Open 842: Diffusion of Power [Postgame]
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Alright I quickly skimmed everything, random thoughts from my read through:
Ydrasse had literally two posts when you posted this and one was her saying she's town.In post 40, implosion wrote:Anyway. Ydrasse also kinda town i think.
---
I agree with Shirou that the hydra no-signing makes it harder to read, and even after reading morph's justification I'm not sure I totally agree with it. You're still two different people, not sure how it's useful to treat you as one entity when you're going to have different thought processes, etc. But I guess if it never becomes a big deal there's no reason to complain, so I'll respect it.
---
What's your one solid read? I think I missed it if you said it, and at this point int he thread I didn't get any solid vibes at all while skimming through, so this is surprisingIn post 98, morph the cat wrote:For having several player slots posting, the fact that we only have one solid read is kind of concerning. If this were a pool game being played casually at the bar, I'd ask to re-rack and break again because half the balls didn't even move yet on THIS break.
---
Weird vote. Shirou's vote seemed perfectly natural especially that early in the game. While yours feels like it has very flimsy justification, and funnily enough that justification WAS that Shirou had flimsy justification.In post 99, GuiltyLion wrote:
y'all beat me to it this time!In post 35, implosion wrote:No rvs. Only Seriousness.
I don't like this post, it doesn't suggest that you're actually trying to figure out which head is which, and if you're confused you could just ask instead of using it as a motivation for a voteIn post 42, Shirou wrote:I can't read hydras if at least one of the heads doesn't sign
it's page 2 and I'm already confused on what head is posting what
VOTE: morph the cat
VOTE: Shirou
GL's 105 is weird too, feels confbias-y
Later posts from GL don't have this feeling though so maybe I just didn't like his opening.
---
In post 131, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't think I have any actual concerns with Shirou now that he's followed up on stuff and I don't really scumread anyone else actively posting so far
VOTE: numberQ
what's this button doSpoiler:Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
That's mainly what stood out to me while skimming, though my eyes glazed over a few times. I'm on somewhat of a time crunch so if there's something more particular to look at, I can do so later if requested. Early, unrefined reads are the Shirou is leantown, GL is funky but I don't know if he's scummy without brewing on it more, and I feel like I should have a more solid opinion on the hydras but I don't.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Fast game, wee. I haven't read every post since my last one. Just gonna try to spit out some thoughts as they came to me while reading.
This is an interesting thought (that I see has already been scrutinized later in the thread so I won't dwell too much on it). I think there's merit in scumreading self-awareness, scum generally ARE hyper aware of what they're doing, if it looks good, what the implications might be of saying something, etc.
Interested in how claiming confusion over hydras is anything but NAI. Like, I've seen scum fake confusion over the mechanics to appear +town. But over hydra composition?In post 174, Cephrir wrote:
i'm liking shirou a moderate amount. they seem at ease and i don't mean because they're talking about how at ease they are/want to be.In post 148, morph the cat wrote:Ceph what are your page 6 thoughts?
i didn't care for fua's first post.
This answer is +town. The question she's answering is -town.In post 178, Amazonian Legends wrote:
Why do I need an end goal?In post 166, fua wrote:
Just genuinely wondering because I’m confused as to what the end goal of the question is.In post 164, morph the cat wrote:
Why did post 110 in particular need to be poked at?In post 156, fua wrote:
Why ask this?In post 110, Amazonian Legends wrote:Hey GuiltyLion! Still love the avatar.
What do you expect from Ydrasse this game?
--PA
--PAHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I think Ydrasse just breadcrumbed that she's scumIn post 227, Ydrasse wrote:Here is my breadcrumI am a Night Two Doctor
Don't tell anyone if you can figure it outHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
The interaction between Tejate and Ceph from 238 on is pinging me. 238 itself does strike me as a lot of nothing thatcouldbe scum indicative. Ceph calling him out on it though, for some reason I didn't like it even though I generally agreed with the sentiment. And overall I feel like Tejate is coming out of that back and forth looking towny, and Ceph null-scum.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I can sort of see that, mostly the first point. Idk if I've ever seen scum preemptively offer an excuse for not being able to find scum at all, rather than just fake scumhunt and make the excuses later. That if that is what's happening here, 280 certainly fits that narrative with the AtE.In post 275, Cephrir wrote:
expressing confusion is easier than engaging with the game & they offered excuses for not finding scum before even tryingIn post 270, numberQ wrote:Interested in how claiming confusion over hydras is anything but NAI. Like, I've seen scum fake confusion over the mechanics to appear +town. But over hydra composition?Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I don't know what to make of this. There are reasons to vote Ceph but in context this doesn't look like anything but OMGUS.
