Everyone has a personality quirk they can’t get rid off easily.In post 323, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's rediculous. Only the most stupid of mafia players "can't change the way they play."
So you're implying you aren't trying to play this game differently than your last game?In post 325, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Everyone has a personality quirk they can’t get rid off easily.In post 323, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's rediculous. Only the most stupid of mafia players "can't change the way they play."
If we could all completely change the way we play perfectly then mafia as a game wouldn’t be able to exist.
I didn't say norway was dumb. I said only dumb players can't change their play style. I'm not using spell check, so sue me.In post 326, Nero Cain wrote:spells ridiculous wrong then argues that norway is dumb...
I barely even remember how i played in that game ur talking about.In post 327, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So you're implying you aren't trying to play this game differently than your last game?In post 325, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Everyone has a personality quirk they can’t get rid off easily.In post 323, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's rediculous. Only the most stupid of mafia players "can't change the way they play."
If we could all completely change the way we play perfectly then mafia as a game wouldn’t be able to exist.
Whoever. I need to read more content that isn’t endless questions aimed at me to get a better feel for the game.In post 332, Nero Cain wrote:who should we focus on, iyo?
Yes any level of aggression is really warranted from a naked vote. Thats why its a bad RT its literally NAIIn post 316, Nero Cain wrote:i mean, it wasn't really a reaction test. Do you feel like the level of agression that he's sending my way is justified?
Nah I aint said thatIn post 321, Nero Cain wrote:you and suberbowl are saying that.
Just said I didn't see your original alien vote tho lolIn post 324, Nero Cain wrote:taking note that SB tried to throw heat on me for changing my mind and vote. He wanted my play to remain static.In post 307, superbowl9 wrote:Taking note of how you proposed an alien wagon then flaked
So you’ll consider moving it tommorow? Then there’s still hope.In post 335, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Norway is scum. I'm not moving my vote for the rest of the day.
which feels kinda close.In post 314, superbowl9 wrote:Also dude naked voting someone and saying aha you reacted is the worst possible reaction test of all time
was mostly making fun of your "Taking note "In post 338, superbowl9 wrote:Just said I didn't see your original alien vote tho lolIn post 324, Nero Cain wrote:taking note that SB tried to throw heat on me for changing my mind and vote. He wanted my play to remain static.In post 307, superbowl9 wrote:Taking note of how you proposed an alien wagon then flaked
LOL cause you're the guy who disagreed when I said concealing info is helpful for all alignmentsIn post 345, Nero Cain wrote:I've said it wasn't a RT like 3 times now, why do you keep insisting that it was a RT? And what do you think of my actual reasom for voting him and his explanation/lack there of depending on POV?
Were you going to make a case on CSF?In post 308, superbowl9 wrote:Oops didnt mean to quote 235 there
Why did you ignore my post? This isn't the first time you just glossed over someone verbalizing a scumlean on you.In post 307, superbowl9 wrote:In post 235, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Well stanley is voting for you. How is that for a follow up?In post 203, superbowl9 wrote:You say an argument looks fabricated. What’s your next thought as a mafia player? Who stands to benefit from fabricating arguments?
It seems like you observe some fact about the game and then just turn off the part of your brain which follows up and makes conclusions from that fact. Also explains why you would not be able to see why weak early wagons are fine to just let be
I would also look favorably upon a superbowl wagonTaking note of how you proposed an alien wagon then flaked
