Newbie 2099 | GTA San Andreas | Endgame
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
So close but so far.In post 26, Rad wrote:Hi Elmk! I think that would have put him at E-3 because me and spartan weren't on him anymore. Double E-1 page 1 would have been fun though
@Rad wanna join me on fancy pants or should we go back to Goldfish?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
The wind blows this way the wind blows that way.
Let's do it.
VOTE: AlwaysNever-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
WhooooosssshhhhhIn post 53, Bulbazoor wrote:I am not getting town vibes from anyone but I lowkey like Rad so far
Spartan not so much
(Appeasement followed by a statement without any actual reasoning)
Zzoooooommm
VOTE: Bulbazoor-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I would see this more as illusive rather than dishonest, Its NAI to keep your cards close to your chest especially early on imo, I think it does look sus to appear to be on a Elmk or Bulba train without actually being on one, its like having recognition for sussing them without actually doing the work to gain that credit, either way it's still early on and we are all still feeling each other out, like the pressure from you even if I don't agree with it all, I dont need to, the effort is good.In post 93, FancyPants wrote:Why juice is dishonest:
I ask (note the bolded part):In post 64, Juice wrote:Also did Bulbasaur OMGUS Rad.
I'd push for either Bulba or Elmk today really.You say (bolded):
In post 80, Juice wrote:In post 74, FancyPants wrote:
If Bulba OMGUS'ed Rad what does that mean to you?In post 64, Juice wrote:Also did Bulbasaur OMGUS Rad.
I'd push for either Bulba or Elmk today really.
Why do you like Bulba and Elmk to "push" today.
there really isn't much else to go with - without a flip. and those are the only two im sus about - but there is nothing concrete at the moment
You very cleary brought up Bulba and Elmk as suspects but when pressured you backed away and offered no justifiation - that's what makes me think you're being dishonest.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I would see this more as illusive rather than dishonest, Its NAI to keep your cards close to your chest especially early on imo, I think it does look sus to appear to be on a Elmk or Bulba train without actually being on one, its like having recognition for sussing them without actually doing the work to gain that credit, either way it's still early on and we are all still feeling each other out, like the pressure from you even if I don't agree with it all, I dont need to, the effort is good.In post 93, FancyPants wrote:Why juice is dishonest:
I ask (note the bolded part):In post 64, Juice wrote:Also did Bulbasaur OMGUS Rad.
I'd push for either Bulba or Elmk today really.You say (bolded):
In post 80, Juice wrote:In post 74, FancyPants wrote:
If Bulba OMGUS'ed Rad what does that mean to you?In post 64, Juice wrote:Also did Bulbasaur OMGUS Rad.
I'd push for either Bulba or Elmk today really.
Why do you like Bulba and Elmk to "push" today.
there really isn't much else to go with - without a flip. and those are the only two im sus about - but there is nothing concrete at the moment
You very cleary brought up Bulba and Elmk as suspects but when pressured you backed away and offered no justifiation - that's what makes me think you're being dishonest.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Did you just name everyone but Rad and yourself? LolIn post 110, Bulbazoor wrote:People I don't have at least a slight town vibe from:
Elemk
Cat.Jpeg
GoldfishFromTheMoon
Juice
AlwaysNever
Spartan117 (SE)
FancyPants (SE)-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
That's cool, I mean I've produced min content, chaotic at best but thats what I'm going for this time, just for the record, I'm still sticking to the plan tho dw I'll have my scum team for you guys before the days out (in game day ofc aha)In post 113, Bulbazoor wrote:And, out of the whole list that I put which is everyone except me and Rad, I am suspicious of spartan the most.
Also side note it feels to me bulba that you are too scared to comit to any reads, like as if you say someone's scum that you can't change your mind with more information or even with further reflection and a good old re-read. I get very static vibes from you as far as reads go, when as town we should be more fluid with our reads they should evolve, now that doesn't mean they have to change ofc but that's all part of the process.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Agreed.In post 145, Rad wrote:
Why are you pushing for pairs on page 6? Wait for a flip or if YOU see something suspicious that you want to point out, fine do it. Like pushing this sort of thing this early is just going to make town hesitant to interact and give opinions when we should be pushing for open communication, not trying to find connections based on nothing.In post 141, AlwaysNever wrote:Appreciate the answer with that said, now that we have developments, whom among all of the players right now do you think are paired in some ways? Or at least trying to not look like they're paired the most?
Could also be scum here hunting for masons.
The more I think about this the less and less I like it.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
This feels like an excuse for any reaction that may come from being voted in the future, could be the first scum slip of the game? HmmIn post 146, Bulbazoor wrote:
Well I did want to pressure you and at the same time I was annoyed that I was being voted asIn post 143, Rad wrote:
Wait, that post had teeth? You were being passive aggressive? I read that as pure wink wink nudge nudge rvs.In post 117, Bulbazoor wrote:What felt toothless about my post. If anything I was being a bit passive aggressive
HmmI tend to have knee jerk reactions any time I am voted.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I have not had the time to read through everyone's posts, rather that just throwing something together I'd like to be able to give some proper game content, I need to go to bed soon for work, I am going to sit down when I get in tomorrow and go through everything properly.