pedit: Which post is he ignoring the context of? Your intro about hydra confusion?Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I mean you literally quoted me a few posts back giving a reason to vote you. This is honestly such a strange reactionIn post 288, Cephrir wrote:
Are there? Because you've failed to provide any.In post 286, numberQ wrote:There are reasons to vote Ceph
VOTE: CephrirHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I called you null-scum. How is that the opposite of a reason?In post 294, Cephrir wrote:
I did quote 273 wherein you express suspicion of me. However, I don't think anything in that post constitues a reason. If anything you posted the opposite of a reason to suspect me.In post 292, numberQ wrote:
I mean you literally quoted me a few posts back giving a reason to vote you. This is honestly such a strange reactionIn post 288, Cephrir wrote:
Are there? Because you've failed to provide any.In post 286, numberQ wrote:There are reasons to vote Ceph
VOTE: Cephrir
When you say "timeline" do you just mean the sequence of events in the thread? I'm not sure what's weird about it.In post 301, Tejate Raichu wrote:I just got back after an extended F5 break so I still need to sort out my thoughts, but man this timeline is looking... very weird so far. I'm still not sure I fully understand fua's logic here. How exactly was Ceph "overexplainy"? And why are you tying our alignments together? The most major interaction we've had so far is me asking him if he has anything that stood out for discussion since I felt like post 172/173 were pretty weak threads but I couldn't find much else.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
The reason I have that read is because I looked at your posts and they made me think, "that guy is null-scum". Idk what you're implying by bringing up my join date, but if anything it means I'm comfortable trusting my gut and the general vibes I get even if I don't always put it into exact words. And judging from this interaction that was driven by me acting on my gut, I also feel pretty comfortable saying it's working.In post 312, Cephrir wrote:
it's a readIn post 304, numberQ wrote:I called you null-scum. How is that the opposite of a reason?
a reason would be why you have that read
your join date is in 2011 come onHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I want to TR Tejate because he does seem earnest. Plus I don't see S/S in Tejate + Ceph, and currently I like Ceph for scum. But I feel like Tejate isn't, I don't know, rocking the boat at all? I guess you don't have to do that to be town, but when I read most of his posts it feels kind of narrow and flat. I'm not seeing anything that makes me think "oh yeah, he's trying to pursue lines of thought and look for new angles to solve from".
Should probably re-ISO him but I'm out of time tonight, likely won't be on again until tomorrow.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I'm curious how Shirou and fua view each other after that exchange. Maybe I'm mistaken but none of that looked like attempts to solve the game state or sort each other's alignment. Shirou's questioning was very directed so I have to imagine he got something out of it, and he even said he was satisfied with the answers he got.
So my question more explicitly is, do either of you lean more town or scum on the other after that conversation?Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Do you think the interactions between me and Ceph that resulted from this accusation are AI at all?In post 366, Tejate Raichu wrote:
Do not like this post. At all. I understand trying to read intent through wording, but what about Ceph's wording here was weird? Even I admit that I was shooting myself in the foot last night by letting LAMIST slip through more than actual town play. It was hardly a push, let alone an argument, so why is this perceived as AI?In post 273, numberQ wrote:The interaction between Tejate and Ceph from 238 on is pinging me. 238 itself does strike me as a lot of nothing thatcouldbe scum indicative. Ceph calling him out on it though, for some reason I didn't like it even though I generally agreed with the sentiment. And overall I feel like Tejate is coming out of that back and forth looking towny, and Ceph null-scum.
239 and 243 are not the kind of push I expect scum to give their buddy. It's such a ridiculous argument imo, to call someone out for putting their thoughts in the thread. And then your 244, particularly you apologizing if you're coming off as scum trying to seem active - I do not think that's scum talking to scum. Ceph never actually used those words, you conjured up that "scum trying to seem active" phrase yourself. I'm trying to picture scum read their buddy call them out the way Ceph did, and then thinking to themselves that putting those words in their buddy's mouth is a good idea. I just can't see it.
Again, I'm not sure what gives nQ the impression that it's not S/S? Like, yes, statistically speaking if you take any two random players the chances of it being two scum are low, but what exactly is giving them this impression that a scum!Ceph means that town!Me is likely? Once again, I would like to emphasize that so far myself and Ceph have barely interacted, and our interaction so far was mainly because we both happened to be on the thread at the same time. As much as I'd love to take this townread and go, this argument genuinely pings me as strange. I wouldIn post 323, numberQ wrote:I want to TR Tejate because he does seem earnest. Plus I don't see S/S in Tejate + Ceph, and currently I like Ceph for scum. But I feel like Tejate isn't, I don't know, rocking the boat at all? I guess you don't have to do that to be town, but when I read most of his posts it feels kind of narrow and flat. I'm not seeing anything that makes me think "oh yeah, he's trying to pursue lines of thought and look for new angles to solve from".
Should probably re-ISO him but I'm out of time tonight, likely won't be on again until tomorrow.reallylike some elaboration.
