Open 814: CultD3 CULT WINS
-
-
Raya36
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Some people are really good at getting away with the "oops didn't know" actIn post 52, Marky Mark wrote:I mean I feel like lolhammering would be a scum claim, but I've been bitten too many times by town lolhammering
Why were you expecting this?In post 56, Enchant wrote:I expecting osuka softbus Lemons without any sane reasons, but fearing to actually push him over river because it's too much.
I don't really understand your case Flea. You think Lemons is scum for not responding to their pm right away, right? But you also said it's scum indicative for that to result in a replace out, which is clearly not the case here.
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Many games where mafia always push other mafia "for a bit" and then forgetting like it ever happened gives me this.In post 70, Enchant wrote:
Why were you expecting this?In post 56, Enchant wrote:I expecting osuka softbus Lemons without any sane reasons, but fearing to actually push him over river because it's too much.
Why you even vote if you fear hammers, you always can discuss without votes altogether.[/quote]
Why Osuka over everyone else on the wagon who unvoted when it was brought to E-1?-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I can see where you're coming from but why do you think someone unvoting at E-1 is more likely to come from soft-bussing scum than town concerned about a quick-elim?In post 76, Enchant wrote:He is acting most outrageous with votes on Lemons (literally #1, VOTEVOTEVOTE and then suddenly "oh wait nvm unvote i fear quickhammers")-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
What assumptions are you referring to?In post 77, Flea The Magician wrote: Raya has made several frankly dangerous assumptions and is a bit all guns blazing in ILs defence which amuses me, SL.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
What I'm trying to say is that scum!Flea could've probably predicted that pushing someone for a role pm confirmation based reason would get fae voted. Generally pushing something that's a stretch is avoided by scum for this reason. So we're agreeing here. Flea is more likely town for this.In post 78, InsidiousLemons wrote:if you think you can predict how someone will react to something, isn't it usually best to confirm your suspicions? town doesn't care about looking like they made a scummy push (at least not unless they're in real danger of becoming a miselim), so as a way to start discussion rolling it's not a bad idea. in my experience, standing back with your hands on your hips rather than answering questions as flea does in 77 can sometimes come from scum, but he doesn't seem to have really believed much in his push and was more using it as a reaction test. considering it got us out of RVS unprecedentedly early, which is usually not something scum actively tries to do, i'm comfortable with a slight townlean here.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Not everyone votes in the mindset that person is absolutely scum. I was on Lemons too and unvoted when they were brought to E-1.In post 87, Enchant wrote:
It would be great if he though he is town, but it's not like that.In post 81, Raya36 wrote:
I can see where you're coming from but why do you think someone unvoting at E-1 is more likely to come from soft-bussing scum than town concerned about a quick-elim?In post 76, Enchant wrote:He is acting most outrageous with votes on Lemons (literally #1, VOTEVOTEVOTE and then suddenly "oh wait nvm unvote i fear quickhammers")
Maybe we have different minds, but why i should even care to save someone i vote if i think he ismafiacult.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Yeah, I agree with this. There's less attachment to a read if you use words like strange to describe scummy.In post 104, Marky Mark wrote:
I get the sentiment, just seemed an odd way to say scummy if that was the point you were making at the timeIn post 103, T3 wrote:The strange was more "i would be surprised if this logic came from town" strange.
Lemons seems to be a strong player which is actually why they were my rvs voteIn post 113, osuka wrote:
it's my experience that lemons just generally puts way too much effort into gamesIn post 99, Marky Mark wrote:Lemons can have townpoints for caring about the solve enough to check up on meta. Scum can do this too, but in my experience its a towny thing more often than not.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
If I understand correctly when the pm was open but not confirmed, Korina wrote that in the confirmation edits in the first post. So anyone watching that post would have seen that the lemons opened their role pm but didn't confirm. Then later when it was confirmed Korina of course updated that.In post 122, Enchant wrote:... No.
Like look.
Assume i open my role PM, and after decide not to confirm for a bit. After that i open it again, and confirm.
How you know i opened PM, but didn't answer to it? It's literally impossible.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I would say busy work but I can also understand wanting to understandIn post 126, InsidiousLemons wrote:we're wasting time. enchant, i've confirmed that flea's information is correct. the push they've made has been responded to. there's no secret "role PM receipt status cop". what is the purpose of this line of questioning?-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Why not? I think there are points for both ways.In post 135, T3 wrote:I don't think the enchant questioning thing is AI.
