traitor, because if he were than his readiness to lynch Zulfy would indicate we ought to lynch pretty much anyone else.

[Umlaut]

That said,

VOTE: Zulfy

because we need a wagon and this one is viable.

[Zulfy]

Firebringer's not a traitor, he's a mafia goon.
Micc isn't a traffic analyst: he's mafia goon

[Zulfy]

An absolute crime to continue insisting lynching in hood today

[Zulfy]

If the lynch is a neighbor then scum no longer has to kill a neighbor for tomorrow's LYLO.
But with a neighbor lynch they're forced to NK either Hoctac or Auro. If both are alive then I'll entertain Umlaut's 3-scum-in-hood theory.
Lynching me: fucks all of that up completely. And from the very beginning of the day the clidd slot has been gunning for a hood lynch.

[Zulfy]

But what about the Umlaut etc: the Umlaut push was an absolute token push

[Zulfy]

The entire neighborhood is on Firebringer. It's a town-oriented wagon unless two of us are scum.

[Zulfy]

Umlaut: are you more convinced by traitor or 3 scum hood?

[Zulfy]

Maybe I should just stick to posting in the hood for my own sanity

[Umlaut]

Umlaut: are you more convinced by traitor or 3 scum hood?

I'm on the fence, but honestly in my heart I believe in the three-scum hood.

[Umlaut]

If the lynch is a neighbor then scum no longer has to kill a neighbor for tomorrow's LYLO.
But with a neighbor lynch they're forced to NK either Hoctac or Auro. If both are alive then I'll entertain Umlaut's 3-scum-in-hood theory.
Lynching me: fucks all of that up completely. And from the very beginning of the day the clidd slot has been gunning for a hood lynch.

Not true, clidd was gunning for my lynch for quite a while from the start of the day. I'm not sure what turned him around on that to be honest.

[Zulfy]

the Umlaut push was an absolute token push

Him calling you an idiot was just because he got angry

[Zulfy]

Though I suppose that happened when the push was tapering off. In any case: token push. Go read it.

[Umlaut]

Aren't you going to vote me ?

With Looker, BS and me being town, you are the only possible scum outside the neighbor> {

Looker

, Umlaut,

clidd

,

Blatant Scum

}

Inference 1:

The hood was designated with 2 scums.

Inference 2:

You are trying not to confront me while looking for a way on scum PT to convert the situation.

Inference 3:

I imagine your partner is Auro or Zulfy.

For you to be town, the hood would have to have been assigned 3 scums and 1 town, which is basically almost a second scum PT (doesn't make sense).

The only way to get out of this is if your partner does a CC on me. But he can't, because if he do that you will both be confirmed even if I am lynched.

So yes, you're fucked.

Hoctac, Auro and Zulfy --> Are you guys there ? I would like opinions on who is scum inside the hood.

We're going to use today to scumhunt Umlaut's partner.

I'm really curious to see how you plan to get out of this.

What part of this looks like a token push to you?

[Zulfy]

What part of that: The whole thing looks like a: push to me.
The fact that it didn't proceed after that makes it: token. So it's a: token push.

[Umlaut]

Zulfy: suppose you magically come to know that one of Auro or Hoctac is scum. Which is it?

[Umlaut]

(Similar question with the names rotated for the other two neighbors)

[Auro]

If town can commit to lynching both hood members apart from me, I'm down with anyone.