---
Anyway I started writing this post like, 3 hours ago and then got pulled away from the computer before I could finish. Haven't read anything since then, gonna try to catch back up now.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Shirou is asking Tejate a lot of leading questions and it all just strikes me as very weird. It ultimately culminates here where he outlines what ostensibly SHOULD have been the pro scum strat. But I don't buy it, I certainly didn't catch onto what Shirou was expecting to hear, and I'd be interested in knowing if anyone else did. Is there anymore clarity in anyone's Tejate read after this - and that question is for Shirou as well? Even if Tejate HAD given that extremely specific answer, I have my doubts that it would have actually helped sort him.
---
This point is valid particularly with daytalk in the setup. Scum will be coordinated and it seems unlikely they'd plan this kind of half-baked wagon attempt, especially so early in the game.In post 434, implosion wrote:
This is also kind of weird. I feel like scum if anything will try to haveIn post 404, fua wrote:
It’s because you have no interactions with each other and yet pray to the reach gods to try to fabricate a reason to scumread me within less than a page of one another. But that’s just why I think you could be paired even outside of you both individually being scum.In post 402, GuiltyLion wrote:
is this because of any specific interactions between us, or just because we are both voting youIn post 362, fua wrote:I can see implosion and GL as a scum pairing.differentreads from each other. I feel like if I were scum and saw a scumbuddy fabricate a scumread on player X the last thing I would do is then go "hm, i should also fabricate a scumread on player X".
And there's plenty of players that I at least have not interacted with at all.
---
What do you mean by "solo player"?In post 465, morph the cat wrote:I think fua's play has solo player written all over it.
---
There's a whole fua vs GL exchange in there that I don't have my thoughts sorted on yet. At multiple times throughout reading it I thought both players were either alignment. I kind of want to just throw it in the TvT bin and be done with it but that feels like a mistake.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Decided to ISO Ceph and maybe it's confbias but I'm seeing scum motivation behind a lot of his posting. Here's a wall about it.
This is where his ISO starts to look funky. I already commented that I wasn't sure how fua's first post was AI, since it was entirely about being confused by the hydrae. Both Ceph himself and morph have indicated this is possibly a valid reason to not care for an entrance, but I still think it's nothing. As town, I've been confused/frustrated by hydrae before.In post 174, Cephrir wrote:
i'm liking shirou a moderate amount. they seem at ease and i don't mean because they're talking about how at ease they are/want to be.In post 148, morph the cat wrote:Ceph what are your page 6 thoughts?
i didn't care for fua's first post.
But even if you don't agree with any of that, just look at the other major point of this post. Ceph claims to like Shirou, despite him ALSO complaining about hydra stuff in his opening post.
To be absolutely fair, Ceph gave these opinions in response to a direct question about his thoughts on page 6, and Shirou's opening post didn't happen on page 6. So in a vacuum, this point is bullshit. But in context with the rest of Ceph's ISO I can't help but see it as suspicious.
After this, Ceph proceeds to pocket Shirou with 207 and 223.
239 begins his interaction with Tejate that I've talked about extensively already, and which initially turned me on to him as a SR.
And this (plus the rest of the discussion he had with me after this) helped me solidify the SR. He oscillated between disproportionately hostile and dismissive.In post 288, Cephrir wrote:
Are there? Because you've failed to provide any.In post 286, numberQ wrote:There are reasons to vote Ceph
Hostile: 288, 312
Dismissive: 277, 294, 296 (actually a response to fua)
Hostile AND dismissive: 324
Note how nowhere in there is a single actual refutation of my read, just consistently saying that I have no reason to come after him. My reasoning at the time was of course mostly gut based. But then why have that kind of reaction to it? It's not scummy to have an emotional reaction and it's not scummy to argue against a scumread on you. What's scummy is the dissonance between them in Ceph's posting here.
I've been in games where reads are impossible to feel good about all the way up to like, D3 or 4. This post feels like he's misconstruing this game as one of them. At a stage where people are starting to put out reads and leans, even tentative ones, here Ceph is giving a reason why he might not be able to. And then of course, he does not for the rest of his ISO. This is also +scum - he's been in several interactions and debates, but his only takeaway is that "everyone is scum"?In post 379, Cephrir wrote:it's weird, i went to bed feeling like no one was scum and have woken up thinking everyone is scum.
pedit: "He's maybe a little focused on some specific people" - great timing for me to come out with a wall about a single personHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Yeah in a vacuum I'm unsure about Shirou. But that's all it is, uncertainty. I'm willing to TR him by association with my SR on Ceph.In post 547, Ydrasse wrote:
ummm sooooIn post 546, numberQ wrote:After this, Ceph proceeds to pocket Shirou with 207 and 223.
i voted you because i felt like you were working towards a potential shirou vote with your posts like. 509 you're saying you don't buy what shirou's saying, you're doubtful, it's felt like a theme in your iso where you're unsure about shirou. so why are you confident then that this is ceph pocketing?Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
But like,In post 551, Shirou wrote:
How come youIn post 509, numberQ wrote:Shirou is asking Tejate a lot of leading questions and it all just strikes me as very weird. It ultimately culminates here where he outlines what ostensibly SHOULD have been the pro scum strat. But I don't buy it, I certainly didn't catch onto what Shirou was expecting to hear, and I'd be interested in knowing if anyone else did. Is there anymore clarity in anyone's Tejate read after this - and that question is for Shirou as well? Even if Tejate HAD given that extremely specific answer, I have my doubts that it would have actually helped sort him.didn'tget my point in that post to be honest...?