Yeah, not the biggest fan of this either.In post 139, Umlaut wrote:
WMFMIn post 136, Major Minor wrote:There are other slots who had done less (and have still done less) and yet you're not applying the same scrutiny to them yet. Strange.
(This tell didn't actually work in my last game but I still think it has merit)
This is the same idea againIn post 146, Major Minor wrote: Feels rather disingenuous on your part, tbh.
I think Enchant's analysis on the cult's likelihood of hard-bussing is good and pro-town. I hadn't really put too much thought into that possibility.
@Flea, why is this set-up fishing? I don't really get how it was fishing for anything. Plus wouldn't the scum have a decent idea of the set-up? It's been a while since I've played one of these block set-up games.
Also don't get this. They can stop the convert?In post 160, Enchant wrote:Sorry, but believing jailkeeper or rolestopper can stop convert is..
Uuuh. How good are docs and jailkeepers? Unless we have unrecruitable townies, it's safe to assume cult always convert someone, and game will turn in chaos mess on day 2 already.
Absolutely agree with this. It's actual proof that no thought was put into who was being attacked. They just grabbed every name that could fit the profile.In post 164, Umlaut wrote:Lol did MM actually include the co-mod on his list of suspects? Can't believe I missed that, it's self-defensive "please yeet anyone but me" finger-pointing if ever I saw it.
What makes Flea convenient?In post 209, T3 wrote:It seems like Major minor basically just chose the most convenient wagon to vote for.
I'm getting a slight scumread on T3. I do think Major is much scummier though. I just don't want him at E-1 yet.
VOTE: T3-
-
Raya36
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Normally the content in his one liners are better though. First post could have been an attempt to direct the conversation somewhere that some rolefishing could easily happen. The quick switch from voting Flea to it not being scummy but we still shouldn't dismiss it is jumpy. Saying the Enchant questioning was NAI when it definitely could be read more into. Saying you're town by meta when he doesn't even have town-meta on you. Saying Major chose a convenient wagon when in my opinion it wasn't convenient at all.In post 237, osuka wrote:@raya talk to me: why are you scumreading t3? because he hard lurks and only posts shit one liners? he does that every game-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I just don't like putting people at E-1 early to be safe and also sometimes people claim at E-1 which isn't what I'm interested inIn post 250, Marky Mark wrote:
Rayna had felt towny prior to this, but I don't get why the whole not putting someone at E-1 thing. I don't think there's any real danger of hammer at this point of the day, and it just feels weird that they are voting avoiding voting the main slot that they are pushingIn post 224, Raya36 wrote:I'm getting a slight scumread on T3. I do think Major is much scummier though. I just don't want him at E-1 yet.
VOTE: T3
The townread on Major was very fence-sitty. The "why" and vote on Enchant didn't really catch my interest either. I can only assume Enchant is just joking around a bit. I don't see the random.org vote on me to be particularly bad on it's own. I'm actually starting to be more interested in T3 than Major now so consider my vote being where I actually want it nowIn post 265, InsidiousLemons wrote:
i'm inclined to agree with this. t3's posts this game have felt noticeably more jumpy and opportunistic this game than any of the games i've played with town!t3. would you not say so, osuka?In post 244, Raya36 wrote:
Normally the content in his one liners are better though. First post could have been an attempt to direct the conversation somewhere that some rolefishing could easily happen. The quick switch from voting Flea to it not being scummy but we still shouldn't dismiss it is jumpy. Saying the Enchant questioning was NAI when it definitely could be read more into. Saying you're town by meta when he doesn't even have town-meta on you. Saying Major chose a convenient wagon when in my opinion it wasn't convenient at all.In post 237, osuka wrote:@raya talk to me: why are you scumreading t3? because he hard lurks and only posts shit one liners? he does that every game
I'll come back with more thoughts on other slots later this weekend. I just got my vaccine and I'm tired-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Maybe but scum could easily do it as a way to keep posting without really giving any actual info. But then of course blah blah wifom as you said.In post 295, Umlaut wrote:Well this slowed down.
It's possible, sure. I have no meta one way or the other with Enchant so I can't say whether they find it hard to fake reads. I'm inclined to say that randing their vote is so conspicuous I wouldn't expect it from scum, but blah blah wifom who knows.In post 291, Raya36 wrote:Is it possible Enchant is struggling to come up with reads because they're scum and know who town is? I thought Enchant was better than that but I can't remember specific meta off the top of my head.
