In post 921, usesPython wrote:
Yeah so if Ranger is a Town Drew Savior then her win condition is advanced by having all the scum dead as fast as possible, which means she'd be a pro-town 3p and should be in the Nightmare. And if Drew
isn't
town then having her in the Nightmare doesn't matter because it's already tainted from Drew
well she will do whatever drew does not knowing what drew is, neither do we. so if ranger is a lawyer voting her in nightmare will be giving drew extra votes - almost. so if drew is for certain town and ranger is for certain lawyer you're right, its no issue. but not knowing what drew is, and what role ranger has neccessirly, would mean be wary of these two slots and not boost either is safer approach.
lawyer/savior is best scum role she can be. assuming she is scum, she also could still be just a traitor, being cheeky with "drew is playing scummy but I have a gut town he is town" or if not traitor, she might be a mean for multi factions/scums to connect, or she might be a scum with a utility to force people in nightmare to use "unknown skills" on them and I might be completely off that it was even signaling - and not setting a bait in first place.
and if she is town, and I'm wrong about how she reacted to my push on her, she still did something very anti town by forcing a nightmare just like how a duel for elimination would be anti town, and her way of reacting to questions about it and how she was signaling was also anti town as it dragged for so long. so I'm against her being in nightmare even in that case. and I am still scum reading her for her omgus on me, even though I think its more likely for her to be 3p now with how she referred to her read on drew gut read after calling him scummy in same post.