yeah, keep lying about this. It really makes me glad that I was willing to reconsider.In post 573, MathBlade wrote:Dude has zero interest in hunting.
Who are you town reads? (2nd time I', asking)
yeah, keep lying about this. It really makes me glad that I was willing to reconsider.In post 573, MathBlade wrote:Dude has zero interest in hunting.
Approx two hundred posts old no related topic of discussion.In post 556, Nero Cain wrote:This sorta bothers me though. Don't really get why Math didn't want to be investigated. You just claim you are in a hood with DGB. You might get the "there's prob scum in the hood" suspicion. So Math is being really self conscious here.In post 289, DrippingGoofball wrote:Then MB was concerned about, er, what's that role that checks if you have a PT? He worried that such a role would get a false positive if we were investigated.
Already answered previously.In post 575, Nero Cain wrote:yeah, keep lying about this. It really makes me glad that I was willing to reconsider.In post 573, MathBlade wrote:Dude has zero interest in hunting.
Who are you town reads? (2nd time I', asking)
I can’t search my ISO at workIn post 579, Nero Cain wrote:well i missed it, pls requote or type it again
This is correctIn post 572, MathBlade wrote:M is one of Gamma’s alters iirc from what I spedreadIn post 569, Nero Cain wrote:how are you talking to him?In post 567, Gamma Emerald wrote:M says this conversation ends now.
It's very early in the game - I think this post is on page 12 - reads are still dancing in my head.In post 316, Nero Cain wrote:At any rate, I think DGB voting Math's biggest attacker while calling Math scum kinda stinks.
In post 316, Nero Cain wrote:At any rate, I think DGB voting Math's biggest attacker while calling Math scum kinda stinks.
In post 342, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:If I've got the timeline right, you were already a little bit suspicious of Math when you suggested he do the mason gambit, right?In post 289, DrippingGoofball wrote:One of the first things that were posted in the neighbor PT was MB explaining how he was going to crumb.
To which I answered, why crumb at all, we're not masons. And curiously MB said that if I'm town,it's like we're masons. It took me aback, because no, FMPOV we're totally not masons, not even close.
Then MB was concerned about, er, what's that role that checks if you have a PT? He worried that such a role would get a false positive if we were investigated.
Then a real lot of the thread was MB working me to scum read Nero, starting with Nero highlighting MB's "PR crumb" in the thread. I'm not very good at reading Nero, so I said I wasn't going to do this on Day 1. MB's crumb wasn't exactly subtle for the type of player that looks for crumbs (unlike me, i never see crumbs). It felt like an opportunistic trap a little bit, Nero had fallen into and MB was going for the kill.
At that point I was noticing MB premature-claiming in the thread and that's when I proposed a gambit, since it seemed like the whole neighbor bit was already blowing up in my face through no fault of mine.
In other word I think MB is scum.
Why did you choose to out the gambit? Wouldn't it have helped you figure out Math's alignment if one of you were eventually NK'd?
In post 316, Nero Cain wrote:At any rate, I think DGB voting Math's biggest attacker while calling Math scum kinda stinks.
Yes I was suspicious, I liked the idea that the scum would waste a kill on us thinking we're masons, or be cornered that scum!MB is claiming mason and now they can't kill him, and if they kill me the jig is up.In post 342, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:If I've got the timeline right, you were already a little bit suspicious of Math when you suggested he do the mason gambit, right?In post 289, DrippingGoofball wrote:One of the first things that were posted in the neighbor PT was MB explaining how he was going to crumb.
To which I answered, why crumb at all, we're not masons. And curiously MB said that if I'm town,it's like we're masons. It took me aback, because no, FMPOV we're totally not masons, not even close.
Then MB was concerned about, er, what's that role that checks if you have a PT? He worried that such a role would get a false positive if we were investigated.
Then a real lot of the thread was MB working me to scum read Nero, starting with Nero highlighting MB's "PR crumb" in the thread. I'm not very good at reading Nero, so I said I wasn't going to do this on Day 1. MB's crumb wasn't exactly subtle for the type of player that looks for crumbs (unlike me, i never see crumbs). It felt like an opportunistic trap a little bit, Nero had fallen into and MB was going for the kill.
At that point I was noticing MB premature-claiming in the thread and that's when I proposed a gambit, since it seemed like the whole neighbor bit was already blowing up in my face through no fault of mine.
In other word I think MB is scum.
Why did you choose to out the gambit? Wouldn't it have helped you figure out Math's alignment if one of you were eventually NK'd?