I do know Enchant can do better than just mechanics. Idk if this is just a newly gained frustration or if they're hiding behind the mechanics talk as scum-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
What's done is done but I don't think claiming this was as beneficial to town as it was to scum.In post 303, Enchant wrote:
I planned to do that anyway, that's reason why i asked what you mind about it. I see this as not bad way.In post 301, Umlaut wrote:Uhhhh wtf
You had, what, two votes on you? This was completely unnecessary.
Definitely keeping my vote on you. Enchant claimed PR, unless you think they're gambiting?
Agreed, this would be one of the worst fakeclaims scum could do.,In post 332, Umlaut wrote: I'm looking over the setup matrix now and every possibility has at least one role who could counter a fake Rolestopper claim, so barring a cc we should believe it.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Enchant only had 2 votes at the time if I recall correctly. I don't think scum would feel enough pressure to fake claim like that.In post 348, T3 wrote:
Enchants pr claim felt like a scum cop out claim earlier. Like that's the kind of thing I would do as scum in ENchants situation there.In post 346, Raya36 wrote:You posted that after the general PR claim but before the rolestopper claim-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Oh, I didn't realize that was something T3 would genuinely do. I don't think that's what Enchant is doing here but I guess I'm wrong about T3's stance being unreasonable.In post 353, Marky Mark wrote:
I mean T3 literally fakeclaimed BP as scum in our recent large normal with minimal pressure on them so arguments over pressure and choice of role to fakeclaim do have some merit to them but nothing is impossibleIn post 352, Raya36 wrote:
Enchant only had 2 votes at the time if I recall correctly. I don't think scum would feel enough pressure to fake claim like that.In post 348, T3 wrote:
Enchants pr claim felt like a scum cop out claim earlier. Like that's the kind of thing I would do as scum in ENchants situation there.In post 346, Raya36 wrote:You posted that after the general PR claim but before the rolestopper claim
Right, I also can't CCIn post 354, Marky Mark wrote:But what is more useful (and is leaning me towards thinking that Enchant's claim is legit) is the fact that nobody so far has stepped forward as being able to counter claim. AFAIK Lemons, Flea and I have all stated that we cannot counter claim (and Umlaut heavily implied that he couldn't) so if we can get the other slots to step up and state their position then we ought to be able to get a quasi-clear on the Enchant slot, which will then give us a useful baseline to scumhunt from.
I think it was fair for me to be concerned when I know Enchant doesn't normally stick to only mechanics and is capable of much better. It makes a lot more sense that Enchant was so focused on mechanics now that they have claimed.In post 355, Marky Mark wrote:While I wait for Osuka to get back to me, I had a look over a couple of slots that have felt towny but have also been somewhat around the edges of the game, Umlaut and Raya. Umlaut looks very town throughout their ISO imo, but a couple of Raya's posts stood out when I was flicking back through them:
In post 291, Raya36 wrote:Is it possible Enchant is struggling to come up with reads because they're scum and know who town is? I thought Enchant was better than that but I can't remember specific meta off the top of my head.
In light of Enchant's claim and the likelihood of them now being town, the above in hindsight have a bit of a vibe of wanting to put the idea of Enchant being scum in people's minds, but without explicitly SRing Enchant or voting the slot. Maybe I'm reading too much into this but I could see how scum could pull this to try and encourage others to vote for Enchant without being in a bad spot themselves, should Enchant flip townIn post 298, Raya36 wrote:
Maybe but scum could easily do it as a way to keep posting without really giving any actual info. But then of course blah blah wifom as you said.In post 295, Umlaut wrote:Well this slowed down.
It's possible, sure. I have no meta one way or the other with Enchant so I can't say whether they find it hard to fake reads. I'm inclined to say that randing their vote is so conspicuous I wouldn't expect it from scum, but blah blah wifom who knows.In post 291, Raya36 wrote:Is it possible Enchant is struggling to come up with reads because they're scum and know who town is? I thought Enchant was better than that but I can't remember specific meta off the top of my head.