Also just to clarify but will expand on tomorrow, the plan I referenced before is based on mine and Rads last game where I called out the mafia day 1, and even though I was getting scum read d1 I was the night kill, and because I was town I helped I fluency Rad to get the job done in remarkable fashion I must say.
So acording to the plan it was all a joke about scraping me from the day 1 vote because I will be the night kill the first night, which I had intended to play more into in a chaotic fun way but unfortunately havnt had the time im sorry, I do still intend to try and nail down the scum team before day 1 ends and we can see post game how that compares if I can get a 2 in 2.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I am just re-reading through the thread and commenting on any posts that ping me in particular. If anyone has anything specific they would like me to answer or respond to what either I missed or hasn't been asked yet please let me know.
Interesting that Bulba didnt like my content at this point especially in comparison to Rad when we were both having some RVS shenanigans, I don't see a whole lot different to mine and Rads posts at this point on page 3 to make this distinction. Although I do like Rads play so agree with this town read.In post 53, Bulbazoor wrote:I am not getting town vibes from anyone but I lowkey like Rad so far
Spartan not so much
Agreed I did think this was very weird from Elemk.In post 56, Juice wrote:I do think the person who instantly unvoted a L1 - wanted to be seen as town by their action even if it was during a random voting sequence.
Fancy is very assertive and pushy with his posts which I think is good and tonally feels like coming from hyper investigative town although I have seen this behaviour played by scum. In fact in my last game with Rad, who will remember well how similarly BBT played in his assertiveness, questioning and challenging everyone and was one of the main scum I called out day 1. Now I am not saying this is the same thing as BBT was much more wagon happy and was very eager to jump on/start wagons and eliminate people with little cause, which I think most saw as him trying to get reactions and push people which is the townie method I think he was emulating. I just don't see hyper activity pushing everyone as getting instant townie points from me.
I have been called out myself for LAMIST behaviour in previous games as town because of playing very active and questioning everyone on things, it is ideal for scum to try to emulate this behaviour because if they are questioning everyone its very hard for town to pair them with anyone and of course makes them look very town.
Just a headsup that we don't necessarily get 8 days if someone is voted off before then, I fully get your sentiment on us taking our time, I personally like to feel a game out and not rush things too much but if things get too stale and drawn out you get too many people lurking and avoiding questions.In post 78, Bulbazoor wrote:And also, we have 8 days. Do you think I would really not scumhunt for those eight days?
Why does it matter that I shared my opinion on how I saw your post, when I make a post I cant take your future posts into account can I?In post 83, Bulbazoor wrote:It is more that spartan accused me of appeasement when I would be providing reads soon anyway.
@FP tell me, why does this behaviour give you a town read on Rad but not me? interesting how both you and bulba came to this same conclusionIn post 84, FancyPants wrote:I actually think you're probably town. Voting 5 times and expressing a "I don't give a F#%& attitude." strikes me as tonally town but I wanted to interact with you to try and sort you correctly.
Taking the game out of RVS doesnt make that person town especially when they are dictating the conversation, scum win games based off dictating the conversation alone.In post 121, Bulbazoor wrote:I am seeing how FancyPants can be town. He helped us move out of the RVS stage pretty much.
Very townie mindset to have, although not impossible to emulate.In post 122, FancyPants wrote:As for my reads none are set in stone - as you said it's early - but I'm willing to defend and discuss any read you'd like to talk about.
Agreed on Rad, still unsure about Juice.In post 124, AlwaysNever wrote:If I have to put money into someone being town, my gut would say Rad or Juice.
At the point of this post it is page 6, by that point there is more than enough posts to be able to form reads. I never said you had to have a read on everyone. I was referring to your overall play of making reads that I read as being static such that you was too scared to commit as your wouldn't be able to change the read. We don't have to wait to nearer the deadline to call someone out if we feel they aren't committing to anything, town should want there to be time for them to respond as they don't know they are scum, where as scum it would be ideal to call someone out nearer the deadline and apply pressure so they have less time to respond and can be pushed for elimination.In post 133, Bulbazoor wrote:@spartan: How would I have had any reads to commit to when a lot of the people had only posted an RVS vote and some is getting prodded? And, like I said to Fancy, you assume my reads are static? It is day 3. We have seven days left. I feel like it is better to say someone isn't committing to anything when it is closer to the deadline.
Why is looking for pairs so early on useful for town to do in your opinion? would it not look more like asking questions that are in no way able to be effectively answered to seem active and driving content?In post 148, FancyPants wrote:Looking for pairs is unhelpful but a town tell IMO.
What's your effectiveness as scum?In post 154, FancyPants wrote:I'm pretty confident about my town game though, haven't lost a town game in a while.
