with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-08-13 20:45:00).
Last edited by Datisi on Wed Jul 28, 2021 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
Implosion's read is literally "they seem nice enough talking about mech" when I strongly, STRONGLY doubt that is something he's learned to put as a +town behavior playing since 2012.
In post 97, The Coalition wrote:also general suggestion is to use the coalition itself as pressure as it scares scum a lot more to see their name excluded on lists. I had people voting me in the last iteration and it had 0 effect on pressure(I was town tho), but seeing ppl not include my name made me feel pressured to get on.
In post 83, Iverson wrote:I wasn't a fan of Cheeky's posting but she's trying to put out content. I contrast that to Vulture, who instead of giving hasty alignment speculation lingered aimlessly on mechanics.
I already have this hydra as a townlean though, not because of Cheeky but because of Gamma.
Gamma has been tilted out of his mind lately by people not efforting as scum/a rapidfire town getting ahead early. He's learned to play significantly faster paced accordingly in order to avoid this. Here he was content to pop in and leave it to Cheeky; in contrast scumGamma has been of this bizarre mindset that he's the one carrying every game even when he gets flipped Day 1/2 like clockwork.
While I appreciate the sentiment, it’s blatant misinformation that I almost always get eliminated D1/2
Out of 4 recent games where I rolled scum at the start (I had 1 game where I replaced into a doomed scum slot) I was not voted out or caught within the first 2 days in 2 of them, and I had decent endgame equity in both of the games I made it past the beginning in
-G
In post 94, The Coalition wrote:GL reasoning works backwards, starting at "this person is X" and then tries to manufacture reasons for it. I'm not sure where people get townreads on that but its like blatantly scum and I'm vetoing all coalitions with them on it.
Why is it blatantly scum?
Tbh I have a plethora of thoughts on this
-G
In post 94, The Coalition wrote:GL reasoning works backwards, starting at "this person is X" and then tries to manufacture reasons for it. I'm not sure where people get townreads on that but its like blatantly scum and I'm vetoing all coalitions with them on it.
a) where do you see me doing that?
b) Do you disagree with any of my townreads (Iverson, Cheek, Vulture) in my coalition? If not, this is a bizarrely harsh reaction to the fact that I'm scumreading you
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 94, The Coalition wrote:GL reasoning works backwards, starting at "this person is X" and then tries to manufacture reasons for it.
I just re-ISO'd myself and I'm really having a hard time seeing how this could be a genuine interpretation of any of my posts or reasoning that I've given
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
1) I don’t think that’s what GL is doing
2) why so certain about something that is very much a thing townies also do?
3) if 1 is clarified, I could potentially see an issue because while I think in general the action described isn’t AI I think doing it this early would be weird, in a bad way
I'm also not sure I buy the tone progression from "I'm so indecisive lol!" to "GL is blatantly scum and I will veto every coalition with him in it", makes me feel that the former was performative (as I already called out) and the latter is agenda-driven.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
As I said, I'd like you to address which of my reads you think was manufactured from a starting conclusion, and whether you disagree with anyone in my coalition besides me.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
Gamma's scumgame has actually evolved a lot in the past couple months, what may have caught them in the past won't catch them anymore. But him pointing this out himself in response to a townread on him is something that I wouldn't assign to his scumrange
In post 120, The Coalition wrote:everytime someone tries to claim they caught me within the first 5 pages of a game, they've flipped scum so get fucked u got caught early.
this big ol show of bravado won't get you very far with me
p-edit: I feel quite confident on Iverson/Vulture, yeah. Cheek a bit less so but pretty good.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"