I do know Enchant can do better than just mechanics. Idk if this is just a newly gained frustration or if they're hiding behind the mechanics talk as scum-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Ok then we're definitely disagreeing. I don't think Enchant panics like that as scumIn post 360, T3 wrote:At the time I thought enchant saw a little bit of pressure as scum and panicked, so decided to get the votes off them by claiming just or so they couldn't be ccd.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
It was more the lack of reasoning when he just stated he was keeping his vote there. You explained why. Although Marky did say T3 has done this before as scum so I guess it would make sense why he could think Enchant was gambiting.In post 371, Umlaut wrote:I think T3 saying in effect "now I believe Enchant's claim" makes it pretty obvious he doesn't have a counterclaim (and, in case anyone is still unclear on this, neither do I). At any rate if he tries to make a counterclaim later I'm certainly not going to believe it.
I don't think T3 keeping his vote on Enchant after the "I'm a PR" claim is scum-indicative at all. I voted Enchant after that and so did others so that's an odd thing to pick on T3 specifically for.
That said, I still scumread T3's general posting and want to keep my vote there.
I had a scumlean for sure but it wasn't strong. Sometimes I like to pick at players I scumlean by giving little bits of pressure that way without writing a whole case. Sometimes I post like that as reminders to myself later on, kind of like thinking out loud.In post 373, Marky Mark wrote:
Ok, let me unpick this from a different angle - did you or did you not SR Enchant when you made those comments? If you did, then why not say that rather than skirting around the subject?In post 357, Raya36 wrote:I think it was fair for me to be concerned when I know Enchant doesn't normally stick to only mechanics and is capable of much better. It makes a lot more sense that Enchant was so focused on mechanics now that they have claimed.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This was quite negative for being about someone you townread in the endIn post 397, Umlaut wrote:They fucked around for most of the day, then started suggesting PRs should just come out and claim on Day 1, then explicitly claimed to have a PR when they had only two votes on them (though as I recall a lot of people agreed they were weird and null at best), then immediately said they changed their mind and no other PRs should claim. This was erratic and suspect enough behavior to get them pushed to L-1 and a full claim extracted; they're a Town Rolestopper. I'm assuming this claim is true since if it weren't someone would be able to counterclaim.
Why does T3 feel the most town?In post 402, Umlaut wrote:
I didn't really think about who was or wasn't on the wagon with me (and if I had I hope I still wouldn't have let it sway me). I didn't really have Enchant as anything like a townread in the first place, then 312 really pinged me and made me want to resolve that slot.In post 400, Dwlee99 wrote:Umlaut you voted with your initial solve onto Enchant (major minor + t3). Why?
Having resolved it, I think there is very likely scum on the Enchant wagon. I can't make up my mind who is most likely but I sort of feel the most town about T3 out of the three now (meaning it's Major Minor and/or you).
It's just my posting style, I'm sure you'd notice it if you read some of my other games too. The scumlean on T3 would be more of a full scumread.In post 410, Marky Mark wrote:
This feels a bit off. It's pretty fence-sitty and markedly different to your progression on T3, where you explictly called out that you had a slight scumread on them from early on.In post 383, Raya36 wrote:I had a scumlean for sure but it wasn't strong. Sometimes I like to pick at players I scumlean by giving little bits of pressure that way without writing a whole case. Sometimes I post like that as reminders to myself later on, kind of like thinking out loud.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Interesting that instead of trying to interact with me you decide to call me out. Interactions go both ways.In post 434, Major Minor wrote: Interesting that Raya has like... completely ignored me today. I can't think of a single interaction we've had.
I haven't been getting many strong feelings on you either way so I'm going to do a reread on your iso:
I do agree with the majority that your early deflection (other people did less than you statement) wasn't the best but I'm not convinced that it was scummy rather than just a bad defense. What bothers me the most about you is the calling out the backup mod as if they were a player. That's proof that you're not thinking about the players and just grabbing whoever fits the description without considering your read on them (you can't possibly have a read on the mod). I think I already discussed that before? I didn't like your take on Marky and Flea hiding as leadership roles so we don't think they're scum together. I felt that was a stretch and unlikely although you get a pass for this because you said you like to hunt by associatives so I think this one just comes down to a different way of looking at things. You were pro-claiming when Enchant asked too which wasn't good. You were on the Enchant wagon which was likely scum lead. You also brought up the idea of a full claim which would be more beneficial for scum. Your case on Umlaut wasn't bad but you didn't even attempt to push it until someone told you too and instead went for the more likely wagon.
So I guess where I'm at now is either Major or T3 but not together. I'll take some time later or tomorrow to reread anyone else I'm fuzzy on. Dwlee has felt fine to me. Obviously Enchant is good. Osuka sticks out to me as someone I need to reread.