If you think its pointless why does it give you a town tell when AN asked about it?In post 164, FancyPants wrote:I'm of the opinion that looking for pairs before we have actually seen any alignments is largely pointless
I like ANs breakdown of their reads in their #168 good detail feel very genuine.
How can it be said that there is no real content from almost everyone in the game, Rad, Juice, AlwaysNever and Bulba have all produced lots of content by this point to put Elemk in the same bracket as them is just lazy.In post 209, FancyPants wrote:It basically seems to boil down to 'no real content' which is somewhat true but the same can be said of almost everyone in this game. At least he's given his thoughts, made a decent point about Spartan and actually placed a vote.
You state he has made a decent point about me, please elaborate on that what part of the following is an actual point on me?
He states he likes my post 126, and agrees with my logic, it seems the whole basis of his scum read on me is based on a joke I made relating to my previous game with Rad that had not been fully explained, which is nothing to do with what I was talking to Bulba about so his point is factually incorrect. he then ends his point sayingIn post 180, Elemk wrote:128 is interesting to me. I like his previous post 126 because I agree with the logic he expresses. I don't like 128 because he alludes to some sort of "master plan" without actually expressing anything, the exact thing he then accuses bulba of doing? He states he is being "chaotic", which I see in his earlier posts, but they are RVS posts and isnt't that the whole point of the RVS stage? However, I again like the logic of the last sentence. Slight scum lean for meslight scum lean for meand this was his whole basis for his vote in a following post with no further analysis or reasoning and you support it FP, it feels to me like you never bothered to review what his read was based on before you supported it.
FP I am not sure if you are supporting Elemk because he is agreeing with you or you are scum and want to encourage him to stay on your side? Surely it would be too obvious for you two to be the scum team right?
By the end of in game Day 1, we still have time,In post 222, FancyPants wrote:Spartan you promised to name the scum team here:
Of course they can be pissed at being voted but it is more common for scum to be frustrated when they are voted as they are trying to look town and if they are being sussed it feels more frustrating as they are putting more effort in to look town than town should be. It also felt very much like an excuse to get out of any reaction to any future pressure which as town you shouldn't be afraid of. Also you didnt say once or twice having a reaction, you specified yourself on having a knee jerk reactionIn post 224, Bulbazoor wrote:I think this is a very big reach. So town can never be pissed at being voted incorrectly?any timeyou are voted.
I would have placed my vote on Elemk but since he is being replaced I will hold my vote until I have investigated further.
For now.
UNVOTE:
Overall reads/leans at this point in time
Rad - Town read
Juice/AlwaysNever - Town read
Bulba - town lean
FancyPants - there is a lot to evaluate here feels townie through general inquisitiveness but could be strong scum, hmm
Elemk - Scum read
I have not seen enough from Cat and Goldfish to get a read on them. Will read their ISOs tomorrow and whatever else happens until then.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Agreed, very good point, i just dont want to rush and comit to it until I'm sure, I dont plan on doing it right at the end of the day, I just havnt spent enough time analysing interactions between players yet, for example if everyone thinks Elemk is scum it would make me think maybe he's not because I would think that ScumElemks partner would be trying to change the conversation or deflecting even if only done subtly (which funnily enough we have actually seen from FancyPants) now I'm not saying they are my proposed scum team I need more time to read through before I comit.In post 306, Bulbazoor wrote:Wouldn't you outing your proposed team produce new points of discussion?
Additionally for reference the whole plan thing that i referenced was about me doing it nearer the deadline to mirror last game where I was heavily sussed, someone else got eliminated and then I was the night 1 night kill, which I was playing into with that whole thing of that.
Also my point about not necessarily having 8 days left to post as if someone's elimed the days over was more game mechanics rather than anything else, just to make sure you was aware.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I dont really know what to say about goldfish and cat at the moment, both havnt produced much in the way of reads and actual content, which doesn't make them necessarily scum because I mysekf hadn't produced a whole lot previously and I know I'm town, and they seem to be sussing each other two so I don't see that they would be a scum team I could defo see it being one of goldfish, cat or Ekemk and someone else. That's where I'm kinda at atmIn post 306, Bulbazoor wrote:guess you are correct about this, but the main reason for my town read on them is the lengths they went to verify the meta goldfish commented on. I don't think that would really come from scum. If goldfish is scum especially.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I agree with this, only thing I would ask is why do you have Cat above AlwaysNever, or vice versa?In post 323, Rad wrote:Ordered towniest to scumiest:
FancyPants
Spartan
Bulba
Juice
Cat
Alwaysnever
Goldfish
Elemk
I'm willing to jump to elemk here if we decide but also wouldn't mind giving a replacement a chance to play
Fancypants is closest to lock town for me though I do see Spartan's point about this style being doable by scum. It feels distinctly different from bbt in that bbt is aggro in both alignments and though fancy is also aggro at times, I've never seen anyone as openly solvey while being scum. Fancy's claim that his scum play differs greatly sounds sincere, follows with his open solvey approach, and I can empathize with it.