If Tejate had said "I wouldn't have tried to stop people tying up our slots together", I would have throw him a solid town lean as long as Cephrir didn't flip scum at some point. Since he failed to show me he would be aware of the mistake of trying to stop the fake associative as scum, I didn't change my mind on his slot that much after the exchange, still kinda neutral on him.
I explained all of the above on that post itself, I understand how you can disagree with my logic and think it's a stretch or that it doesn't help on anything to you/other players, but I surely can't understand how after reading that post you didn't understandhowit would have helpedmyread on him at least as you seem to imply?
This feels like you decided you should shade me here so you proceeded to doing it even if the reasoning feels like a bit of a stretch.
I asked some questions, had a reason to ask said questions, and explained my motivation on trying to obtain that reason. How come you think it wasthatweird? I think this isn't the first time you shade one of my posts with some generic words without going too much in-depth about it.whywould that answer have made you townlean him? If you're attributing his lack of awareness of that strategy to him being newb, why can't he be newb scum? Is there something I'm missing from your explanation? It's weird because in my eyes it just amounts to nothing, but there was a lot of effort behind it anyway.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
How do you have anything but null on imaginality?In post 561, morph the cat wrote:[snip]
not enough data to make an educated guess, but kinda scum-leaning tea, and kinda townleaning imaginalityHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
tbh though you probably should pile on me, I think I do my best work under pressure.In post 585, Ydrasse wrote:like also
"town parade on numberq"
no read on numberq given
do you think that town's all going to pile on numberq and be wrong then or is numberq scum who town's going to get right
if it's the first why haven't you said anything/tried to soothe things a bit and if it's the second do you think i feel a need to bus this early on
why even anticipate a pile-on at allHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
If you saw my suspicion towards Ceph as swerving then idk what to tell you.In post 604, Ydrasse wrote:because from my pov
it feels like number is doing the like frog in boiling water heating it up slowly to end up on a shirou vote because of all the commentary/focus, it's not the only thing but it feels apparent 2 me
and then it's just like swerving around to jump onto someone else and crashing through the setupHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
@Ydrasse, I really don't think I put as much focus on Shirou as you're saying I did, until very recently when we argued over his questioning of Tejate. My "backing off" was more a function of my Ceph SR implying a Shirou TR, not as much based on my misunderstanding of his logic. And misunderstanding or no I still don'treallysee how that line of questioning could have lead him to a townlean, regardless of alignment. You're acting like I can only question my scumreads.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I feel like I'm being gaslighted lmao. Did I ever actually call Shirou scum? I'm pretty sure I didn't and I just poked through my own ISO to confirm, in case I had a thought like that which I may have forgot. Doesn't look like that's the case. Even in 509 where I started to question what he was doing, it's literally just that - questioning what he's doing, because I didn't understand it and I wasn't sure what to think of it. Earlier I even gave him a tentative townlean. So unless you can point out where I ever said I SRed Shirou and it was anything other than confusion, you're just putting words in my mouth.In post 622, Ydrasse wrote:
when i read through your iso it felt like there was a lot of questioning or like, "why do this"/"what gain from it" but it wasn't quite like a fos but sort of just... a presence. so seeing it sort of be sidelined to fit into a new narrative is ??? to me, even if it's not 'new' but like... a more forward one. if that makes sense. like. "this is the case i am sending out to people on ceph."In post 620, numberQ wrote:@Ydrasse, I really don't think I put as much focus on Shirou as you're saying I did, until very recently when we argued over his questioning of Tejate. My "backing off" was more a function of my Ceph SR implying a Shirou TR, not as much based on my misunderstanding of his logic. And misunderstanding or no I still don'treallysee how that line of questioning could have lead him to a townlean, regardless of alignment. You're acting like I can only question my scumreads.
and i am not doing that lol
~
tbh i think some of my issue with how you treated the shirou stuff was i guess... hmm
why do you think shirou approaches solving/reading someone like that as scum if he's capable of building a narrative of like, reading through psychology/asking tejate "imagine you're this alignment, etc"? because if people see it and believe it to be genuine, i guess like...
what do you think the gain is through faking that versus a more 'traditional' questioning that could resonate more easily with people?
beyond just like "well people are townreading him now so clearly it's working"Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I don't think inno results should be outed as soon as day starts, but they shouldn't be held super close to the chest. At least wait until/if that person starts getting some heat, but I don't think it needs to be held until they get to E-1 or something.In post 631, Shirou wrote:
?In post 626, implosion wrote:innos when relevant
I think that cops should always claim results here, even if it's only an inno?
