RudeIn post 10, Iconeum wrote:Gypyx - will scumtell
VOTE:
Bruh, i'm saying we either got masons or investigatives, not both tht would be bustedIn post 24, Staarling wrote:Should the masons claim so the investigative doesn't waste time on them?
Oh cmon, it's not because my setups are weird that i don't have a sense of "traditional" balanceIn post 44, Iconeum wrote:i refuse to listen to any kind of setup talk from youIn post 22, Gypyx wrote:Anyways let's make bets, this setup will either be 2 masons vs 2 mafi1 with a bit of spiciness or 1 investigative + 1 protective vs goon + PR because that's all micro normal seems to be
YupIn post 46, innocentvillager wrote:Have you played with Shelly before?In post 43, Gypyx wrote:Damn, 2 lists in 2 pages from shelly, i can townlean that
Saudade?In post 51, innocentvillager wrote:I wouldn’t have scumleaned this reaction but Saudade is rubbing off on meIn post 49, Iconeum wrote:In post 42, shellyc wrote:Iconeum - scumlean the offhanded town comments seem pretty lamisty
That kind of effort of structuring thier reads feel town to me, you see what i mean?In post 50, innocentvillager wrote:can you tell me why you townlean Shelly’s readslists this early on
That's a stretch yes, we're earlyIn post 59, shellyc wrote:formatting/structuring = town?In post 58, Gypyx wrote:That kind of effort of structuring thier reads feel town to me, you see what i mean?In post 50, innocentvillager wrote:can you tell me why you townlean Shelly’s readslists this early on
kinda a stretch ngl
I'm explaining what iconeum said, this ain't my opinionIn post 62, innocentvillager wrote:Also, I want to know if this is based on any meta of me or just purely my name, lolIn post 21, Gypyx wrote:No, it means that innocent village will look very towny if town, currently he's neutral i'd say
Basically, the fact that this is in a list makes me think that like, shelly is trying to structure thier thoughts, of course scum could do that, but they're not really incentivized to as the more thougths they tell, the more attention they get / the faster we get out of RVSIn post 61, innocentvillager wrote:Is it the fact that it looks like she is putting effort in towny or is it specifically like, the format of that postIn post 58, Gypyx wrote:That kind of effort of structuring thier reads feel town to me, you see what i mean?In post 50, innocentvillager wrote:can you tell me why you townlean Shelly’s readslists this early on
Like what distinguishes the effort in formatting from general effort or is there no distinction at all and it’s all towny?
I townlean that, we'll just have to disagree thereIn post 68, shellyc wrote:"Shellyc posts well, fluidly as scum, doesn't necessarily have a rigid scum!trajectory either"In post 66, Gypyx wrote:Basically, the fact that this is in a list makes me think that like, shelly is trying to structure thier thoughts, of course scum could do that, but they're not really incentivized to as the more thougths they tell, the more attention they get / the faster we get out of RVS
making readslist is strictly NAI and you're finding a bad reason to TR me
Mind saying how this is a scumtell exactly? It's apparently a bad read, but that doesn't make it come from a scum mindestIn post 76, Iconeum wrote:and here we have itIn post 58, Gypyx wrote:That kind of effort of structuring thier reads feel town to me, you see what i mean?In post 50, innocentvillager wrote:can you tell me why you townlean Shelly’s readslists this early on
the first scumtell
(and i'm only half-joking)
I hope this isn't a serious postIn post 90, shellyc wrote:see you are self aware as well lolIn post 84, Gypyx wrote:Mind saying how this is a scumtell exactly? It's apparently a bad read, but that doesn't make it come from a scum mindest
you know that's a bad read but you state it
...