Alwaysnever is bordering on scum for similar reasons as fancy gave for goldfish. But he's one of the Ted talkers which is just difficult as scum so I'd avoid voting him today over goldfish and elemk.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I'm assuming your vote/unvote on goldfish is a vote which makes what FP said in #330 make sense.In post 326, Juice wrote:I only think that Bulba or FP will flip mafia - if Elmk is Mafia.
Cat is my biggest town read - but when they mirrored me - I felt unsure.
I feel I should be worried about Spartan
With Cat being your biggest town read, which is think is a bit odd given the contrast in the amount of content given compared to others, who would you think would be Goldfish's scum partner if they get eliminated and flip scum?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I like this a lot from FP, you didn't have to do that, easy town cred if scum but I think scum would more likely just not say anything on the chance of a mis-elim.In post 330, FancyPants wrote:That's L-1 for Goldfish BTW,I'm OK with her being lynched, but she should have a chance to claim.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I have no issue giving intent if the general consensus is happy they are scum, from reading through their ISO it is pretty lackluster, lots of lurking and lack of real townie desire to solve the puzzle seems very relaxed.In post 331, FancyPants wrote:Although no intent has been declared yet.
My main concern with everyone seeming happy to jump on their wagon, is who their scum partner is? Maybe they have just given up with them at this point and jumped on the wagon to get town cred I'm not sure. Either way it does make me hesitant, but in order to move this game on I feel like we need to see a flip soon.
So consider this intent to hammer (provided Juices vote is legit) although I do wish to respond back to Rad first before hand. (hopefully that gets things moving again, que escalator music)-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
If you think Cat is Town or at the very least are leaning that way, who do you think is Goldfish's scum partner?In post 327, Rad wrote:
Cat's analysis of goldfish sounds sincere without shading goldfish as much as a scum!cat vs town!goldfish could get away with here. And cat vs goldfish probably isn't a SvS imo. Openness to not list any scum reads with a "take it or leave it, I don't care" mentality comes across townie.In post 325, Spartan117 wrote:I agree with this, only thing I would ask is why do you have Cat above AlwaysNever, or vice versa?
Alwaysnever has the potential mason hunting + pairing style of day 1 reading, which was questionable and feels like appeasement when openly stating that they're switching to "individual-based reads". Lists me as null-town but sure does like to shade me on my issues with pairing, going as far as saying I could be scum simply because I'm considering the setup. Feels like manufactured shade.
I also didnt like the pair matching so early on, although I don't think that alone would make him scum, I got general townish vibes when i saw his posts, I will need to go and give his ISO a proper read and pick out what I think is specifically townie or if anything pings me as scummy.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Very good question, scum must hate how effective you seem to be, not just in this game but in your other games too when you've rolled town. Just curious did you find yourself becoming a policy elimination night one in other games where you are town because of how well you play?In post 362, FancyPants wrote:Anyway important question for @Spartan and @Alwaysnever:
Let's say hypothetically you are a one shot town-aligned vigilante today, who can't choose to not-kill, who would you kill and why?
To answer your question that's a difficult one and I would need to re-read some ISOs before making my decision, my main driving force would be finding a flip that would give us the most amount of information, I would say it would probably be somewhere in the pool of Cat, Elemk or AlwaysNever (who I've yet to re-read so this is on the assumption that I find from that what is giving Rad the read they are). Although I would want to keep in mind the chance of it being a stronger player who has the ability to fall under the radar rather that the 3 most inactive players, I could see maybe a bulba option but I felt convinced by their tone so would need to see from a re-read. But yeah good question very thought provoking.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
My comments were on the assumption she was the day 1 elim in order to get to the first nightIn post 366, FancyPants wrote:I see you don't mention Goldfish in people you'd consider vigging, why are you willing to hammer her then?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Take credit where credit is due, ive flagged previously my thoughts on where you might be a strong scum player being hyper dominant but I think you have far surpassed the effort of scum trying to look like they are trying to solve the game. I know you've been effective as far as asking that question because I feel it's a very good question to ask at this point in the game as well, you are setting up data for day 2 obviously depending on who the night 1 kill is. I don't believe you are in anyone's scum pool at this point, I dont just have your word youre townie I have the thoughts of every other player here who are also majority town.In post 366, FancyPants wrote:Eish the bolded part is a bit red flaggy. How do you know I've been effective, I could have been barking up the wrong trees this entire game? You only have my word that I'm a good townie at all. Show some healthy paranoia will you. Not sure what to make of this.
Maybe it's just how the game kinda dropped off but it just feels like the scum are in the depleted inactive pool and have given up.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Goldfish has had plenty of chance to respond its been days without anything. And why would I not be able to hammer? You've subbed into the game giving orders, are we just getting a repeat of last game...In post 401, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Nobody is hammering Goldfish before they get a chance to come in thread and respond. Least of all Spartan!-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I feel like you're just trying to antagonise me into being rash. YukkyIn post 407, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You're not hammering because I don't like your play so far this game. In fact, someone should probably unvote to give the slot time and ensure no hammer.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
No by telling me I can't hammer, it's very obnoxious behaviour.