Everyone is 1-shot so we aren't losing anything other than "hiding them from scum kills", but like, I don't want to write a wallpost here but basically it's not really that much of an issue even if they kill the inno given it would likely be someone that is a former suspect?
Forcing an inno to get nightkilled sounds way better to me than risking someone been cleared before but no one knowing it because the cop died at a night later before saying it.
I guess we can "crumb results" but...I don't know. I think it's obvious by now but I'm not a fan of crumbing, to the point I don't bother looking for crumbs even when I'm scum.
pedit: I think I'm saying the same thing implo just did
ppedit: in 634Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I wasn't really saying we should let cops skate by the entire day without claiming. I do think it should happen the day after the result is received. I just contested that it had to happen RIGHT at daystart.In post 637, Shirou wrote:eh
if I was scum I would love that opinion of yours
being able to claim later on "oh btw I'm cop and my inno is a dead guy from ages ago" is too much of a convenient fakeclaim here
There's barely any difference between claiming innos as soon as day start, and "waiting" to claim innos for town (when you consider the risk of the cop dying without ever saying someone was cleared, in fact it sounds like a swingy strategy)
However there certainly is a lot of benefit for scum to be able to hold on claiming until later. You want to make scum claim as soon as possible in this setup in my opinion. If you leave it all for when we massclaim, scum can fakeclaim whatever is the most convenient to counter our results by then.
This is probably a take we should give our opinions on. Everyone should comment on whether they are in favor or against cops claiming the innos as soon as day start.
I'm infavor. I want to lock scum to their claims as soon as humanly possible.
However, after reading your next post, I do see what you're saying about making it risky for scum cop claims. Let me think about this.
Pros for letting cops hold onto their info, as long as they out it that day at some point:
- conversation can progress naturally without immediately being dominated by a cop result
- gives a chance for further scum interactions with the innocent party before everyone knows they're innocent
Pros for forcing cops to out inno results at daystart:
- forces scum to make a choice and be accountable to it
Though I technically havemorepros in the "let them wait" list, maybe the pro in the "force them to claim" list outweighs both of the other ones. Also maybe I'm not thinking of every pro.
Take away claim space, what?fua wrote:Oh no, I'm actually a cop. I just want to take away claim space.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
What's LHF?In post 667, fua wrote:Anyway, I would suggest healing someone that's more widely TRed instead of me. Forcing scum to kill me and closing off space for them to claim in the future by confirming myself (LHF) as town is a good move, especially since it means one townie is confirmed right out the gate.
So are you saying you don't think either plan gives us better chances?In post 670, implosion wrote:
Like yeah, they're not. Neither is the one point on the other side. Scum will have to make a choice and be accountable for it at some point. That is... how the game of mafia works.In post 662, numberQ wrote:eh yeah on reflection I don't think the two points in the "let them wait" list are THAT important. I'm for the plan I think.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I don't think your cop claim puts as big a target on your back as you're saying, in a setup with at least 4 cops in it.In post 677, fua wrote:Low hanging fruit. I'm an easy target for a mislim.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I misread what you were saying then. Though what I said before about there being 4 cops also applies here. EVERYONE will claim cop or doc, and on D1 no one has a result to back it up. Why would you claiming cop now be any different from you claiming cop at E-1? I can't imagine any scenario where we don't ignore you either way.In post 683, fua wrote:
Obviously I'm not LHF anymore since I claimed cop.In post 681, numberQ wrote:
I don't think your cop claim puts as big a target on your back as you're saying, in a setup with at least 4 cops in it.In post 677, fua wrote:Low hanging fruit. I'm an easy target for a mislim.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
What towncred are you getting though? That's my point.In post 690, fua wrote:Have you never put your ducks in a row and singled out potential miselims to push as scum? By taking one of those away and putting that fat towncred on myself I remove some of their power and give town time to talk about the events preceding my alignment and role reveal.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Thanks for the input. Not what (or who) I was asking though.In post 704, Cephrir wrote:
well, there is the towncred they're getting from being obviously town on these last 2 pages, does that helpIn post 692, numberQ wrote:
What towncred are you getting though? That's my point.In post 690, fua wrote:Have you never put your ducks in a row and singled out potential miselims to push as scum? By taking one of those away and putting that fat towncred on myself I remove some of their power and give town time to talk about the events preceding my alignment and role reveal.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I think it's a NAI thought process but fair enough I guess.In post 707, fua wrote:
Being town and explaining my thought process behind the claim.In post 692, numberQ wrote:
What towncred are you getting though? That's my point.In post 690, fua wrote:Have you never put your ducks in a row and singled out potential miselims to push as scum? By taking one of those away and putting that fat towncred on myself I remove some of their power and give town time to talk about the events preceding my alignment and role reveal.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Yeah I can see what you're seeing in those posts. All I can say is I didn't SR him at those times, and was more poking at something I didn't understand to see if IIn post 718, Ydrasse wrote:also @numberq i was correlating 270 + 509 as scumreading because you were like vibing with the vote on shirou and then the language u used was doubtful (not buying) vs just like questioning
no i will not link these posts on mobileshouldSR him.