Congratulations Kori! Enjoy your celebrationsIn post 440, Korina wrote:Hi all,
Just a notice, I will be unavailable for most, if not, all of today. I just got my name legally changed to Kori, so I’m gonna be taking today easy and celebrate.
My Discord is Korina#0359 if you urgently need me.
~ Kori
Can you link the game? I've also read a couple of your other games too so I may be thinking of those.In post 446, Enchant wrote:I starting to actually suspect Raya though.
She played game with me, but said i never used onlymechanic. In our only game i was town and played almost same and called out for no-reads.
Either Raya have bad memory, or simple used it as excuse.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Right. You definitely did focus on mechanics but you were giving council suggestions. At first it was focused on player experience but I assumed it evolved into reads even if they weren't being shared. You did give some reads later game when prompted. From that point on you seemed to be reading players-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
The PR claimed slot... This either has to be a dumbtell or a townslipIn post 477, osuka wrote: enchant has absolutely braindead takes but i'm not entirely sure that's necessarily ai. willing to exec this slot-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I was never waiting. Like I said, I'm working 7 days a week. I can't be around during the day. I've been posting every evening. I also don't think you're town.In post 546, Major Minor wrote:
This is +cult equity btw. Waiting while the game stalls out and contributing nothing then using the fact the game has stalled out as a cover to vote for town.In post 536, Raya36 wrote:We're getting pretty close to deadline now. My interests are still T3 and Major but I don't see much interest in T3 anymore so I'm going to move over to Major.
VOTE: major
I believe this is E-1 if I counted correctly-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'm gonna just put it out there that I definitely don't believe Enchant wasn't culted but they're right we need to hunt for the CL primarilyIn post 582, Enchant wrote:Well.
1. I was not culted. Even if you doesh't believe me, don't elim me, because i can't be CL.
2. My target was Marky. I somewhat believed he is town, when he tried to push after hammer. Why cult would do that?
3. Idk what to do next.
UmIn post 584, T3 wrote:I think the cop/trackser should out.
Agreed. Flea has been playing much too aggressively and drawing too much attention to be the CL. The CL is someone being more on the careful sideIn post 615, Marky Mark wrote:I also don't think Flea is likely to be CL due to how hard he pushed major D1. too much risk of him getting elimed D2 as a result
VOTE: T3
I still like this read from last day and I don't think it's likely T3 was culted because there was a decent amount of pressure there.
Somewhat v/la, I got a kitten-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Its still expected that you give a good amount of game advancing content as town thoughIn post 635, osuka wrote:
i've said this several times on site but ill say it again: it's not my job to dump my brain on thread. if you want to know something i haven't voluntarily publicized and you don't ask, that's your own problem and your own faultIn post 630, Raya36 wrote:Yeah I could go for Osuka too. They're quite aggressive but really haven't said much. Only really gave clear reads when asked-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
And why couldn't you have done that as scum? Or maybe is was the second option where you as scum realized that it was a scummy thing to sayIn post 638, T3 wrote:
Please look at the timestamps.In post 627, Raya36 wrote:I think there's just more possibilities there. Maybe someone in the cult PT told him that suggesting that was a bad idea so he retracted it. Maybe he realized it was a bad idea to say as cult, in the exact same way he would've realized it was a bad idea as town.
I thought that the other pr should out because I forgot it wasn't melo. Then I thought, hold up, what are the mechanical probabilities of getting CL if the pr outs and went and calculated it.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
You've been after me nonstop but you barely gave any good reason. The "shade" on Enchant is simply just how I post. And even if I was scum I wouldn't have known they were a power role or anything so why shade like that anyway. You can see that I will state my scumreads. I will put little self reminders and thought process statements for anything less than a scumlean.In post 651, Marky Mark wrote:Let's POE this bad boy - who ISN'T likely to be CL?