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I have already claimed intent to hammer a while ago, they are not coming back anytime soon, let's just see this flip and go from there.
I believe they will flip red it feels like scum who has given up and has no more fight to give. In the event of what I think will happen and BBT night kills me again, I think it is the Elemk/BBT slot that was sussed by others before the switch and is and im sure will be sussed after.
Other than that AlwaysNever dropped off too which I felt could have been from feeling flat and deflated that their scum partner was cornered and not being sure how to assist them.
All the best Rad, I hope you can win this for the town.
VOTE: Goldfish-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
We had several really slow days followed by Elemk subbing out and was about to have Goldfish sub out which would have led to someone else filling their slot, which would have left a new player to sort. At the time I hammered there was around 2 days left and with the inactivity previous lack of any other real pushes I think it certainly would have been close.In post 532, FancyPants wrote:
I don't think we were ever in danger of no-lynching there.In post 531, Juice wrote:Scummy? It would have been anti town to prevent the lynch everyone else wanted. People need to know the difference between obstructive and scummy
But for me the main thing that was scummy was when you said - "Goldfish will flip town." I don't know how a townie could possibly know that... and now I'm talking myself into your wagon.
Personally I read Juices comments about goldfish's alignment as their opinion, on how they felt they were town and I believe they had mentioned how their original vote was one of pressure to try and gain content rather than out of an actual scum read (correct me if im wrong) I still find Juices content tonally and methodically town and stay with Rad and FancyPants as my top 3 town reads.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Who do you think is scum atm Juice?In post 535, Juice wrote:I know you are town though - because you being scum makes no sense
What do you think of it being Bulba and 1 of Cat, AlwaysNever, or BBT.
I feel like the 2 scum are in that pool of 4.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
@bulba why didn't you answer my question? HmmIn post 539, Spartan117 wrote:Bulba what are your thoughts on BBT, would you be happy with a BBT elimination today?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Has he? In what way?In post 564, Bulbazoor wrote:BBT has done well to ease a bit of the suspicions I had on his slot.
What suspicion did you have on him before that you don't now?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I'm unsure about Cat, it doesn't look like Cat and BBT are a pair, unless that was some recent scum theatrics. I don't like how 3 people have jumped on their wagon with the general premise relating to their activity which is what happened with Goldfish, I feel like it is way more than likely that 1 scum is on their wagon.In post 583, Juice wrote:I want to know what Spartan and FP think about Cat and if they would vote them - I wasn't obstructive before. But I won't join any wagon with Cat on the line,
With 3 votes on them currently and 5 to eliminate I do not intend to put my vote on Cat currently, this game has been painfully slow with large periods of inactivity, I dont think its as simple as the scum are just being inactive.
Always never being missing doesn't help to sort their slot, and I don't like that Bulba ignored my question, I feel like they are just trying to get through the day, slot onto the wagon that others are pushing and get to the night phase where they can try again. So for that reason my vote today resides here.
VOTE: Bulbazoor-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
As much as I would love to join you, Bulbas slot has just been active and posted again and still ignored me, if I could vote for them again I would, can you join me on Bulba? They aren't even trying to provide any towie content just trying to deflect of themselves. I think this is one of the scum.In post 590, Rad wrote:
I like your reasoning but I don't like this pick. Let's go BBT?In post 584, Spartan117 wrote:
I'm unsure about Cat, it doesn't look like Cat and BBT are a pair, unless that was some recent scum theatrics. I don't like how 3 people have jumped on their wagon with the general premise relating to their activity which is what happened with Goldfish, I feel like it is way more than likely that 1 scum is on their wagon.In post 583, Juice wrote:I want to know what Spartan and FP think about Cat and if they would vote them - I wasn't obstructive before. But I won't join any wagon with Cat on the line,
With 3 votes on them currently and 5 to eliminate I do not intend to put my vote on Cat currently, this game has been painfully slow with large periods of inactivity, I dont think its as simple as the scum are just being inactive.
Always never being missing doesn't help to sort their slot, and I don't like that Bulba ignored my question, I feel like they are just trying to get through the day, slot onto the wagon that others are pushing and get to the night phase where they can try again. So for that reason my vote today resides here.
VOTE: Bulbazoor
VOTE: BBT-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Hey Juice would you like to join me on Bulba? We can try on BBT tomorrow depending on the flip.In post 585, Juice wrote:by process of elimination - after BBT, I do think Bulba would be the next person i'd seriously consider. And if I am wrong about Elemk/BBT - and its not Bulba either. Then town are in serious trouble-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
A question you did in fact answer? hmm lets investigate shall we?In post 597, Bulbazoor wrote:All of this based on a question I did in fact answer. How hilarious
Here was my original question directed to you, on its own not hidden in a big chunk of text or anything.In post 539, Spartan117 wrote:Bulba what are your thoughts on BBT, would you be happy with a BBT elimination today?