You're saying i chose deliberately to townread shelly, then tried to BS my way into TR'ing him, at page 2? I think you can see where this is getting ridiculousIn post 93, Iconeum wrote:it pings me because it feels like u need *any* reason to have a townread, so you thought of something that might fitIn post 84, Gypyx wrote:Mind saying how this is a scumtell exactly? It's apparently a bad read, but that doesn't make it come from a scum mindest
Because the argument is just weak and based on meaningless rhetorics?In post 98, shellyc wrote:why would you assume that it isn'tIn post 95, Gypyx wrote:I hope this isn't a serious post
are you afraid of the Shellyc Tunnelling
It was moreIn post 113, shellyc wrote:your thought process seems likeIn post 105, Gypyx wrote:You're saying i chose deliberately to townread shelly, then tried to BS my way into TR'ing him, at page 2? I think you can see where this is getting ridiculous
ok I'm gonna TR shelly
oh shelly made a structured readslist let me TR her for that
which is fitting evidence to reads which is scummy
So you aren't actually linking "bad" reasons to read someone to being scum, coolIn post 107, Iconeum wrote:i'm saying that the reason you used to get a townlean on someone was pinging me enough to call it outIn post 105, Gypyx wrote:You're saying i chose deliberately to townread shelly, then tried to BS my way into TR'ing him, at page 2? I think you can see where this is getting ridiculousIn post 93, Iconeum wrote:it pings me because it feels like u need *any* reason to have a townread, so you thought of something that might fitIn post 84, Gypyx wrote:Mind saying how this is a scumtell exactly? It's apparently a bad read, but that doesn't make it come from a scum mindest
I played with you as town?In post 114, Iconeum wrote:gypyx, in the one game we played together where you were town i managed to instantly townread you
i don't get that here
The thing is that... what am I even supposed to do, I get a read that's bad / illogical, if i defend it i'm scum for stubbornly defending that read, and if I drop that read i'm scum for being indecisive and not really having a directionIn post 136, innocentvillager wrote:More than the readslist thing itself, I don’t like gypyx’s reaction to getting fos’d. At no point since we started jumping on him for the readslist townlean did do anything but stubbornly defend his read and make sarcastic comments about how he’s caught scum for that. It feels a bit like defensive scum getting accused for the wrong reasons.
VOTE: Gypyx
Well, last time something like this happened i admitted that the read was bad and promptly got pushed even more so... (although there were other reasons too but you see the problem)In post 143, innocentvillager wrote:Gypyx, i see your concerns. My thing is that I think the stubbornness for defending the read vehemently when everyone else seems to disagree with it being an AI thing leans towards a scum mindset. Partly because I think town is more likely to admit there could be some merit to what others are saying.
It also feels like you don’t really care about anything right now about reading the people pushing you, only defending against the push with sarcasm in an attempt to laugh it off.
Can this come from town!you? I think so? But I still see 139 as still fitting in with the scum!you narrative. I think scum!you gets frustrated in this spot too that you’re getting so much flak for this as well
Well, i was getting annoyed / angry, trying to justify me getting the read wasn't helping at all so i just took a breath, calmed down and tried to be a little bit more rational, i can see where your confusion is coming fromIn post 145, innocentvillager wrote:I guess I’m just kind of confused now. It feels like you’re overreacting to what you just admitted was a “bad read”. Like you’re getting upset and combative about the case on you but now you’re finally admitting the read is bad/illogical
Ok, this is epicIn post 170, Staarling wrote:I think he was really angry and where I played, mafia were less likely to get angry or really emotional, sometimes they fake it but this time it looked real to me. And the other reason was that I think the quote at the bottom of his posts is quite townie, like he doesn't want to show off about people calling him good at being a townie to make us want to keep him around, instead he's showing off him being a very solid mod.
You seem self-aware of your pushy / "inconsistent" nature yet when going on me you didn't try to like, control that natureIn post 279, shellyc wrote:i think almost the whole plist knows that my inconsistencies is ammunition for scum to push on for a free misexe?
what do you think is different from my towngame here?
Tbf i don't think being informed prevents weird reasoning, it might even encourage it as ydrasse saidIn post 289, shellyc wrote:yeah but alas scum!me is informed and i dont think informed people come up with weird reasoningsIn post 285, Ydrasse wrote:mmmm.
i think it's slightly scummy to come up with the convoluted reason rather than seeing the one that's laid out in front of you.
Ydrasse's theory makes sense to think, but i didn't really look up into your meta to see if it is trueIn post 286, shellyc wrote:uhhh both of them have created content, why don't you try comment on their content?In post 284, Gypyx wrote:Well, i kinda instinctively wanna townbin them, but i'd just say datisi is +town and ydrasse is neutral (mainly gut feeling)
like ydrasses tinfoil theory on me having a meta mutation and datisi's push on me
If i see one more accusation based on phrasing i swear to godIn post 303, Iconeum wrote:like, these are exactly the scumpings i'm looking for early game, and it's the second or third time you do thisIn post 296, Gypyx wrote:Datisi's push is fine, i'm kinda having trouble to find alignement but i think it's town-motivated
if you think it's town motivated, then ur not having trouble finding allignment, which means you only added that part for gesture -> scum trait
Mind explaining this duo?In post 311, Iconeum wrote:(GB/gypyx)
I was waiting to see everyone enter the game, and i still liked my vote on icoIn post 422, Datisi wrote:samw goes for you, she was your strongest expressed suspicion if i recall correctly and you're still voteparking icoIn post 390, Gypyx wrote:Ydrasse, you've been susing shelly pretty strong, why's your vote not on her?