Enchant almost certainly not due to un CCed claim
Flea as already mentioned was being v aggressive
Dwlee I don't think hammers end of D1 as CL as the wagon would likely have gone through anyways and it feels like uncessesary attention
That leaves Raya / T3 / Osuka / Umlaut - of these, Umlaut felt v town D1
So basically my d1 POE hasn't really changed, except that Raya/T3 have gone up a bit and Osuka has gone down a bit due to being on/off the town wagon respectively
Your main part of my read is that I'm in a bad position on the wagon but you're not even considering my reasoning. Just purely my position? And of course I switched there. T3 had no interest and I gave my reasoning for Major which despite the flip I still think was valid.In post 653, Marky Mark wrote:I'm gonna VOTE: Raya tho largely because of the wagon position on Major and the way she flipped her vote there from T3
Why me? You never gave reasoningIn post 665, T3 wrote:
Replace osuka with Raya and that's where I'm at.In post 664, Dwlee99 wrote:Flea + Marky + Osuka scumteam Osuka cult leader solve SUBMIT-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Enchant was barely a scumread. I already explained why I said what I said. I don't openly state every suspicion I have as a scumread. Sometimes it's better just to prod at someone you might suspect and have them react.In post 669, Marky Mark wrote:
The way you suggested Enchant could be scum without explictly SRing him was different to your interactions with other slots you SRed and I've already pointed this out.In post 666, Raya36 wrote:
You've been after me nonstop but you barely gave any good reason. The "shade" on Enchant is simply just how I post. And even if I was scum I wouldn't have known they were a power role or anything so why shade like that anyway. You can see that I will state my scumreads. I will put little self reminders and thought process statements for anything less than a scumlean.In post 651, Marky Mark wrote:Let's POE this bad boy - who ISN'T likely to be CL?
Enchant almost certainly not due to un CCed claim
Flea as already mentioned was being v aggressive
Dwlee I don't think hammers end of D1 as CL as the wagon would likely have gone through anyways and it feels like uncessesary attention
That leaves Raya / T3 / Osuka / Umlaut - of these, Umlaut felt v town D1
So basically my d1 POE hasn't really changed, except that Raya/T3 have gone up a bit and Osuka has gone down a bit due to being on/off the town wagon respectively
Your main part of my read is that I'm in a bad position on the wagon but you're not even considering my reasoning. Just purely my position? And of course I switched there. T3 had no interest and I gave my reasoning for Major which despite the flip I still think was valid.In post 653, Marky Mark wrote:I'm gonna VOTE: Raya tho largely because of the wagon position on Major and the way she flipped her vote there from T3
Why me? You never gave reasoningIn post 665, T3 wrote:
Replace osuka with Raya and that's where I'm at.In post 664, Dwlee99 wrote:Flea + Marky + Osuka scumteam Osuka cult leader solve SUBMIT
I've also commented on your post where you give your reasons for Major (460) - I get that you justified your vote, although the reasoning felt like a narrative summary of major's interactions. I also get that your vote on major was a compromise from T3, but it is also objectively the penultimate vote on a town wagon, which is frequently a place where scum are found. Ultimately, votes can be justified in a number of ways, but at a basic level of the game, votes on the middle/end of a town wagon have a decent chance of coming from scum. Not always, but frequently.
Doesn't it make sense that it's a bit of a narrative. I did say at the start of the post that I was rereading their iso and then of course wrote down my thoughts in order. Actually I just reread my post and that's not a narrative at all. A narrative would be if I just said stated what they did and then stuck a scumread on. I explained everything I liked and disliked. I didn't state anything they did without giving an opinion along with it.
I get that my vote is more likely to come from scum in wagon structure but you need to look at the reasoning more. Look at my stance on T3. The countdown time when I switched. The chances of T3 actually going through at that time. The activity at the time. There were a lot of factors for why I switched.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Yes they do.. no chance of their convert being stopped. I feel pretty confident in saying cult either recruited you or no recruited. And the fact that you're arguing they have no benefit from recruiting you makes me think you were recruited. But like I said, doesn't matter until we get the CL.In post 676, Enchant wrote:They didn't convert me, because they have no benefit from that.
So I'm going with Osuka is clear. I believe Flea and don't think they would've been recruited since they were quite aggressive. I think cult would have gone for someone more townread but less confrontational. (Outside of going for PR Enchant of course)-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This is where I stand rn
Flea The Magician - Not CL, too aggressive to be CL, too aggressive to have been culted so still town if they were town to begin with
Enchant - Not CL, was rolestopper, now recruited cult
Marky Mark - Unsure, prob just town? Their read on me felt disingenuous but I'm obviously biased so not reading too much into it
T3 - Cult, maybe CL?
Umlaut - Townread
osuka - Cult, maybe CL?
Dwlee99 - Townread
So I think the cult is Enchant, T3, Osuka and one of T3 and Osuka are the leader-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Oops completely forgot the Flea thing while making that list. Let me revise
Flea The Magician - Not CL, too aggressive to be CL, too aggressive to have been culted so still town if they were town to begin with, also claimed tracker
Enchant - Not CL, was rolestopper, now recruited cult
Marky Mark - Unsure, prob justcult? Their read on me felt disingenuous. I also don't think they truly think I'm cult for forgetting the claim and clear.