Your first post after my question, clearly not an answer to me about BBT, just you stating your town reads of FP and Juice and how you are not willing to change that.. okIn post 556, Bulbazoor wrote:I still think FP and Juice are town af. I am very stubborn in my reads so it will be hard to change them
Your second post is a vote on AlwaysNever, no context, no comments in this post to go along just you voting the most innactive player who hasnt posted in 7/8 days, was you expecting him to return based on the pressure you appled in this impactful post?
Your third post is you letting everyone know that you would be open to voting cat the second most innactive player, and just that no reasoning in this post as to why just that the offers there if anyone wants it... okIn post 560, Bulbazoor wrote:I would also be down to vote cat
Your fourth post after my question and here we see a few more words this time. Yet they are just you expressing your hope that the two people (most inactive) have hopefully 1 scum amongst them 2 (still not answering my question).In post 561, Bulbazoor wrote:I really hope there is a scum in those two. I am not letting spartan off the hook. My pool of players I will be looking into today are:
Spartan
Cat
AlwaysNever
BBT but I am less sure on this one.
You say youre not letting me off the hook, (shock, for what? its not clear)
You then list the players you will be looking into today (I hope you are looking at me while I'm showing my good side) consisting of Myself, Cat, AN and BBT but you feel the need to express you are less sure of the need to look into him today (I wonder why? Hmm)
and just checking yep that doesnt tell me what you think of BBT or if you would be happy with a BBT elim today, nope.
Now here is your fifth post since my question and this one is much meatier, you have now switched your vote from AN to Cat with only 3 posts inbetween this and your last vote, 2 of them being yours. You seem to change your vote based on 1 post from Rad asking why you didnt just vote Cat, so you do very sheepy just following everyone else, you dont vote them because you have a scum read on them, you explain that you town read FP Juice and have a weak town read on Rad, so I guess that just leaves everyone else for you to scum read? your scum reads are based just on whos left, there doesnt seem to be any actual scum reading proper thought provoking questions involved.In post 563, Bulbazoor wrote:VOTE: cat
My reads boil down to strong trs on Juice and Fancy. I don't see myself ever fosing Juice tbh. And then that leaves you, Rad, who I have a weaker tr on. Then, BBT has done well to ease a bit of the suspicions I had on his slot. That leaves Cat, AlwaysNever, and Spartan.
You state BBT has done well to ease a bit of the suspicions you had on him. now this ties into one of my posts right after your 5th post questioning this because you just made a simple easy statement with no actual backup, anyone can say what you did, it doesnt mean anything, we need to know in what way this was done, I feel like you don't explain yourself because you cant't. It is very hard to have suspicion and change suspicion when you already know whos town and whos scum.
Again just to remind this still does not answer my question of what your actual thoughts are on BBT and what you would think if they was eliminated today. Looks like youre just avoiding answering the question.
Following your 5th post I challenged you asking why you didnt answer my question.In post 564, Spartan117 wrote:
@bulba why didn't you answer my question? HmmIn post 539, Spartan117 wrote:Bulba what are your thoughts on BBT, would you be happy with a BBT elimination today?
And like I said following up on your post about your reasoning for why your suspicion on BBT has eased. Lets see if you answer this either?In post 565, Spartan117 wrote:
Has he? In what way?In post 564, Bulbazoor wrote:BBT has done well to ease a bit of the suspicions I had on his slot.
What suspicion did you have on him before that you don't now?
I then made #584 explaining my thoughts and how it looks like to me that you are trying to get through the day undetected without doing enough to be on anyones radar, sus the people who are absent because thats the 'in' thing to do and they wont push you, they are not here, join Cats wagon because its easy to as there are 2 others on it and you town read everyone else so they must be scum or at least you.. hope.
I actually find this post quite amusing, now bare in mind this is your 6th post after my original question. You say that you would been ecstatic after goldfish flipped town (I am assuming on the premise that if you was scum, again you are not very clear). So you are telling us, that if you was scum then you would have celebrated and been all happy in your posts in a way that would translate through for us to see? do you not think that might give the game away, errm wouldnt we all notice if you was ecstatic after we eliminate a town player? Curious.In post 587, Bulbazoor wrote:I would have been ecstatic after a goldfish town flip as she was incredibly scummy. You guys just can't read me.
This is your 7th post after my question - still unanswered - maybe you are feeling the pressure of having a vote on you, but you state that with honestly very little pressure on your slot that "scum thinks I am somehow an easy lynch today" not sure if deflecting or trying to appear town - weird - you then follow on to say "I see what you are doing BBT" I am not sure what this is reference to, you don't quote a post, I can only assume this is something you had been discussing in scum chat with your scum partner BBT about trying to distance but forgot to quote the post (maybe the post was in scum chat, who knows)In post 588, Bulbazoor wrote:And I can sense scum thinks I am somehow an easy lynch today. I see what you are doing BBT. People just can't see that I am disappointed I was wrong and thus have less motivation to try as much.
