In post 323, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's rediculous. Only the most stupid of mafia players "can't change the way they play."
Everyone has a personality quirk they can’t get rid off easily.
If we could all completely change the way we play perfectly then mafia as a game wouldn’t be able to exist.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
spells ridiculous wrong then argues that norway is dumb...
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 323, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's rediculous. Only the most stupid of mafia players "can't change the way they play."
Everyone has a personality quirk they can’t get rid off easily.
If we could all completely change the way we play perfectly then mafia as a game wouldn’t be able to exist.
So you're implying you aren't trying to play this game differently than your last game?
Mafia Record: Town 4-3 Mafia 0-1 Third Party 1-0 Total 5-4
"NPOM you can do apparently whatever the fuck you want this game." - Alduskkel
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 323, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's rediculous. Only the most stupid of mafia players "can't change the way they play."
Everyone has a personality quirk they can’t get rid off easily.
If we could all completely change the way we play perfectly then mafia as a game wouldn’t be able to exist.
So you're implying you aren't trying to play this game differently than your last game?
I barely even remember how i played in that game ur talking about.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Whoever. I need to read more content that isn’t endless questions aimed at me to get a better feel for the game.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 335, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Norway is scum. I'm not moving my vote for the rest of the day.
So you’ll consider moving it tommorow? Then there’s still hope.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
well, i guess you didn't say that I was scum reading him but you did say.
In post 314, superbowl9 wrote:Also dude naked voting someone and saying aha you reacted is the worst possible reaction test of all time
which feels kinda close.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 307, superbowl9 wrote:Taking note of how you proposed an alien wagon then flaked
taking note that SB tried to throw heat on me for changing my mind and vote. He wanted my play to remain static.
Just said I didn't see your original alien vote tho lol
was mostly making fun of your "Taking note "
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I've said it wasn't a RT like 3 times now, why do you keep insisting that it was a RT? And what do you think of my actual reasom for voting him and his explanation/lack there of depending on POV?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 345, Nero Cain wrote:I've said it wasn't a RT like 3 times now, why do you keep insisting that it was a RT? And what do you think of my actual reasom for voting him and his explanation/lack there of depending on POV?
LOL cause you're the guy who disagreed when I said concealing info is helpful for all alignments
A straight naked vote would be a little weird coming from that philosophy no? I mean regardless of this meaningless shade I just threw it became a RT whether you like it or not because you analyzed the reaction and knew it had potential to have what you view as a negative reaction.
I get why you voted him (I think) and I dont necessarily disagree just think alien is better right now
In post 203, superbowl9 wrote:You say an argument looks fabricated. What’s your next thought as a mafia player? Who stands to benefit from fabricating arguments?
It seems like you observe some fact about the game and then just turn off the part of your brain which follows up and makes conclusions from that fact. Also explains why you would not be able to see why weak early wagons are fine to just let be
Well stanley is voting for you. How is that for a follow up?
I would also look favorably upon a superbowl wagon