At the moment I think he's in the top half of my reads list. I still want to go back and try and grok his interaction with Tejate, but regardless of that I think the way he reacted to my questioning of him over it was more town than not. It was consistent and had a clear thought process behind it, at least.
\In post 742, morph the cat wrote:
For what it's worth, it's a very high confidence read for us. I'll be very surprised if they leave our "Utterly Town, never elim this" pile. We'd love to have 4 more reads of that strength, or even four more in that plus the second tier combined before the day ends.In post 738, Shirou wrote:Ah, also I guess unless they're scum together (which wouldn't be that weird considering their openings), I should probably trust Morph read on Amazon for now. Even if they were wrong on it at the moment, as long as they are alive they will likely correctly sort out Amazon correctly. If they die...well, we can cross that bridge when we get there.
fua's headed in that direction.
Can you elaborate on your high conf TR here? Skimmed your ISO but I don't think I saw anything to this effect, and based on your familiarity with each other I suspect it's mostly meta.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I don't think morph's 753 tracks with the meta read claim. If open games aren't either of your cups of tea, then idk how you're getting such a strong meta read in this open game as to put them in the "forever town" category. I play differently enough in the different queues (or at least I think I do) that I'd consider it difficult for someone to meta me THAT strongly across them.
idk though, feels like that thought is meshing with Ceph because of 766 and that gives me pause. Maybe I'm paranoidHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
It was really the assuredness of the read that pinged me. It's not that I wouldn't consider it at all, just find it odd that you'd lock it down so hard when there are plenty of dependent variables that could be affecting meta. Or maybe I mean independent variables, I'm not a scientist lolIn post 793, morph the cat wrote:
The game type makes little difference in the kind of meta I analyze and I feel that's the case for Cabd, too. And I don't think either Tammy or Peng are much more into open games than we are. We're reading them a meta lens on the basis of their interactions with us and with other players.In post 780, numberQ wrote:I don't think morph's 753 tracks with the meta read claim. If open games aren't either of your cups of tea, then idk how you're getting such a strong meta read in this open game as to put them in the "forever town" category. I play differently enough in the different queues (or at least I think I do) that I'd consider it difficult for someone to meta me THAT strongly across them.
idk though, feels like that thought is meshing with Ceph because of 766 and that gives me pause. Maybe I'm paranoid
Why is setup type a big factor to you in meta? Big enough that you wouldn't consider deep experience with a player because of setup type?
I feel that knowing exactly what roles and mechanics are in the setup drastically alters my way of thinking compared to not knowing, such as in a theme or something. It's possible that's not the case for everyone though, I guess.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I don't think I know what that means. Are you talking about games from 2020? wild if truemorph the cat wrote:
Counterpoint: 2020 scum teams still exist two years later.In post 804, numberQ wrote:My take is that we shouldn't lim any of the inactive slots today. This isn't a game suffering for activity, so unless we think all 3 scum are lurking then I don't see an upside to basing wagons on activity.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
whatIn post 807, implosion wrote:My take is that we shouldn't lim any of the active slots today. This isn't a game suffering for inactivity, so unless we think all 3 scum are active then I don't see an upside to basing wagons on inactivity.
Are you trying to make a point? Because I can explain why having more activity to read from is better than having less activity to read from if you need me to.
I feel like that happened in the Trust Fall game I modded a little bit ago. What makes that the better route to take when deciding wagons on D1 though?morph the cat wrote:A "2020 scumteam" is a mafia faction that rolls over and dies due to analytical paralysis and inability to keep up.
It's been seen quite a bit on site over the past few years.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I don't know why this game in particular I keep getting misunderstood or misrepresented or whatever, but I did not say we should categorically not lim less active slots. I said I would rather lim a more active slot because it's day 1. What is limming imag, nsg, or redtea going to tell us about the rest of the gamestate? This early on, I'm more interested in voting a scummy slot who has actually interacted with other slots and might give us some associations day 2. And let's say we do wagon inactive scum. Then the rest of the team has carte blanche to bus their buddy and get sweet towncred. Whereas with an active slot, bussing is a lot harder and there can be clearer lines drawn after the flip irrespective of alignment.In post 816, implosion wrote:nQ my point is half that I think it’s silly to categorically not lim less active slots and half to be snarky.
I'm just saying there is more than likely scum amongst the semi-to-very active players, so even if there's also scum in the inactive players, why should we focus there on day 1?
