"Spending your time trying to halt bad discussion isn't the same thing as attempting to generate good discussion." Thanks Sherlock. What's you point?In post 222, SJReaver wrote:-- Even if they find it to be filler, it might serve a purpose.In post 215, 72offsuit wrote: Nothing wrong with that post. Why wouldn't !townMM try to halt discussion that they think is filler and bloating the thread?
-- Spending your time trying to halt bad discussion isn't the same thing as attempting to generate good discussion.
-- If filler is removed from a thread, the pace becomes sluggish and the activity level dips. It makes it easier to coast.
Do you have any reads so far? Any thoughts on the conversations?In post 138, Lapsa wrote:I don't.In post 40, SJReaver wrote: Hey Lapsa, what do you think of Bell's line of questioning? Is how someone responds to a role PM alignment indicative?
If filler is removed from a 21 player game.... the thread becomes easier to read.