That's me!In post 363, Gamma Emerald wrote:Before I read deeply I just wanna say whoever compelled the other to mason claim is probably town because I’ve only done that as town and in general that’s a huge leap of faith to ask as scum
In post 363, Gamma Emerald wrote:Before I read deeply I just wanna say whoever compelled the other to mason claim is probably town because I’ve only done that as town and in general that’s a huge leap of faith to ask as scum
I will always go along with someone who tries to do that with me.In post 371, House wrote:For future reference, you should totally fakeclaim Mason as town sometime, Math.
It's a gas.
In post 491, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: GammaIn post 415, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Nero
The amount of time it took him to vote DGB is unreal, it’s clear his initial push against the neighborhood was sowing seeds of paranoia.
A big no to these votes.
TBF, I am the one that said they're not Masons, which was based on the amount of waffling and DGB shading that Math was doingIn post 540, Nero Cain wrote:Also, while I don't think the gambit was great or anything Math at least tried to keep it up and WIFOM. DGB hard claiming neighbors in 257 and ending any possibility that they get shot is pretty scummy I feel.
Aren't you at all curious how they figured that out so soon after explicitly stating that they weren't going to read your posts because there's too many of them?In post 555, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay that’s a startIn post 552, Kerset wrote:you are good boy gamma
how do you plan to read House+Nero?
I felt I was being manipulated into scumrrading Nero a bit, but then Nero wasn't helping himself. His more recent rebuttals had the passion of town, thoughIn post 504, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:With leading questions in the hood, like the leading questions scum!you asked me about town!titus in our last game. I was specifically curious if there was anything like that in the PT, but didnt want to lead DGB there myself in case it is scum, and I don't think from its explanation that it is very likely that you led it there.In post 499, MathBlade wrote:In post 496, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Kinda feeling like there's scum on Nero wag.In post 478, Dwlee99 wrote:
House's talk about Nero pushing for a hood lim because Nero is informed of T/T, if anything, could be seen as House's own TMI spewing into the thread in order to frame up Nero on any hood lims or NKs.
If there is scum in the hood, my bet is on Math as DGB's play wrt the gambit aligns with its town meta, and I feel like it's possible that Math manipulated DGB into claimingsomething.
I'm not sure if I buy the outrage about outing Math's crumb, though Math didn't fake outrage in our last game together where hewasscum, so possibly the hood is just t/t. From DGB's description it doesn't sound too much like it was manipulated into claiming, but DGB, if you felt at all like a horse being led to water, let me know. In truth that is what I was looking for, and what I expected to hear, but it seems like this may not be the case, in which case I don't have a case on Math at this time.
Gamma I got a bad feeling about early on and wasn't impressed by that last vote. I think the wagon has been on Nero long enough that if Gamma is scum, now is a good time to get on if Math, DGB, and House are all town. It doesn't look like a bus if Nero flips red, and there's little risk of the wagon dissipating, which means Gamma won't have to move his vote anywhere new anytime soon.
I feel like House or Gamma are the best bets actually, but House being scum is kinda contingent on t/t hood and aside from possible TMI he's seemed town.How would I be manipulating DGB into claiming something?
It’s demonstrated I have a PT with DGB.
The only thing claimed is neighbors.
I did that first and then DGB narrowed it down.
So what manipulation would there be?
I don’t know if you’re just paranoid because of our last game or scum but this doesn’t logically add up
But yes, I am paranoid about you having manipulated DGB inside the hood specifically because of our last game.
I thought she only wasn’t reading you and NeroIn post 590, House wrote:Aren't you at all curious how they figured that out so soon after explicitly stating that they weren't going to read your posts because there's too many of them?In post 555, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay that’s a startIn post 552, Kerset wrote:you are good boy gamma
how do you plan to read House+Nero?
That's fair, tbh.In post 562, Nero Cain wrote:especially when you are arguing that you are a shit town player but you are still bullheaded enough to assume that you are right but I guess that's the difference between us.
In post 545, Kerset wrote:i didn't read nero or house posts, there are too many of them
Oops you're right.In post 592, Gamma Emerald wrote:I thought she only wasn’t reading you and NeroIn post 590, House wrote:Aren't you at all curious how they figured that out so soon after explicitly stating that they weren't going to read your posts because there's too many of them?In post 555, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay that’s a startIn post 552, Kerset wrote:you are good boy gamma
how do you plan to read House+Nero?
I only have like 50-something posts rn
Scum doesn't confbias in singleball because they KNOW who's town and who's not.In post 568, Nero Cain wrote: You have like the worst case of conf biasness ever.