He shouldn't get a pass for day 1 either. VP Balter is an amazing bandwagon.In post 596, farside22 wrote:He only gets a free pass for day 1.
Remember how bad your reads were in all of our recent games.
Listen to me and vote VP Baltar.
He shouldn't get a pass for day 1 either. VP Balter is an amazing bandwagon.In post 596, farside22 wrote:He only gets a free pass for day 1.
ABR: Can you explain why you found this scummy?In post 329, Albert B. Rampage wrote:This is moderately scummy.In post 324, VP Baltar wrote:We caught two scum in the first 10 pages? Well that was easy!In post 321, Llamarble wrote:Well the IAAU one is simple. There are two posts there and his vote is the kind of minor inconsistency scum go for.
GC has a more developed ISO of different stuff, but most recently 305 calls a bunch of people suspicious and disappointing without really doing anything.
I'm kind of surprised Reck and Puppy are such wallpaper this game. Not really what I was expecting from either
VOTE: VP Baltar
You know I'm the worst when it comes to joining a wagon without a really good reason or I scum read the player.In post 600, Albert B. Rampage wrote:He shouldn't get a pass for day 1 either. VP Balter is an amazing bandwagon.In post 596, farside22 wrote:He only gets a free pass for day 1.
Remember how bad your reads were in all of our recent games.
Listen to me and vote VP Baltar.
that respect has been misplaced for about 5-6 years budIn post 589, Llamarble wrote:I have a lot of respect for Reck as a scumhunter and as a scum, so my default guess is Reck catches UT, UT might miss Reck.
In post 610, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I have always been a better player than you at your prime, don't be jealous
seems like a rather creative softclaim to concoct as scum. much more likely that unprompted claims like come from town, as they have a genuine reason to do so, unlike scum who have to think up an angle that will make a softclaim tease make sense from a town-perspective once more info comes into the game.In post 541, xRECKONERx wrote:i suppose being coy adds nothing. i received a piece of game information in my role PM. i was also told that the mafia were aware that i know a piece of information about the game. i assume that will put a target on my head.
i agree with iamausername. the desire to get down & dirty in the weeds of the blair/starbuck back-and-forth to quell a potential multipage shitfight of confusion is in fact town. i could barely be bothered to read it all and form an opinion on it, so the fact he was willing to make heads or tails of it in first place is a valuable contribution, probably powered by town curiosity.In post 544, iamausername wrote:in other news, AGar has now thoroughly ingratiated himself into my town reads - can't imagine this post coming from scum - there are clear benefits for scum to not alerting everyone to the source of the misunderstanding, pretty much regardless of Blair/Starbuck alignments.
you've been on my case most of the game - even listing me in your top 3 scumpicks in 360. all of a sudden i am no longer on your radar without any reason why your suspicion has subsided. why?In post 605, farside22 wrote: VOTE: VPB
Completed my iso so I feel better with some reads.
Null to scum:
Agar
UT
Kmd
Auro
Iam
CLP
MT
VPB
then in post 605, essentially changed your mind;In post 596, farside22 wrote:Some of the votes on VP come from players I haven't seen say much in regards to this game and are sheeping along (like Iam and UT). I'm staying the hell away from it.
I will say within regards to UT if he continues the lurking I would vote for him. He only gets a free pass for day 1.
that was a rather sharp turnabout. can you explain your mindset in further detail given you didn't like the make-up of the wagon to begin with?In post 605, farside22 wrote:Okay so on the ISO of VP I found him to basically just sheep reads and have no follow through with pushing any reads. I don't even know why he voted Auro at this point and he pushed MT and dropped it, which looks for pretty freeking weak reasons.
VOTE: VPB
(And the reason that makes him a little sketchy is that I know he likes to play scum and believe he is good enough as scum to produce what he has produced here and most other players have begun to accumulate little moments of towniness although there's also a lack of OBVTOWN players)In post 614, Llamarble wrote:Well it's powered by the fact that he initially read the exchange the same way Starbuck did, he didn't have to go far out of his way to figure out what was going on, but I do appreciate the effort at constructing a good post to clarify it for everyone.
But yes, it is a good post, there's nothing wrong with Agar - I see him in a pro town without that extra essence of towniness that I would want for a strong townread.
i have a handful of scum leanings, but generally speaking i find it easier to townhunt on d1, and will usually be willing to lynch anyone not a townread.In post 615, xRECKONERx wrote:hoopla do you have scumreads instead of just townreads
can you explain? my read on her has flipped and she's currently in my townbucket.In post 619, Llamarble wrote:I'm somewhat convinced MT is scum.
Uh, maybe not.In post 620, Hoopla wrote:can you explain? my read on her has flipped and she's currently in my townbucket.In post 619, Llamarble wrote:I'm somewhat convinced MT is scum.
Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh of course this gets brought upIn post 622, Llamarble wrote:Uh, maybe not.In post 620, Hoopla wrote:can you explain? my read on her has flipped and she's currently in my townbucket.In post 619, Llamarble wrote:I'm somewhat convinced MT is scum.
MT has been more active elsewhere on the site than here, but they're doing enough that it may not be worth worrying about. I should disengage for a while and come back more rested tomorrow like I was planning to.