I think it's pretty obvious what I meant here. I don't know if you're misrepping on purpose or I'm just chronically not clear this game. Benefit of the doubt that it's the latter: If you look at the rest of the context of that discussion, you'll see I'm advocating that we not use inactivity as a reason to wagon someone this early in the game. Plus the above response to implosion.Tejate Raichu wrote:Ah, low hanging fruit makes sense. Well, it is an early day 1 list. I can assure you people will be moving as the game progresses.
As for the matter of nQ, I feel like my thoughts remain largely unchanged. Even some recent posts ping me as... egh.
This one makes little sense to me. We shouldn't base wagons on activity, therefor we shouldn't eliminate the inactive slots? Isn't thatIn post 804, numberQ wrote:My take is that we shouldn't lim any of the inactive slots today. This isn't a game suffering for activity, so unless we think all 3 scum are lurking then I don't see an upside to basing wagons on activity.basing wagons off of activity?Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
It's less a townbin and more of a nullbin, but sure, I agree for the most part. We should certainly be trying to get info out of them. Maybe I was wrong to use the word wagon, because I do think wagons are pretty much always a good thing for a healthy town. But people were saying these slots should be today's lim, which is what I disagree with.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I'm back. Feeling better about mafia than I was a few days ago. I'll be playing catch up while working on some stuff around the house for the next few hours. I'll try to sequentially read all 20-30 pages I missed, but my ability to retain information will probably die a few pages in. So I might switch to an ISO centric catch up.
If there's anything anyone feels I should pay particular attention to, let me know.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Alright, housework took longer than expected but I did start to catch up. Made it to the end of page 42 before my eyes started to glaze over. Brief summary of my notes so far:
---
GL looks town on page 35/36 where he SRs me, though I tend to TR people who build cases against me. But I'm seeing a town perspective from his analysis.
---
Ceph has not been pinging my radar nearly as much, in either direction. His posting feels less directed than it did back when I was pressing him. I have very few notes about him up to page 42, except for his post 897 where he is very waffley on GL. And he says GL's page 35/36 posting "treads into eyeglaze territory" and somehow that's a scumtell?
Also I do not think it's scummy to park my vote without pushing for the slot to be limmed. I think it was GL who said that? I didn't actually note it down, just remembering it now as I type this summary. My vote doesn't always mean I'm going to actively push them, especially if activity surrounding the voted slot dies down and my attention is drawn elsewhere.
---
implosion pinged me enough that I made a TODO to ISO him. Particularly, posts 906 and 907 do not strike me as town motivated. And then the vote in 908 does not vibe with the other two at all.
---
redtea is extremely blase and has posted almost nothing of worth. Does scum do that so blatantly? <- literally the exact line in my notes, and literally the entirety of my redtea thoughts up to page 42
---
The only posts from imaginality I saw that had anything close to scumhunting in it was 938 and maybe 928, both of which are very light touches. That pinged me enough to put a TODO to ISO him as well. I also noted down that AL's 949 puts into words some of my pingy thoughts on imag.
---
Shirou did It™ again, and I'm starting to think It™ is a playstyle thing that just rubs me the wrong way. First It™ was having a magical method to extract a read out of Tejate based on a very specific and obscure series of questions. Then It™ was post 978, where he was some magical way to observe a read from imaginality posting on his own like a goddamn nature documentarian observing giraffes in their natural habitat or something.
But outside of It™, his engagement with others has been in depth and probing, with what I think is a clear town perspective. It's just those It™ instances that I cannot grok at all. So I'm inclined to say I just don't get It™ and should use his non-It™ posting to read him.
---
Anyway this is obviously incomplete. Next I'm going to ISO implo, imag, and redtea and see if I can use those to follow threads throughout the remaining 20 pages I haven't read, hopefully can do that tonight. But a post-by-post catchup of ~500 posts will probably fry my brain so I don't think THAT will be happening tonight.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I don't know, I still need to do those ISOs I hoped to do last night. Though from skimming through redtea's today, they do seem to start actually playing after the point I stopped reading. Have not looked at imaginality at all. Expect more thoughts on redtea v imag in the next few hours probably.In post 1545, Shirou wrote:I'm interested to see what Ceph will decide here
@numberQ, you seem kinda whatever/neutral on redtea while kinda suspicious of some imaginality's posts. Are you willing to vote him in a redtea vs imaginality dilemma?
I don't have a feel for the current gamestate except that there's something between you and redtea. How does implosion factor into that? Why do I need to prove myself town to you, and how does an implo vote do that?In post 1547, imaginality wrote:I'll vote redtea if it does come down to redtea or me, of course, but currently I would rather see implosion or numberQ limmed and I think there's time for that to happen.
numberQ's iso has a lot of caveats, to-dos and minor questions. He backed off his early suspicion of Cephrir. I'm not seeing anything strikingly towny in his posts.
He can prove himself town by voting implosion with me though - how about it, numberQ?Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Starting with redtea because they have the least amount of posts of the three I wanted to pay more attention to. Beware, I quote a couple of long posts unabridged in here.
