with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-08-13 20:45:00).
Last edited by Datisi on Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I think I tend to be liberal with early townreads as both alignments. Probably the way in which my reads evolve over time is a lot more indicative of my alignment though I wouldn't be able to quantify exactly how.
I have a feeling that all of the alts I don't know are going to lead to some of my reads being mediocre but well that's okay I guess.
In post 149, GuiltyLion wrote:Normally I'd agree but I think this setup does discourage early game TMI townreads due to the possibility of autoloss with a correct 5-townblock. I could maybe see scum thinking that handing out key early townreads might buy the towncred needed to get themself into a coalition, but specifically Vulture at that point in particular I'm not sure would have been an attractive slot to TR for towncred.
You do have a point that it wasn't necessarily a strong commitment from Implosion at the time, so I guess we'll see where it goes, but on average I do think people who are more liberal with the townreads early game are going to be more likely town here
ok I MIGHT understand not seeing that GL is howling b4 this point because you don't have the knowledge of my role pM but like ....... this is blatant scummery of planting ideas to subtly suggest one is town. unfortunate for GL, this contradicts also their scumread on me because it shows their uncharitableness. I feel they targeted me in particular because they are very pressured and threatened by my coalition because it is pure and avoids their partner.
In post 154, The Coalition wrote:iverson, even if you don't townread implo yet, at least take the gas off and try elsewhere. I don't think you're SvT at all and definitely not SvS.
This is a little rich considering your stance on GL.
How am I threatened by your coalition when it's literally the same as mine?! Especially when you updated it to match mine after I pressured you to do so + the last one w/ Shelby not making sense?
I suspected you because your early game was lamisty and performative. This new argument of yours doesn't make any sense at all.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
just as an added thought to my previous post, in my experience when scum try to frame me as scum - they'll attack my playstyle primarily, because it is easily framed as scummy. (fact is, I can mimic it nearly perfectly between town/scum so its NAI) - and their insistence about garbage(that yes, is scum indicative for the average scum player who hates playing scum) like "LAMIST" shit is the type of stuff I'd expect scum to try to point out to push what appears to be a reasonable scumread.
In post 154, The Coalition wrote:iverson, even if you don't townread implo yet, at least take the gas off and try elsewhere. I don't think you're SvT at all and definitely not SvS.
I have outed two townreads-one with extended justification, the other denied it by meta-elsewhere while you townread implosion for not being a potato and tunnel GuiltyLion for incoherent nonsense.
If implosion is town all you have to do is get out of the way.
In post 154, The Coalition wrote:iverson, even if you don't townread implo yet, at least take the gas off and try elsewhere. I don't think you're SvT at all and definitely not SvS.
This is a little rich considering your stance on GL.
The uncle shelby/Iverson coalitions are interesting in that they have each other in them plus pretty much the same constituents. Not sure what that means yet.
Iverson appears to be in everyone's wishlist with little effort.
In post 162, The Cheek of Gamma wrote:Just so I understand how this works, we all choose our coalitions then there's a vote of which coalition is best, is that right?
~ C
5 people have to vote the exact same list of 5 people
In post 163, Iverson wrote:My initial list was me+the 4 people below me in the playerlist. I haven't bothered to swap every readchange but Vulture should go in so far.
In post 157, The Coalition wrote:just as an added thought to my previous post, in my experience when scum try to frame me as scum - they'll attack my playstyle primarily, because it is easily framed as scummy. (fact is, I can mimic it nearly perfectly between town/scum so its NAI) - and their insistence about garbage(that yes, is scum indicative for the average scum player who hates playing scum) like "LAMIST" shit is the type of stuff I'd expect scum to try to point out to push what appears to be a reasonable scumread.
I feel like GL is giving you opportunities to explain your stances and you keep shutting him down by avoiding the questions and calling him scum. I don't think he's misrepping/framing you unfairly.
~ C