why is it difficult to get any wagon going, especially on shelly
Well, iv was supposed to towntell hard according to you, i'm not seeing that, and he voted gb based on his entranceIn post 466, Iconeum wrote:why 1 scum in gb/villager?In post 465, Gypyx wrote:I was waiting to see everyone enter the game, and i still liked my vote on icoIn post 422, Datisi wrote:samw goes for you, she was your strongest expressed suspicion if i recall correctly and you're still voteparking icoIn post 390, Gypyx wrote:Ydrasse, you've been susing shelly pretty strong, why's your vote not on her?
why is it difficult to get any wagon going, especially on shelly
I think there's one scum in villager / george
VOTE: georgebailey casing my vote here, i'll make a deeper read of this game when i'll feel like it
(That's exe-2 i think)
what did you like to keep your vote on me?
- yes, but i am also aware of your meta so i'm taking it into the balanceIn post 467, shellyc wrote:didn't you SR me most for my pushback onto youIn post 465, Gypyx wrote:I was waiting to see everyone enter the game, and i still liked my vote on icoIn post 422, Datisi wrote:samw goes for you, she was your strongest expressed suspicion if i recall correctly and you're still voteparking icoIn post 390, Gypyx wrote:Ydrasse, you've been susing shelly pretty strong, why's your vote not on her?
why is it difficult to get any wagon going, especially on shelly
I think there's one scum in villager / george
VOTE: georgebailey casing my vote here, i'll make a deeper read of this game when i'll feel like it
(That's exe-2 i think)
didn't you TR IV most (scumreaad them the least)?In post 277, Gypyx wrote:Among the peoples that push me, i'd say that from least to most suspicious about the way they're pushing : innocentv (actually looked like he was trying to figure me out instead of piling up reasons) ico ( didn't do that much, but his reasons for scumreading me kinda crumbuled when looking at them) shellyc (hard push, based on reasons which are meant to be solid but they aren't, ofc i know shelly's meta but i'm not letting her off the hook like that)
You're mixing with the fake hammer reactions i think?In post 471, Iconeum wrote:i faintly remember you doing those fake pressure votes multiple times last go around and you were scum :p
Oh wait really? My bad, i sometime "invent" things that haven't actually happened, tell me if i do it againIn post 491, innocentvillager wrote:I don’t understand this at all sorry
I never voted GB?
And can you or @Ico explain this whole I’m supposed to look super towny thing you two keep mentioning or whatever? Im just lost
AgreedIn post 579, Ydrasse wrote:what in the world is going on
I'd probably put by order of certainety : straaling / datisi / battle mageIn post 802, Iconeum wrote:gypyx
your to-do list is getting a couple townreads (and maybe sheep them)
and explaining your GB scumread, which you promised to do a while ago
I was townreading staarling since pretty early into the game, apparently i didn't post that so you'll just have to take my word for itIn post 811, Iconeum wrote:You probably just read somewhere that 'straaling' is a uni townread, so you stick to that
You townread Datisi, but are unwilling to vote shellyc and don't see the scumpart in shellyc who shitpushed your number 2 townread?
GB read is fine or whatever
You also don't wanna Exe-1 someone you don't townread (you just gave a top 3 townread, shellyc not in it), who just tried to push one of your main townreads for crap reasons, and retracted everything faster then I could push it, with deadline this close because
'oh no I don't wanna put someone on l-1' is just terrible
2169 was perfectly balanced idk what you're talking aboutIn post 853, Iconeum wrote:gypyx amiright ^^
I'll try to do that for Ydrasse, don't base your TR solely in meta thoughIn post 872, shellyc wrote:can you open a random ydrascum gameIn post 866, Gypyx wrote:Good point for ico - iv, guess it's ico / ydrasse then, i don't have any clue why you TR them
ydrascum doesn't give effort as scum at all and the tone here is really good imo. also genuine solving and unique takes on some of the slots
ico has been really disagreeable, actively trying to poke at people which I don't see from scum especially in a micro where town apathy can lose town the game
I'm better at scumreading gypyx thoughIn post 897, Battle Mage wrote:2 for 2 at least - you can be an apprentice i guess, unless you're right here.In post 894, Iconeum wrote:i'll have you know i am 1 for 1 in catching scumpyxIn post 891, Battle Mage wrote:and i'm an expert on reading Gypyx.
what's your record
I doubt it honesrly, like if it is congrats but things are rarely this simpleIn post 915, shellyc wrote:tinfoil hat solve: mini/gypyx/BM contains all 2 scum