You follow up your 7th post after my question with you 8th with only 2 minutes inbetween. Here you look as if you are questioning the reasoning on my scum read on you except again you dont quote a post so its unhelpful for anyone scrolling down reading your post without the context. You choose to deflect to an inactive slot that hasnt been active in 8 days as the reason as to why I shouldn't be scum reading you. If you are town Bulba why are you so worried if im "focused" on you?In post 589, Bulbazoor wrote:And how does it seem like I am trying to move through the day? There's other slots that have not even spoken a damn word like alwaysnever. Why so focused on me spartan? And suddenly cat picks up her effort today after not trying at all d1? What do you make of that?
Either way you still havent answered my question, any of them.
This is your 9th post after my original question also quoted at the top of this post, with you stating that you did in fact answer my question, hmm I wonder if your post where you told me your thoughts on BBT or if you would be happy with a BBT elimination? were deleted or maybe even got lost in the mail? Did you use a pigeon? maybe an owl?In post 597, Bulbazoor wrote:All of this based on a question I did in fact answer. How hilarious
You still have yet to answer my original question or my additional questions in #565
A minute later you follow up with your 10th post after my question with you stating you voted Cat and AlwaysNever (the two most innactive players in the game, and the second vote was a sheep vote) and that it should tell me who you want lynched? but wait Bulba I never asked you who you wanted to be eliminated, I specifically asked you on your specific thoughts on BBT and if you would be happy with a BBT elimination yet you deviate and deflect at every opertunity talking about inactive players.In post 598, Bulbazoor wrote:I voted cat and alwaysnever. Should tell you who I fucking want lynched. I can't even fathom how I am an option for a lynch today.
You the follow up saying how you can't fathom how you are an option for elimination today, well maybe it is because of the lack of game moving content and pure sheeping and attempts to hide under the radar.
2 minutes after your 10th we see your 11th post where you clarify you wish to eliminate the most inactive players in the game thats right guys its AlwaysNever and Cat, now by no means am I defending them in their inactivity but with them being inactive it means they are not here to interact with (thankfully Cat has been recently) in order to sort their slot and find out what their alignment isIn post 599, Bulbazoor wrote:For those that can't understand, I would like alwaysnever or cat today.by their playnot their lack of it.
Here is your 12th post and you dont push me, you dont question me you simple send a very empty threat that you wont let this slide (sounds like I've been lined up for the next night kill, someone help eek) never the less you still dont answer my question shame.In post 600, Bulbazoor wrote:And spartan I won't let this push over a fabricated reason slide. You are also on my radar.
Your13th post after my original question and still nothing that answers it at all, I am very disappointed, I believe it is a response to Rad and their vote on you, but you don't quote anyone so again its not completely clear to tell.In post 603, Bulbazoor wrote:So your response is to vote me for no reason? Have you read what I have said?
And thats it 13 posts after my question to you to date and nothing in any of it that answers me much to your claims that you have indeed answered me, this feels like scum to me.
VOTE: Bulbazoor-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Please read my #610 I think he has been consciously hiding under the radar not pushing anyone that might draw attention to himself, and deflecting to the two most inactive players when questioned.In post 606, FancyPants wrote:Can someone voting Bulba give me a case. I really don't think it's him.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Why has your stance on Rad changed? you had a town read on him before right?In post 606, FancyPants wrote:After reading the last couple pages I'm liking Cat + Rad or Alwaysnever.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I don't believe you think that they are scum purely based off their inactivity right? Someone not turning up to the game doesn't have any control in what alignment they are, I get if someone is struggling with the game because they are unable to make reads because they are scum can lead to inactivity which is why there is a link between the two but it can't be an exclusive, these newbie games a full of players switching out all the time who aren't scum.In post 607, FancyPants wrote:If there was no scum in Goldfish and Cat after day 1 I'll be shocked.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
If the game is so simple who are the scum team, are you implying its Cat & AlwaysNeverIn post 604, FancyPants wrote:I feel like this game may actually be simply but we screwed up the day 1 lynch. Largely because Goldfish did nothing.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Its not like there is a single scummiest thing he has done, there are lots of things he has done that are scummy fromIn post 615, FancyPants wrote:I like your post Spartan, I think the effort alone makes you look townie and solidifies my town read on you, however I'm not convinced aboout the Bulba case.
Everything post you've brought up from him I feel like could be read from a town perspective.
Can you isolate the MOST scummy thing you feel bulba has done?
- jumping on wagons without conviction and sleeping votes
- outright lieing that he has answered my questions when he has very clearly not.
- trying to go under the radar and not seriously push anyone (classic scum play) so as to not be under pressure themselves.
- be completely unable to have any detailed scum reads, simply he has a couple town reads so who evers left must be scum.
I dont like your association that because you get a tonal reads that someone sounds townie that makes them town, its literally your job as scum to sound as if your town...-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Why can't scum just be playing very strong as town and go under the radar as everyone is town reading them, I guess like your Rad review.In post 627, FancyPants wrote:Frankly if it's neither Cat or Goldfish scum deserve the win for being that sneaky,
Im not exactly sure why you are so sure BBT is definitely town, it's not just because of your read on elemk and the tonal read on BBT right?
