Mafia of Revelations ~ Game Over!

[Green Crayons]

while calling me scum anyway and positing me as a buddy to Green Crayons when he already expressed a scumread on me

No I didn’t.

The rest of this post reads fine to me.

[Auro]

was going to vote Auro for his no lynch suggestion

I was inferring from this + that my response to Starbuck "looked bad", and can you explain why those two posts looked bad?

[Hoopla]

Do you always write like this?

i'm in between personal assistants at the moment, and my chief editor has run off to the amazon to "

find herself

" - whatever that means.

sadly, you are stuck with my flowery prose... unfiltered.

[farside22]

VOTE: Auro
Honestly you have a certain similarity of way of thinking to mine. And 275 is pure early-mid d1 scum me.

this actually may be the first misstep. can you explain this?

on first parse, it read well to me.

Tell me where in that post his vote on gc makes sense.

[Vi]

~Vote Count II:

Mod Jukebox is Currently Set to "Cute"

Green Crayons (L-4)

~ Hoopla, CantLynchAPuppy, xRECKONERx, AGar,

(Llamarble,)

Auro

iamausername (L-5)

~ Blair, farside22, VP Baltar, Kmd4390

Blair (L-7)

~

(CantLynchAPuppy,)

Morning Tweet, Albert B. Rampage

Hoopla (L-8)

~

(Blair, farside22, Porkens,)

iamausername

xRECKONERx (L-8)

~ Starbuck

Untrod Tripod (L-8)

~ Green Crayons

Porkens (L-8)

~ Untrod Tripod

Auro (L-8)

~ Llamarble

Llamarble (L-9)

~

(Auro)

Morning Tweet (L-9)

~

(VP Baltar, AGar)

Albert B. Rampage (L-9)

~

(Llamarble)

Starbuck (L-9)

~

(xRECKONERx, Kmd4390)

Not Voting: Porkens

--With 17 alive, it will take 9 votes to extrajudicially kill a player.
--Deadline is at 21:00 on Wednesday, 1 July 2020.

(9 days left)

---Vote Count I has been corrected. I apologize.

[Green Crayons]

was going to vote Auro for his no lynch suggestion

I was inferring from this + that my response to Starbuck "looked bad", and can you explain why those two posts looked bad?

Your no lynch suggestion was hella dumb and I would've voted you for it because it was hella dumb, but I don't think it was particularly AI given that it was a early (first?) D1 post.


Starbuck's call for discussions not related to finding scum generates activity that doesn't help find scum. Suspicious.

Your decision to take up that discussion not related to finding scum generated activity that didn't help find scum. Suspicious.

Except the second half of that suspicion got shot when I realized that all the "new" people were responding. So only Starbuck gets suspicion points.



AGar's "Call and response"? Is that what we call answering questions now? shade, that conflates Starbuck's call for "empty calories" discussions (AGar's words) and several responses with actual, scum-hunting questions, is disappointingly bland.

[Hoopla]

@farside

i have no qualms with auro jumping on the wagon. i mean, he was probably too late to gain any town cred - that was snapped up by the early adopters.

but if you have a problem with it, why aren't you asking him yourself?

[Green Crayons]

sadly, you are stuck with my flowery prose... unfiltered.

Truly, the modern tragedy suited for our times.

[Green Crayons]

Honestly you have a certain similarity of way of thinking to mine. And 275 is pure early-mid d1 scum me.

Just so we can run this down, do you intend to explain this?

[Auro]

Can I lure you guys into theory talk about how scum have higher cognitive load and don't recognize jokes easily, and also the theoretical value (or lack of it) of RQS?

he was probably too late to gain any town cred

Damnit!

[Starbuck]

Quite a few pages on the overnight. Catching up in a bit!

[Green Crayons]

Can I lure you guys into theory talk

Either tie theory to concrete suspicions of a player

Or take it to mafia chat.

[Llamarble]

VOTE: Green Crayons
I was going to say something like "I may go back to Crayons later" but it seems more useful to be here.

275 reminds me of scum-me. It's a bit difficult to describe how though. Some struggle introspection, some reads that feel planned. It makes me think he might be a buddy for Reck, which would make a much scarier scumteam. "I townread scumbuddy X" is the kind of phrasing I might use trying to make the buddy I expect can endgame look like someone I simply don't believe I can lynch for the benefit of post death ISO. I'll want to resolve those thoughts later.