T3 - Cult, maybe CL?
Umlaut - Townread
osuka - Cleared by Flea.
Dwlee99 - Townread
So I'm thinking cult is Enchant, Marky (CL?), T3 (CL?)-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I actually feel more confident about Marky now that I've fixed my mistake and narrowed the pool down more.
Look at his attack on me.
I'm scummy for not wanting to put someone at E-1 (who ended up being town) and instead went to my second scumread (who now has a good chance of being CL). I think it's pretty normal to not put people at E-1 when it's nowhere near the end of the countdown anyway.
Said I was scummy for not explicitly stating a scumread on Enchant but instead shading them while having a different progression on T3... who is a different person...
He said a large part of his scumread on me was my position on the Major wagon and my switch from T3 to there but he never looked into why I switched and what put me in that position on the wagon.
My main problem is he called my case on Major a narrative. No part of my case was even close to a narrative. I explained my opinion but obviously gave context to what I was explaining. That feels incredibly disingenuous.
When I explained myself for the Enchant scumread, the Major case, and my switch off of T3 he said my explanation makes sense but then continued to scumread me. I just explained why his entire case on me was wrong and he agreed with me, so why is he still scumreading me?
Then we have the post saying that he's still happy with his vote on me because I forgot about the Flea claim and Osuka clear while making my list. I'm not gonna explain myself there. Just think about it..-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
If I TMIed then I would be TMIing town. That's what I meant by think about it at the end of my postIn post 747, Marky Mark wrote:
Forgetting it would be one interpretation. Another would be that you either TMIed or forgot about some scum fakeclaim. Lots of potential reasons why scum could get their facts wrong about the scenarioIn post 742, Raya36 wrote:I also don't think they truly think I'm cult for forgetting the claim and clear.-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Ok so suddenly my case on major isn't bad because it's a narrative. Now it's bad because it's not original. You keep losing things to scumread me for so you make up new ones.In post 748, Marky Mark wrote:And yes, your case on major does involve an element of analysis, but is largely rehashing arguments that had already been made by other players. There was no real fire there-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
How was I playing around the edges? I thought I was quite vocal about my reads. Major was a later read for sure. I got the read the same time I said I'd read their iso and made my case. And major was second to T3, so my heart wasn't fully set on elimming Major. I wanted T3. But Major was still a good compromiseIn post 751, Marky Mark wrote:Ultimately, you'd been playing around the edges D1 and I don't really believe that your heart was in SRing major (or at least not later on in the day). I may not have phrased this in the most articulate manner, but I know when something doesn't feel right
--pedit the pool of 3 you never mentioned in the orginal post but have now conveniently invented
I did mention it. It's at the bottom. T3, Osuka, Enchant. Now T3, you, Enchant-
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-Do you really think cult makes a reads list and accidentally puts the CL as a CL read?? Have you ever as scum accidentally but your teammate as a scumread simply because you know they're scum?In post 754, Marky Mark wrote:
In the post you highlighted earlier you have Osuka as potential CLIn post 750, Raya36 wrote:If I TMIed then I would be TMIing town. That's what I meant by think about it at the end of my post
-Could be they legit are CL and you are cult member and you TMId
-Could be that Flea is town and you just wanted to push Osuka and had forgotten about their result
-Could be that Flea is cult and you forgot that they'd made up a result on Osuka
It's also possible town forgets tracker result here, but its far from the only explanation and you know it, so stop trying to paint it as such
--pedit that's BS ref the case on major and you know it. It's narrative because you are just listing arguments (ie narrating) that have been made by others. Perhaps I could've phrased this better, but we are areguing over semantics here, rather than the actions themselves
-The second one is the correct one to an extent. I forgot Flea's claim. I believe they are town. I forgot about their result. I wanted to push Osuka because I thought Osuka was cult.
It's not the only possibility but it's the most likely. You only gave 2 and the second makes sense for town too and the first makes 0 sense no matter what. I have never seen someone TMI that way.
I didn't list arguments made by others. I'm not going to go through the whole thread and figure out what's original and what's not but it's not like I reread the whole thread and stole other people's arguments. I read Major's iso, I wrote down my thoughts.
-
-
-