Im not saying its definitely not Cat and AN (at this point I wish we had someone to sub into the slot its been far too long so we can try and sort the slot properly rather than everyone sussing it for inactivity) but if we had 5 inactive slots would they all be scum?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Are you seriously gonna ignore me continuously, are you intentionally trying to be scummy?In post 637, Bulbazoor wrote:I can't believe spartan is actually seriously doing this. And people are really trying to start a BW on me with such a BS "case" when there is alwaysnever and cat here. Why can't we get alwaysnever out? It's who I originally was voting before spartan and Rad got on me for no reason.
Bulba for all us town on the other side of the alignment slide, why do you want always never eliminated so badly? What is it they have done that is so scummy? They've not been lurking, that's what you've been doing, making posts seeming like you're active without actually providing game moving content. They have been completely inactive they might as well have checked out, so why are they scum? What threat do they pose, Bulba?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Bulba please tell the class where you answered these questions, now please be specific and quote your post, you won't be able to mind because I have already quoted all of yours and explained how it doesn't answer it...In post 539, Spartan117 wrote:Bulba what are your thoughts on BBT, would you be happy with a BBT elimination today?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Also please show everyone where you answered this too, k thanksIn post 565, Spartan117 wrote:
Has he? In what way?In post 564, Bulbazoor wrote:BBT has done well to ease a bit of the suspicions I had on his slot.
What suspicion did you have on him before that you don't now?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Please actually read my content before responding to it, this is just lazy...In post 641, Bulbazoor wrote:Nothing he said is true other than me operating mainly on townreads today. Which is not even alignment indicative.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I've not actually because he's been in active for nearly 9 days, I can go back and read them from day 1 but he hasn't been posting here in day 2 not providing any game moving contentIn post 644, Bulbazoor wrote:Have you seen alwaysnever's posts. A better question is why are you tunnelvisioning me? I have been lurking my fucking ass.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Im clearly talking about when you voted for Cat seeing as we are in Day 2 but sure ignore that..In post 640, Bulbazoor wrote:"Jumping on wagons without conviction " give me a break
... yeah I definitely pushed goldfish without conviction....-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Hey um I'd rather you read through my really long post, I'm on phone atm and about to go to sleep, but can try and make it as clear as possible when I get home from work tomorrow, I can also add these new posts he's providing, it's great when they do the work for you.In post 634, FancyPants wrote:Hey Spartan
I know it's kinda shitty to make you do the work but can you point out where he lied outright?-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
That tells me nothing about where you answered my questions, it also doesn't answer the questions, telling me you'd rather get Cat or AN out than BBT isn't a comprehensive analysis or read on BBTs play....In post 650, Bulbazoor wrote:
He is in the four I mentioned but I wouldn't be as willing to get him out as I would always or catIn post 645, Spartan117 wrote:
Bulba please tell the class where you answered these questions, now please be specific and quote your post, you won't be able to mind because I have already quoted all of yours and explained how it doesn't answer it...In post 539, Spartan117 wrote:Bulba what are your thoughts on BBT, would you be happy with a BBT elimination today?
And neither is it you telling me if you would be happy with a BBT elimination.
Telling me you'd be more willing to eliminate cat or AN doesn't tell me if you are ok with BBT being elimed it just says you want them elimed more...-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Who's to say you weren't just dejected because your night kill failed.. huh?In post 653, Bulbazoor wrote:I seriously don't see how you don't read my posts coming into today as dejected town. But I guess that is just a me issue.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
Welcome Flowerdogs
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
I get you, apart from the general scumminess of bulba lurking, not pushing for any reads, no intention to scum hunt just wanting to eliminate the players who aren't here (which will be interesting with flowerdogs sub in if Bulba still really wants to eliminate their slot, if he flips his pov and stops scum reading them when they produce content it proves my point). I see Bulbas reluctance to answer my questions about BBT which he has still not done, as eitherIn post 657, Juice wrote:If I am wrong about the Elemk slot I would rather know now - then spend the whole game being paranoid about it
- A tell of him not wanting to get involved in a wagon of his scum partner and not wanting to express a strong town read on him in the event of getting paired up with him some sort of distancing attempt
- or his inability to provide actual reads in players providing content with his only scum reads who he 'hopes' are scum that are players who ate not active because he is scum and scum struggle more with making reads as they know who is town and who is not.
So I think bulba is the vote for me today and with a scum flip we look at scum partner associations which I would put BBT at the higher end of that list.-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
This, is literally lurking....In post 663, Bulbazoor wrote:Still pushing the "bulba is lurking" thing... I am so tempted to just ignore you-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
-
-
Spartan117 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: April 7, 2015
^ These two.In post 539, Spartan117 wrote:Bulba what are your thoughts on BBT, would you be happy with a BBT elimination today?