I'm not!In post 167, Jacket wrote:Yeah, Vanderscamp is just scum here.
What do you think I've said is scummy?
I'm not!In post 167, Jacket wrote:Yeah, Vanderscamp is just scum here.
It feels inauthentic.In post 175, Vanderscamp wrote:I'm not!In post 167, Jacket wrote:Yeah, Vanderscamp is just scum here.
What do you think I've said is scummy?
There's not too much I can say to this other than that you're wrong, happy to answer any actual questions you have for me though.In post 176, Jacket wrote:It feels inauthentic.In post 175, Vanderscamp wrote:I'm not!In post 167, Jacket wrote:Yeah, Vanderscamp is just scum here.
What do you think I've said is scummy?
weren't people calling bugs scummy? and do you have an opinion on those players? (or like, anyone not named shiki)In post 171, Dorsey wrote:Only players I haven't seen really criticized are bugspray and Cape (other than Looker's hate crime)
I also have Cape as light scum because this is a baffling read.In post 150, Cape90 wrote:I don't have strong opinions on Dorsey butIn post 28, Dorsey wrote:Have there been any games where there were no scum slots assigned? Like everyone was town and didn't know it? I want to read that one.Both of these strike me as towny with one another, moreso on the ladder quote hereIn post 29, Dorsey wrote:Sorry, that really didn't progress this thread at all.
Not much, really. LGW's fixation on my page 1 read was a little bizarre. Datisi's entry was all right, but not blown away.
I do, but I doubt it'll be helpful or I would have given it already. But here goes...In post 180, Datisi wrote:weren't people calling bugs scummy? and do you have an opinion on those players? (or like, anyone not named shiki)In post 171, Dorsey wrote:Only players I haven't seen really criticized are bugspray and Cape (other than Looker's hate crime)
Thinking about things.In post 186, Datisi wrote:why did you unvote vanders then?
this part personally rubs me the wrong wayIn post 178, Vanderscamp wrote:I think what shiki had to say around that period was probably the towniest anyone has been this game and I dislike that Dorsey didn't pick up on that.
It's day 1, everything is just kind of a gut feeling that everyone is stretching to put into words. I just looked at his stuff and it felt inauthentic.In post 193, Looker wrote:It's difficult to read through arguments and differentiate between who's potentially contradicting scum and who's just getting out-communicated. What did Vanderscamp do? Was it just the catch-up post?
My main reason is that I feel that when shiki said "I often don't RVS vote as either alignment" that statement was obviously true regardless of alignment, on top of shiki sounding town anyway.In post 194, Datisi wrote:this part personally rubs me the wrong wayIn post 178, Vanderscamp wrote:I think what shiki had to say around that period was probably the towniest anyone has been this game and I dislike that Dorsey didn't pick up on that.
it feels like a sorta stretchy reason for suspecting someone for not having a read they think they should have, and after (i think) no attempts to engage with dorsey about it
but yeah i don't have a whole lot more than ~vibes~ and i'm genuinely curious what jacket is thinking about right now
In post 166, Vanderscamp wrote:Dorsey, you're doubling down here on suspecting shiki for not voting.
Do you think shiki is lying about this?:In post 85, Dorsey wrote:yea. u say u suspect cape, but all your questions are for jacket.
In post 78, shiki wrote:sometimes i rvs, i often do not, and otherwise i vote when i wish for the person i am voting to be eliminated,In post 76, shiki wrote:and no of course not but i also do not think it was necessary for me to rvs vote ?
What's bad about it?In post 190, Jacket wrote:I think umlaut's read on Datisi is kind of bad.