[Llamarble]

305 isn't enough GC. In fact it digs the hole a little deeper. If you are town, you must let the town flow through you.

[Green Crayons]

You don't get double town points for re-voting me. That's not how it works.

[Green Crayons]

It's a bit difficult to describe how though

For mafia being a game about words, some players seem to have an awfully difficult time actually articulating their suspicions.

[VP Baltar]

UNVOTE: MT
VOTE: iamausername

I just spent a game as scum fighting against Blair's instincts to save my team. No one in that game would really follow her and she screamed into the void for many pages. She ended up copping two of them.

Blatant sheep here. Come at me if you don't like it.

Why you leave MT?

Eh, still felt like a bit of a forced interaction on her part, but maybe that's how she actually is.

I decided I'll just stan Blair instead.

Can I lure you guys into theory talk about how scum have higher cognitive load and don't recognize jokes easily

"Me scum. You no funny"

You mean like that?

Your no lynch suggestion was hella dumb and I would've voted you for it because it was hella dumb, but I don't think it was particularly AI given that it was a early (first?) D1 post.

You were actually going to vote over that?

[Green Crayons]

Yes I was going to make my first post, first vote based on a hella dumb suggestion. Don't first vote shame.

[Albert B. Rampage]

I dont even start reading the game until page 25 these days.

Explain to me what's going on and I'll give you my opinion on it.

town heroine hoopla dazzled onlookers with a stunning moment of divine intuition, powering the wagon on GC-scum.

in response, shady antihero blair rustled up an uninspired counterwagon on lurking easy-target iamausername. her motivations? god knows.

You didn't explain anything and I still need to be explained gc and iamuser if you want my vote

[VP Baltar]

I dont even start reading the game until page 25 these days.

Explain to me what's going on and I'll give you my opinion on it.

town heroine hoopla dazzled onlookers with a stunning moment of divine intuition, powering the wagon on GC-scum.

in response, shady antihero blair rustled up an uninspired counterwagon on lurking easy-target iamausername. her motivations? god knows.

You didn't explain anything and I still need to be explained gc and iamuser if you want my vote

You're on a wagon with MT. Is that a better explanation?

[Llamarble]

I have too many scumreads to do PoE now. Wait I lied I have 4 of them and life is good.

Most probable scumteam:
Auro Reck GC IAAU?

Baltar
UT
MT
ABR
Agar
CLAP

Starbuck
KMD
Blair
Hoopla

Porkens
Farside
Llamarble

Order within groups probably imperfect.

[Llamarble]

Well the IAAU one is simple. There are two posts there and his vote is the kind of minor inconsistency scum go for.
GC has a more developed ISO of different stuff, but most recently 305 calls a bunch of people suspicious and disappointing without really doing anything.

[farside22]

@farside

i have no qualms with auro jumping on the wagon. i mean, he was probably too late to gain any town cred - that was snapped up by the early adopters.

but if you have a problem with it, why aren't you asking him yourself?

You were fine with his response. I wanted to understand why when his words don't match his vote so why is it fine to vote GC when he stated suspicion elsewhere?

[farside22]

I have too many scumreads to do PoE now. Wait I lied I have 4 of them and life is good.

Most probable scumteam:
Auro Reck GC IAAU?

Baltar
UT
MT
ABR
Agar
CLAP

Starbuck
KMD
Blair
Hoopla

Porkens
Farside
Llamarble

Order within groups probably imperfect.

That is the strangest list......is that scum to town list?

Well the IAAU one is simple. There are two posts there and his vote is the kind of minor inconsistency scum go for.
GC has a more developed ISO of different stuff, but most recently 305 calls a bunch of people suspicious and disappointing without really doing anything.

Got to say I'm just not a fan of a few of those on the wagon.

[VP Baltar]

Well the IAAU one is simple. There are two posts there and his vote is the kind of minor inconsistency scum go for.
GC has a more developed ISO of different stuff, but most recently 305 calls a bunch of people suspicious and disappointing without really doing anything.

We caught two scum in the first 10 pages? Well that was easy!

I'm kind of surprised Reck and Puppy are such wallpaper this game. Not really what I was expecting from either