Spoiler: redtea posts that interested me
Overall thoughts: redtea started out very fluffy, which gave me town vibes of not caring. This can be easy to fake as scum however, so I think you sort that by looking at how they continue to play throughout the game. The rest of redtea’s ISO sees them caring a little more than their first 20 or so posts - the fluff gets cut down, but it’s replaced with very minor reads and light analysis. I struggle to see the perspective behind many of their posts, especially the ones where they’re trying.
But I keep coming back to the thought I had originally, which was - is scum this blatantly superficial? There were moments where I felt scum!redtea could have faked more thoughts, like with the mech analysis thing at the end of the spoiler. If this is scum then they’re either really struggling to fake reads in a game that has plenty of bait to do so, or they’re trying really really hard to look like town that doesn’t care.
(I’m going to hold off any explicit reads until I finish at least the imaginality ISO and probably some snooping in Shirou’s as well, since some recent posts indicate that may be important to sorting redtea.)Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
Hmm. From any perspective but yours the exact same thing can be said about you. If I help get you limmed and you flip scum, then it's unlikely I'm bussing there either. This argument is only helpful to anyone who has you as locktown I think, which is not me.In post 1553, imaginality wrote:
If you help get implosion limmed today and he flips scum it would be extremely unlikely you were bussing him, considering how easily you (if scum) can get away with encouraging or acquiescing to mislimming me instead.In post 1552, numberQ wrote:
I don't have a feel for the current gamestate except that there's something between you and redtea. How does implosion factor into that? Why do I need to prove myself town to you, and how does an implo vote do that?In post 1547, imaginality wrote:I'll vote redtea if it does come down to redtea or me, of course, but currently I would rather see implosion or numberQ limmed and I think there's time for that to happen.
numberQ's iso has a lot of caveats, to-dos and minor questions. He backed off his early suspicion of Cephrir. I'm not seeing anything strikingly towny in his posts.
He can prove himself town by voting implosion with me though - how about it, numberQ?
I think implosion has a better chance of flipping scum than redtea and I'm wary that people are trying to make this an imaginality vs redtea dilemma when there's still time to coalesce around a better option.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
I think that a day's discussion gradually moving towards two competing wagons is natural and happens quite often. imaginality, are you seeing a particular agenda behind Shirou and GL pushing this "imaginality vs redtea" narrative? It just feels weird to attack the entire construct itself and use that as a main point in wanting people to vote implosion (not the only point, but it seems to be factoring heavily into your case)
Looks like the day's lim is between redtea and imaginality, this makes imaginality paranoid. Beyond that I'm still catching up myself.In post 1579, Ydrasse wrote:i’m still super sick and haven’t followed has anything important happenedHey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
If the people pushing for you v redtea are scum, then that's most of the scumteam already since I think you pointed out Shirou and GL as being part of that group. And if you think implosion is also scum then that's the whole team. Maybe I'm misreading the numbers you're putting out but if I'm not, then redtea should be townbinned by POE alone. But redtea is instead +town because of a bussing argument?imaginality wrote:
This is in the context of a post talking about people who are pushing for/okay with me v redtea. I'm saying if redtea is scum as well as the people narrowing it down/letting it drift to a 1v1, I think they might more likely have been keen to keep other names open as possible D1 lims, unless they're confident they can get me limmed over redtea.In post 1584, GuiltyLion wrote:
Wait lmao good catch, "if they're scum as well"In post 1582, fua wrote:> That's part of why redtea looks a bit better to me now, because I think if they're scum as well, scum would be keeping more names in the mix unless they're pretty sure of getting me mislimmed over redtea.
This also feels like a perspective slip.Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
The two unsnipped portions are a contradiction no? You see no reason for scumreading redtea but then later you say lurkers with meh content are usually just scum. Unless you think redtea has more than meh content.In post 1589, Cephrir wrote:[snip]
i'm coming into this feeling like voting imaginality after some distance from the thread. my memory is full of holes but when i think about reasons to vote for imaginality im like "the scummy stuff he posted" and when i think about reasons to vote for redtea i'm like,,,, morph said so???? maybe i need to reread their posts on the subject or the pages i'm rereading will move me but i don't really get it at the moment.
[snip]
sometimes. i have bought into the school of thought that lurkers with meh content are actually just scum a shocking percentage of the time in the current meta. it's disappointing, but true. naturally, it's not going to happen every time.In post 1433, Shirou wrote:Also Ceph, why are you sheeping Morph like that when you don't town read them?
Do you really think Imaginality accepting all the votes on him and being like "my elimination is okay as long as we get the most information out of it" is less scummy than...redtea's ISO lacking much content?
Let me ask you
How many times have you seen a lurky slot that doesn't have much content in their ISO being just limbait and flipping town?
[snip]Hey!-
-
numberQ he/himMafia Scumhe/him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him